Judge: Only time for one insurer merger case in 2016

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payer/judge-only-time-for-one-insurer-merger-case-2016?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal&mrkid=959610&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWldRd1kyUXpNalUwWXpFeCIsInQiOiJaWkJVWkdKWG9DSFJwYytCZmVHV1JKcFhVd1lZbUlHS1JjZTZHZWI2ZDl3dU1XNU5oTWpCY3lSU3BYaWtyZXVyeGZmbDdyTVFHWk5OQUhEQzhlZkdlNm9lTnE3Y2M2elhcLzRrN3F5aXFKXC9RPSJ9

A federal judge said Thursday it is unlikely he would be able to rule on both the Aetna-Humana and Anthem-Cigna antitrust suits by the end of the year, according to Reuters.

Lawyers from Anthem and Aetna argued this week that Judge John Bates should hear their cases before the end of 2016. The Justice Department filed suits in July against both mergers, citing competition concerns that it says would increase prices for consumers and stunt innovation.

Bates said in a hearing Thursday that both requests cannot be fulfilled, but did not say which case would be sent for reassignment.

“That’s my determination: that I can’t do both,” Bates said in the hearing, according to Reuters.

Aetna believes it has a simpler case, the article adds. Further, its deal with Humana was announced first.

Anthem’s lawyers, though, point out that if the case is not settled by the end of the year, Cigna will likely refuse to extend their agreement, thus dooming the merger, Reuters notes.

In an interview with FierceHealthPayer, antitrust lawyer David Balto indicated that the Anthem-Cigna merger is “like climbing Mount Everest,” and that they are less poised to battle the DOJ than Aetna and Humana.

As Hospital Chains Grow, So Do Their Prices For Care

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/finance/hospital-chains-grow-so-do-their-prices-care

As health care consolidation accelerates nationwide, a new study shows that hospital prices in two of California’s largest health systems were 25 percent higher than at other hospitals around the state.

For Hospitals, Prestige Leads To Profits

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/finance/hospitals-prestige-leads-profits

Market Power

Many of the hospitals best-positioned to earn profits are non-profits. They are the largest hospitals, and the ones with the most prestige.

If You Want To Spend A Bundle On Your Bundle Of Joy, Go To Northern California

http://khn.org/news/if-you-want-to-spend-a-bundle-on-your-bundle-of-joy-go-to-northern-california/?utm_campaign=KHN%3A+Topic-based&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=31951328&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_1BzSYwT-xGOcALjAQd2-dZvlcoF62s1zwVRj0oKlA7omZsyLQTHRzY0tbS0zTr7Z71wR4bJ5O-Ict1u1tjlS-DkIWPA&_hsmi=31951328

Everyone knows that real estate is no bargain in Northern California. It turns out that giving birth ain’t cheap either.

New research on the cost of childbirth in the nation’s 30 largest metropolitan areas ranks Sacramento and San Francisco as the two most expensive for both vaginal delivery and Cesarean sections.

Sacramento is No. 1, San Francisco No. 2.

The study, based on private health insurance claims from this year and other data, shows the totals actually paid for childbirth by employees and employers. It was conducted byCastlight Health, a San Francisco-based health care information company that analyzes medical costs to help consumers and purchasers compare prices.

A vaginal delivery costs an average of $15,420 in the Sacramento area and $15,204 in San Francisco — nearly $4,000 more than the third-most expensive location, Minneapolis. In the least expensive metropolitan area, Kansas City, a vaginal delivery costs $6,075.

C-sections are even more expensive, costing an average of $27,067 in Sacramento — nearly four times as much as in Pittsburgh, the cheapest city. San Francisco had the second highest cost for C-sections, at $21,799. San Diego came in fifth at $16,810.

The data show that prices vary widely even within the most expensive regions. In San Francisco, for example, the cost for a Cesarean delivery ranged from $8,399 to $41,191 — a five-fold price difference. Patients, however, rarely know how much a procedure will cost until they receive the bill.

CMS needs to halt the march to health care gigantism

CMS needs to halt the march to health care gigantism

From a major speech by Sen. Elizabeth Warren to a recent report from the President’s Council of Economic Advisers, there has been a renewed interest by Democrats in monopolies and market consolidation. From tech to airlines, they argue, too many sectors of the economy are being dominated by a few big players.

In American health care, this is not only the case, but has been the default preferred stance. In health care, there is an almost Darwinian belief that the evolution to bigger is better. This is why last year saw 112 hospital mergers (up 18 percent from 2014), and the percentage of physician practices owned by hospitals doubled between 2004 and 2011.
Yet, there is no evidence that consolidation of hospitals and physician practices leads to better clinical outcomes or cost reductions. In fact, recent studies suggest that small, physician-owned practices have a lower average cost per patient, fewer preventable hospital admissions, and lower readmission rates than hospital-owned practices.
That is why it is so unfortunate that, as part of the largest rewriting of doctor payment rules in a generation, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) unwittingly has drafted regulations that—as currently proposed—further neglect the power of physician independence and create strong incentives for further consolidation in health care.

Standard & Poor’s puts Aetna, Humana on credit watch following DOJ move to block merger

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/standard-poors-puts-aetna-humana-credit-watch-following-doj-move-block-merger

S&P Global Ratings has placed Aetna and Humana on creditwatch following the Department of Justice’s announcement Thursday to block their merger.

S&P said it has placed its ratings on Aetna on creditwatch with developing implications, and on Humana and its core subsidiaries on creditwatch with negative implications.

The DOJ also blocked the merger between Anthem and Cigna on Thursday.  S&Psaid its ratings on the two insurers would remain on creditwatch negative, where they were placed on June 21, 2015.

Anthem and Aetna have both said they would fight the DOJ’s injunction against their respective mergers in court.

For Anthem’s proposed $53 billion acquisition of Cigna, litigation could be difficult and time-consuming, S&P said.

DOJ sues to block Aetna-Humana, Anthem-Cigna mergers

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payer/doj-sues-to-block-aetna-humana-anthem-cigna-mergers?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal&mrkid=959610&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWkRFMk5ERTBOemd5TkRZMyIsInQiOiJiaEZQV3RZeFFXVUR5TFwvTDhmd2JBc2ppRzVpRjY3eDN5b1Q1aXh3aHV5VDdud2xpblFBME92bkl2ZFQ2NXZOZ1BEZ3BqSkZ2Y2NGUDA2aG5laE5JMzhIeTJ4UWNuckxkUkI0bVwvdFRyM3o0PSJ9

Justice Department building inscriptionJustice Department building inscription

10 states with the costliest employer-sponsored health insurance

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/payer-issues/10-states-with-the-costliest-employer-sponsored-health-insurance.html

Money Roll

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality recently released data from its Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a large-scale study of families, individuals, providers and employers in the U.S. concerning the cost and use of healthcare and health insurance.

Here are the 10 states with the costliest employer-sponsored health insurance in 2015, listed with the average single premium per enrolled employee at private-sector organizations:

Anthem-Cigna Deal: Seeking Merger Approval, Anthem Makes Major Donations To State Political Groups

http://www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/anthem-cigna-deal-seeking-merger-approval-anthem-makes-major-donations-state

Money in Sky

Seeking regulatory approval for a controversial merger proposal, health insurer Anthem recently pumped $460,000 into groups supporting the election campaigns of governors and state attorneys general. The money was disclosed in second-quarter campaign finance reports reviewed by International Business Times.

Those federal filings, which were released by the Internal Revenue Service late Friday, show Anthem gave $210,000 to the Republican Governors Association, $200,000 to the Democratic Governors Association in the last three months. In many states, the insurance commissioners reviewing the proposed Anthem-Cigna mega-merger are appointed by governors. The cash to state officials is on top of $50,000 Anthem gave to a Democratic-affiliated political group called “Unity Convention 2016.”

The money to the DGA is particularly notable because the group is headed by Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy, whose insurance commissioner, Katharine Wade, runs the agency leading the national multistate review of the deal. Anthem money flowed to the DGA in June amid an ethics probe prompted by IBT’s investigative series documenting Wade’s personal and familial ties to Cigna.

Malloy has refused to force Wade to recuse herself from the merger review, at a time when Anthem and Cigna have increased their donations to the DGA, which backed his campaigns and which he has chaired since late 2015. In all, the DGA has raised a total of $1.1 million from Anthem and Cigna since Malloy began the process of nominating Wade to the insurance post in 2015. That sum is 37 percent more than the group raised in the entire 2014 election cycle, and almost half of the total campaign contributions the companies have given the group in the last decade.

iFHP cost report highlights cause for concern over lack of provider competition

http://www.healthcaredive.com/news/ifhp-cost-report-highlights-cause-for-concern-over-lack-of-provider-competi/422860/

The International Federation of Health Plans (iFHP) today released its2015 Comparative Price Report, detailing its annual survey of medical prices per unit. Designed to showcase the variation in healthcare prices around the world, the report examines the price of medical procedures, tests, scans and treatments in seven countries.

The report undercuts the idea of what’s being played out in the recent Sutter Health case which alleges the health system is overcharging insurers causing medical costs to be pushed downstream to patients. Last Friday, the suit was allowed to seek class-action status. Matthew Cantor, partner and attorney at Constantine Cannon and lead lawyer for the plaintiffs, told Healthcare Dive the plaintiffs allege to have contracts which require health plans to purchase all the hospital services that Sutter provides in Northern California.

Sutter is “leveraging its larger power in those markets to say to these health plans that they have to also purchase Sutter Health hospital services elsewhere and not only do they have to purchase them but they have to purchase those Sutter services at higher, super competitive prices,” Cantor said, adding that this, in turn, raises the costs of medical services to health plans. These higher costs, Cantor said, are then sent downstream to insurance policyholders.

“Competition is not working,” Sackville told Healthcare Dive. “The market’s not working because if it was, no one would get away with charging $17,000 [for a day of hospital care].”

The report put a focus on the lack of provider competition and consolidation. There’s been a fair amount of consolidation in various states and more systems are pursuing the idea of mergers or partnerships. Such activity, in theory, could bring down competition in an area and tick up costs for consumers as hospitals’ market power grows. “Powerful hospital systems have the ability to raise the prices of medical care. Health plans have no alternative but to take these forced, higher costs upon them because [if they refused] then no one would buy their insurance,” Cantor told Healthcare Dive.