13 health systems with strong finances

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/13-health-systems-with-strong-finances-012317.html

 

Here are 13 health systems with strong operational metrics and solid financial positions, according to recent reports from Moody’s Investors Service and S&P Global Ratings.

Note: This is not an exhaustive list. Health system names were compiled from recent credit rating reports and are listed in alphabetical order.

1. Downers Grove, Ill.-based Advocate Health Care has an “Aa2” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The health system has a strong market position, healthy liquidity, moderate leverage and good debt metrics, according to Moody’s.

2. Morristown, N.J.-based Atlantic Health System has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s and an “AA-” rating and stable outlook with S&P. The system has stable operating performance, balance sheet growth and a favorable market position, according to Moody’s.

3. Dallas-based Baylor Scott & White Health has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The health system has strong cash flow margins and a favorable business position as the largest nonprofit health system in Texas, according to Moody’s.

4. Milwaukee-based Children’s Hospital and Health System has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The system has a strong balance sheet and is the dominant provider of tertiary and quaternary pediatric services in southeastern Wisconsin, according to Moody’s.

5. Indianapolis-based Indiana University Health has an “Aa2” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The system has healthy margins and a strong market position, according to Moody’s.

6. Rochester, Minn.-based Mayo Clinic has an “Aa2” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. Mayo has an excellent clinical reputation and diversified revenue across multiple locations, states and types of hospitals, according to Moody’s.

7. Mercy Health in St. Louis, Mo., has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s and an “AA-” rating and stable outlook with S&P. The health system has solid debt service coverage and strong balance sheet metrics, according to Moody’s.

8. Chicago-based Northwestern Memorial HealthCare has an “Aa2” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The system has a prominent and growing market position in the Chicago region, a strong investment position, good margins and manageable leverage, according to Moody’s.

9. San Diego-based Sharp HealthCare has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The system has strong balance sheet measures and a fundamentally stable and strong strategic position, according to Moody’s.

10. Stanford (Calif.) Health Care has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The system has a strong market position as one of two major academic medical centers in the Bay Area, has a reputation for clinical excellence and research, and is in a service area with strong population growth and high wealth levels, according to Moody’s.

11. Iowa City-based University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics has an “Aa2” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The health system has a broad market with growing patient volumes and geographic reach for its high-acuity services. Moody’s expects the health system’s expense control initiatives to continue to gain traction through fiscal year 2018.

12. Philadelphia-based University of Pennsylvania Health System has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The health system has a strong market position, solid operating margins and limited debt burden, according to Moody’s.

13. Yale New Haven (Conn.) Health System has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The system has a leading market position in Connecticut, solid liquidity, moderate capital needs and manageable leverage, according to Moody’s.

The Secret of Success for Independent and Thriving Hospitals?

https://www.definitivehc.com/hospital-data/the-secret-of-success-for-independent-and-thriving-hospitals?source=newsltr-blog&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=06-20-17

Image result for rural hospitals

Consolidation remains a major trend in the healthcare industry, especially among hospitals. In 2016, there were 102 announced partnership and transaction deals, compared to 66 in 2010, according to a Kaufman, Hall & Associates analysis. In the current climate of declining reimbursements and greater emphasis on value-based care, many hospital executives see mergers as a necessary way of reigning in costs and benefiting from economies of scale. Yet, a significant number of acute care hospitals remain independent and even thrive. A recent article highlighted Marin General Hospital, which separated from Sutter in 2008 but has performed well enough on its own to fund construction of a new $400 million replacement hospital. What do high-performing independent hospitals have in common? An analysis of Definitive Healthcare data suggests independent hospitals with consistently strong operating margins have limited competition from other facilities, high discharge volumes, and a greater proportion of private payers.

Under the analysis, a high-performing hospital was classified as a facility with a median operating margin of at least four percent during a five-year period from 2011 to 2015, as four percent is often cited as the traditional minimum necessary for a hospital to be able to raise capital effectively. 143 out of around 1,450 independent hospitals met this condition, according to Definitive Healthcare data. Of them, 67 were non-profit, 56 were proprietary (for-profit) companies, and 30 were government owned.

A favorable payor mix and higher-than-average discharge volume appear to be the most common characteristics among the selected hospitals. The median payor mix for independent hospitals was 38 percent private/other, 6 percent Medicaid, and 51 percent Medicare, compared to 50 percent private, 6 percent Medicaid, and 41 percent Medicare at hospitals with median margins over four percent. The greater percentage of private payors means higher reimbursement rates per procedure and can reflect the presence of a more affluent patient base. The larger volume of discharges compared to the overall median, 1,662 to 792, also helps explain their higher margins. Despite the trend towards outpatient treatment, inpatient care is still necessary and tends to be more profitable for hospitals. Some facilities actually witnessed discharge increases from 2011 to 2015, possibly indicating a growing area population, but they were the minority and the trend did not always coincide with a stable operating margin.

Geography also appears to be an important factor. Isolated hospitals with limited competition have a natural advantage, being the only source of inpatient care within the immediate area. Some independent critical access hospitals, which by definition are geographically isolated, do have strong margins, but so do many regular acute care hospitals. Of the top 10 non-critical access facilities by median operating margin, eight are located at least 15 miles from the next-closest hospital, making them the primary destinations in terms of convenience and emergency care for local residents.

The company status of independent hospitals is also associated with high profitability. While proprietary hospitals constituted only around 10 percent of all independent hospitals, they were 37 percent of all those with median margins over four percent. In addition, they tended to have the highest margins overall. Of the top 30 hospitals by median margin, only three identified as non-profits or government-owned hospitals. Nearly all were specialty hospitals, which are generally more profitable than acute-care hospitals as they usually have more favorable payor mixes and focus on a single high-margin specialty, such as surgery or orthopedics. Non-profits came next, while government-owned facilities were the least likely to have strong margins. Of course, the margin of a government-owned hospital is less significant due to its ability to leverage tax revenues to support operations.

While financially strong independent hospitals appear to benefit largely from circumstances beyond their control, such as patient income, insignificant competition, and fundamental organizational structure, they are not a guarantee of success. Previous research, such as that here, has identified other characteristics that are equally if not more critical to an independent hospitals’ fortunes. Among them are strong business and clinical planning, high levels of cooperation with both local providers and national institutions (such as those covering specialty consults and clinical trials access), and capable leadership. Obviously, such qualities are easier described than achieved, but if attained, could be enough to create a strong, thriving hospital even in spite of unfavorable geography, payor mixes, or organization type.