Cigna ends merger with Anthem, sues for more than $14B

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payer/cigna-ends-merger-anthem-sues-for-more-than-14b?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTm1Nd1lUTXdNRGxsTm1SaCIsInQiOiJqVTFQMklENmVyckE1T0RUUVdJOXlXUmVQS21VY09IR0dcL2VlUnEwd09Fa0tlamZhdUtDM21zc0gwMFZcL01xYmllZmVoWjJib3U4aUFxNU11NDk3YUZNM1J1UndFQ1k3NlE1cTZ4UU5mS0hjMlF0b29mRkZUSldXT1I0QkFQQ0NZIn0%3D&mrkid=959610&utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal

Lawsuit document

In a move that defies Anthem’s push to fight for their deal, Cigna has terminated its merger agreement with Anthem and filed suit against the larger insurer.

Earlier this month, a federal judge ruled against the two insurers’ planned merger, saying it would violate antitrust law by lessening competition in the national accounts market. Anthem responded by saying it intends to appeal the ruling.

But in a statement issued Tuesday, Cigna said that given the court’s decision, it “believes that the transaction cannot and will not achieve regulatory approval and that terminating the agreement is in the best interest of Cigna’s shareholders.”

Thus, Cigna filed a suit against Anthem in the Delaware Court of Chancery, seeking a declaratory judgment that Cigna has lawfully terminated the merger agreement and that Anthem is not permitted to extend the termination date.

The suit also asked the court to compel Anthem to pay Cigna the $1.85 billion termination fee outlined in the merger agreement, plus additional damages of more than $13 billion. Those damages “include the lost premium value to Cigna’s stockholders caused by Anthem’s willful breaches of the merger agreement,” according to a question-and-answer document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

For its part, Anthem maintains that “under the terms of the merger agreement, Cigna does not have a right to terminate the agreement. Therefore, Cigna’s purported termination of the merger agreement is invalid,” a company spokesperson said in an emailed statement. “Anthem will continue to enforce its rights under the merger agreement and remains committed to closing the transaction.”

Ex-CFO: Sonoma West Medical Center benefactor said ‘cook the books’

http://www.pressdemocrat.com/news/5929800-181/ex-cfo-sonoma-west-medical-center?utm_campaign=CHL%3A+Daily+Edition&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=32551462&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9clPt83wEDUurMMpqyDM1dyAp7deut55DqYuzz1P4pNgxjkcuDVhbiSnVGG5xFKGPT-_yQSR7_csUpx_FO377us5sVdQ&_hsmi=32551462

The former chief financial officer at Sonoma West Medical Center said a key hospital benefactor asked him to “falsely portray” the hospital’s finances to show positive net profit for the hospital, according to a whistleblower lawsuit filed this week.

The lawsuit against Sonoma West Medical Center was filed Monday by Douglas Goldfarb, who served as chief financial officer from Nov. 30, 2015 to June 6, 2016. It is the latest legal complaint against the embattled hospital, one that echoes charges made in a lawsuit filed two months ago by the hospital’s former chief nursing officer, Cheri AnDra.

As Sonoma West Medical Center officials said with AnDra’s lawsuit, they could not comment on the legal challenge because it involved personnel matters. Both Goldfarb and AnDra are represented by the same Bay Area attorney, Daniel Bartley.

The suits allege millionaire west county software entrepreneur Dan Smith, the hospital’s largest donor and most consistent financial supporter, is using the hospital as a testing ground for his “defective” tablet-based electronic medical records system called HarmoniMD.