5 Ways to Choose Important Over Urgent

5 Ways to Choose Important Over Urgent

People tend to choose urgent tasks they can complete quickly and put off important tasks that take longer to complete. (The Mere Urgency Effect)
Important tasks take longer and are more demanding than unimportant urgencies.

The Mere Urgency Effect:

You tend to delay important tasks by saying, “Just let me finish this and I’ll do that later.” But we all know that ‘later’ seldom comes.
The Mere Urgency Effect indicates …

We choose unimportant tasks with lower payoffs over important tasks with better payoffs.

We let artificial deadlines drive us to choose unimportant tasks.

You didn’t change the oil in your car because you had more urgent things to do. One day the car starts making scary noises. You neglected the important – scheduled maintenance. Now you have an urgency.

The same can be said for relationship building. You just don’t have time! But skillful leaders build and strengthen relationships before they need them.
In an age when running around with your hair on fire is desired and admired, important work gets pushed aside.

5 ways to choose important over urgent:

Put important work on your calendar. Expect important work to take longer than expected.*

Use values to guide decisions.

Establish short-term goals for long-term projects. Suppose you have an important task due at the end of the week.

Create effective urgency by setting a goal to be completed by 3:00 p.m. today. (Set short-term daily goals for important long-term work.)

Turn off social media. Check email at scheduled intervals. Turn off email alerts. (Yes, not everyone can do this.)

Bonus: Identify important work with your team or boss. Ask, “What’s important this week?” It helps to know what’s important if you plan to do what’s important.
How might leaders choose important over urgent?

How might leaders distinguish between important work and unimportant urgencies?

 

 

 

Editor’s Corner: Why are we still letting pharma pay physicians?

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/antifraud/editor-s-corner-why-are-we-still-letting-pharma-pay-physicians

Close-up of a doctor's white coat

Last month, W. Carl Reichel was acquitted of charges that he oversaw a kickback scheme designed to induce physicians to prescribe certain drugs manufactured by Warner Chilcott LLC.

The president and CEO of the pharmaceutical company was acquitted of those charges despite the fact that the company itself pleaded guilty to “knowingly and willfully” paying off physicians in the form of sham speaking fees and meals at high-end restaurants, and agreed to pay the government $125 million in civil and criminal fines.

He was acquitted even though prosecutors trotted out nearly a dozen witnesses who worked under Reichel to testify against him, some of whom admitted to participating in the scheme that used “medical education” events–including barbecues, picnics, parties and trips to a casino–to improve physician prescribing rates. The government also alleged that Reichel oversaw the whole thing by demanding sales reps engage in “business conversations” about “clinical experience,” which was code for a physician’s prescribing rate.

But most importantly, he was acquitted because his attorneys never denied that he oversaw any of these payments, or that he instructed sales staff to take physicians out “at least twice a week.” They merely argued that “relationship building” is “widely accepted conduct” in the medical community.

They aren’t lying–allowing pharmaceutical companies to pay physicians large sums of money is a widely accepted practice. The question we should be asking ourselves is, why?

 

Tiger Without Sexy Stripes

https://leadershipfreak.wordpress.com/2016/04/02/solution-saturday-tiger-without-sexy-stripes/

live beyond your job description if you hope to earn the next position.1

Scripps Health CEO discusses leadership rounds, onboarding and relationship building

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/story/leading-way-scipps-health-ceo-takes-hands-approach-frontline-staff-engageme/2015-04-09?page=full