http://www.realclearhealth.com/articles/2017/07/19/the_gops_collision_with_health_care_reality_110676.html?utm_source=morning-scan&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mailchimp-newsletter&utm_source=RC+Health+Morning+Scan&utm_campaign=23be29d95b-MAILCHIMP_RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b4baf6b587-23be29d95b-84752421

The Trump administration and Republicans in Congress find themselves in a position there never wanted to be in: heading into the August recess having failed to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA), and also without any significant legislative accomplishments since the November 2016 election.

Before charting a new course, the GOP needs to understand how they drove themselves into this political ditch.

The Initial Embrace of the Doomed “Repeal and Delay” Strategy.

In the weeks after the November 2016 election, elated Republicans planned a quick strike “repeal and delay” bill for the ACA. The idea was to follow the script the party used in 2015 to put a repeal-only bill on President Obama’s desk. With “repeal and delay,” the party could avoid the difficult internal discussions on how to reform health care and just focus on gutting the ACA, with delayed effective dates to allow time for the Congress to come up with a replacement plan later. This strategy was never going to work, but many conservatives argued that it should because of the successful test run of 2015 (a bill was sent to President Obama, who vetoed it). Conservatives made the case for months that a House or Senate member who voted for this approach in 2015 should do so again in 2017. But that is a disingenuous argument. It was obvious in 2015 that the repeal and delay bill was never going to become law, and so it was a way for the GOP to voice dissatisfaction with the ACA without having to replace its key provisions. It was clear then to anyone who paid attention that any repeal bill would have to include replacement provisions to have any chance of success because a repeal-only bill would instantly create a massive disruption in the marketplace for many millions of consumers. Still, some in the GOP who should know better convinced themselves that a repeal-only bill could work. The party wasted the first few precious months after the election on this doomed scheme.

Lack of a Clear Policy Direction from the Trump Administration Hampered the Effort.

President Trump ran successfully in 2016 without ever specifying a clear agenda, including on health care. That lack of clear direction probably helped Trump avoid needless controversy as a candidate but it has hurt the ability of the GOP to unite around a positive agenda. If Trump had been clearer about what he would do instead of the ACA, and won the election with that agenda clearly presented to the voters, it would have helped push the GOP toward a consensus. As matters stand, however, the administration has no clear positions on any of the major issues in question. Moreover, the president has made it clear in his remarks that he cares much more about something passing than what is in it. It is very difficult to pass legislation as complex and controversial as health reform without a strong push from the executive branch on key details of the overall framework.

An Entirely Partisan Approach on Health Care Was a Bad Idea.

There’s a reason that major social legislation usually passes with votes from both parties. It’s because laws that are entirely partisan engender political resentment, which leads to instability. The Obama administration pushed the ACA through Congress in 2010 with no Republicans voting in support of the final bill. Over the four ensuing election cycles, Democratic officeholders paid a heavy political price for the legislation. Moreover, the ACA is more unstable programmatically because of opposition to it from Republicans. Before the effort collapsed this week, the GOP was trying to replicate the Democrats’ strategy by relying on just Republican votes to pass legislation replacing key features of the ACA with new provisions. Even if they could pass legislation this way, they shouldn’t have tried because whatever they did would probably be reversed too when the Democrats were next in power. Of course, it is now clear that the difficulty of passing such controversial legislation is too heavy of a lift for a Republican majority with just two votes to spare in the Senate.

CBO’s Emphatic Support of the Individual Mandate Presents Challenges.

The GOP effort to move away from key ACA provisions was dealt a series of blows when the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released its estimates of the various versions of the legislation. With each estimate, CBO made it clear that the GOP’s desire to eliminate the tax penalties associated with the individual mandate would dramatically increase the number of Americans going without health insurance. For the House-passed bill, CBO estimated there would be an additional 23 million people without health insurance in 2026 compared to current law. For the draft Senate legislation released in June, CBO estimated the increase would be 22 million. These estimates made a deep impression on public opinion and created significant political problems for House and Senate members. Republican opponents of the mandate have never come up with a credible alternative that would ensure the marketplace would function smoothly while still providing protections to people with pre-existing conditions.

At this point, the GOP does not have much choice but to step away from the effort to roll back the ACA and reconsider its options. Republicans have squandered the most important months of a new presidency, and they have also given up significant leverage in the process. Still, there is time to proceed with a different and more promising approach if there is a desire to do so.

To get a better result with a renewed push, the GOP should include willing Democratic senators in the conversation. The party should understand that the goal should be a plan that costs less, reduces regulations, and injects serious market discipline into the system, even while ensuring all Americans have ready access to insurance. That may mean finding a compromise approach on giving individuals strong incentives to enroll in health insurance. The party should also work with GOP governors to find a reasonable and affordable compromise on Medicaid, one that provides for significant reform of the program, with more state control and clear federal budgetary restraints, while also providing a safety net to all Americans with incomes below the poverty line.

It would have been easier, and more fruitful, to pursue a bipartisan deal on this kind in the weeks after the election. That was when Republicans had the most power. But they have still have some leverage. They should use when the time is right to begin the process of moving the health policy in a direction more their liking. That will inevitably be less satisfying to some than writing a bill entirely on their own because of the compromises that will be necessary, but this kind of legislation would be far more likely to pass, and also survive when political control inevitably changes again.

5 reasons why GOP’s ACA repeal and replace efforts have failed in Senate

Seven years of Republican vows to “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act came to a crashing halt Tuesday, when it became clear that the Senate could not muster the necessary votes for any of three separate proposals that have been under consideration.

The failure, at least for now, breaks one of the key promises Republicans have made to their voters since 2010, when the ACA first became law.

“This has been a very challenging experience for all of us,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) told reporters Tuesday afternoon. “It’s pretty clear that there are not 50 Republicans at the moment to vote for a replacement for Obamacare.”

Monday night’s declaration of opposition by conservative Sens. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Jerry Moran (R-Kansas) effectively scotched even the chance to start debate on the version of a bill unveiled last week.

McConnell added that the Senate would vote early next week on a plan, originally approved in 2015 and vetoed by President Barack Obama, that would repeal parts of the health law. That approach would delay the effective date for two years to give lawmakers time to come up with a replacement.

However, the opposition of moderate Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Shelley Moore Capito (R-West Virginia) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), ensures that vote will fail, too.

“To just say ‘repeal and trust us, we’re going to fix it in a couple of years,’ that’s not going to provide comfort to the anxiety a lot of Alaskan families are feeling right now,” Murkowski told reporters.

In retrospect, Republicans’ inability to overhaul the health law should not come as much of a surprise. Here are some of the reasons:

1. It’s hard to take things away from people

Once launched, federal programs that provide people with benefits they find important and valuable are very difficult to rescind. In the case of healthcare, people’s lives can be at stake. In the current debate, patients who feared what would happen to their health coverage made their concerns known — loudly — to lawmakers.

2. Republicans have long been divided on healthcare

Republicans’ dirty little secret the past seven years is that the only thing they fundamentally agreed on when it comes to healthcare was the slogan “repeal and replace.” There’s a reason they failed to have a plan ready when Donald Trump was elected president — all efforts to reach a consensus had thus far failed.

“I did not come to Washington to hurt people,” said Capito in a statement. “I have serious concerns about how we continue to provide affordable care to those who have benefited from West Virginia’s decision to expand Medicaid.”

But the more conservative members, notably Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky), have other priorities. “All of us promised we would repeal Obamacare,” Paul told reporters Tuesday. “If you’re not willing to vote the way you voted in 2015 then you need to go back home and you need to explain to Republicans why you’re no longer for repealing Obamacare.”

3. Presidential leadership on hard issues is important

President Trump has been all over the place in what he said he wanted from a health bill. It was his original insistence that “repeal and replace” happen simultaneously that moved Congress away from its 2015 strategy of repealing first and replacing later. He hosted a celebration in the White House Rose Garden when the House passed its bill, then subsequently called the measure “mean” during a strategy meeting with Senators.

When it became clear Monday night that the Senate effort was foundering, Trump tweeted: “Republicans should just REPEAL failing ObamaCare now & work on a new Healthcare Plan that will start from a clean slate.” But within hours he instead suggested, “As I have always said, let ObamaCare fail and then come together and do a great healthcare plan.”

The president “gave them an impossible assignment with his promises (more, better, cheaper for all) and neither policy nor bully pulpit help at crunch time,” said Len Nichols, a professor of health policy at George Mason University. “And now he’ll blame them for failing.”

Added Thomas Miller, of the conservative American Enterprise Institute: “We now have a randomized clinical trial that proves one cannot lead and govern via Twitter.”

4. Healthcare is complicated. Really.

Healthcare has not traditionally been a major voting issue for Republicans, and thus it has been a low priority — compared with issues like taxes and trade — for the officials they elect.

Adding to the complexity is that the Republicans’ bench is nowhere near as deep as the Democrats’ when it comes to health policy expertise. Democrats have toiled on these issues for years. Even before the Affordable Care Act, many had served in Congress for decades and learned from the mistakes that were made on efforts like the failed health bill under President Bill Clinton.

5. Some parts of the ACA really are popular, even among Republicans

The requirement for most people to have insurance or else pay a fine — the individual mandate — has consistently been unpopular among voters of all political stripes. But many other major provisions of the health law, such as guaranteeing coverage for people with pre-existing conditions, remain broadly popular.

In fact, in recent months, the Affordable Care Act has been growing in popularity. Most polls show it more than twice as popular as GOP efforts to overhaul it.

“Republicans have to admit that some of the things in the ACA, we actually liked,” said Murkowski.

That left a huge gap between Republicans who wanted to maintain the popular benefits and those who wanted to repeal the law entirely. A gap that, so far, Republicans have been unable to bridge.

https://www.axios.com/repeal-then-replace-plan-is-a-no-go-with-3-no-votes-2461490907.html

Three GOP senators — Shelley Moore Capito, Susan Collins, and now Lisa Murkowski — all will vote “no” on the new plan to repeal and then replace the Affordable Care Act.

Why it matters: This guarantees what was already widely expected: that Senate Republicans wouldn’t be any more successful with a straight repeal plan, without a replacement, than they were with the repeal-and-replace legislation that stalled yesterday. Republicans could only lose two votes.

What’s next: Senate Republicans are still likely to schedule the vote — even if it fails — because they have to prove to conservative groups (and President Trump) that they’ve tried everything.

Trump says he’ll ‘let ObamaCare fail’

President Trump on Tuesday said he was disappointed in the Senate’s failure to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act and argued that Republicans should now let the law fail on its own.

In his first on-camera remarks about the stalemate in the Senate, Trump said it “will be a lot easier” to allow ObamaCare to falter on its own.

“I think we’re probably in that position where we’ll let ObamaCare fail,” he told reporters in the Roosevelt Room. “We’re not going to own it. I’m not going to own it. I can tell you the Republicans are not going to own it. We’ll let ObamaCare fail and then the Democrats are going to come to us.”

Venting his frustration with Congress, Trump talked of how he had heard lawmakers for seven years talk about the need to repeal and replace ObamaCare.

Given the chance to do so, “they don’t take advantage of it,” he said.

“I’m sitting in the Oval Office right next door, pen in hand, waiting to sign something,” Trump added.

Despite the defeat on healthcare reform, Trump cast his presidency as a string of victories, saying the United States was winning in the war of terrorism and that it would secure an overhaul of the tax code.

Congress has not moved forward with Trump’s tax reform agenda so far, largely because of the time spent working on healthcare reform.

Trump promised to win repeal of ObamaCare upon his election, and the defeat is a significant loss for the White House.

Legislation to repeal and replace ObamaCare was approved by the House in May and was celebrated in a Rose Garden ceremony by Trump.

But it has come to a complete standstill in the Senate, where GOP leaders do not even have the votes to bring legislation repealing ObamaCare to the floor.

While Trump took a shot at Congress, he said he does not blame Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) for the defection of two Republican senators that effectively killed the measure.

Trump said he was “very surprised” that conservative Sens. Jerry Moran(Kan.) and Mike Lee (Utah) came out against the bill, evidence of the disconnect between the White House and Capitol Hill that has helped stymie the president’s agenda.

The White House and its allies have periodically lashed out at GOP opponents of the healthcare measure, reportedly threatening to back a primary challenge of Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake and to run attack ads against Nevada Sen. Dean Heller, both of whom are up for reelection next year.

But Trump said Tuesday the key to advancing his priorities was expanding the GOP’s 52-seat majority in the Senate.

“We’re going to have to go out and get more Republicans elected in ’18,” he said. “I’ll be working very hard for that to happen. It would be nice to get Democrat support but really they are obstructionists. They have no ideas.”

Some Republicans, however, believe the president is at fault. They say he failed to master the details of the healthcare initiative, did little to sell it and sent mixed messages about his desired outcome.

That was on display in the past 24 hours. Trump on Monday night called on the Senate to repeal ObamaCare and then pass a replacement later.

“Republicans should just REPEAL failing ObamaCare now & work on a new Healthcare Plan that will start from a clean slate. Dems will join in!”

But on Tuesday morning, he tweeted out a completely different proposal — letting former President Obama’s law fail on its own.

“As I have always said, let ObamaCare fail and then come together and do a great healthcare plan. Stay tuned!” he wrote.

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/aca/gop-s-repeal-and-delay-plan-dies-after-3-senators-oppose-it?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTWpSbE9EVXdZekprT0dGayIsInQiOiJhZTUwUmloU3JtK3RGdXNJenNmSFwvRlpJaUlvbkRaZ3B1Q3kwYnFYS3hydUVQTGt0dE1CbFRMN2orMEgybjR0SjI1WXZuTHlkZ3BKS09kNlArVW1Vbm00QnZKMFNvTHorbkM2Ymw3Zk1ZTjM4UHBsQWlwQVg4TVwveFhPN1FBZ2E4In0%3D&mrkid=959610&utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal

Three moderate Republican senators now oppose a plan to repeal the Affordable Care Act and replace it later, leaving Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell lacking the votes he’d need to move the measure forward.

With the Better Care Reconciliation Act scuttled following news late Monday that two more senators would oppose it, McConnell said Tuesday that the Senate would vote on an ACA repeal measure “combined with a stable, two-year transition period” during which it will craft a replacement.

But the measure’s chances quickly died after Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski became the third GOP senator to announce her opposition to the bill.

“I cannot vote to proceed to repeal the ACA without reform that allows people the choice they want, the affordability they need and the quality of care they deserve,” she said in a statement posted on Twitter. Instead, she called for the Senate to undertake a bipartisan effort to fix the ACA exchanges.

View image on Twitter

Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia was the first to announce her opposition to a repeal-and-delay plan. “As I have said before, I did not come to Washington to hurt people,” she said in a statement.

Maine Sen. Susan Collins—who was one of the four “no” votes that led to the demise of the BCRA—also quickly came out against McConnell’s new strategy.

“I will vote no on the motion to proceed to repeal the Affordable Care Act without a replacement,” she said.

“We can’t just hope that we will pass a replacement within the next two years,” Collins added. “Repealing without a replacement would create great uncertainty for individuals who rely on the ACA and cause further turmoil in the insurance markets.”

As with the BCRA, McConnell could only afford to lose two votes on a repeal-and-delay bill tailored to pass the chamber through the fast-track budget reconciliation process, given that such a measure was not expected to attract any Democratic support.

The White House, meanwhile, said it is willing to back whichever strategy results in repealing the ACA—whether that’s a repeal-and-delay bill or a “return to the legislation carefully crafted in the House and Senate,” Vice President Mike Pence said at a National Retail Federation event Tuesday.

“Inaction is not an option,” he added. “Congress needs to step up, Congress needs to do their job and Congress need to do their job now.”

GOP reeling after healthcare collapse