CHS to sell 25 more hospitals after $1.7B loss in 2016

http://www.healthcaredive.com/news/chs-to-sell-25-more-hospitals-after-17b-loss-in-2016/436555/

Dive Brief:

Dive Insight:

The downfall of CHS continued into the fourth quarter of 2016, although it could have been worse. On a per share basis, earnings came in at 46 cents per share while financial analysts had predicted earnings of 12 cents per share, according to an Associated Press report.

How CHS will proceed from here remains unclear. The hospital operator divested from dozens of hospitals last year and deals to sell additional hospitals are in the works. Reports surfaced last year that CHS was considering a sale, but it may be difficult to find a buyer willing to take on debt accumulated by CHS.

In 2016, CHS’ net losses were “primarily related to impairment charges totaling approximately $315 million to reduce the value of long-lived assets,” the earnings report states. “These impairment charges were partially offset by the gain of $91 million on the sale of a majority ownership interest in the company’s home care division, which closed on Dec. 31, 2016.”

CHS has made some progress paying off its debt, but there is still a long way to go. Long-term debt totaled $16.5 billion at the end of 2015 and dipped to $14.8 billion at the end of 2016. The hospital operator has entered into agreements and letters of intent, “consisting of ten separate contemplated transactions,” to divest the additional 25 hospitals, which represent about $3.0 billion of 2016 net revenue.

Medicaid’s Role: What’s at Stake Under a Block Grant or Per Capita Cap?

Medicaid’s Role: What’s at Stake Under a Block Grant or Per Capita Cap?

Image result for Medicaid’s Role: What’s at Stake Under a Block Grant or Per Capita Cap?

A new video slideshow from the Kaiser Family Foundation explains how Medicaid works now and what is at stake as policymakers in Washington consider converting program financing to a block grant or per capita cap.

The 3-minute video describes how Medicaid is financed under current law, whom it covers and how spending is distributed across various groups of enrollees, including children, adults, seniors, and people with disabilities. It shows, for instance, that although seniors and people with disabilities comprise about a quarter of Medicaid enrollees, they account for nearly two-thirds of Medicaid spending because they have more complex health needs and therefore higher per person costs.

Proposals to convert Medicaid to a block grant or per capita cap financing could reduce federal Medicaid spending over time and be tied to increased flexibility for states in how they run their Medicaid programs. However, the video slideshow also explains how such proposals may shift costs to states, beneficiaries and providers, as well as limit states’ ability to respond to changes in medical costs and/or demand for Medicaid.

PD Editorial: 20 million reasons to retain and repair Obamacare

http://www.pressdemocrat.com/opinion/6701027-181/pd-editorial-20-million-reasons

For six years, and over the course of five dozen high-profile, low-probability votes, Republicans in Congress vowed to do away with Obamacare.

Republicans denounced the Affordable Care Act as “a crime against democracy” and labeled it “the most dangerous piece of legislation ever passed.” Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn went so far as to warn seniors, “You’re gonna die sooner.”

The election of Donald Trump removed the specter of a presidential veto, yet the Affordable Care Act hasn’t been repealed.

Large and boisterous crowds supporting Obamacare at town hall meetings probably are making some lawmakers nervous about the fallout from killing a program that provides insurance for 20 million Americans. Here’s another possible explanation: Despite its shortcomings, Obamacare has delivered on its basic promise — expanding access to health care by reducing the cost of insurance, especially in states such as California that fully embraced the program.

California has reduced its uninsured rate to a record low of 7.1 percent, according to a report issued this month by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

That’s a decline of 9.9 percentage points since the Affordable Care Act took full effect in 2013.

The CDC figures, based on data for the first three quarters of 2016, also showed a marked improvement on a national scale, with 8.8 percent of Americans lacking health insurance. In 2013, the uninsured rate was 14.4 percent.

Let those be benchmarks.

Trump and congressional Republicans still say they’re going to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. But any plan that results in fewer people having coverage isn’t a replacement. It’s retrenchment. And that isn’t acceptable.

Despite their harsh criticism of Obamacare, Republicans are far from agreeing on any replacement. They have promised to keep the most popular provisions of Obamacare, including protection for people with pre-existing conditions and coverage of dependents up to age 26. There also is GOP support for retaining requirements that insurers cover treatment of mental illness and substance abuse. Targeted for elimination are the financing mechanisms needed for the program to remain viable — individual and employer mandates and subsidies to help low- and middle-income families pay insurance premiums. A proposal to convert Medicaid to a block grant program almost certainly will result in some states raising the threshold for eligibility.

The numbers simply don’t add up.

Hospitals justifiably fear a return to the days of writing off millions of dollars from providing emergency care to uninsured patients, and insurers will have little choice but to drop out of the exchanges — 11 participate in California — if people can wait until they’re sick before buying coverage.

That’s the death spiral Republicans have been predicting since the Affordable Care Act passed in 2010. It could become a self-fulfilling prophesy if insurers conclude that the risk pool that undergirds the insurance market has been, or will soon be, undermined.

No big program is perfect. Republicans have pointed out Obamacare’s shortcomings for years while refusing to work with Democrats on improvements. If it collapses now, some Republicans will point fingers at Obama and claim the program was fatally flawed. But if millions of people who gained access to health insurance suddenly find themselves without coverage once again, many of them are going to blame the people who wrote the cancellation notice.

 

Conservatives Want Obamacare Repeal, and They Want It Now

http://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/demint-to-congress-repeal-obamacare-now

Image result for conservatives aca repeal

Conservatives rallying here are calling for their congressional brethren to keep the faith and quickly gut the 2010 health care law, dismissing concerns about lost health coverage and motivated voters at town halls.

Reported remarks by former Speaker John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, far away from the conservatives gathered at the convention hotel provided the latest cause for alarm. Boehner had said that repeal and replace was “not going to happen,” according to Politico.

“The last I checked, Boehner doesn’t have a vote anymore,” Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas told Roll Call just as a cacophony of barking came from nearby police canines.

“This is a test. It’s a test for Republicans in the executive and both Houses of Congress. Do we honor the promises we made? This election was a referendum on repealing Obamacare,” Cruz said in a brief interview. “I think failure is not an option.”

“We’ve got to keep that promise, and I believe we will,” Cruz said.

 Cruz, who has been among the loudest voices for rolling back as much of the 2010 law as possible, was one of few lawmakers appearing at CPAC during the February congressional recess, flying back from Texas for the occasion. He got a heroes welcome from the conservative activists and media assembled at the hotel just outside D.C.

Heritage Foundation President Jim DeMint, the former South Carolina Republican senator, called on activists attending the Conservative Political Action Conference to push their members of Congress to send to President Donald Trump the same legislation that dismantled the law and was vetoed by President Barack Obama with all due haste.

“We must and we can repeal Obamacare now,” DeMint said. “They should send that same bill to President Trump right now.”

DeMint called the idea that there needs to be a replacement on the front end, “absolutely ludicrous.”