A Billion Dollars Won’t Make You Happy, but This Will

https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/bill-gates-a-billion-dollars-wont-make-you-happy-but-this-will.html?cid=nl029week09day26_3&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Inc%20Must%20Reads&position=1&partner=newsletter&campaign_date=26022019

Gates just opened up about his happiness and what he believes holds many people back from peace of mind.

Yesterday, on his seventh Reddit AMA (that’s “Ask Me Anything,” for the uninitiated), Bill Gates took on a simple but profound question: “Are you happy?” You might think the answer is obvious. The man is a billionaire, after all. Why wouldn’t a phenomenally rich guy like Gates be happy?

And indeed, the Microsoft founder answered with a resounding, “Yes!”

But even as Gates celebrated his own contentment, he also made a point of explaining that it isn’t his billions that make him happy. Instead, it’s something much simpler that, unfortunately, is increasingly out of reach for many Americans.

Gates and science agree: Not worrying about money makes you happier

When another Reddit user asked Gates, “Do you think being a billionaire has made you a happier person than if you were just a middle class person?” he offered a forthright “Yes.”

But it isn’t the trampoline room in his house or the fact he frequently flies via private jet that makes the difference. Instead, it’s the freedom to not stress about money. “I don’t have to think about health costs or college costs. Being free from worry about financial things is a real blessing. Of course, you don’t need a billion to get to that point,” he explains.

Gates reads a lot of research so he’s no doubt aware that science is on his side on this point. Study after study shows that making more will increase your happiness about up to the point where you can stop worrying about covering essentials and absorb the shocks and setbacks life inevitably throws your way. After that, having strong relationships and more time are greater predictors of well being.

The trouble with Gates’s happiness advice

So far, Gates’s thoughts on money and happiness seem sensible and straightforward. But there’s one big complication when it comes to the relationship between finances and well being. As Gates acknowledges, getting to that magic point where you can stop worrying about money and cover basics like college and health care is becoming harder and harder for most Americans.

“We do need to reduce the cost growth in these areas so they are accessible to everyone,” he adds in his answer.

Later, he elaborates on the problem of health care costs in America. When a Redditor asks, “Is there something that is incredibly important in your opinion that hasn’t garnered as much interest generally as it should have?” he replies: “In the US I would say getting bipartisan consensus on how to reduce health care costs is a critical issue that doesn’t get enough focus.”

The numbers (as usual) bear him out. The average cost of health insurance, adjusted for inflation, has increased ninefold since the 1960s. Total spending on health care rose from $74.6 billion in 1970 to $3.5 trillion in 2017. Meanwhile, the cost of an undergraduate degree at a public school rose 213 percent just from the late ’80s.

These statistics put a grim spin on Gates’s answer. Sure, you don’t need a billion dollars to be happy. You don’t even need a million dollars. (And no, don’t write me enraged tweets–no one, including Gates, who also writes about his joy in his kids, is saying money is everything when it comes to happiness.) But it is super helpful not to worry that, if your child gets sick, you won’t be able to afford her medicine. And that sadly, is too high a bar for many Americans.

What’s to be done about this? Unfortunately, this isn’t one of those columns where I can offer you an easy takeaway, except maybe to call your congresspeople and express outrage about the situation. Because Gates and a ton of research are right: In America, it’s getting a lot harder to reach the point where money isn’t a drag on happiness.

 

CEOs shouldn’t pick their replacements

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/hospital-management-administration/viewpoint-ceos-shouldn-t-pick-their-replacements.html?origin=ceo&utm_source=ceoe

Image result for ceo succession

While CEOs may be intimately familiar with their companies, their opinion should take a backseat to the organization’s board of directors, according to Stanford (Calif.) University business school professor David Larcker, PhD, and researcher Brian Tayan.

In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, the authors note that while it was once general practice for CEOs to pick their successors, changes to corporate governance in recent years have shifted the balance of power to a company’s “independent, professional, outside directors.”

The authors claim that allowing a company’s CEO outsize influence on the hiring of their successor is a mistake because the CEO may not have the right perspective on evaluating candidates and may intentionally or unintentionally control the information presented to the board about candidates, shaping the board’s decision about those individuals.

“At the end of a long career, many CEOs are concerned about their legacy. This can bias them toward favoring candidates who will guide the company in the same direction — and in the same manner — that they themselves led it,” they write.

Instead, the authors argue that a company’s board should be responsible for the final hiring decision and use the CEO’s input to help come to that conclusion.

“Hiring the CEO is a fiduciary duty. The board owes it to the shareholders … to get it right. A subcommittee of independent directors with previous experience in succession at other companies should manage the process, with an open invitation to all board members to participate. If the board doesn’t have depth of experience in place, it can bring in an outside adviser to help,” they write.

To access the full report, click here.

 

Tenet’s patient volumes face sustained pressure

https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/tenets-patient-volumes-face-sustained-pressure/549171/

Image result for headwinds

Dive Brief:

  • Tenet Health reported Monday patient volumes continue to slide for both inpatient and outpatient units for the fourth quarter and full-year. Looking at volumes on a same facility basis, which accounts for the sale of facilities, total admissions declined nearly 3% in the fourth quarter compared to 2017 and fell nearly 2% in 2018 compared to 2017. Still, the hospital operator beat analyst expectations for its fourth quarter revenue and earnings per share.
  • Hospital segment fourth quarter revenue fell nearly 8% to $3.8 billion from 2017 due to hospital sales last year and the California Provider Fee program. The ambulatory segment reported a modest increase in revenue to $554 million. And client losses in the Conifer RCM segment, which Tenet is looking to sell, caused revenue to dip nearly 6% compared with the fourth quarter in 2017.
  • Overall, for the full year, revenue declined nearly 5% from 2017, while net income improved to $111 million compared to a net loss of $704 million in 2017

Dive Insight:

Hospitals throughout the country continue to face a number of headwinds affecting patient volumes, particularly inpatient admissions. But Tenet reported volume declines for nearly every patient measure, including outpatient visits. 

Tenet’s competitor CHS also reported a drop in total admissions for the year, although CHS’ was much steeper.

While analysts with Jefferies said the softening of patient volumes for Tenet was of concern, the company also delivered strong payer-mix growth and increased hospital profit margins, which underscores “(management’s) progress in delivering cost efficiencies,” the investment bank’s analysts wrote in a note.

CEO Ronald Rittenmeyer told investors Tuesday the company is entering 2019 with a renewed sense of urgency around volume growth. Tenet’s chief operating officer will be tasked with improving organic growth at the system’s hospitals, he said.

Rittenmeyer also outlined the priorities for 2019, which include expanding its ambulatory business, adding new physicians and improving operations to win over patient loyalty. He added the company will look to develop its brand image by delivering the “same unified message” in advertising in its markets around the country.

Tenet disclosed it may have found a buyer or partner for its Conifer business, though executives could not offer any specifics. “We have recently entered into exclusivity with one of the parties that has been engaging with us. While there can be no assurance that this negotiation will result in a transaction we are very pleased with this progress,” Rittenmeyer said.

Tenet also released its guidance for 2019. It expects to generate revenue between $18 billion and $18.4 billion while its window for net income is expected to be between $15 million and $115 million.

Rittenmeyer called 2018 “a year of significant change for the company,” and pledged “additional progress in each of our business segments in 2019 in line with our plan to deliver long-term sustainable growth.”

 

 

 

DOCS GENERATE AN AVERAGE $2.4M A YEAR PER HOSPITAL

https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/finance/docs-generate-average-24m-year-hospital

Family physicians provide an excellent ROI, earning an average $241,000 as a starting salary but generating nine times that amount in hospital revenues.


KEY TAKEAWAYS

Invasive cardiologists were No. 2 on the list of money makers for hospitals, generating an average of $3.5 million, followed by neurosurgeons at $3.4 million, and orthopedic surgeons at $3.3 million.

The average net revenue generated by all physicians in the survey, $2,378,727, is up 52% from 2016.

The increase in net revenues was attributed to more outpatient visits, higher costs per hospital stay, and sicker patients as the population ages.

Physicians each generate an average of nearly $2.4 million in revenues annually for their hospitals, a new survey finds.

Cardiovascular surgeons, on average, generated $3.7 million for their hospitals, topping the list of money makers among the 18 specialties examined in the survey of hospital chief financial officers, which was conducted by Dallas-based physician recruiters Merritt Hawkins.

The money includes net inpatient and outpatient revenue derived from patient hospital admissions, tests, treatments, prescriptions, and procedures performed or ordered by physicians.

“The value of physician care is not only related to the quality of patient outcomes,” said Travis Singleton, Merritt Hawkins’ executive vice president.

“Physicians continue to drive the financial health and viability of hospitals, even in a healthcare system that is evolving towards value-based payments,” Singleton said.

Invasive cardiologists were No. 2 on the list of money makers for hospitals, generating an average of $3.5 million, followed by neurosurgeons at $3.4 million, and orthopedic surgeons at $3.3 million.

Primary care physicians pulled their weight too, according to the survey.  Family physicians generate an average of $2.1 million in net revenue, while general internists generate an average of almost $2.7 million.

The average net revenue generated by all physicians in the survey, $2,378,727, is up 52% from 2016, the last year Merritt Hawkins conducted the survey.

Average revenue generated by each of the 18 medical specialties included in the survey increased compared to 2016, in most cases significantly.

Even though inpatient stays declined or flat-lined in recent years, Singleton attributed the increase in net revenues to more outpatient visits, which have more than tripled since 1975,   higher costs per hospital stay, and sicker patients as the population ages.

“Demographics are our destiny,” Singleton said. “New delivery models that promote prevention, population health and fee-for-value are laudable innovations but they don’t change the basic facts.  People get older and require more medical care, with much of it ordered by or directly provided by physicians.”

While primary care physicians are not the top revenue generators for their hospitals, Singleton says they represent an excellent return on investment.

Family physicians average $241,000 as a starting salary, according to Merritt Hawkins’ data, but they generate nine times that amount in hospital revenues. Orthopedic surgeons, with an average starting salary of $533,000, generate six times that amount for their hospitals.

“PHYSICIANS CONTINUE TO DRIVE THE FINANCIAL HEALTH AND VIABILITY OF HOSPITALS, EVEN IN A HEALTHCARE SYSTEM THAT IS EVOLVING TOWARDS VALUE-BASED PAYMENTS.”