Obamacare repeal without replace would cost $140 billion in funding, kill more than 2 million jobs

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/advocates-lawmakers-laud-policy-changes-curb-death-fees-imposed-my-medi-cal

President-elect Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans have made clear their intentions to repeal the Affordable Care Act, but a new analysis from the Commonwealth Fund finds that repeal, without a replacement, would result in a $140 billion loss in federal funding for healthcare in 2019, leading to the loss of 2.6 million jobs, most of them in the private sector.

Without replacement policies in place, there would be a cumulative $1.5 trillion loss in gross state products and a $2.6 million reduction in business output from 2019 to 2023, the analysis shows. The state, and healthcare providers, would be particularly hard-hit.

Congress and the new administration would likely begin by targeting the ACA’s insurance premium tax credits and the expansion of Medicaid eligibility. Commonwealth’s research shows that the loss of those two provisions would double the number of the uninsured, cause higher uncompensated care costs for providers and hike taxes for lower-income Americans.

Healthcare will comprise almost one-fifth of the nation’s economy by 2019, so major changes to the healthcare landscape would reverberate across other parts of the economy.

To track this, Commonwealth analyzed funding flows from the federal government to states, consumers and businesses. Federal tax credits first flow to health insurers. Most of that money, aside from overhead, goes to hospitals, clinics, pharmacies and other providers. Those are the direct effects of federal funding.

Most of the revenue earned by providers is used to hire staff and pay for goods and services, like clinic space or medical equipment. In turn, those vendors pay their employees, and additional goods and services. Those are the indirect effects.

Lastly, the workers use their incomes to pay for food, mortgages, rent, transportation, etc., which provides income to other business and industries. Those are the induced effects. When federal funds are cut, it triggers losses in employment and economic activity.

How Will The Planned Repeal Of Obamacare Affect Californians?

How Will The Planned Repeal Of Obamacare Affect Californians?

covered-california-enrollment2

As federal lawmakers debate the fate of Obamacare this month, health coverage for millions of Californians hangs in the balance.

Covered California, the state health insurance exchange, and the expansion of Medi-Cal, the state’s Medicaid program for low-income residents, are products of the Affordable Care Act. Both could be at risk if the GOP-led Congress and President-elect Donald Trump gut key pieces of the health law.

Earlier this week, California Healthline Senior Correspondent Emily Bazar discussed the future of Obamacare coverage in California on Valley Public Radio’s Valley Editionprogram.

So far, answers remain elusive.

 

7 things you need to know about the future of Obamacare

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-obamacare-explainer-20170105-story.html?utm_campaign=KHN%3A+Daily+Health+Policy+Report&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=40201659&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9Uem4u-88vm0uSaKSUtpimygRZcnoFsTKnFjgSMV_-DO2M1uADZ2botlQqf2or2w1gLrjuw6jxaztyZOpFjfhhh2nvKQ&_hsmi=40201659

You’ve seen the headlines and you’ve heard the slogans: Obamacare is on the chopping block and President-elect Donald Trump is going to replace it with “something terrific.”

But what are the new president and Congress really going to do? How much of the current law will really go away? And what could “Trumpcare” look like?

In case it’s been a while since you read about the Affordable Care Act and the GOP replacement plans, here’s a refresher on the biggest Obamacare issues.

Obamacare Repeal Could Push Rural Hospitals to the Brink

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2017/01/05/Obamacare-Repeal-Could-Push-Rural-Hospitals-Brink?utm_campaign=KHN%3A+Daily+Health+Policy+Report&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=40201659&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8KqKXcgqf_db4edAlc57mjW0ZBhwKkpUjZiSlsuEm5fUpTtlY79dLUg_WR5hqtaQqIpmHbr1QCs8iiVNz7EsE_1FhovQ&_hsmi=40201659

Many of the rural hospitals and health centers serving 62 million Americans have operated on a shoestring for years.

Since January 2010, 80 rural hospitals and health care facilities that provided treatment to large numbers of elderly and low-income families were forced to close for financial reasons. More than 670 of the remaining 2,078 facilities are vulnerable or “at risk” of closure, according to hospital industry experts.

For many of those hospitals, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was a lifeline, providing millions of their patients with the financial wherewithal to obtain health care treatment and prescription drugs without having to turn to emergency rooms for assistance.

But as the new Republican Congress and GOP President-elect Donald Trump press to repeal Obamacare in the coming months with no suitable replacement in hand, rural hospital officials say they are facing a “triple whammy” of lost financial benefits that could force many of the remaining rural hospitals out of business in the coming decade.

“We’re in the midst of a rural hospital closure crisis right now, and that is with the ACA currently in place,” Alan Morgan, the CEO of the National Rural Health Association, said in an interview Thursday. “Looking at our projections for where we’re headed, at the current rate we could see a third of all rural hospitals closed within the next decade.”

The advent of Obamacare enabled 1.7 million rural Americans to purchase subsidized private coverage on government operated exchanges last year, an 11 percent increase from 2015, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Millions more obtained expanded Medicaid coverage for low-income adults in rural states that opted into the program under Obamacare.

Only 20 Percent Of Americans Support Health Law Repeal Without Replacement Plan

http://khn.org/news/only-20-of-americans-support-health-law-repeal-without-replacement-plan/

0106117-kff-fig7

The Republican strategy of repealing the Affordable Health Care Act before devising a replacement plan has the support of only one in five Americans, a poll released Friday finds.

The Kaiser Family Foundation survey also disclosed that shrinking the federal government’s involvement and spending in health care — the long-sought goal of House Speaker Paul Ryan and other Republican lawmakers — is less important to most Americans than is ensuring medical care is affordable and available. (Kaiser Health News is an editorially independent project of the foundation.)

Views split not only on partisan lines but also within the Republican Party, where nearly four in 10 think that the government should guarantee health care is available to the elderly and to low-income people, even if it means more federal involvement.

Despite the rout of Democrats in the election, which gave the GOP control of both the White House and Congress, the public’s view on the Affordable Care Act remains as divided as it has been since it was passed by President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats in 2010.  Currently, 47 percent of the public wants to keep the law, which upended the way insurers do business and expanded coverage to 20 million Americans.

 

The Complex Mess of Health Insurance

The Kaiser Family Foundation is one of the best sources of information on health care, and it recently convened some focus groups in the Midwest and Pennsylvania. These groups included people who received health insurance through an Obamacare exchange and who also voted for Donald Trump.

You can read about the results in an Op-Ed today by Drew Altman, Kaiser’s chief executive. It underscores how messy and uncertain the coming debate over Obamacare’s future will likely be.

I want to point out one theme that keeps popping up in Altman’s piece — and existed long before Obamcare: A lot of Americans are deeply frustrated by the logistical headaches built into our health care system.

As Altman writes: “They were especially upset by surprise bills for services they believed were covered. They said their coverage was hopelessly complex.” If they had their way, Altman says, their insurance would become “much more understandable.”

I share their frustration, and I imagine most of you do, too. Just this week, a member of my family endured the Kafkaesque experience of being told that she needed to show up for an appointment even if she were no longer sick or face a penalty, thanks to insurance rules.

The Health Care Plan Trump Voters Really Want

This week Republicans in Congress began their effort to repeal and potentially replace the Affordable Care Act. But after listening to working-class supporters of Donald J. Trump — people who are enrolled in the very health care marketplaces created by the law — one comes away feeling that the Washington debate is sadly disconnected from the concerns of working people.

Those voters have been disappointed by Obamacare, but they could be even more disappointed by Republican alternatives to replace it. They have no strong ideological views about repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act, or future directions for health policy. What they want are pragmatic solutions to their insurance problems. The very last thing they want is higher out-of-pocket costs.

The Kaiser Foundation organized six focus groups in the Rust Belt areas — three with Trump voters who are enrolled in the Affordable Care Act marketplaces, and three with Trump voters receiving Medicaid. The sessions, with eight to 10 men and women each, were held in late December in Columbus, Ohio, Grand Rapids, Mich., and New Cumberland, Pa. Though the participants did not agree on everything, they expressed remarkably similar opinions on many health care questions. They were not, by and large, angry about their health care; they were simply afraid they will be unable to afford coverage for themselves and their families. They trusted Mr. Trump to do the right thing but were quick to say that they didn’t really know what he would do, and were worried about what would come next.

They spoke anxiously about rising premiums, deductibles, copays and drug costs. They were especially upset by surprise bills for services they believed were covered. They said their coverage was hopelessly complex. Those with marketplace insurance — for which they were eligible for subsidies — saw Medicaid as a much better deal than their insurance and were resentful that people with incomes lower than theirs could get it. They expressed animosity for drug and insurance companies, and sounded as much like Bernie Sanders supporters as Trump voters. One man in Pennsylvania with Type 1 diabetes reported making frequent trips to Eastern Europe to purchase insulin at one-tenth the cost he paid here.

 

Poll: Public Divided on Repealing Obamacare, But Few Want It Repealed Without Replacement Details

http://connect.kff.org/poll-public-divided-on-repealing-obamacare-but-few-want-it-repealed-without-replacement-details?ecid=ACsprvtG5kIoCbXzcE3WLgrX01kIXFDaDUgXQ0BUzNGGn2gIr2haSAC8OzTQSp0H3e0Qeujg-Q9Y&utm_campaign=KFF-2017-January-Priorities-Tracking-Poll&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=40166809&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_zwF7NlvPoFINfG9Nd0OPcBebPHjaaSvuWqkCefkoOcmCo9aOPqJHM0W6_uhOAYH4ucOOIuXrEe40HttSNtSg8udNc1A&_hsmi=40166809

1.6.17 - 2017 tracking email alert - image 2.png

Out-of-Pocket Costs, Not the Affordable Care Act, Top Public’s List of Health Care Priorities for new Administration and Congress

As Congress begins to work on repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act, the latest Kaiser Health Tracking Poll finds that one in five Americans (20%) support repeal alone, while three quarters either oppose repeal altogether (47%) or want to wait to repeal the law until the replacement plan’s details are known (28%).

Overall, the poll finds that nearly equal shares say that the next Congress should vote to repeal the law (49%) and that it should not vote to repeal it (47%), which mirrors the public’s overall views of the 2010 law (46% view it unfavorably, 43% favorably).

The debate surrounding repeal could influence the public’s views, as the poll finds that some people shift their opinions after hearing counter-arguments.  For example, after hearing pro-repeal arguments about the law’s costs to individuals and the government, the share of the public supporting repeal grows as large as 60 percent, while anti-repeal arguments about people losing coverage and the impact on people with pre-existing conditions decreases support for repeal to as low as 27 percent.

When asked directly about their family’s health care costs, similar shares of the public say repealing the Affordable Care Act would make their situation worse (28%) as say it would make it better (27%). Most say their own ability to get and keep health insurance (55%) and the quality of their own health care (57%) will stay about the same if Congress votes to repeal the law.

Beyond ‘Repeal and Replace,’ Further Health Reforms Loom

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/leadership/beyond-repeal-and-replace-further-health-reforms-loom?spMailingID=10175220&spUserID=MTY3ODg4NTg1MzQ4S0&spJobID=1080402683&spReportId=MTA4MDQwMjY4MwS2#

Image result for Health Reforms

The old saying, “May you live in interesting times,” may sound like a blessing.

U.S. healthcare leaders know it is a curse.

All they’ve been working toward and preparing for since the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was enacted almost seven years ago has been turned upside down in the wake of the Republican election sweep.

Yet, for all their campaign promises to repeal the ACA, most congressional Republicans and President-elect Donald Trump must know that healthcare costs are too much for many Americans, and abolishing Obamacare with no replacement could be politically dangerous.

A report from consulting firm KPMG and an opinion piece published on LinkedIn by a Navigant executive predict that the Republican Congress and the executive branch will change the healthcare reform efforts initiated through the ACA, but the concept of value-based care will stay.

Governors signal support for Medicaid expansion

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payer/state-governors-signal-support-for-medicaid-expansion?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTldOaE1qUm1ZMlV6T0dJNCIsInQiOiJVQWx2aDRmUXpsaGlUeEJcL0xFb1ZzcVFpbWp6ak1sU0VmUVY3Sk5BUHduNEVjeXNUUGw5emdwZVR6ajcrR0x1VnB0WFJaMWdWXC9tbG1SeDlEcVUxa3NPTmR5dEFEZ1dMYVFHdU1VOHJJRE1FSjR2ZGd0aEZxYzRLWUo1ckFTWVZ3In0%3D

Some governors—including two Republicans—are voicing support for Medicaid expansion even as lawmakers on Capitol Hill move toward repealing the Affordable Care Act.

In Michigan, Republican Gov. Rick Snyder wants Congress and President-elect Donald Trump to preserve the state’s unique version of Medicaid expansion even in the event of an ACA repeal, The Detroit News reported. The Healthy Michigan plan, which has seen enrollment surge past initial projections, requires recipients to contribute to health savings accounts and allows them to reduce their co-pays through healthy behaviors.

“I think it’s important that as they look at the Affordable Care Act … I hope they carefully look at the success we’ve had in Michigan, because we didn’t just do Medicaid expansion,” Snyder told the publication.