The benefits of bankruptcy? How one hospital found redemption in Chapter 11

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/benefits-bankruptcy-how-one-hospital-found-redemption-chapter-11?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWkRObE1XWmhNemt3TjJFNCIsInQiOiJuWXNFaDk2M2RINGpwRlZ6ck1oekJyVkg0clVSUjlQek9TUExrdVVYUlNubjAzU2pkS0FtNndPODc0dVpBaTkvUEFKd05aK01mMXp6dDc5NzVTNDVQZmVZWmFXTjFCd08xMnRKWGljZzNGTEFPSHFIY21UT1Y2TnYwTk5QWWVGUCJ9

Image result for hospital bankruptcies

Filing for bankruptcy might make hospital finance executives cringe with desperation, if not failure, but strategically pursuing Chapter 11 can actually lay the foundation for a brighter future.

In fact, Morehead Memorial Hospital in Eden, North Carolina, actually owes its future to its leader’s decision to file for Chapter 11. Like so many rural hospitals, whose ranks are shrinking fast, Morehead faced common problems including flat or declining populations, migration of patients who find work in other communities and get care there, as well as the prevalence of Medicare and Medicaid in payer mixes that cause financial losses and vulnerabilities.

The albatross: Old debt

Morehead CEO Dana Weston’s original inclination was to look for a buyer, but after a year of searching a realization sunk in: the large amount of debt attached to the hospital was a liability akin to a brick wall between Morehead and a path forward.

Weston said they got consistent feedback that organizations felt it wasn’t in their current strategy to acquire a struggling rural hospital, since many systems already have more than one such facility under their umbrella. Most of the debt was at least a decade old, and addressing it was really the only way to make themselves attractive to potential buyers.

So Weston and the executive team did something that sounded more like an end than a beginning: Morehead filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on July 10.

Navigating Chapter 11, especially for a struggling rural hospital with limited resources and personnel must be done properly for the strategy to succeed.

And Morehead had some unique complexities, according to Ron Winters, managing director of hospital and healthcare services management firm Healthcare Management Partners. Winters has followed Morehead’s case and pointed out that the hospital is near a state border so they deal with different insurers from other states and are within 90 minutes of several larger competing hospitals, which didn’t help. Even worse, the size and scope of the their complex debt picture, including a $34 million U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development loan that offered limited flexibility on repayment, really limited their options, Winters said.

“You couldn’t just go to HUD and say let’s make a deal,” Winters explained. “You needed the bankruptcy code to make a transaction happen.”

That’s because when a hospital enters bankruptcy, Winters said it is effectively drawing a line in the sand on the very day it files. Chapter 11 code dictates that any obligation incurred after the petition date is superior to anything owed prior to the petition date. So new debt legally takes priority over old in terms of what will be covered by proceeds from a transaction. Moreover, bankruptcy rules state that any buyer that acquires an entity that went through chapter 11 proceedings is assured no creditor can come after them for the acquired hospital’s debt. They only pay what they agreed to for the transaction, providing security and alleviating risk.

Eliminating the risk of old debt is the precise upside Morehead leveraged to make itself attractive to a prospective buyer.

Common misperceptions

The phrase Chapter 11, and this is true in any industry, hits an organization’s reputation pretty hard.

The legalese is hard to translate to employees and the community, and Weston said the sale of assets, which is how their bankruptcy transaction is referred to, caused quite a stir because it sounded like a liquidation.

“People had this picture in their mind of an auction where the furniture, equipment, everything was just gonna be sold off to the highest bidder,” Weston said. “That’s not the case at all.”

She insisted that the board’s decision to file for Chapter 11 was the right one because it removed one of the major barriers to interest in buying Morehead by addressing the debt through bankruptcy and shedding that liability.

Without a partner, Morehead simply had no future.

Avoiding bankruptcy’s downside

Winters warned that there is a risk to bankruptcy and two main drawbacks are costs and the consequences of not being prepared with a plan. First, a debtor must hire a bankruptcy lawyer and other experts such as a patient care ombudsman to monitor the care provided to patients and look after patient rights. If a hospital doesn’t have available assets to pay for those things, that’s a problem.

“It’s ideal to have some unpledged assets to use as liquidity for the proceedings or have a buyer lined up the very first day,” Winters said.

Having a buyer lined up on the first day would seem an ideal scenario, and is called a stalking horse purchaser. Bankruptcy code provides that a debtor must create protections so that the stalking horse can’t be easily outbid or outbid at all. A winning bidder that beats the stalking horse must do so by a minimum amount, for instance, and reimburse them for costs related to establishing stalking horse status.

Without a buyer ready to go or other financing plans laid out, creditors get worried, Winters said. “With financing, your creditors should be satisfied that all obligations following the bankruptcy petition will be satisfied.”

Hospitals would do well to start thinking about options like seeking a partner or bankruptcy while they still have some amount of liquidity and unpledged assets. “When you have none left you’re not going to be able to drive an attractive transaction and you run the greatest risk of collapsing,” Winters said.

The new future

Weston’s plan worked and Morehead’s survival is now all but assured.

On Nov. 13, a federal bankruptcy judge chose UNC Health Care as the winning bidder for Morehead, setting a course for emergence from Chapter 11 for early 2018.

The closing is expected to take 60 days, and Morehead will operate as usual during the transition. UNC personnel will be visiting Morehead in the coming weeks to start building relationships with hospital staff and the community.

Collapsing was never an option, according to Weston. The first-time CEO said there was far too much at stake. She said what keeps her up at night are the employees at Morehead and the community it serves. The hospital is vitally important to its hometown and to Rockingham County. It’s the biggest employer in Eden and the 4th or 5th largest in the county.

“The most valuable thing for me in this role is for the 700 who work here to trust that I am in this with them,” Weston said. “This community is my family.”

The hospital divestiture trend is heating up, and not going away anytime soon

http://www.healthcaredive.com/news/the-hospital-divestiture-trend-is-heating-up-and-not-going-away-anytime-so/505566/

Image result for The hospital divestiture trend

Not long ago, health systems gobbled up hospitals with the overriding goal of growth, expanded footprints and market share. Some major health systems are now regretting those buys as they have become saddled with community hospitals that are losing money and struggling with large debt and capital needs.

Two major health systems facing this issue are Community Health Systems (CHS) and Tenet Healthcare, who are both looking to shed facilities.

“The strategy that CHS, Tenet and many others had was to really build around scale without really thinking about the regional economics of how these hospitals work together,” Gregory Hagood, senior managing director at SOLIC Capital Advisors, which works with hospitals on mergers and acquisitions, told Healthcare Dive.

Health systems like CHS and Tenet grew their systems with large purchases, but they’ve learned from their experiences and are now looking at divestiture options as a way to shed unprofitable hospitals and billions of debt. No longer are major systems and investors interested in buying struggling hospitals, which CHS did when it purchased the struggling Florida system Health Management Associates for $7.5 billion in 2014.

CHS and Tenet look to cut facilities, debt

CHS, a for-profit system with 137 hospitals in 21 states, is looking to divest at least 30 hospitals this year. They have already announced more than 20 hospital sales this year. CHS’ divestitures come after the health system lost $1.7 billion last year and accumulated about $15 billion in debt. Given their financial situation, Moody’s Investors Service recently downgraded CHS’ corporate family rating, probability of default rating and senior unsecured notes.

Meanwhile, Tenet Healthcare, the third largest investor-owned U.S. health system, is looking into strategic business options that may include a sale. The Wall Street Journal estimated Tenet has a market value of $1.6 billion, which is a far cry from what it owes. Fitch Ratings reported that Tenet had about $15.4 billion of debt at the end of June.

Tenet recently announced it’s selling eight U.S. hospitals and all of its nine U.K. facilities, which CEO Trevor Fetter said will yield between $900 million and $1 billion.

In addition to the sales, the company is dealing with executive and board shake-ups. Fetter recently announced his impending departure and two board members left the board because of “irreconcilable differences regarding significant matters impacting Tenet and its stakeholders.”

CHS and Tenet might be the most high-profile systems looking to shed debt and facilities, but they’re far from the only ones. A recent report by Kaufman Hall found that hospital and health systems mergers and acquisitions increased 15% in Q2. Big players are especially active. There were six transactions of health systems with nearly $1 billion or more in revenues announced in the first half of 2017. There were only four such deals in all of 2016.

Though hospital M&A activity remains high, healthcare financial experts say the days of health systems swallowing small, unprofitable hospitals as part of larger deals to solely build a system’s footprint are gone. Those days have been replaced by more strategic decisions as to what is right for the organizations, Richard Gundling, senior vice president of healthcare financial practices at the Healthcare Financial Management Association, told Healthcare Dive.

Health systems are now taking a strategic view of hospitals to see if they fit into their culture. They are also ignoring small, community hospitals with debt or buying them for much less than they may be worth.

The systems that are selling unprofitable hospitals are also faced with a market in which investors aren’t interested in paying top dollar for struggling hospitals with heavy debt. Instead, Hagood said, investors are more interested in post-acute care services like rehab and long-term care and ambulatory care initiatives. They don’t typically see hospitals as a wise investment.

“Smaller systems that have huge debt loads or pent-up capital demands have received a lukewarm reception at best,” Patrick Allen, managing director with Kaufman Hall’s mergers and acquisitions practice, told Healthcare Dive.

Why are health systems divesting?

Health systems, especially ones that have built up debt, are having trouble making up lost revenues. Hospitals could once cover a struggling type of care through a different, more profitable service. That’s no longer the case as payers and the CMS have squeezed hospital margins.

Sagging reimbursements and payer policies that move patients from hospitals to outpatient care and freestanding facilities are hurting hospital finances. There’s also a CMS proposal to allow hip and knee replacement surgeries for Medicare patients on an outpatient basis. Those kinds of surgeries are often the most profitable for hospitals, which means they may soon lose another revenue driver.

Beyond those direct payer impacts, health systems are looking to protect themselves against a changing industry in which market share isn’t as important as flexibility and efficiency.  “As all of these changes are occurring, the systems are strategically moving and gathering their assets to be able to deal with expected changes,” Gundling said.

Gundling said another issue facing large systems that may lead to divestiture is cultural mismatch. A large system may have swooped in and bought a 100- or 150-bed community hospital as part of a larger purchase. The hospital’s community may have bristled at the idea of a large out-of-state corporate entity buying a mainstay of their community. Plus, physicians may dislike a new system’s clinical protocols.

“There might be times when you say it might not be the right fit for us after all … That can lead to a divestiture decision,” Gundling said.

How are health systems handling divestitures?

Health systems are taking different avenues to deal with possible divestitures. Some systems want to completely rid themselves of certain hospitals. Others look to repurpose small hospitals for outpatient, skilled nursing facilities, labs or imaging while maintaining a large regional hospital. Still others forge partnerships, so they don’t completely sell the properties.

Allen said many health systems see their small community hospitals aren’t bringing in enough revenue and can’t be competitive in every service line and business. So, instead, they are dropping unprofitable services and sticking with what works for them.

Gundling compared health systems’ decisions about divestiture to an individual creating the right investment balance. For health systems, divestitures are not about selling properties, but strategically managing risk. “They aren’t just selling off to sell off. All have different strategies,” said Gundling.

Allen said divestitures are a balancing act for systems. They can shed debt and assets, but that comes with revenue loss. “The balance is always what is the right sale price for the exchange of cash flow when it becomes less than profitable. Balancing those two are always tough,” said Allen.

When deciding on whether to divest, merge or partner with other facilities, Allen said systems need to figure out the community’s needs, the area’s business climate, what the facility wants to be and potential partnership opportunities. Allen, whose company works mostly with nonprofit systems, said many are repurposing underutilized facilities into other uses like rehab, skilled nursing facilities, labs and imaging.

“Once you have a handle on what the market needs and what the market provides, then you can make strategies to get you there,” he said.

Another issue facing health systems is infrastructure. Many smaller hospitals don’t meet today’s care delivery system. “A lot of hospitals don’t lend themselves very efficiently to quality care based on their 30- and 40-year old design,” said Hagood. “That factor can accelerate their repurposing.”

The results and future of the divestiture trend

Allen said divestitures have resulted in systems being able to reallocate capital and move forward with less debt. However, Hagood said one major reason health systems have for divestitures — shedding debt — hasn’t completely worked. Part of the problem is that the new investors aren’t paying top dollar for a struggling community hospital with debt.

“The biggest challenge so far is that they have struggled to get value for those assets to effectively repay that debt,” he said.

Gundling said health systems that have shed debt have followed the divestitures by focusing on cost efficiencies, supply chain management and revenue cycle management.

The hospital divestiture trend has led to sales, mergers and partnerships, with repurposed or downsized facilities, but it hasn’t closed many facilities. That may be coming soon, though.

Hagood said pending mergers, including the Mountain States Health Alliance and Wellmont Health System deal in Tennessee and Virginia, will likely lead to facility closures. There aren’t enough healthcare dollars to support the number of facilities in some of the Appalachian communities involved, he said.

Most of the large divestiture action has been centered around for-profit systems, but Hagood said to watch for more nonprofit action, including Catholic Health Initiatives (CHI), which recently reported a $585.2 million operating loss for fiscal year 2017 after losing $371.4 million in 2016.

Earlier this year, Moody’s Investor Service downgraded CHI’s rating on long-term debt and variable rate demand bonds because of poor operating performance since 2012 and a relatively low level of liquid assets. Moody’s warned that further downgrades could occur unless CHI improves its operating performance.

CHI divested its KentuckyOne facilities earlier this year, a move expected to bring in $534.9 million. Given the company’s finances and healthcare environment, Hagood said there could be more divestitures.

“Nonprofits are going to move slower, but I think you’re going to see them (divest) as economics continue to shift,” he said.

Experts agree the divestiture trend is just heating up as health systems deal with the greater emphasis on outpatient care and freestanding centers. Hagood predicted 24-7 inpatient facilities with full emergency rooms and surgical facilities will continue to dwindle in the coming years as systems repurpose facilities.

“There are 5,000-plus hospitals today. I think you’re going to see that consolidate down,” he said.

 

Why days cash on hand is so important for hospitals

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/why-days-cash-hand-so-important-hospitals?mkt_tok=3RkMMJWWfF9wsRogvKvOZKXonjHpfsX57u4rUa6zlMI%2F0ER3fOvrPUfGjI4GTsRmI%2BSLDwEYGJlv6SgFQ7LHMbpszbgPUhM%3D

Changes in payment trends brought about by the Affordable Care Act, technology expenditures related to electronic health records, and fluctuations in cash flow from higher deductibles and patient copays have all impacted the need for readily available cash.

Changes in payment trends brought about by the Affordable Care Act, technology expenditures related to electronic health records, and fluctuations in cash flow from higher deductibles and patient copays have all impacted the need for readily available cash.