The Medicaid Agency of the Future: What capabilities and leadership will it need?

https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare-systems-and-services/our-insights/the-medicaid-agency-of-the-future–what-capabilities-and-leadership-will-it-need?cid=other-eml-alt-mip-mck-oth-1802&hlkid=f3e96b6a484442438bbdc44b7744e1e9&hctky=9502524&hdpid=c2f3cd34-a3e9-46d4-bc69-f4a9cc3b0ac9

Image result for The Medicaid Agency of the Future: What capabilities and leadership will it need?

Medicaid’s scale and complexity are unprecedented. State Medicaid leaders will need to innovate if they are to develop the capabilities that will enable them to steer their agencies into the future.

Since its inception in 1965, Medicaid has grown to have an expanded role in state governance—it is usually the first- or second-largest state program. Nationwide, Medicaid agencies manage about $574 billion in annual spending.1In an average-sized state, Medicaid directors are the single largest purchaser in the health sector, overseeing about $10 billion each year in payments to providers (roughly 17% of the state’s economy).2The agencies typically serve nearly one-quarter of their state’s population3and, in our experience, procure the largest IT infrastructure projects in state government.

Recently, demands on state Medicaid agencies have grown. Increasingly, Medicaid agencies are playing a multi-part role, fulfilling their traditional responsibilities (i.e., payer-purchaser, operator) and taking on new ones (i.e., market shaper and innovator). And while they are doing this, the agencies must address an array of competing priorities, as well as uncertainty about future funding levels. To perform well in these new roles, the agencies must develop new, next-generation capabilities so they can address the needs of their state’s citizens—even those not enrolled in Medicaid.

We believe the roles played by state Medicaid agencies will continue to evolve, but the agencies—in conjunction with the state government leaders they work with—can choose their strategic path forward (primarily, the extent to which they want to be market shapers). Those that pursue this path aggressively will be the first of their peers to evolve into a Medicaid Agency of the Future.

As we discuss below, all state Medicaid agencies will need to strengthen their capabilities if they are to meet the demands of the future—an issue that has important implications not only for the agencies themselves but also for state government leaders, managed care organizations (MCOs), local providers, and others. However, agencies focused on becoming market shapers will need to double down on capability building if they want to succeed on their chosen path.4

Trends shaping Medicaid

A number of trends are shaping what Medicaid agencies need to do to prioritize the direction of their efforts.

Spending growth is putting pressure on state budgets. Medicaid is putting continued cost pressure on state budgets. Program spending (including federal and state funding) increased from 20.5% of state budgets in 2008 to 29.0% in 2016.5The continued increase in Medicaid spending could have funding implications for other state programs, such as elementary and higher education, public assistance, and transportation. The cost pressures resulting from Medicaid spending are expected to continue regardless of what, if any, changes are made at the federal level.

Medicaid programs can lead to payment inno­vation. As program costs have risen, Medicaid directors have increasingly tried to slow the medical cost trend. One lever available to them is transitioning from fee-for-service reimbursement to payment innovations that include meaningful levels of provider risk-sharing. New payment models that reward providers for delivering high-quality care at lower cost have been shown to improve care quality and reduce costs by 5% to 10% when rolled out across the full spending base.6In several states, Medicaid programs have led multi-payer efforts to achieve payment inno­vation across the state.7

Medicaid plays an important role as both a payer and a convener. In the aggregate, Medicaid is the country’s largest payer in terms of covered lives and, in many states, is the largest purchaser of healthcare ser­vices.8Thus, Medicaid agencies are uniquely positioned to facilitate change. In addition, the agencies can often bring together multiple stakeholders to help align on improvements that would affect not only Medicaid but also the entire healthcare market.

Recognition of Medicaid members as consumers is increasing. Some Medicaid agencies are beginning to approach Medicaid members as consumers. For example, they are offering members technological tools, such as apps and patient portals, that empower greater decision making (e.g., about choice of provider, care setting, or treatment). If well utilized, these tools can improve member experience and encourage higher-value care.

Awareness of social determinants is rising. Increasingly, states are turning their attention to non-health factors, such as housing, education, and transportation, that influence Medicaid members’ ability to maintain their health and adhere to treatment. Some programs are beginning to address these determinants head on (e.g., by providing housing or transportation vouchers). Experimentation in special needs care is underway. Integrated models typically deliver better quality and cost outcomes. For example, integrated behavioral and physical healthcare approaches for high-needs patients have been shown to reduce emergency department and inpatient visit spending by 10% to 25%.9The successes to date are paving the way for further innovation in other special needs areas.

Analytics is playing an increasing role. Advanced analytics and big data can help Medicaid and other public health officials better understand state needs, design programs, and target interventions to maximize the impact of limited funds. The emergence of new national data-sets, such as the Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System (T-MSIS, which includes states’ comprehensive claims and enrollment data) and CMS’ online database of state waivers and state plan amendments, may enable states to draw on experiences elsewhere when designing new programs.10

In short, state Medicaid agencies are facing an increasingly complex and difficult set of challenges at a time when the expectations of multiple stakeholders—members, families, and advocates; providers and MCOs; the federal government, state leaders, and other state agencies—are rising. If Medicaid agencies are to address these challenges successfully, the role they play must evolve.

Introducing the Medicaid Agency of the Future

In the future, some state Medicaid agencies may opt to follow the path set by previous state leaders. In other cases, they may want to respond to the trends just discussed by taking the lead in transforming healthcare delivery in their programs and their states. These Agencies of the Future will have to be able to chart a strong strategic direction and execute the activities that follow both efficiently and effectively. To accomplish those goals, they will need to use a data-driven approach to program management, build new capabilities, and improve their organizational health (Exhibit 1).

Agencies that opt to follow a more traditional path would also benefit from strengthening their operational performance and organi­zational health, but the level of improvement needed is lower for them than for the Agencies of the Future. Both sets of agencies, however, will want to prioritize their strategic investments once they have chosen their path forward.

 

Artificial Intelligence In Healthcare Will Make Decisions For Doctors

https://techdigg.com/2017/03/25/artificial-intelligence-in-healthcare-will-make-decisions-for-doctors/

artificial intelligence

Artificial intelligence could soon make tough medical choices

Patients are often willing to put themselves in the hands of healthcare professionals when they need to see a doctor, and this includes accepting the technological devices that help physicians. But, artificial intelligence making vital decisions for doctors is another story.

AI is already playing a significant role in healthcare. The healthcare organization, MedyMatch says it is, “creating a new category of AI-driven diagnostic tools” and “leveraging the richness of 3D imaging, the breadth of patient-specific data, and other relevant data… to deliver precise clinical decision support directly to the physician.”

MedyMatch recently announced a major collaboration with IBM Watson Health. The aim is for artificial intelligence applications to work alongside doctors in emergency rooms and other acute care settings.

AI can use deep learning to help physicians by highlighting regions of interest that could “indicate the potential presence of cerebral bleeds in suspected head trauma and strokes.”

Better decisions from better information

So what would AI decision making in a hospital setting look like?

“Clinical Decision Support (CDS) is where the greatest opportunity exists to make an impact,” MedyMatch CFO Michael Rosenberg told TechDigg.

While it’s well known that better decision making comes from having better information, it’s also well known that healthcare professionals are constantly short of time, making it difficult to process a lot of information.

“CDS in its classical sense has been about decision trees, if this then do that… when it comes to AI, we take it to a whole other level,” Rosenberg said.

“When looking at decision support, we aren’t looking at a set of rules, but a set of considerations highlighted for the physician, whether they be statistical data looking at similar patients across a population or highlighting regions of interest.”

This also has a positive financial impact, because: “better decisions lead to better outcomes, and better outcomes mean the reduction of costly errors, which means cost savings for the healthcare system from the Provider, Patient, and Payer.”

Speaking on the relationship between artificial intelligence and doctors, and the stage that relationship is now at, Rosenberg said:

“I think we are seeing the very early stages of an evolution where the definition of a doctor changes. AI will never replace the physician, at least not in our lifetime. The physician will always be the ultimate decision maker, however that decision will be influenced by recommendations that an AI platform recommends.”

“We think of AI as a capability that can be used to enhance the work of a physician… the final diagnosis will always be the responsibility of the doctor, but it will rapidly increase the number of physicians that can perform at an expert level.”

Can we be sure artificial intelligence decisions are safe?

There are many areas of life where people are both excited and cautious about the role that AI can play. Healthcare is perhaps the number one area where the public needs to know it can trust the technology.

“The great thing in healthcare is the regulator,” Rosenberg said. “The FDA is looking out for the patient, and close collaboration between the healthcare industry and the AI provider will result in the best quality for the marketplace.”

Even the best doctors get tired and short of time, and artificial intelligence could be on hand to do the work they simply can’t do themselves.

The Kaiserification of Healthcare

http://www.fiercehealthpayer.com/story/will-more-providers-make-splash-insurance-business/2015-02-12?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal

20 major health systems, payers pledge to convert 75% of business to value-based arrangements by 2020

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/20-major-health-systems-payers-pledge-to-convert-75-of-business-to-value-based-arrangements-by-2020.html

OR Efficiencies