ACHE report: High healthcare CEO turnover rates now the norm

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/healthcare/ache-reports-continued-high-turnover-among-healthcare-ceos?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal&mrkid=959610&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiT0RGaE9USTFOR1F4T0dGbSIsInQiOiJsMHdQVHhVK1pcL0c4S0JpV21SZXJxaVFNU3M5TWFHWWRJSU1XWnp1Szl0VkJlT29xdkFzNWJqdE9YMURvUTJYVjl4NVB3RHlBcVpZMEJVUEVVMVZNakFnUUVPNWV4SzU5amdCeGNWTURDdllzYzhrQWwxdFJHdHlxMDZidnlYN3MifQ%3D%3D

Boardroom

The high healthcare CEO turnover rates seen over the past several years continued in 2016, according to the American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE).

The turnover rate was 18% for healthcare CEOs in 2016, down from the record high of 20% in 2013, ACHE announced. Still, this level was approximately equivalent to those seen over the past few years, which the association notes are among the highest in the past 20 years.

Structural changes in the industry appear to be among the main drivers of this trend, according to ACHE President and CEO Deborah J. Bowen. “The ongoing consolidation of healthcare organizations, continuing movement toward new models of care and retiring leaders from the baby boomer era,” she said in the announcement, are likely influences behind the high turnover rates.

These results align with other recent reports of unprecedented turnover throughout hospitals, which are on pace to turn over half their overall staff every five years, according to previous reporting byFierceHealthcare. High turnover rates in the C-suite present organizations with problems beyond recruitment and retention, however, since changes to top leadership can have a ripple effect throughout the leadership pipeline.

RELATED: Hospitals nationwide face unprecedented turnover, report says

With the multiyear trend continuing unabated, Bowen urges healthcare organizations to ensure they have developed succession plans and that they keep them up to date. “Succession planning should include not only naming and preparing immediate successors to C-suite positions, but more broadly an emphasis on developing the pipeline of future leaders,” she said.

ACHE found the highest rate of turnover in the District of Columbia, which came in at a whopping 67%. That result appears to be an outlier, as the second- and third-highest states of New Hampshire and Washington came in at 38% and 30%, respectively. All other states showed adjusted turnover percentages under 30. Alaska, North Dakota and Delaware showed the most stable trends, all three in single digits.

65 financial benchmarks for hospital executives

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/65-financial-benchmarks-for-hospital-executives-022117.html

Image result for financial benchmarks

Hospitals leaders across the nation use benchmarking as a way to determine the areas of their business that need improvement. The continuous process of benchmarking allows hospital executives to see how their organizations stack up against local and regional competitors as well as national leaders.

Here are 65 benchmarks related to one of the most important day-to-day areas hospital executives oversee — finance.

Key ratios
Source: Moody’s Investors Service, “U.S. Not-for-Profit Hospital 2015 Medians” report, September 2016.

The medians are based on an analysis of audited 2015 financial statements for 340 freestanding hospitals, single-state health systems and multi-state health systems, representing 81 percent of all Moody’s-rated healthcare entities. Children’s hospitals, hospitals for which five years of data are not available and certain specialty hospitals were not eligible for inclusion in the medians.

 

Anatomy of a post-acute care partnership

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/hospital-transactions-and-valuation/anatomy-of-a-post-acute-care-partnership-a-guide-to-finding-the-right-partner-and-forming-a-successful-joint-venture.html

Image result for post acute partnership

In communities across America — large and small — local hospitals serve a purpose that goes beyond being a center for on-demand emergency care. Our nation’s healthcare facilities have a legacy and responsibility as leaders and guardians for the health of individuals in the communities they serve.

As such, it is imperative that local hospitals continue to take the lead in community patient care and avoid being relegated to the position of bystander through managed care or government mandate.

In addition to providing quality patient care, hospitals also have a responsibility to remain financially healthy. And in today’s environment of uncertain and changing regulation, government-mandated penalties, and shifting payment models, hospital leaders are being reminded that financial health and quality patient outcomes go hand-in-hand.

Balancing these two responsibilities is an increasingly tough task. Avoidable readmissions are a cost no organization can afford to ignore, and many of America’s best healthcare facilities are struggling to find an effective solution to their patients’ post-acute needs.

For many hospitals and health systems seeking an answer, partnering with an experienced and proven post-acute care provider has been the solution.

In a value-based world, the ability to manage the total cost of care — from admittance, through acute care, to the post-acute environment — is a strategic advantage for sustaining organizational health and getting patients the right care at the right time, obtaining efficient outcome and attracting and retaining the best and brightest of professional caregivers.

But how do executives and hospital leaders find the right partner, and how can they determine competence and compatibility for their needs?

William F. “Bud” Barrow II, the recently retired president and CEO of Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center in Lafayette, La., developed what he calls his “Four-Way Test” for evaluating prospective  post-acute care partners.

“There are many players in the sub-acute space, and a lot of them are not in it for the right reasons,” Mr. Barrow says. “There are many small companies formed not to advance care AND make a profit, but to make a profit and flip the company for even more profit.”

“It’s important to partner with a large capital healthcare provider that has demonstrated long-term commitment to patients, to profitability and to doing the right thing at the right time — every time,” adds Mr. Barrow.

The four “C’s” in Mr. Barrow’s test include:

  • Character: Examine the cultural history of the organization and the character of key individuals.
  • Competence: Can they demonstrate long-term, systemic success and expertise in their field?
  • Capital: Is there a financial model in place that suggests sustainability in a profitable way?
  • Creativity: Does the organization demonstrate nimbleness and the ability to rethink and adjust on-the-go based on the uncertainties inherent in healthcare reimbursement and the overall healthcare landscape?

Once a suitable partner is found, Mr. Barrow further identifies three “must-haves” for forming a successful and sustainable joint venture.

  • Organization-wide support

    Support must come from all areas of the organization. Everyone — from board members to medical staff — must understand and support the goal of the enterprise and fully endorse what is a time-consuming process and significant investment.

  • A critical eye

    You must be willing and able to employ a critical eye when viewing your own organization and make a clear and unbiased assessment of what you do well versus what you wish you did well. “Most people are unable to make this critical internal evaluation,” Barrow says. “As a result, they continue to try and do things on their own, often times leading to long-term failure.”

  • Assemble the right team

    The right people must be in place to evaluate various alternatives and possible solutions as you go through the process and fill in the deficit gaps determined in the critical assessment.

Poor evaluation of organizational readiness, Mr. Barrow adds, is one of the most common pitfalls — particularly when it comes to the vital mutual commitment from administration and medical staff.

“There has to be alignment between the business of medicine and the practice of medicine — it’s paramount,” he says. “The prevailing attitude must be that failure is not an option. This is not something where you put your toe in the water, see what happens, and then back out the first time you hit a bump in the road. Everyone must be on board with an all-in focus on clinical networks, evidenced-based best practices, shared accountability and a singular focus on best patient outcomes.”

Nearly two decades ago, LHC Group pioneered a model of post-acute care partnership that has since earned a reputation for enhancing patient outcomes and financial performance in cities and towns across the country. Since then, the company has pursued a mission to build stronger healthcare delivery systems in the communities it serves.

Quality outcomes — for patients and partners — are the driving force behind everything LHC Group does. Quality metrics are now the preferred standard for evaluating post-acute providers, and with more than 60 percent of its home health locations named among the 2016 HomeCare Elite®, and with the highest CMS Star Ratings compared to home health national averages, LHC Group continues to enhance its reputation as one of the top quality home health providers in the country.

“I can think of no other post-acute provider that demonstrates all of the ‘Four C’s’ at the level of LHC Group,” says Mr. Barrow, who formed his first joint-venture partnership with the company in 2007. “Their overwhelming commitment to character, competence and creativity has allowed them to develop the strong capital to deliver on what they promise.”

LHC Group’s record of designing and growing successful post-acute care partnerships throughout the country is the result of years of dedication, tireless work and experience. Their team is accustomed to rising to the challenge of succeeding in the constantly shifting landscape that is the healthcare industry, and they know how to provide value for partners and improved outcomes for their patients.

The conclusion is clear: Choose the right partner. The health of your community and your organization is at stake.

12 recent hospital transactions and partnerships

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/hospital-transactions-and-valuation/12-recent-hospital-transactions-and-partnerships-51517.html

Image result for hospital m&a

The following healthcare mergers, acquisitions and general partnerships took place or were announced the week of May 15.

1. Erlanger in talks to acquire or affiliate with 25-bed Murphy Medical Center
Erlanger Health System, a five-hospital system in Chattanooga, Tenn., is in talks to partner with 25-bed Murphy (N.C.) Medical Center.

2. 3rd hospital joins Beth Israel Deaconess, Lahey Health merger
Newburyport, Mass.-based Anna Jaques Hospital is the third health system to join the proposed merger between Boston-based Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Burlington, Mass.-based Lahey Health, bringing the total number of health systems interested in merging up to five.

3. Quorum to divest 2 hospitals in Tennessee
Brentwood, Tenn.-based Quorum Health Corp., signed a definitive agreement May 15 to sell two hospitals in Tennessee.

4. Steward Health Care to acquire IASIS Healthcare
Boston-based Steward Health Care signed a definitive agreement to acquire Franklin, Tenn.-based IASIS Healthcare.

5. Mount Auburn joins Beth Israel Deaconess, Lahey merger: 3 things to know
Cambridge, Mass.-based Mount Auburn Hospital will join a proposed merger between Boston-based Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Burlington, Mass.-based Lahey Health.

6. Quorum Health seeks to sell 6 more hospitals
Brentwood, Tenn.-based Quorum Health, the 35-hospital spinoff of Franklin, Tenn.-based Community Health Systems, plans to sell six hospitals to restructure its portfolio to improve financial performance.

7. Accumen partners with SSM Health hospital to improve quality of care, patient outcomes
SSM Health Saint Louis University Hospital partnered with Accumen on a multiyear agreement to implement a comprehensive patient blood management program.

8. Geisinger Health System, Jersey Shore Hospital sign integration agreement
Danville, Pa.-based Geisinger Health System and 25-bed Jersey Shore (Pa.) Hospital and Foundation signed an agreement integrating Jersey Shore’s facilities into Geisinger.

9. HealthEast, Fairview Health Services receive final OK to merge
The respective boards of directors of HealthEast, a four-hospital system in St. Paul, Minn., and Fairview Health Services, a seven-hospital system in Minneapolis, approved the organizations’ plans to merge, effective June 1. The merger will create one of the largest hospital networks in Minnesota.

10. Hackensack Meridian, St. Joseph’s Healthcare to partner on home health, hospice services
Hackensack Meridian Health, a 13-hospital system in Edison, N.J., and Paterson, N.J.-based St. Joseph’s Healthcare revealed plans to form a jointly owned home health services agency and a hospice services agency.

11. Yale New Haven, Day Kimball Healthcare partner to improve clinical care
Yale New Haven (Conn.) Health System and Putnam, Conn.-based Day Kimball Healthcare inked an agreement to become community partners and enhance the breadth of clinical care services available at Day Kimball.

12. Wake Forest Baptist partners with Northern Hospital of Surry County on cardiac rehabilitation care
Winston-Salem, N.C.-based Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center and Mount Airy, N.C.-based Northern Hospital of Surry County will partner to provide residents with better access to cardiac rehabilitation services.

8 hospitals with strong finances

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/8-hospitals-with-strong-finances-051817.html

Here are eight hospitals and health systems with strong operational metrics and solid financial positions according to recent reports from Fitch Ratings, Moody’s Investors Service and S&P Global Ratings.

1. Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago has an “AA-” rating and stable outlook with S&P. The credit rating agency believes the hospital will maintain its business position, improved balance sheet and solid cash flow margins.

2. Coral Gables-based Baptist Health South Florida has an “AA-” rating and stable outlook with S&P. The system maintained key balance sheet metrics and generated better-than-projected financial results in fiscal year 2016, according to S&P.

3. Dallas-based Baylor Scott & White Health has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The health system has strong cash flow margins and a favorable business position as the largest nonprofit health system in Texas, according to Moody’s.

4. Christiana Care Health Services has an “Aa2” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The Wilmington, Del.-based system has solid liquidity and a history of above average financial performance, according to Moody’s.

5. Kaiser Permanente has an “AA-” rating and stable outlook with S&P. The Oakland, Calif.-based system has a strong enterprise profile with a favorable integrated business model, according to S&P.

6. Albuquerque, N.M.-based Presbyterian Health Services has an “AA” rating and stable outlook with S&P. The system has a solid financial profile and a modest debt load, according to S&P.

7. Madison-based University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The system has strong balance sheet resources and established clinical and academic market positions, according to Moody’s.

8. WellSpan Health has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The York, Pa.-based system has a strong and broadening market position and a track record of healthy financial performance, according to Moody’s.

HHS delays 340B drug program regulations: 4 things to know

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/hhs-delays-340b-drug-program-regulations-4-things-to-know.html

Image result for 340b drug pricing program

HHS on Thursday delayed a regulation preventing drug companies from overcharging hospitals under the 340B drug discount program.

Here are four things to know.

1. The 340B drug pricing program, enacted in 1992, ensures hospitals treating a large proportion of low-income patients can buy drugs from manufacturers at a discount of 20 to 50 percent, according to the report. About one-third of U.S. hospitals — or 2,000 — participate in the program, purchasing about $12 billion in discounted drugs in 2015, reports The Washington Post.

2. In 2010, Congress instructed HHS to implement program regulations to set price ceilings fordrugs and establish civil monetary penalties on manufacturers that “knowingly and intentionally overcharge 340B covered entities,” according to a statement from HHS. The agency in January issued a final rule for the regulations to take effect March 6.

3. After President Donald Trump initiated a hiring freeze on all federal agencies in early March, HHS pushed back the rule until May 22. The agency also requested comments over a proposal to further delay implementation of the regulations until October. After reviewing the comments, HHS decided to officially push back the regulations to take effect Oct. 1.

4. 340B Health, a lobby group representing hospitals and health systems in the 340B program, shared an emailed statement with Becker’s, saying it was “disappointed with HHS’ decision to further delay … a long-overdue regulation to police the pharmaceutical industry.”

The health system CEO’s affiliation playbook — 5 thoughts from a CEO who has executed 50+ agreements

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/hospital-management-administration/michael-dowling-the-health-system-ceo-s-affiliation-playbook-5-thoughts-from-a-ceo-who-has-executed-50-agreements.html

Image result for compatibility

As hospitals and health systems seek ways to fortify their organizational strategies amid the transition to value-based care, the drive to forge new partnerships will continue. Although analysts forecast the consolidation trend will carry on, strategic organizations are increasingly realizing the value of establishing other relationships, such as affiliations and joint ventures.

The local forces at play in a given region are a significant determinant of an organization’s need to merge with, acquire or be acquired by another hospital or health system. And while transactional deals will always be necessary, ongoing financial pressures stemming from the transition to value-based reimbursement and the overall emphasis on population health management have prompted health care leaders to partner with their likeminded peers to deliver better, more cost-effective care.

The key is figuring out where your organization can do a better job working with a partner than alone, and more importantly, who to collaborate with.

In some cases, this has led to the union of unlikely bedfellows — organizations that were formerly competitors are, in some cases, coming together to pursue a joint goal. In other cases, hospitals and health systems may benefit from establishing partnerships with pharmaceutical companies, medical device makers, retail clinics or even non-healthcare entities. For example, Northwell Health has worked with The Ritz-Carlton and Tiffany & Co. as part of our efforts to improve the patient experience and our operational processes.

As with all relationships, the most positive and high functioning are symbiotic; both partners must satisfy and complement the other. They must also — at the most basic level — get along. Here are five more ideas on successful partnerships, affiliations and joint ventures.

1. Know what you need and what you can offer. Partnerships create opportunities to expand into new markets and broaden your reach. But when it comes to selecting a partner, it’s important to clarify what it is they have that you want — and visa versa.

For example, we have a strategic affiliation with Cold Spring Harbor (N.Y.) Laboratory, a premier cancer research facility on Long Island. They have an international reputation, with  several Nobel laureates in their ranks. We needed to strengthen our cancer research, and they needed a clinical partner that would allow them to connect with patients. We entered into a long-term partnership in 2015. Even though we’re very different organizations, we both benefit from the relationship. 

2. Don’t overemphasize the short-term benefits. Focus as much on the short-term benefits of a partnership or affiliation as you do on your goals for five or 10 years down the line. Most relationships hit a rough patch in the beginning, but if you give up on the partnership because your troubles are making you doubt the viability of your short-term goals, you’re being too impetuous. In other words, success takes time. Take steps to solve short-term complications, but hang in there and try to make it work.

3. Be open to new partners. Keep an open mind when it comes to discussing new relationships with different partners — even those that don’t seem to make much sense in the beginning. The rapid pace of change in healthcare and our collective pursuit of innovation oblige us to at least listen to others’ ideas and consider new possibilities. 

4. Don’t get stuck in an abusive relationship. New partners might hit a rough patch or need to adjust their communication style to meet one another’s needs, but it is also important to know when it’s better to cut your losses and call it quits. If a relationship becomes abusive or dysfunctional and there is no longer any benefit for being involved, then it’s time to re-evaluate the situation.

5. Determine whether you’re truly compatible with a potential partner. If your organization is looking for a long-term partner — not just a fling — the two entities must mesh culturally. When considering a potential partner, ask yourself if there is mutual respect on both sides. Do those who are in charge of communication and collaboration work well together? Is the relationship riddled with conflicts or is it smooth sailing? Keep in mind, however, that conflicts are not necessarily a symptom of an impending breakup. Sometimes the issue can be resolved by changing the people or metrics at hand.

Most importantly, there must be ongoing and open communication. Two partners can disagree, but in most cases they can work it out.

Steward Health Care to acquire IASIS Healthcare

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/hospital-transactions-and-valuation/steward-health-care-to-acquire-iasis-healthcare.html

Related image

Boston-based Steward Health Care has signed a definitive agreement to acquire Franklin, Tenn.-based IASIS Healthcare.

The Wall Street Journal reported the transaction is for $1.9 billion. Becker’s has reached out to Steward to verify the value of the deal and the article will be updated accordingly.

Under the deal, Steward will become the largest private for-profit hospital operator in the U.S. with 36 hospitals across 10 states, managed care operations in Arizona, Utah and Massachusetts and projected revenues of nearly $8 billion in 2018, the first year of consolidated operations. The transaction, which is subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions, is expected to close in the third calendar quarter of 2017, according to a news release on Steward’s website.

Currently, Steward operates 18 hospitals and directly employs more than 1,300 multispecialty physicians in facilities across Massachusetts, Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania. IASIS operates 17 hospitals and one behavioral health hospital across Utah, Arizona, Colorado, Texas, Arkansas and Louisiana.

The deal will transfer operations of IASIS Healthcare’s 18 hospitals, which encompass nearly 7,500 patient beds and approximately 38,000 employees — including more than 1,800 directly employed multispecialty physicians and several thousands aligned physicians — to Steward Health Care. Steward will also assume operations of IASIS’ 140 outpatient facilities across Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Louisiana, Texas and Utah, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Steward Health Care is backed by private-equity firm Ceberus Capital Management LP and real estate investment trust Medical Properties Trust. Under the deal, Medical Properties Trust has agreed to acquire the interests of substantially all of IASIS’ hospital real estate subject to long-term leases and loans with Steward, according to the news release from Steward. The terms of the agreement specify that cash proceeds paid by MPT and other financing sources will be used to retire IASIS’ senior secured term loans and unsecured notes. Remaining cash proceeds will be paid to IASIS equity holders, including its majority stockholder, TPG Capital.

This deal marks the latest in a series of acquisitions for Steward, which in May closed a deal to acquire eight hospitals from Franklin, Tenn.-based Community Health Systems.

Physician Age Linked to Clinically Significant Patient Mortality Risk

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/physician-leaders/physician-age-linked-clinically-significant-patient-mortality-risk?spMailingID=11059722&spUserID=MTY3ODg4NTg1MzQ4S0&spJobID=1161579213&spReportId=MTE2MTU3OTIxMwS2#

Image result for hospital mortality rates

The difference in mortality rates translates into one additional patient death for every 77 patients treated by physicians 60 and older, compared with those treated by doctors 40 and younger.

Patients treated by older hospitalists are somewhat more likely to die within a month of admission than patients treated by younger physicians, suggests research published this week in the BJM.

Researchers at Harvard note that the difference in mortality rates was modest yet clinically significant—10.8% among patients treated by physicians 40 and younger, compared with 12.1% among those treated by physicians 60 and older.

That translates into one additional patient death for every 77 patients treated by physicians 60 and older, compared with those treated by doctors 40 and younger.

Study lead author Anupam B. Jena, MD, a hospitalist, and associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, spoke with HealthLeaders about the findings. The following is a lightly edited transcript.

Broward Health fires another auditor

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/broward-health-fires-another-auditor.html

Image result for financial statement disclosures

Fort Lauderdale, Fla.-based Broward Health will terminate a contract with its outside CPA at the end of this month after a 29-year working relationship. The fired audit director sees the break-up as the health system’s attempt to curb independent examination of the public system, according to the Sun Sentinel.

Joel Mutnick, audit director for Plantation, Fla.-based Fiske & Co., abstained from a vote to approve a draft of the firm’s audit since the documentation did not disclose several key events, including the suicide of late CEO Nabil El Sanadi, MD, in January 2016, the governor’s suspension of two board members and the lawsuit filed against the board by Pauline Grant, interim CEO who was fired in December 2016.

The audit covered the year ending June 30, 2016. Mr. Mutnick served on the committee of Broward board members and executives that supervised a third-party annual audit of the five-hospital system.

“They didn’t like not having control of me,” Mr. Mutnick told the Sun Sentinel. “Clearly they didn’t like the idea of me turning down the financial statements because of their inadequate disclosure. I don’t think they liked an outside auditor telling them or questioning the financial statement results.”

The chairman of Broward Health’s audit committee, Chris Ure, refused accounts that Mr. Mutnick’s departure involved his voting record or his independence. Mr. Ure said the committee is operating under new bylaws that impose term limits on members to strengthen independence and fresh perspectives, according to the Sun Sentinel. Under those new bylaws, Mr. Ure said outside members will no longer be paid.

Last September, Broward Health cut ties with KPMG after the accounting firm refused a contract addendum that would have extensively restricted its inquiry powers into Broward’s activities. Broward officials said they added the addendum over concerns KPMG would be unable to certify the system’s financial statements by the end of the year, due to the length of KPMG’s possible investigation into corruption allegations against the system.