New CEO takes over at Novant Health UVA Health System

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/business/article160875514.html

Image result for Novant Health UVA Health System

A northern Virginia-based network of community hospitals and health providers has a new CEO.

Novant Health UVA Health System announced Tuesday that Maggie Gill has been named the system’s chief executive.

She previously served as president of Memorial Health in Savannah, Georgia.

Novant Health UVA formed last year as a partnership between Novant Health and the UVA Health System. Based in Manassas, it operates three community hospitals ranging in size from 60 to 130 beds in Haymarket, Culpeper and Manassas. It also operates urgent care centers and physician offices throughout northern Virginia.

Talbert leaving Rock Hill’s Piedmont Medical Center

http://www.heraldonline.com/news/local/article160701949.html

Image result for Talbert leaving Rock Hill Piedmont Medical Center

 

Piedmont Medical Center’s chief executive officer will leave his post at the end of July — after 13 months in charge.

A hospital spokesperson said Brad Talbert, who took the job as chief executive officer in June 216, will soon take a job in Jacksonville, Fla. The spokesperson said she did not know at which hospital Talbert would be working.

“He’s doing what’s best for his family,” said Shelly Weiss, director of public relations for Piedmont Medical Center. “I think that he has a really strong affinity for Piedmont and Rock Hill. The decision to leave the organization was a difficult one, but he and family are looking forward to the next chapter, and it’s exciting for him.”

Chief financial officer Steve Gilmore will take over for Talbert while the hospital begins a nationwide search, Weiss said.

Talbert’s job will not be within the Tenet Healthcare Corporation, Weiss said. Talbert joined Tenet in 2008.

The CEO position oversees all areas of operations at the Rock Hill hospital. Talbert joined Piedmont Medical Center after a stint at Coastal Carolina Hospital in Hardeeville, S.C.

Under Talbert’s leadership, Coastal Carolina Hospital twice received Tenet’s Circle of Excellence Award, the company’s highest recognition for hospitals that show exceptional performance in quality, patient satisfaction and operational excellence.

Talbert has more than 16 years of hospital executive leadership and management experience at hospitals in South Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi and Tennessee.

Tufts nurses set to strike Wednesday after talks between union, hospital break down

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/technology/tufts-nurses-set-strike-wednesday-after-talks-between-union-hospital-break-down?spMailingID=11458874&spUserID=MTY3ODg4NTg1MzQ4S0&spJobID=1201062655&spReportId=MTIwMTA2MjY1NQS2

Nursing strike supporters on Washington Street wave at people inside Tufts Medical Center on Wednesday morning. (Robin Lubbock/WBUR)

More than 1,200 nurses at Tufts Medical Center are set to go on strike Wednesday morning after a last-ditch effort to reach a contract deal with hospital officials failed. Both sides spent hours negotiating Tuesday but couldn’t reach a compromise. The Massachusetts Nurses Association said its members would go on strike at 7 a.m. Wednesday. It will be the first strike at a Boston hospital in more than 30 years.

http://www.wbur.org/commonhealth/2017/07/12/tufts-nurses-strike

 

Is Medicaid driving the budget deficit, as Pat Toomey said?

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/jul/12/pat-toomey/medicaid-driving-budget-deficit-pat-toomey-said/

Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Penn., defended the Senate health care bill’s curbing of Medicaid spending by calling Medicaid the single-biggest driver of the federal budget deficit.

Toomey said the proposed cuts to Medicaid spending would slow the growth of entitlement programs, which he claimed are “driving the fiscal train wreck we’re on” in a Morning Joe interview on July 10, 2017.

Medicaid “is the one that is growing most rapidly, and is contributing to 70 percent of our budget deficit right now. It’s the one that is in our lap because of Obamacare,” Toomey said.

Is Medicaid the primary culprit behind the federal budget deficit? We found Toomey is playing parlor games with budget figures.

‘Misleading’ numbers

When we asked Toomey’s office for evidence that Medicaid is contributing up to 70 percent of the deficit, they pointed out that spending on Medicaid is equal to 70 percent of the deficit. They divided projections on Medicaid spending in 2017 ($389 billion) by the estimated budget deficit ($559 billions) to get 69.6 percent. The figures come from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, or CBO.

The problem is, that same calculation can be made with any federal program to reach a different conclusion. Dan Mitchell, an economist with the libertarian Cato Institute, agreed with Toomey’s arithmetic. But, he said, the framework of the calculation is misleading.

“I’m not a fan of creating a link between the deficit and any program, Medicaid or otherwise … but it happens all the time,” Mitchell said.

Dividing Medicaid spending by the budget deficit makes little sense to Dean Baker, the co-director of the left-leaning Center for Economic and Policy Research.

By the same logic, Baker said, “since we will spend $634 billion on the military this year, defense spending is more than 100 percent responsible for the deficit. No one would take this argument seriously about the military and the deficit, nor should they take his argument seriously about Medicaid and the deficit.”

Defense spending would account for 113 percent of the deficit, non-defense discretionary spending 103 percent, and Medicare 101 percent if we were to divide spending by the deficit in the same way Toomey did.

“Clearly, there’s something misleading about the calculation you’re making when things are adding up to 300 percent or more,” said Ben Sommers, a health policy and economics professor at Harvard University.

Toomey’s office made a more nuanced argument about their calculation, though, discussing Medicaid in the context of entitlements and net spending.

“Unlike the other entitlement programs, Medicaid has no dedicated revenue stream, so it is taken solely out of general revenue or the deficit. Therefore, when direct revenue streams are taken into account, Medicaid spends the most on net,” said Kasia Mulligan, the communications director for Toomey.

Medicaid looks worse compared with Medicare or Social Security because its federal share is wholly financed by general revenues, whereas Medicare is partially covered by payroll taxes and premiums, according to Diane Rowland, executive vice president at the Kaiser Family Foundation.

General revenues still help finance Medicare and Social Security, however. Discounting payroll taxes and premiums, Medicare represents 34 percent of the deficit and Social Security 17 percent (using Toomey’s rationale). This would make Medicaid the biggest contributor within entitlements, but entitlements aren’t the only contributors to the deficit.

Defense spending is also wholly financed by general revenues, and surpasses Medicaid in the amount it contributes to the deficit.

“All spending has to be paid for with tax revenue from some source, or it contributes to the deficit,” Sommers said. “There’s no way to say that a dollar spent on Medicaid is any more responsible for the deficit than a dollar spent on defense or discretionary spending or anything else the government does.”

Is the Affordable Care Act to blame?

Toomey blamed Medicaid spending on the Affordable Care Act, but that’s not exactly right, either.

Elderly people and those with disabilities account for two-thirds of Medicaid spending and low-income children account for one-fifth; two groups that were unaffected by the Medicaid expansion introduced by the Affordable Care Act, Rowland said.

Medicaid spending has been growing faster than Medicare or Social Security in recent years, as Toomey claimed, but per-capita costs are actually growing at a slower rate than for Medicare or private insurance. An increased number of people covered by Medicaid is responsible for higher costs.

The cost of this increased coverage was covered by taxes imposed by the Affordable Care Act that added to the general revenue so as not to grow the deficit.

Our rating

Toomey said that Medicaid is contributing to 70 percent of our budget deficit.

The truth is, Medicaid spending annually is about 70 percent of the size of the federal budget deficit. The same logic, if applied to defense spending, would mean defense spending contributes more than 100 percent to the deficit. Experts say both comparisons are flawed and misleading.

Blaming the Affordable Care Act for the rise in Medicaid spending isn’t entirely right either, as the majority of Medicaid spending was already in place before the law, and taxes were imposed to offset the Medicaid expansion’s strain on the deficit.

Toomey’s claim contains an element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression.We rate this statement Mostly False.

Death spiral? Obamacare insurers may be having ‘best year’ yet under ACA

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/article160601814.html

Image result for death spiral

New data on the improving finances of the nation’s individual insurers are calling into question repeated Republican claims that Obamacare marketplaces are collapsing under the Affordable Care Act.

For months, Republican leaders from President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price to House Speaker Paul Ryan have said Obamacare was crumbling under its own weight and could not be saved. And this week, when HHS announced a 38 percent decline in the number of insurers that want to offer coverage next year in states that use the federal marketplace, Price said, “The situation has never been more dire.”

But new research released Monday by the Kaiser Family Foundation shows that profitability and other financial measures for individual insurers have dramatically improved over the last year.

“Now it looks like they’re on track to be profitable and that they’re actually having the best year that they’ve had since the ACA began,” said Cynthia Cox, associate director of health reform at Kaiser.

The share of premiums paid out as medical claims by individual insurers fell to 75 percent in the first quarter of 2017, down from 86 percent in the first three months of 2016 and 88 percent in the first quarter of 2015.

In addition, average monthly premium income exceeded monthly per-enrollee medical claims by roughly $100 in the first quarter of 2017, Kaiser reported. That’s up from about $48 in the first quarter of 2016 and just over $36 in the first quarter of 2015.

Throughout their push to repeal the Affordable Care Act, Republicans have said the market troubles in some areas were proof that Obamacare was unraveling and legislative change was needed. In a pair of tweets on May 4, Trump declared that ObamaCare was “dead” and the individual market was in a “Death spiral!,” in which insurance offerings disappear as premium hikes force all but the sickest to drop coverage.

Cox disputed that assessment: “There’s not really signs of a death spiral here,” she said.

The report, based on insurers’ first-quarter financial reports filed with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners and compiled by Mark Farrah Associates, comes as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell struggles to find 50 votes to pass his Obamacare repeal legislation. Facing opposition from some conservatives, he has expressed a willingness to negotiate with Democrats on a legislative fix of the ACA as Republicans try to re-draft their legislation and move forward next week.

But Monday’s report could make across-the-aisle appeals more difficult, as the data indicates insurers could be on the verge of righting their financial ship.

In a letter to McConnell on Monday, four Democratic senators — Charles Schumer of New York, Debbie Stabenow of Michigan, Richard Durbin of Illinois and Patty Murray of Washington — urged McConnell make “common sense reforms” such as guaranteeing the cost-sharing payments, creating a permanent reinsurance program and finding solutions for areas without insurers.

Certainly, some marketplaces remain under enormous pressure. Far fewer people than originally expected enrolled into marketplace coverage and those who did were sicker, older and more costly than insurers expected. As losses mounted, insurers sharply increased premiums in 2017, making coverage unaffordable for many as enrollment slipped. Some insurers exited unprofitable markets altogether, leaving 38 rural counties in Ohio, Indiana and Nevada with the possibility of no coverage options next year, according to Kaiser. Five states — Alabama, Alaska, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Wyoming — have only one insurer offering marketplace coverage this year.

The Trump administration added to insurers’ problems by relaxing enforcement of Obamacare’s individual mandate and refusing to reimburse insurers for billions of dollars of financial assistance, known as cost-saving reductions, that go to low-income plan members.

An analysis by the Oliver Wyman consulting firm estimated that up to two-thirds of insurer rate increases for 2018 “will be due to the uncertainty surrounding these two market influences” and the Congressional Budget Office estimates premiums will increase 20 percent next year if the individual mandate is not enforced.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina, which has more than 500,000 individual policy holders, wants to increase rates on their Obamacare plans by an average of 23 percent next year.

Speaking in Washington, DC at a recent Bipartisan Policy Center panel discussion, J. Brad Wilson, President and CEO of BCBS North Carolina said, “Over 50 percent of that increase is attributable to the uncertainty of CSRs.”

The industry trade group America’s Health Insurance Plans would not comment on the report.

 

CEO turnover increases as hospital losses swell

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/ceo-turnover-increases-as-hospital-losses-swell.html

Image result for hospital CEO turnover

Hospitals across the nation have seen operating margins shrink as they face dwindling reimbursement, regulatory uncertainty and new alternative payment models. Many hospital CEOs are taking the fall for their organization’s financial challenges, according to the Houston Chronicle.

Thirty medium- to large-sized hospitals across the country have lost their CEOs in the last six months, Janis Orlowski, MD, chief healthcare officer for the Association of American Medical Colleges, told the Houston Chronicle. Some CEOs voluntarily departed to take on a new position or retire, but many were ousted.

“That’s an increase in turnover, probably a reflection of the current volatility of the healthcare market,” Dr. Orlowski told the Houston Chronicle. “Many hospitals are losing money now and the future only looks rockier, with more uninsured and less Medicaid support. Boards want the right person to lead them into such turbulent times.”

To succeed in today’s healthcare market, hospital CEOs need to not only ensure the organization is financially stable but also stay ahead of change and remain engaged in their work, according to the report.

15 hospitals with strong finances

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/15-hospitals-with-strong-finances-071117.html

 

Here are 15 hospitals and health systems with strong operational metrics and solid financial positions according to recent reports from Fitch Ratings, Moody’s Investors Service and S&P Global Ratings.

Note: This is not an exhaustive list. Hospital and health system names were compiled from recent credit rating reports and are listed in alphabetical order.

1. St. Louis-based Ascension Healthhas an “Aa2” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The health system has manageable leverage, limited debt structure risk and a large portfolio of sizeable hospitals, according to Moody’s.

2. Coral Gables-based Baptist Health South Floridahas an “AA-” rating and stable outlook with S&P. The system maintained key balance sheet metrics and generated better-than-projected financial results in fiscal year 2016, according to S&P.

3. Dallas-based Baylor Scott & White Healthhas an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The health system has strong cash flow margins and a favorable business position as the largest nonprofit health system in Texas, according to Moody’s.

4. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphiahas an “Aa2” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The hospital has a history of solid financial performance and strong fundraising capabilities, according to Moody’s.

5. Christiana Care Health Services has an “Aa2” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The Wilmington, Del.-based system has solid liquidity and a history of above average financial performance, according to Moody’s.

6. Greenville (S.C.) Health Systemhas an “AA-” rating and stable outlook with Fitch. The system has recorded dramatic improvement in its operations, posting operating income of $18.6 million in fiscal year 2016 and $20.9 million for the first six months of fiscal year 2017, according to Fitch.

7. Indianapolis-based Indiana University Health has an “Aa2” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The system has healthy margins and a strong market position, according to Moody’s.

8. Kaiser Permanente has an “AA-” rating and stable outlook with S&P. The Oakland, Calif.-based system has a strong enterprise profile with a favorable integrated business model, according to S&P.

9. Bryn Mawr, Pa.-based Main Line Healthhas an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The health system has a solid market position and additional support from independent foundations, according to Moody’s.

10. Columbus-based OhioHealth has an “Aa2” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The system has a strong market position, consistently healthy cash flow margins, a manageable debt load and a solid investment position, according to Moody’s.

11. Parkview Health System has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The Columbia City, Ind.-based system has solid financial performance, healthy debt service coverage and has seen liquidity metrics improve, according to Moody’s.

12. Albuquerque, N.M.-based Presbyterian Health Serviceshas an “AA” rating and stable outlook with S&P. The system has a solid financial profile and a modest debt load, according to S&P.

13. San Diego-based Rady Children’s Hospital has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The hospital has healthy balance sheet metrics and a strong market position in pediatric services, according to Moody’s.

14. Madison-based University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinicshas an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The system has strong balance sheet resources and established clinical and academic market positions, according to Moody’s.

15. WellSpan Healthhas an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The York, Pa.-based system has a strong and broadening market position and a track record of healthy financial performance, according to Moody’s.

Why Kaiser added tech execs to its med school board

https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/news/2017/07/11/kaiser-permanente-medical-school-board-23andme.html?lipi=urn%3Ali%3Apage%3Ad_flagship3_me_share_analytics%3BlvxxuqaBTIiOEUeGO7Ntwg%3D%3D&licu=urn%3Ali%3Acontrol%3Ad_flagship3_me_share_analytics-analytics_suggested_article

Image result for Kaiser Medical School

Kaiser Permanente has selected 13 board members for its new medical school in Pasadena.

The roster includes Kaiser medical executives and Silicon Valley technology leaders, including Anne Wojcicki, CEO of 23andMe, and Mary Hentges, former chief financial officer of PayPal and CBS Interactive. Dr. Holly J. Humphrey, dean for medical education at the University of Chicago, will serve as board chair.

The move shows Kaiser’s continued emphasis and investment in technology integration and innovation: Kaiser was one of the first to use an electronic medical records system, and in 2015 Kaiser reported 52 percent of its primary care encounters were telemedicine visits, completed by email, phone or video.

Medical students at the Pasadena school will apply what they learn immediately within the Kaiser system, said Dr. Edward M. Ellison, board member and executive medical director of Southern California Permanente Medical Group. Many existing medical schools involve two years of basic science and lots of lectures.

“Medical school education hasn’t changed for a hundred years. Engaging physicians from the very beginning … and teaching them to be a part of our system, that’s something that other medical schools can’t do,” Ellison told the Business Times.

“We knew we wanted to create physicians who will lead care and innovations in the country. We’re integrating that with technology because it allows us to see care everywhere.”

Half of residents stay at Kaiser, and half go elsewhere after completing their training, according to Ellison. The school can accommodate 100 students on campus and is discussing plans to start satellites in other locations.

In 2015, Kaiser said it would open a nonprofit “national school of medicine” in Southern California. The Oakland-based nonprofit system, which trains more than 600 physicians in residency every year, plans to start classes in the fall of 2019. It will start accepting applications in 2018 and expects full enrollment of 192 students by 2022.