Labor board will charge Kaiser for refusing to bargain, union says

https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/labor-board-will-charge-kaiser-for-refusing-to-bargain-union-says/544648/

Dive Brief:

  • The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is preparing to prosecute health system Kaiser Permanente for refusing bargain with SEIU United Healthcare Workers West, according to the union. SEIU-UHW, part of the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions, filed a complaint with the NLRB in the spring charging Kaiser for refusing to negotiate a new contract that covers 85,000 employees across eight states and D.C. Hearings for case will likely begin in the spring.
  • In their complaint, SEIU-UHW and the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions claimed Kaiser tried to set conditions on bargaining that would ban unions from engaging in political action that could affect the healthcare organization. Kaiser issued a statement last week arguing the delay was due to a split that occurred within the coalition earlier this year, and said it is “confident the NLRB will agree that Kaiser Permanente has acted lawfully and in good faith” in dealings with SEIU-UHW.
  • That may not be the case. SEIU-UHW is planning on proposing a new arrangement. If Kaiser doesn’t agree to enter into that settlement proposed by the union, the NLRB is expected to issue charges by the end of the month — if not sooner, according to an email obtained by Healthcare Dive.

Dive Insight:

Kaiser has been wracked with labor woes this year. The health system reached an agreement with the Alliance of Health Care Unions — the 21 unions that broke off from the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions — earlier this year. That split occurred the day before bargaining was scheduled to begin, and negotiations with the coalition did not move forward.

That contract, according to SEIU-UHW, included a condition prohibiting those unions from taking any kind of political action against Kaiser, including ballot initiatives, legislation or public policy campaigns. That’s the same condition that led SEIU-UHW to file its complaint earlier this year.

“The Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions strongly opposes such a proposal,” SEIU-UHW said in a statement, “and believes this condition violates their free speech rights.”

Healthcare Dive reached out to the NLRB for confirmation on its reported decision to prosecute Kaiser, but did not receive a response in time for publishing.

“The decision confirms what has been clear to workers for months now: Kaiser isn’t the labor friendly employer it claims to be, nor is it as committed to patient care as it claims to be,” Lanette Griffin, a laboratory assistant at Kaiser Permanente, said in a statement. “If Kaiser was committed to improving patient care, you would expect it to want to negotiate a contract to retain and attract the outstanding caregivers who have driven the corporation’s success. But Kaiser is showing its true colors when it avoids bargaining and wants to silence our voices.”

Last week, 4,000 mental health workers represented by National United Healthcare Workers engaged in a five-day strike against Kaiser, causing the system to postpone some surgeries. Kaiser has attributed the cancellations to California Nurses Association nurses joined the picket line in an authorized sympathy strike.

“The determination by the district 32 office of the National Labor Relations Board is not a verdict. It is the beginning of the NLRB’s process to hold evidentiary hearings to fully understand this complicated case,” Kaiser said in its statement.

 

 

Prime Healthcare Services unlawfully stopped nurses’ anniversary raises, court rules

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/legal-regulatory-issues/prime-healthcare-unlawfully-stopped-nurses-anniversary-raises-court-rules.html

Image result for national labor relations board

 

A federal appeals court ruled that Ontario, Calif.-based Prime Healthcare Services violated the National Labor Relations Act when it canceled anniversary raises for unionized nurses, according to a Reuters report.

Here are six things to know about the issue.

1. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit made the ruling May 18, affirming a previous ruling by the National Labor Relations Board.

2. The NLRB found Prime “violated both the unilateral change doctrine and the duty to provide relevant information during negotiations with its employees’ bargaining representatives, Service Employees International Union Local 121RN and SEIU United Healthcare Workers-West,” according to the May 18 ruling. The NLRB specifically found Prime canceled anniversary step increases for nurses after the expiration of its labor deals with the two SEIU bargaining units, and determined the private for-profit hospital operator failed to provide information about employee healthcare programs as requested by the units. The NLRB ordered Prime to resume the raises, take care of any owed back pay due to the discontinuation of the raises and provide the requested information.

3. Both sides reached a settlement regarding complaints related to UHW’ unfair labor practice charges in the matter, and the unfair labor practice charges filed by 121RN remained at issue, according to the ruling. Prime’s agreements with 121RN, as well as UHW, were effective from Jan. 1, 2007, through March 31, 2011. The 121RN bargaining unit represents registered nurses at Prime’s Encino (Calif.) Hospital Medical Center, while UHW represents service and technical employees at Encino and Prime’s Garden Grove (Calif.) Hospital Medical Center.

4. Prime argued, among other things, that the anniversary step increases were terminated when the labor deal with 121RN expired in 2011 because they were tied to annual pay increases in the expired contract, according to the ruling.

5. The appeals court found “no merit in these challenges, however. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review and grant the [NLRB] board’s cross-application for enforcement of its order.”

6. In response to the ruling, Jamie Konn, outside counsel for Prime, told Becker’s Hospital Review: “This is an old matter that is now behind us. Encino and 121RN entered into a collective bargaining agreement in November 2014. The parties will continue to work together, and this matter should be resolved soon.”

 

UPMC workers plan Thursday strike, demand $15 an hour, right to unionize

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/upmc-workers-plan-thursday-strike-demand-15-hour-right-unionize?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiT0RZMFptTmtNMlJsTUdVMiIsInQiOiJuZjAwWEdTaDd6S0hXT0NjTlwvMXlTZ0oySVBWN3RFUFBcL1JGeDVWMFBSMEp4ekR6cFJXUjRhOEIrUkNVbEZuZFlBanQ0a3FPZ2Nzem1QbnQzZUxITDRKTlFVcjFTazRpc2ZVb0doR0lQTGRBPSJ9

Thursday’s strike in Pittsburgh is also expected to include employees working in other industries such as fast-food, home care and nursing.

What the NLRB joint staffing decision means for healthcare

http://www.healthcaredive.com/news/what-the-nlrb-joint-staffing-decision-means-for-healthcare/405102/

Lasst week, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled that contract workers are jointly-employed by both their temporary staffing agencies and the organizations for which they are working; this means both organizations can be held responsible for labor violations committed by contractors. The ruling will also make it easier for contract workers and other temporary employees to unionize.