Analysis Shows One-in-Five U.S. Rural Hospitals at High Risk of Closing Unless Financial Situation Improves

https://www.navigant.com/news/corporate-news/2019/rural-hospitals-analysis

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/1-in-5-rural-hospitals-at-high-risk-of-closing-analysis-finds.html?origin=cioe&utm_source=cioe

Related image

Twenty-one percent of U.S. rural hospitals are at high risk of closing unless their finances improve, according to an analysis from management consultancy firm Navigant.

The study also found 64 percent, or 277, of high financial risk rural hospitals are considered essential to their communities.

The analysis — which examined the financial viability (operating margin, days cash on hand and debt-to-capitalization ratio) and community essentiality of more than 2,000 of the nation’s rural hospitals — suggests 21 percent or 430 rural hospitals in 43 states are at high risk of closing. These hospitals represent 21,547 staffed beds, 707,000 annual discharges, 150,000 employees and $21.2 billion total patient revenue, according to Navigant.

Of the 43 states, 34 have five or more rural hospitals at risk. 

Navigant cited payer mix degradation; declining inpatient care driving excess capacity; and inability to leverage innovation as factors putting the hospitals at risk. Medicare payment reductions, the age of many rural facilities and a lack of capital to invest in updated, innovative technology were specifically cited.

“While the potential for a rural hospital crisis has been known for years, this predictive data sheds light on just how dire the situation could become,” the study authors concluded. “Now, by being able to accurately assess the economic health of all rural hospitals in America, there is no choice but to pay attention. Local, state and federal political leaders, as well as hospital administrators, must act to protect the well-being of rural hospitals nationwide and the communities they serve.”

Read more about the analysis here

 

Auditor “shocked” by massive billing schemes at rural hospitals

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/questionable-billing-schemes-rural-hospitals-costing-health-insurance-companies-millions/

Image result for Auditor "shocked" by massive billing schemes at rural hospitals

Rural hospitals across the country are closing at the highest rates in decades. Since 2010, 83 have shuttered. Desperate to stay open, some hospitals got caught up in dubious billing schemes. In March, CBS News investigated questionable billing at rural hospitals in Georgia and Florida.

Insurance companies reimburse rural hospitals at higher rates to help keep critical healthcare in those communities. Those higher rates have made rural hospitals attractive targets for schemes that have generated nearly half a billion dollars in allegedly fraudulent billing.

In 2016, Missouri state auditor Nicole Galloway began examining the finances of several rural hospitals in her state. One was Putnam County Memorial, a 15-bed hospital in Unionville, Missouri, struggling to keep its doors open.

“We were shocked….When we started to look at the financial records and notice that tens of millions of dollars were coming through, I remember sitting down at the table with my audit staff and, you know, I just said we gotta dig deeper on this,” Galloway told CBS News’ Jim Axelrod.

Her team discovered a management company called Hospital Partners had swooped in weeks before Putnam was about to close, promising to turn it around. They made deals with labs around the country to funnel billing for blood tests and drug screens through Putnam, which collects higher reimbursement rates as a rural hospital. Putnam kept about 15 percent; most of the money was wired back to the labs and the management company.

“Essentially the hospital appeared to act as a shell company for these questionable lab billings,” Galloway explained. “In a six-month period, the hospital funneled through about $92 million in revenues. To put that in perspective, the previous year their total revenues were $7.5 million.”

And it wasn’t just happening at Putnam. According to court filings reviewed by CBS News, insurance companies are now attempting to claw back nearly a half a billion dollars they paid rural hospitals across the country with similar billing arrangements which they call “fraudulent.” They all declined our requests for an interview so we sat down with Jason Mehta, a former federal prosecutor who specialized in healthcare fraud.

“The question’s gonna be did the laboratories intend to cheat? Did they intend to trick? Did they mislead the insurance companies? Because simply making extra money isn’t a crime in and of itself. It’s the question of, was someone tricked? Was some deceived?” Mehta said.

Insurance companies say one way labs deceived them was paying kickbacks to healthcare providers for specimens they could then bill at the higher reimbursement rates. CBS News obtained a voicemail of a lab representative soliciting samples from a rehab center in California.

“He would send about, as soon as you guys sent 300 samples he would just send you $100,000 right then and there,” the representative is heard saying on the message.

“If I heard that message and we were talking about Medicare money, I would be very, very concerned and I would be opening an investigation immediately,” Mehta said. “In my experience, some of the most sophisticated actors in this space, some of the ones that….get the most amount of money from the healthcare programs, are those that know exactly where the line is, and skirt right up to that line.”

What Mehta told us could cross the line is a key finding of Nicole Galloway’s audit.

“Several months after the questionable lab billings had started, there was no operating lab in the hospital,” she said.

Which begs the question, how could they be billing for lab tests if there was no lab in the hospital?

In March, Blue Cross Blue Shield filed a $60 million lawsuit against Hospital Partners, alleging their arrangement with labs was a “fraudulent scheme.” Hospital Partners is suing Galloway, claiming she had no right to audit Putnam.

“They (Hospital Partners) are pushing back on us but I will tell you that will not stop me from doing my job on behalf of taxpayers,” Galloway said.

In a statement, Hospital Partners said “Putnam County Memorial Hospital is authorized by law to assign and bill for clinical laboratory testing provided at a reference lab.” On Tuesday, the Missouri Attorney General’s office told “CBS This Morning” it is actively investigating this matter.

 

 

The benefits of bankruptcy? How one hospital found redemption in Chapter 11

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/benefits-bankruptcy-how-one-hospital-found-redemption-chapter-11?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWkRObE1XWmhNemt3TjJFNCIsInQiOiJuWXNFaDk2M2RINGpwRlZ6ck1oekJyVkg0clVSUjlQek9TUExrdVVYUlNubjAzU2pkS0FtNndPODc0dVpBaTkvUEFKd05aK01mMXp6dDc5NzVTNDVQZmVZWmFXTjFCd08xMnRKWGljZzNGTEFPSHFIY21UT1Y2TnYwTk5QWWVGUCJ9

Image result for hospital bankruptcies

Filing for bankruptcy might make hospital finance executives cringe with desperation, if not failure, but strategically pursuing Chapter 11 can actually lay the foundation for a brighter future.

In fact, Morehead Memorial Hospital in Eden, North Carolina, actually owes its future to its leader’s decision to file for Chapter 11. Like so many rural hospitals, whose ranks are shrinking fast, Morehead faced common problems including flat or declining populations, migration of patients who find work in other communities and get care there, as well as the prevalence of Medicare and Medicaid in payer mixes that cause financial losses and vulnerabilities.

The albatross: Old debt

Morehead CEO Dana Weston’s original inclination was to look for a buyer, but after a year of searching a realization sunk in: the large amount of debt attached to the hospital was a liability akin to a brick wall between Morehead and a path forward.

Weston said they got consistent feedback that organizations felt it wasn’t in their current strategy to acquire a struggling rural hospital, since many systems already have more than one such facility under their umbrella. Most of the debt was at least a decade old, and addressing it was really the only way to make themselves attractive to potential buyers.

So Weston and the executive team did something that sounded more like an end than a beginning: Morehead filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on July 10.

Navigating Chapter 11, especially for a struggling rural hospital with limited resources and personnel must be done properly for the strategy to succeed.

And Morehead had some unique complexities, according to Ron Winters, managing director of hospital and healthcare services management firm Healthcare Management Partners. Winters has followed Morehead’s case and pointed out that the hospital is near a state border so they deal with different insurers from other states and are within 90 minutes of several larger competing hospitals, which didn’t help. Even worse, the size and scope of the their complex debt picture, including a $34 million U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development loan that offered limited flexibility on repayment, really limited their options, Winters said.

“You couldn’t just go to HUD and say let’s make a deal,” Winters explained. “You needed the bankruptcy code to make a transaction happen.”

That’s because when a hospital enters bankruptcy, Winters said it is effectively drawing a line in the sand on the very day it files. Chapter 11 code dictates that any obligation incurred after the petition date is superior to anything owed prior to the petition date. So new debt legally takes priority over old in terms of what will be covered by proceeds from a transaction. Moreover, bankruptcy rules state that any buyer that acquires an entity that went through chapter 11 proceedings is assured no creditor can come after them for the acquired hospital’s debt. They only pay what they agreed to for the transaction, providing security and alleviating risk.

Eliminating the risk of old debt is the precise upside Morehead leveraged to make itself attractive to a prospective buyer.

Common misperceptions

The phrase Chapter 11, and this is true in any industry, hits an organization’s reputation pretty hard.

The legalese is hard to translate to employees and the community, and Weston said the sale of assets, which is how their bankruptcy transaction is referred to, caused quite a stir because it sounded like a liquidation.

“People had this picture in their mind of an auction where the furniture, equipment, everything was just gonna be sold off to the highest bidder,” Weston said. “That’s not the case at all.”

She insisted that the board’s decision to file for Chapter 11 was the right one because it removed one of the major barriers to interest in buying Morehead by addressing the debt through bankruptcy and shedding that liability.

Without a partner, Morehead simply had no future.

Avoiding bankruptcy’s downside

Winters warned that there is a risk to bankruptcy and two main drawbacks are costs and the consequences of not being prepared with a plan. First, a debtor must hire a bankruptcy lawyer and other experts such as a patient care ombudsman to monitor the care provided to patients and look after patient rights. If a hospital doesn’t have available assets to pay for those things, that’s a problem.

“It’s ideal to have some unpledged assets to use as liquidity for the proceedings or have a buyer lined up the very first day,” Winters said.

Having a buyer lined up on the first day would seem an ideal scenario, and is called a stalking horse purchaser. Bankruptcy code provides that a debtor must create protections so that the stalking horse can’t be easily outbid or outbid at all. A winning bidder that beats the stalking horse must do so by a minimum amount, for instance, and reimburse them for costs related to establishing stalking horse status.

Without a buyer ready to go or other financing plans laid out, creditors get worried, Winters said. “With financing, your creditors should be satisfied that all obligations following the bankruptcy petition will be satisfied.”

Hospitals would do well to start thinking about options like seeking a partner or bankruptcy while they still have some amount of liquidity and unpledged assets. “When you have none left you’re not going to be able to drive an attractive transaction and you run the greatest risk of collapsing,” Winters said.

The new future

Weston’s plan worked and Morehead’s survival is now all but assured.

On Nov. 13, a federal bankruptcy judge chose UNC Health Care as the winning bidder for Morehead, setting a course for emergence from Chapter 11 for early 2018.

The closing is expected to take 60 days, and Morehead will operate as usual during the transition. UNC personnel will be visiting Morehead in the coming weeks to start building relationships with hospital staff and the community.

Collapsing was never an option, according to Weston. The first-time CEO said there was far too much at stake. She said what keeps her up at night are the employees at Morehead and the community it serves. The hospital is vitally important to its hometown and to Rockingham County. It’s the biggest employer in Eden and the 4th or 5th largest in the county.

“The most valuable thing for me in this role is for the 700 who work here to trust that I am in this with them,” Weston said. “This community is my family.”

12 hospital closures so far in 2016

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/12-hospital-closures-so-far-in-2016-june22.html

OR Efficiencies

Hospitals across the nation face a myriad of financial challenges, including underpayments from Medicare and Medicaid and new reimbursement cuts.

These financial challenges, combined with other issues such as declining patient volumes, have caused more than 60 rural hospitals to close over the past five years.

Below are 12 hospitals closures reported so far this year.