There’s a simple fix for Obamacare’s current woes: the public option

http://www.vox.com/2016/8/18/12520820/public-option-health-care-obamacare

THE REALITY IS THAT COMPETITION AMONG PRIVATE INSURERS HAS NEVER LIVED UP TO THE RHETORIC PUT FORTH BY THE INDUSTRY OR FREE MARKET FUNDAMENTALISTS

This week, Aetna announced it would stop selling insurance plans in all but four Obamacare exchanges, the state-run markets set up under the 2010 Affordable Care Act. Aetna, which now covers more than 800,000 people in 15 exchanges, said it had been hemorrhaging money on the plans. (A fight with the government over an acquisition of the insurance company Humana may have played a role, too.)

Aetna’s exit, following similar departures by UnitedHealth and Humana, means that a growing number of US counties — 20 to 25 percent, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation — now have only a single private insurer offering coverage on the exchanges, a development that essentially eliminates consumer choice. One county in Arizona now has no insurers. Even before Aetna’s decision, more than half of state exchanges had four or fewer insurers, with DC, Vermont, Connecticut, and Rhode Island having only two.

It’s enough to make a frazzled health care consumer in one of those feeble markets wish there were another option — perhaps even (dare one say it?) a public option. Does the phrase ring a bell? That’s the health care policy that some policymakers pushed to include in the 2010 law.

Five Health Issues Presidential Candidates Aren’t Talking About — But Should Be

http://khn.org/news/five-health-issues-presidential-candidates-arent-talking-about-but-should-be/

5 things_770

References to the Affordable Care Act — sometimes called Obamacare — have been a regular feature of the current presidential campaign season.

For months, Republican candidates have pledged to repeal it, while Democrat Hillary Clinton wants to build on it and Democrat Bernie Sanders wants to replace it with a government-funded “Medicare for All” program.

But much of the policy discussion stops there. Yet the nation in the next few years faces many important decisions about health care — most of which have little to do with the controversial federal health law. Here are five issues candidates should be discussing, but largely are not:

In Nod to Sanders, Clinton Offers New Health Care Proposals

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/07/09/us/ap-us-dem-2016-clinton-health-care.html?utm_campaign=CHL%3A+Daily+Edition&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=31499894&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_YVFuV6N-xd__Ij8NeuODTC1G45rv_nDpH-lD8mfWo9RVqCpIS4TlEHahl3hu9_slRYFpZJvUCv1oIF7xCOxVI5gIXnA&_hsmi=31499894&_r=0

Medicare3

Clinton’s campaign says the proposal is part of her plan to provide universal health care coverage in the United States. The presumptive Democratic presidential nominee also is reaffirming her support for a public-option insurance plan and for expanding Medicare by letting people age 55 year and older opt in.

2016 Presidential candidates: Where they stand on healthcare

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/slideshow/2016-candidates-where-they-stand-healthcare?mkt_tok=3RkMMJWWfF9wsRonuqTNd%2B%2FhmjTEU5z16ukvX6%2B%2Fh4kz2EFye%2BLIHETpodcMTcBqMrzYDBceEJhqyQJxPr3MLtINwNlqRhPrCg%3D%3D