Study: In healthcare price negotiation, insurer size matters

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payer/study-when-negotiating-healthcare-prices-insurer-size-matters?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWmpCaVl6YzNZVGMzWW1VMSIsInQiOiJFOWcxQXlNRFltbXIzc2FocWNwREJpRnp6dEpLbmZORTVIb29WaTRtQ2lrYzVwQ1hjOW4rS1RMUDlNOEE1RVRJdEJoMjJYeEpNWUFjbnBiRUQ0WGhoSGpkUDQyWkQxZE1UQ3NBbFU1bjVwVm5ITjBTVUxRbmNWQ3JcLytnMlM0bnAifQ%3D%3D

Handshake

Larger health insurers are able to negotiate lower prices with providers, according to a new study. But that doesn’t necessarily mean payer consolidation is the answer to keeping healthcare costs in check.

The study, conducted by researchers from Harvard Medical School and published in the January issue of Health Affairs, examined multipayer claims data from 2014 to assess how insurers’ market power affected the rates that they were able to negotiate for office-based physician services.

The researchers found that greater market power did indeed give insurers a leg up at the negotiating table. For example, when examining rates for office visits paid to the same group of providers, they estimated that large insurers—those with market shares of 15% or more—negotiated prices that were 21% lower than prices negotiated by small insurers, or those with market shares of less than 5%.

Looking at providers of different sizes, the study also found evidence that insurers require greater market shares to negotiate lower prices from large provider groups than with smaller ones. And if providers respond to insurer mergers with greater consolidation of their own, that would boost their bargaining power and let them negotiate higher prices, the study said.

Antitrust trial over $37B Aetna-Humana merger nearing an end

http://www.healthcaredive.com/news/antitrust-trial-over-37b-aetna-humana-merger-nearing-an-end/433206/

A decision on the $37 billion merger between Aetna and Humana will be made soon. The payers and the federal government have been an engaged in a legal standoff since the U.S. Department of Justice and several states filed an antitrust lawsuit in July 2016 to block the merger, citing reduced competition, hindered innovation, and increased prices to consumers. The federal government also alleges the deal would give Aetna too much of a stake in the Medicare Advantage market.

Representatives for both Aetna and the federal government have been exchanging barbs for the past several months. The government accused Aetna of scaling back its participation in ACA marketplaces as a result of the lawsuit. Aetna claimed that these accusations were unfounded and said the deal would be a pro-competitive move that would benefit millions.

Health insurance giant Anthem has also proposed a $54 billion merger with Cigna. If both mergers occur, it would combine four of the five largest insurers in the country.

There is no timeline set for a decision in the case. Yet Judge Bates said he would issue his decision in a “timely manner,” according to Bloomberg.

Slow going for LVHN-Pocono merger

http://www.mcall.com/business/healthcare/mc-lvhn-pocono-merger-20161215-story.html

Image result for Lehigh Valley Health Network

A year ago, Lehigh Valley Health Network and Pocono Health System announced that their boards had authorized a merger.

The two institutions had disclosed a letter of intent to merge six months earlier.

A year and a half later, however, LVHN and PHS remain independent, their long-planned marriage apparently held up by a slow-moving regulatory approval process.

In the meantime, LVHN has announced and completed a different merger — with Schuylkill Health System. And PHS has announced it is laying off 61 nurses of 530 nurses at Pocono Medical Center.

Health, hospital system consolidation will reshape delivery system, HFMA report says

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/health-hospital-system-consolidation-will-makeover-delivery-system-over-next-decade-hfma-report?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWm1Fd1pEWXdPV1V3TlRRNSIsInQiOiJqRitmbGZXbGdhVndGYytNYkdtSFkzMVlrM2tYanVNbXVJM1wvT3M3cHBmTnZHNDRkTG56MVwvZVQwQm5taExhRHlYaEtGYXFJWXd6WTBvbGdDRlJscFAwRThWMnFyejM2SUhFVmU5d0hxRGhJPSJ9

Image result for market consolidation

Hospital and health system consolidation will continue to build, giving the delivery system a significant makeover during the next decade, according to Health Care 2020: Consolidation, a new report published by the Healthcare Financial Management Association. Over that time, healthcare organizations will be challenged to prove that the changing landscape actually improves value to consumers.

The report is the third in a series of four that comprise an environmental assessment designed to guide healthcare organizations in their strategic planning efforts over the next several years.

One major trend cited by the report is that Independent physician practices are increasingly becoming an endangered species, due principally to the healthcare industry’s accelerating transition from volume to value. Regardless of whether pending mergers are allowed to go forward, the health insurance sector should remain highly consolidated for the near future.

HFMA President and CEO Joseph J. Fifer, FHFMA, CPA, said in a statement that consolidation is a trend that’s here to stay.

Is antitrust the answer to hospital consolidation?

Is antitrust the answer to hospital consolidation?

Image result for Is antitrust the answer to hospital consolidation?

robust literature on the benefits of competition in the health care marketplace shows that when health care markets are competitive, prices tend to be lower, quality tends to be higher, and people have more choices for care. Competition is a remarkably powerful tool that needs to be wielded more effectively. The good news is that ensuring competition is already the law of the land. The problem is that with the pace of consolidation, monitoring potential anticompetitive effects will be increasingly difficult as the FTC is tasked with examining a rapidly increasing number of mergers. The FTC needs renewed focus from policy makers to ensure that it can do its job effectively.

Catholic Health Initiatives, Dignity Health in Merger Talks

http://www.wsj.com/articles/catholic-health-initiatives-dignity-health-in-merger-talks-1477335251

Catholic Health Initiatives operates in 18 states, but not in Arizona, California and Nevada, where Dignity Health operates its hospitals. Above, Dignity Health California Hospital Medical Center in downtown Los Angeles.

Hospital operator Catholic Health Initiatives, which has struggled after rapid expansion and a foray into health insurance, is in merger talks with Dignity Health to create one of the nation’s largest nonprofit hospital systems by revenue.

Catholic Health Initiatives and Dignity Health said in a statement they are in talks regarding “aligning their organizations.” A person familiar with the matter said the talks involve a merger.

The deal would combine 103 hospitals owned by Catholic Health Initiatives, based in Englewood, Colo., with 39 hospitals operated by San Francisco-based Dignity Health. Combined revenue for the new organization would reach $27.8 billion annually, based on the most recent financial statements.

Healthcare mergers and acquisitions in 2016: Running list

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/slideshow/healthcare-mergers-and-acquisitions-2016-running-list?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWlRkaE16VTBPRGhrTmpWbSIsInQiOiIxRk44S3JKdEd3Mzl5czNscEJZNjI1N210RWE0b0RxNWd3RHhoZUg2TXJCM3U2QnZJWm1VcFhMS2daQ1pmRzEyTG5DU2E0cWFCdGtWQlJKS0N0NE51Y2FubWdZbWptcTRhVHRZaTZJNDM1VT0ifQ%3D%3D

Lazy Image

 

Dignity Health, CHI Explore ‘Alignment’

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/leadership/dignity-health-chi-explore-alignment?spMailingID=9754012&spUserID=MTMyMzQyMDQxMTkyS0&spJobID=1021982472&spReportId=MTAyMTk4MjQ3MgS2#

 

 

Image result for dignity healthImage result for catholic health initiatives

Potential merger would create a one of the nation’s largest non-profit health systems, with more than 140 hospitals and hundreds of clinics and physicians’ offices in two dozen states.

FTC puts an end to Penn State-PinnacleHealth deal

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/finance/ftc-prevails-squelching-penn-pinnaclehealth-deal

FTC logo

Thanks to the Federal Trade Commission, the Penn State Health and PinnacleHealth merger will not go forward.

Plans to merge were called off late last week, according to PennLive.com. The Penn State Board of Trustees voted unanimously to call off the deal, which would have created a four-hospital system in the Harrisburg region, including Penn State’s Hershey Medical Center and the three PinnacleHealth facilities.

The FTC and the Pennsylvania Attorney General intervened in the deal late last year, with both claiming that residents in Central Pennsylvania would have few alternatives for other healthcare providers, leaving the likelihood open that the merged entity would raise prices. Thetransaction was initially approved by a U.S. District Court in May, but the parties were dealt a blow when the ruling was reversed by the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals last month.

The aborted deal cost Penn State an estimated $17.6 million in legal fees and other costs, according to PennLive.

The case is part of what has been heightened scrutiny of recent hospitals deals by both federal and state regulators. In November, the FTC intervened in a deal between two rural hospitals in West Virginia, Cabell Huntington Hospital and St. Mary’s Medical Center. The agency recently prevailed in a 2010 case where it intervened in ProMedica’s acquisition of St. Luke’s Medical Center in Toledo, Ohio. The agency is also fighting a proposed merger between Advocate Health Care and NorthShore University HealthSystem in Chicago, although as in the Penn State matter, it has lost at the lower court level.

FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez expressed concern earlier this year that ongoing hospital mergers will soon impact healthcare pricing around the U.S., but deal-making appears to go on unabated. That’s despite the fact that a recent analysis suggested that mergers even across markets can lead to double-digit cost increases.

DOJ says Aetna, Humana are trying to derail antitrust case

http://www.bizjournals.com/louisville/news/2016/10/11/doj-says-aetna-humana-are-trying-to-derail.html

Lawyers for the U.S. Department of Justice say Aetna Inc. and Humana Inc are trying to derail the government's antitrust challenge of Aetna's proposed $37 billion acquisition of Humana.

Lawyers for the U.S. Department of Justice say Aetna Inc. and Humana Inc are trying to derail the government’s antitrust challenge of Aetna’s proposed $37 billion acquisition of Louisville-based Humana.

This comes after lawyers for the companies accused the DOJ with “serious delay and misconduct” last week. The companies requested sanctions, claiming that the government withheld about 1 million documents and that this had “gravely undermined” the companies’ ability to mount a defense against claims that the acquisition would hurt competition.

The National Law Journal reports that the government’s response came Saturday in a court filing, in which it said the DOJ has tried to accommodate the “broad and extremely burdensome discovery demand” from Aetna (NYSE: AET) and Humana (NYSE: HUM) on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

The government called the request for sanctions “a transparent attempt to derail the United States’ merger challenge before the district court ever hears from a single witness or reviews any evidence,” the law journal reported.

At issue is how much market share the combined company would control in Medicare Advantage, a type of Medicare plan offered by a private insurer. A court date is set for Dec. 5, 2016, and the judge says a decision isn’t likely until mid-January 2017 — past the companies’ end-of-year deadline to close the deal.