The CBO report raises five serious questions

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/03/14/the-cbo-report-raises-five-serious-questions/?_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8z9Sylks_wibB_-6SdY9AQGBM3g03O-yrykjFdnlayePaRf6KdLp5erCdoZM5RZvXTKhGTRTUJKrOfKMio5kAnhglcYQ&_hsmi=45675040&utm_campaign=KHN%3A%20Daily%20Health%20Policy%20Report&utm_content=45675040&utm_medium=email&utm_source=hs_email&utm_term=.86ffca0b81b7

The Congressional Budget Office report on the American Health Care Act — showing that as many as 24 million people could lose health insurance, Medicaid would be drastically cut and older, poorer Americans would suffer the most — leaves us with a number of questions:

Why did House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) force votes in two committees and then spring the disturbing CBO score, revealing that members voted rashly (not knowing the effects) or don’t care about loss of coverage and regressive consequences? Perhaps he is so convinced that his members will vote for anything that he made no effort to spare them from votes they one day (Election Day 2018, for example, and especially in districts Hillary Clinton carried) will regret. It is far from clear what he thought he was going to “get away with.” Unlike President Trump, he cannot merely dismiss inconvenient facts and plunge forward. Well, he can, but he puts his members’ seats and his own speakership at risk.

What’s the point of passing something so obviously unacceptable to the Senate? Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) blasted the effort: “The CBO estimate that millions of Americans could lose their health insurance coverage if the House bill were to become law is cause for alarm. It should prompt the House to slow down and reconsider certain provisions of the bill.” Her colleague and Trump supporter Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.) echoed Sen. Tom Cotton’s advice on Sunday to “get this right.” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) argued, “[L]et’s say the CBO is half-right. That should be cause for concern. So, rather than attacking the CBO as the exclusive way of moving forward, I would think the prudent thing for the party to do is to look at the CBO report and see if we can address some of the concerns raised.” Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) scoffedat the notion the bill would really save money. “Society is going to pay for health care whether it’s through insurance or not,” he remarked.

 

Medicaid Is About Grandma

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/medicaid-is-about-grandma_us_58c823d8e4b022817b29178d?utm_campaign=KHN%3A%20Daily%20Health%20Policy%20Report&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=45675040&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8LGIyTmn6nhDk89cZo6cUrufFATTTJ0UEOLkEAL40dVGaTTKG-_3pnWLxOkvp2OhsqJnaKQT0UF6ciBSrrzUF_dRYROg&_hsmi=45675040

Image result for medicaid grandma in nursing home

Why don’t Democrats more often make the point Sen. Chuck Schumer made this week about the consequences of GOP efforts to scuttle Medicaid:

Medicaid is for poor people, but also 60 percent goes to people in nursing homes. And that affects not only them, but their kids. You’re a kid 45 or 50, your Mom or Dad is in a nursing home. They could be kicked out after this bill passes. What would you do? You have to take them at home, stop working to take care of them. Or you have to shell out thousands of dollars out of your pocket. — Schumer press conference (3/13)

Bill Clinton routinely made this point when Medicaid was debated during his presidency. Inexplicably he is among a surprisingly few Democrats who stress the program’s service to elder Americans in dire need of long term care. But the GOP continues to get away with feeding the illusion that it mostly serves malingerers who’d rather take a federal handout than get a job.

Baby boomers everywhere are facing the painful needs of parents who need nursing home care. Many are finding that Medicaid is their only choice. That’s the political pitch that can save Medicaid.

Tax Credits under the Affordable Care Act vs. the American Health Care Act: An Interactive Map

Premiums and Tax Credits Under the Affordable Care Act vs. the American Health Care Act: Interactive Maps

Image result for Tax Credits under the Affordable Care Act vs. the American Health Care Act: An Interactive Map

These maps compare county-level estimates of premium tax credits consumers would receive under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2020 with what they’d receive under the American Health Care Act as unveiled March 6 by Republican leaders in Congress.

The maps include premium tax credit estimates by county for current ACA marketplace enrollees at age 27, 40, or 60 with an annual income of $20,000, $30,000, $40,000, $50,000, $75,000, or $100,000. A downloadable spreadsheet of this data is available, as is a spreadsheet with family scenarios, including a family of four with two 40-year old adults and two children, as well as a 60-year-old couple with no dependent children. (Note: the map and spreadsheets do not include cost-sharing assistance under the ACA that lowers deductibles and copayments for low-income marketplace enrollees. For example, in 2016, people making between 100 – 150% of poverty enrolled in a silver plan on healthcare.gov received cost-sharing assistance worth $1,440; those with incomes between 150 – 200% of poverty received $1,068 on average; and those with incomes between 200 – 250% of poverty received $144 on average).

Generally, people who are older, lower-income, or live in high-premium areas (like Alaska and Arizona) receive larger tax credits under the ACA than they would under the American Health Care Act replacement.

Conversely, some people who are younger, higher-income, or live in low-premium areas (like Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Washington) may receive larger assistance under the replacement plan.

Most current Healthcare.gov enrollees have lower incomes:

  • About 66% of have incomes at or below 250% of poverty (approximately $31,250 for a single individual in 2020), with the bulk (44% of all enrollees) having incomes at or below 150% of poverty (approximately $18,750 in 2020).
  • About 36% of enrollees are under age 35, 37% are age 35 to 54, and 27% are 55 or older.

Both the ACA and the American Health Care Act include tax credits in their approach. However, the law and the proposal calculate credit amounts differently: the ACA takes family income, local cost of insurance, and age into account, while the replacement proposal bases tax credits only on age, with a phase out for individuals with incomes above $75,000.

 

Repealing the Affordable Care Act

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/unpacked/2017/03/08/repealing-the-affordable-care-act/?utm_campaign=Economic%20Studies&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=45259936

Image result for brookings institute

THE ISSUE: If Congress rejects the new House Republican-backed replacement for the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the full repeal long advocated for by many Republicans could be their next option.

A straight ACA repeal would leave an estimated 20+ million people without health coverage.

THE THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW

  • Republicans have long advocated for repealing the ACA and if their new replacement isn’t approved, that plan could soon be put into motion.
  • The ACA provides coverage, and subsidies towards coverage, to people who previously couldn’t get health insurance through the individual market.
  • A straight ACA repeal would leave an estimated 20+ million people without health coverage.
  • If the ACA is repealed, many lower-income Americans (earning a maximum family income of about $33,000) participating in Medicaid, which was expanded under the ACA, would lose health coverage.
  • Many individuals with pre-existing medical conditions, previously unable to get health insurance, would also lose coverage.
  • The ACA also benefits health insurance industry by stabilizing coverage, and provides assurance to state hospitals that patients have coverage of some kind.
  • It is incumbent upon Republicans to provide a clear plan and implement it quickly in order to stabilize the markets and assure Americans that whatever replaces the ACA will be at least as good and at least as affordable as their current plans.
  • Polling on repeal shows that people are unhappy with the ACA, but not with their coverage. They most frequently criticizes the cost and the availability of coverage.
  • Republicans are faced with a challenge: Americans don’t just want repeal, they want a replacement that is comprehensive and affordable.

Five key findings from the CBO’s healthcare score

Five key findings from the CBO’s healthcare score

Image result for congressional budget office bill scoring

The Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO) analysis of the Republican plan to replace ObamaCare is sending shockwaves through Washington.

Democrats have seized on the report, while Republicans have been split over whether to attack the CBO’s conclusions or focus on the more positive aspects of the analysis.

Here are five key findings from the CBO report that is shaking up the ObamaCare debate.

Ten Inconvenient Truths About The Current Healthcare Debate

https://flipboard.com/@flipboard/flip.it%2FS33hcr-ten-inconvenient-truths-about-the-curre/f-2c2e4d8c41%2Fforbes.com

The Bottom Line

Overstatement and the quest for political revenge may mobilize political allies. It may generate lots of likes in the echo chambers of Twitter or Facebook. But does it persuade? Does it contribute to good policy? I doubt it. We should listen to the parting words of the brilliant George Washington:

The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries, which result, gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of Public Liberty.

CBO: Republican healthcare bill would cover millions fewer than ACA but reduce federal deficit

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/aca/cbo-republican-healthcare-bill-would-cover-millions-fewer-than-aca-but-reduce-federal-deficit?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTW1OaFl6TXlZVFF6WldKayIsInQiOiI3eHNMN1ZraGpJWHJ0eUFFRmdzaDRjVFVsOXBpV0VKVzdtWlU1UmxTbVZWRkpnMDhEN0Rrb3cyZlwvM0NmZnFJMXZTOG1KYXlLRHc0YWNUQzA3MmhpOVNQRFN4WmNsNUZVQmNQTGdPWE5UNUczUGppRUFGZ2dwelltaldGXC9IM3pWIn0%3D&mrkid=959610&utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal

capitol

The Congressional Budget Office on Monday released its highly anticipated score of House Republicans’ healthcare bill, finding that it would increase the number of uninsured individuals by millions, but also lower individual market premiums in the long run and decrease the federal deficit.

Congress uses the CBO’s cost estimates to evaluate the effects of any major legislation, and policymakers were particularly eager to get its estimate for the American Health Care Act given the high political stakes associated with the bill.

Here’s a brief rundown of the CBO’s estimates (PDF):

  • In 2018, 14 million more people would be uninsured under the GOP bill than under the Affordable Care Act—mostly due to the repeal of the individual mandate penalties. By 2026, that number would swell to 24 million because of changes to subsidies in the individual market and in the Medicaid program.
  • Relative to projections for the ACA, the Republicans’ bill would lead to higher average premiums in the individual market before 2020—15% in 2018 and 20% in 2019—and lower average premiums after that. The CBO notes, though, that premium changes under the new proposal would differ “significantly” for people of different ages, given the bill’s provision that allows insurers to charge older customers up to five times more for coverage.
  • Enacting the legislation would reduce federal deficits by $337 billion from 2017 to 2026, with the largest savings coming from reductions in Medicaid spending and eliminating the ACA’s subsidies for individual market customers. The largest costs, on the other hand, would come from the bill’s elimination of many of the ACA’s taxes and its creation of a new tax credit for health insurance.
  • The CBO estimates that the individual market would probably be stable in most areas under either the ACA or the AHCA. While tax credits under the newly proposed bill would be less generous than the ACA’s subsidies, other changes such as grants to states from the Patient and State Stability Fund would lower average premiums enough “to attract a sufficient number of relatively healthy people to stabilize the market,” the agency said.

Before the score emerged, the Trump administration had already cast doubt on the merits of the CBO’s projections. White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer pointed out during a press briefing Monday that the agency had originally projected 24 million people would be enrolled through the Affordable Care Act exchanges as of 2016, but the number ended up being only about 10.4 million.

“The CBO was off by more than half last time,” he said.

Later, he acknowledged that some senators are likely to look at the CBO’s score when evaluating the American Health Care Act, and it’s important to remind them of the agency’s past track record.

Previously, The Commonwealth Fund issued an analysis that sought to dispel such criticism of the agency’s estimates about the ACA. It concluded that while the CBO overestimated marketplace enrollment and costs and underestimated Medicaid enrollment, overall its projections were “reasonably accurate,” and closer to realized experience than the estimates of many other prominent forecasters.

 

CBO report predicts 24 million would lose coverage by 2026 under American Health Care Act

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/cbo-report-predicts-24-million-would-lose-coverage-2026-under-american-health-care-act

Image result for CBO report predicts 24 million would lose coverage by 2026 under American Health Care Act

An estimated 14 million people would lose coverage under the American Health Care Act, a number that would rise to 24 million by 2026, according to a Congressional Budget Officer report released Monday afternoon.

Most of the initial loss would be due to repeal of the federal mandate for individuals to buy coverage, due to lack of a financial penalty and higher premiums.

Uninsured numbers would rise due to the bill’s repeal of Medicaid expansion. Some states would discontinue the expansion. Also per beneficiary spending caps would affect coverage, the CBO said.

Due to a lack of subsidies for insurance purchased in the nongroup market and to the Medicaid program, the increase in the number of uninsured people relative would rise to 21 million in 2020 and then to 24 million in 2026, the CBO said.

“In 2026, an estimated 52 million people would be uninsured, compared with 28 million who would lack insurance that year under current law,” the CBO said.

Premiums are expected to rise 15 to 20 percent in 2018 and 2019.

Older Americans would pay five times the amount on their premiums as compared to younger enrollees.

 

CBO ignites firestorm with ObamaCare repeal score

http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/323652-cbo-millions-would-lose-coverage-under-gop-healthcare-plan

Image result for congressional budget office

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) on Monday projected that the number of people without health insurance would grow by 14 million in 2018 under the Republican ­ObamaCare replacement bill, with that number rising to 24 million in a decade.

The bombshell estimate was larger than even many analysts had predicted, stirring fresh doubts about whether the legislation can pass ahead of a possible vote in the House next week.

Democrats highlighted President Trump’s campaign promises to provide “insurance for everybody,” saying the bill falls woefully short.

“The CBO’s estimate makes clear that TrumpCare will cause serious harm to millions of American families,” Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer (N.Y.) said in a statement.

“Tens of millions will lose their coverage, and millions more, particularly seniors, will have to pay more for health care. The CBO score shows just how empty the president’s promises, that everyone will be covered and costs will go down, have been.”

The CBO estimated that 24 million people would become uninsured by 2026 under the bill, largely due to the proposed changes to Medicaid. Seven million fewer people would be insured through their employers over that same time frame because some people would choose not to get coverage and some employers would decline to offer it.

The CBO calculated that premiums would decrease an average of 10 percent by 2026 after an initial increase of 15 percent to 20 percent due to the repeal of ­ObamaCare’s requirement that everyone buy coverage. Costs would rise for older people but fall for younger people, it said.

Out-of-pocket costs, including deductibles, “would tend to be higher” under the GOP plan than under ­ObamaCare because of looser requirements on insurers. High deductibles have been one of the GOP’s main lines of attack against ­ObamaCare.

 

If the AHCA can’t pass, what does @SpeakerRyan do next?

If the AHCA can’t pass, what does @SpeakerRyan do next?

Image result for healthcare

The House Republicans released the American Health Care Act (AHCA) on Monday. Aaron summarizes it here. Critics of the bill include all liberals, many conservatives, the major medical societies, and many health industry groups.

It will be challenging to pass the bill. On the one hand, Democrats will oppose it because it reduces taxes on people with high incomes while cutting Medicaid and health insurance subsidies. On the other hand, the conservative wing of the House Republicans may not support it because they view it as “Obamacare-lite“.

Nevertheless, the AHCA could pass Congress. Will House conservatives really vote against a bill that largely repeals the ACA? The House leadership is moving the AHCA forward as fast as possible, hoping they can pass it before opposition groups can mobilize. Senator McConnell can eliminate the filibuster rule so that the AHCA can be passed on a majority vote. He might then be able to hold his coalition together to get that majority.

But suppose conservatives refuse to support the AHCA and it is defeated in the House. What happens next?

Speaker Ryan will revise the bill to meet the conservatives’ demands and unite the Republican caucus. He’ll then pass the revised bill in the House. Here’s why.

First, although Ryan could conceivably pass a more liberal ACA replacement with Democratic votes, he won’t. Ryan believes what the conservatives believe. The current AHCA is his attempt to win just enough moderate Republican Senate votes to get the bill passed. The current AHCA was his move to the left, and he won’t make another one if it fails. Second, although Ryan’s in trouble if he can’t pass something, he’s finished as Speaker if he compromises with the Democrats on ACA repeal.

Ryan’s problem if he moves right is that a more conservative AHCA would probably lose moderate Senate Republican votes and be defeated in the Senate. However, that defeat would not cost Ryan his job and his credibility with the Republican base, and with them his prospects for enacting his legislative program. Moreover, the 2018 election has many Democratic seats at risk. If the Republicans take those seats and expand their Senate majority, the chances for a hard-right ACA repeal and replace bill get much better.

If I’m correct, the Democrats might think they are winning based on the critical reception of the AHCA, but they are actually in peril. They have to defeat the AHCA now and then win seats in 2018. The way to defeat the AHCA is to sustain and build the opposition to ACA repeal shown during the Congressional ‘town hall’ demonstrations this winter. They have to convince Republicans representing Blue districts and states that they are at risk if they vote for the AHCA.