University Hospital boss talks changes after nurse arrest, says ‘this will not happen again’

http://www.sltrib.com/news/health/2017/09/04/live-university-hospital-officials-discuss-arrest-of-nurse-who-refused-to-draw-blood/

University Hospital boss talks changes after nurse arrest, says ‘this will not happen again’

Administrators at University Hospital said Monday they have already changed policies so nurses, like the one who was arrested earlier this summer for refusing to draw a patient’s blood, no longer interact with police.

At a news conference Monday, Gordon Crabtree, the interim chief executive officer of University Hospital, said the nurse, Alex Wubbels, upheld hospital policy and patient privacy despite her July 26 arrest.

“Her actions are nothing less than exemplary,” Crabtree said. ”She handled the situation with utmost courage and integrity.”

The Labor Day news conference occurred on the same day Wubbels spoke on the ”TODAY Show.” She said while the discussions she’s had with the Salt Lake City Police Department have been progressive, she released the police body camera video Thursday because she felt University Hospital and the campus police force had not appropriately responded to the episode.

Crabtree took time Monday to praise Wubbels and to describe changes that have been implemented. Crabtree also said the University of Utah’s attorneys are considering whether to take action against Salt Lake City police and Jeff Payne, the detective who arrested Wubbels. Crabtree didn’t elaborate.

“His actions were out of line,” Crabtree said of Payne. “There’s absolutely no tolerance for that kind of behavior in our hospital.”

On July 26, Payne wanted Wubbels to draw the blood of 43-year-old William Gray, who was unconscious after being involved in a fiery crash earlier in the day in Logan. Wubbels refused, citing hospital policy against drawing the blood of someone without that person’s consent or without a warrant for arrest.

Thursday, bodycam video was released of Payne shouting at Wubbels and handcuffing and arresting her on suspicion of obstruction of justice. Police released her after about 20 minutes.

The video went viral and was picked up by many national news outlets. It drew nationwide criticism last week.

Payne has been placed on leave pending an internal investigation by Salt Lake City police and the city’s Civilian Review Board. Salt Lake County’s Unified Police Department has opened a criminal investigation at the request of District Attorney Sim Gill.

Crabtree said the hospital staffers are doing everything in their power to support Wubbels in the aftermath of the arrest.

“We have a traumatized nurse and a traumatized team,” Crabtree said referring to the burn unit.

Wubbels returned to the burn unit about a week-and-a-half after the arrest, said Margaret Pearce, chief of nursing. But her schedule is flexible so that she can take as much time as she needs.

“Alex took the time she needed,” Pearce said. “We’ve been playing it by ear with her.”

Nurses will no longer interact with police, Pearce said. That will be left to hospital administrators.

“We have to make sure this never, ever happens again,” Pearce said. “I was appalled at the events of July 26. She was advocating for the rights of her patient. She did this beautifully.”

The new policy, which was implemented in mid-August, will require police to interact with the hospital supervisor. It also will prevent law enforcement officials from entering the emergency room, burn unit or other patient areas in the hospital.

Crabtree and Pearce said the new policy began to be developed within hours of Wubbels’ arrest.

“As the CEO of this hospital, I take this very seriously,” Crabtree said. “We must stand together and make sure this is what it should be, a place for healing and a place for safety.”

Wubbels and her attorney, Karra Porter, said they released the video because police were not taking the event seriously. Porter has said her client does not necessarily want to file a lawsuit, but wants changes from both the Salt Lake City police force and police and security forces at the University of Utah.

University of Utah Police Chief Dale Brophy took an apologetic tone when he said he didn’t understand the gravity of the incident until he saw the body camera video.

“My reaction changed after viewing the video,” he said. “She shouldn’t have been hauled off in handcuffs.”

Apparently following protocol, two university police or security officers stood by during the arrest. Brophy said all of his officers will get training in de-escalation techniques. It remains unclear, however, whether university police will engage Salt Lake City officers differently in the future.

Nonetheless, Crabtree said that when it comes to University Hospital and its new policy, such an incident cannot take place again.

 

Paladin to buy 2 Tenet hospitals for $170M

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/hospital-transactions-and-valuation/paladin-to-buy-2-tenet-hospitals-for-170m.html

Image result for paladin healthcare

Dallas-based Tenet Healthcare will sell its two Philadelphia hospitals to El Segundo, Calif.-based Paladin Healthcare for $170 million, to help lighten its debt burden of $15 billion.

The sale will transfer ownership of Hahnemann University Hospital, St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children and other related operations in Philadelphia to American Academic Health System, a new company formed by Paladin Healthcare.

“Paladin shares [Tenet’s] commitment to providing compassionate, exemplary care and service, and we believe that entrusting the stewardship of these institutions to its affiliate AAHS will benefit the patients, employees, physicians and community for years to come,” said Mike Halter, CEO for Tenet’s Philadelphia division and CEO of Hahnemann University Hospital.

The transaction is expected to be completed in early 2018. It will need regulatory approval.

The decision to sell the two hospitals comes a day after Tenet announced it would replace longtime CEO Trevor Fetter and “refresh” the composition of its board of directors.

Detective, nurse altercation could spur review of hospital policies

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20170904/NEWS/170909968/detective-nurse-altercation-could-spur-review-of-hospital-policies

Image result for Detective, nurse altercation could spur review of hospital policies

In a case that’s gone viral, a Salt Lake City nurse endured a police detective’s rough treatment, handcuffing, and threat of arrest to uphold her hospital’s policy of not allowing police to draw blood from a patient without an arrest, a search warrant, or the patient’s consent.

The incident is likely to spur hospital administrators to evaluate their policies surrounding police access to patients, said Jennifer Mensik, a nursing instructor at Arizona State University and vice president of continuing education for OnCourse Learning.

“I hear nurses all the time say it’s a lot easier not to argue with law enforcement and just draw blood,” Mensik said. “They don’t realize they are putting themselves at risk.”

The incident, captured by police officers’ body cameras, involved Alex Wubbels, a burn unit nurse at University of Utah Medical Center, refusing to let Salt Lake City Police Detective Jeff Payne draw blood from an unconscious patient who was severely burned in a car crash. During the encounter, Wubbels consulted via speakerphone with her supervisor, Brad Wiggins, who stated the hospital’s policy bars blood draws in such situations.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled last year that police must obtain a warrant to test the blood of motorists suspected of drunken driving. In the Salt Lake City case, the patient, a reserve police officer, reportedly was driving a truck when his vehicle was struck head-on by a man in a pickup truck who was trying to evade police. He was not a suspect in any crime.

Mensik said police requests to draw blood from patients without an arrest, a warrant, or consent are common around the country. Nurses and emergency department staff often go along because they are busy or don’t know their hospital’s policy.

During the July 26 encounter, Wubbels, who’s worked at the hospital since 2009, calmly told Payne he couldn’t proceed with the blood draw. After Wiggins, the burn unit manager, said over the speakerphone that Payne was making a mistake by threatening a nurse, Payne is seen trying to swat the phone out of Wubbels’ hand, grabbing her by the arms, pulling her arms behind her back and handcuffing her.

“Help,” she screamed. “Help me. Stop. You’re assaulting me. Stop. I’ve done nothing wrong. This is crazy.”

Payne then strapped her into the front seat of his car. Another officer arrived and told her she obstructed justice.

“I’m also obligated to my patients,” she replied. “It’s not up to me.”

Wubbels was released without being arrested after hospital COO Dan Lundergan contacted police officials.

Wubbels and her attorney held a news conference last Thursday to describe the incident and play the 19-minute video taken from the officers’ body cams.

Salt Lake City Mayor Jackie Biskupski and Police Chief Mike Brown apologized on Friday for the conduct of Payne, who, along with another officer on the scene, reportedly has been placed on administrative leave. The police department, the district attorney, and the sheriff are conducting a criminal investigation into any misconduct that may have been committed by police during the incident.

Biskupski noted that Wubbles was “simply doing her job.”

“I just feel betrayed, I feel angry, I feel a lot of things,” Wubbles said during her press briefing. “And I’m still confused.”

Following the July 26 incident, the University of Utah Medical Center worked with the Salt Lake City police department to craft an agreement on how to handle police requests for blood draws and medical information from patients, said hospital spokeswoman Kathy Wilets.

Now, law enforcement personnel register at the hospital’s front desk and make their requests through hospital administrators rather than asking front-line providers directly.

Wilets called Wubbles a “rock star” for the way she stuck to hospital policy in that tense encounter with police. “We’re grateful to her. She put the needs of patients first and set a great example for everyone.”

When ‘gigging’ healthcare, providers must balance risk with cost

http://www.healthcaredive.com/news/when-gigging-healthcare-providers-must-balance-risk-with-cost/448756/

An explosion of innovative tech is disrupting the care-delivery model, aiming for both cost savings and better outcomes. Uber’s partnership with MedStar Health to reduce patient no-shows, a huge cost-sink, and the expansive potential of drones to fill healthcare infrastructure gaps in remote areas are just two examples of ways in which healthcare providers are setting out to provide better care at lower cost.

Cost-saving innovations have also begun to extend to the healthcare employment model — something notably risky when it comes to compliance. One program offers a solution to staffing issues that connects freelance nurses with open positions using an entirely digital platform in an attempt to modernize the business. Others have opted for more ad hoc hiring processes for IT and transcription talent.

Either way, the “gig economy” has reached healthcare — and it looks like it’s here to stay.

What does gig work in the healthcare space look like right now?

Healthcare providers have to manage an employee population with vastly different skill sets. But even in the diverse healthcare workplace, where special rules run rampant, some general guidance still applies.

Typically, the more specialized and trained the worker, the less likely they can be hired on as an independent contractor, Matt Stevenson, partner at Mercer, told HR Dive. And right now, most gig workers are on the lower end of the skill scale — especially in healthcare.

“Because of the way healthcare has been restructured, there’s been an explosion of employment at the low end,” Stevenson said. Increased calls for low-acuity care, like physical therapy and daily caregiving, have heralded the growth of contracted work. Convenience for both patient and provider also plays a part. Telehealth (while not specifically contract work, usually) allows doctors to sign up for specific hours to treat patients via phone or video, while digitization lets those doctors keep all records securely online. It brings a flexibility few office jobs can compete with.

Another bonus: cost.

“Incentives are changing,” Stevenson said. “You are now paying for results instead of the hospital getting paid more for you being in the hospital longer.”

As providers seek better outcomes for a lower price, contract work plays a pivotal role in improving care but keeping barriers low for patients. Caregivers can visit homes and encourage patient compliance, such as taking medicine and completing physical therapy, and hospitals can hire those workers on a job-to-job basis, which is cheaper overall.

Providers must keep liability in mind when hiring out independent gig work, however. Hospitals in need of on-demand talent often retain nursing agencies that take on liability, employee background checks and other major risk issues in exchange for hefty fees. Independent workers tend to be cheaper, but come with much higher risk.

Managing liability and questions of quality

Classification is a perpetual headache for employers in many industries. Simply calling someone an independent contractor doesn’t cut it, Shanna Wall, labor law attorney at ComplyRight, said. Nationally, employers have to satisfy a slew of tests under regulations from the IRS, the U.S. Department of Labor and individual states meant to protect workers from exploitation. Courts have been in on the action, too.

Most tests balance on one key question: How much independence does an individual worker have? More specifically, does an employer focus on a result alone or the job itself? Is the worker using their own equipment and deciding their own hours, or is an employer dictating that? The more control an employer has, the riskier independent contractor classification can be.

But that’s not all. Medical personnel have to deal with strict laws on private health information, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Contractors must be trained on what those and other rules require.

“How do you ensure the quality of care provided by the gig person is okay?” Stevenson said. “How do you keep costs down but ensure quality? You may pay $15 an hour, but that is low for healthcare.”

Worse, if something goes wrong, the provider is on the hook. By giving jobs to outside workers, providers risk losing strict control over the quality of care and, in the long term, their brand. Employers already struggle to gather data on full-time employees. Gathering data on the success of gig workers is even tougher, since the very nature of the relationship is fairly low-touch.

That’s partly why the agency model has lasted for so long, as they take on most of those risks and give hospitals the ability to up- or downsize when needed. But the costs are real.

In the future: Outsourcing some jobs but not all

For that reason, employers may want to consider their needs on a sliding scale of risk versus efficiency. Joint employer cases are still working their way through the courts. Uncertainty remains the rule of the day. “It’s always best practice to err on the side of an abundance of caution,” Wall said.

As far as the future goes, that uncertainty renders predictions suspect. Digitization has encouraged the contracting out of some support services, including diagnostic work such as radiology. As long as a radiologist has an internet connection, they can read a scan and send their analysis from anywhere.

Innovation continues in the on-demand non-emergency medical transportation space, too. Circulation, a Boston-based provider of medical transportation, recently raised $10.5 million in a funding round that included participation from leading names in healthcare such as the Boston Children’s Hospital, Humana and NextGen Venture Partners. Experts believe that ride-share partnerships could save billions of dollars usually spent by Medicaid.

But as more employers focus on ways to engage employees, contract workers will largely remain outside those efforts, Stevenson said. Gig workers usually seek independence for a reason, be it the flexibility of hours or ability to set their own pay. They prefer autonomy, and don’t want to be bogged down in HR processes.

“If I really cared about engagement, I would bring them in-house,” Stevenson said.  But as long as demand is high, treatment of contract workers will have to remain top notch to keep a steady flow of candidates in the pipeline.

The influx of independent work has enabled unprecedented flexibility for workers and access to talent for employers. But above all, employers must be wary of the risks to truly enjoy the perks of independent contracting.

“You think you are safe from compliance because they are gig workers, but really, it’s the opposite,” Wall said.

Wanted: Leaders for tomorrow’s emergency room

http://www.healthcaredive.com/news/wanted-leaders-for-tomorrows-emergency-room/448757/

A conversation with Bill Haylon, CEO of Leaders For Today

Economic anxieties need not correlate with a high unemployment rate. Take it from business leaders across multiple U.S. industries: Their biggest challenge is not a lack of job openings for thousands of qualified candidates — it’s a lack of candidates for thousands of openings.

HR professionals are used to hearing about skill shortages in manufacturingand other blue-collar work, but perhaps more understated are gaps in the STEM fields.

Careers in nursing and medicine, which often require years of additional, specialized education are hard to fill. Physician assistant openings were one of the most in-demand fields near the end of 2016, according to the American Staffing Association. But hospitals aren’t just struggling to find people to staff operating rooms. They face a much bigger challenge in a lack of leadership skills.

HR Dive/Healthcare Dive spoke with staffing firm Leaders For Today’s CEO Bill Haylon about the root of leadership gaps in healthcare, and how hospital HR departments can confront the problem. Our conversation has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

HR Dive: When hospitals come to a healthcare staffing firm like Leaders For Today, what are they asking for?

Bill Haylon: What we’re really doing is helping them find people who have particular sets of skills. We provide staffing on an interim basis. A hospital or healthcare system comes to us and says, “we really need somebody who can fix and lead our case management department,” “we need somebody who’s got certain technical skills and leadership skills.” We’re not actually training individuals, we’re finding people who fill those slots.

We’re going out and finding people, who they can either hire full time or on an interim basis. We’ll look for, on average, a little more than six spots, and we’ll start from a pool of people that we have that we’ve worked with before.

We’re not really doing training, but training is one of the problems in the healthcare world.

HR Dive: When you look for potential staffers, what kind of skills do they have? What stands out the most to the healthcare systems you work with?

Haylon: There are certain skills that go across all positions, and there are certain skills that are specific to a position because we can hire for. For example, we have a team that focuses on OR people, while others focus on case management, hospital finance, physician management, practice management, etc.

Across the board, what we focus on is, first and foremost, trying to find people who have been steady with or who have stayed with an organization for some period of time and developed within that. In other words, we try and stay away from what we call “jumpers” — people that have a job for a year, two years, and then try and go on their next role.

Unfortunately, that’s counter to what occurs in the industry. People in the hospital industry jump all the time.

We try and get some stability in their job, because we believe they learn more that way [when it comes to] both the technical skills and leadership skills. Of course, you look for the basic things: education, undergraduate work, master’s degree and other certifications.

You’re trying to vet the person along, so a lot of time you’re talking about different situations, different experiences, how they’ve handled them in the past or how they might handle them in the future. It could be a difficult position to deal with, a union situation, a quality situation, a safety situation. And you try to understand what their thought-making process is.

HR Dive: What skills are hardest to come by in the medical world, given that a lot of industries are seeing skills shortages?

Haylon: There’s an enormous shortage of talent within the hospital industry in all key levels. It was going on before Obamacare, and now with Obamacare and more people being covered, each organization is seeing a big uptick in the number of patients they see. It’s really gotten to be a very critical moment.

The most difficult job category is the O.R., the second hardest is case management and the third hardest is physician practice management.

From a skill set perspective, it’s leadership. Most of those in leadership positions are people who were nurses or doctors. When you go to school, you do not learn about financial statements, management skills or leadership. You’re learning how to suture, avoid infections and open up rib cages.

You take a person who has been a staff nurse for [a certain number] of years, and they decide they want to go into a leadership role. Because there’s a shortage of people, they are put in those spots well before they’re ready. They don’t have any training; hospitals do not train people for career development or leadership, and so you’re just kind of winging it. You get people who are very quickly over their head in their positions.

HR Dive: What can hospitals change about the way they operate to help develop those skills, or is that simply not possible given their bandwidth?

Haylon: They make it harder than it is. The reality is that hospitals consolidate, so they’re parts of bigger systems. You have a director in the O.R. who could be managing 440 people. That’s a lot of people. This was the case for one hospital we worked with, and the person running that OR had been a staff nurse and morphed to this role. But her [previous] role had been running a small hospital where she had 30 people, and now she’s up to 440 people, and it’s over her head.

So the reality is that they need to start thinking about different skill sets, and the obvious one is an MBA. When you’re the director of a 440-person O.R., you’re not seeing patients anymore. You’re doing hiring and scheduling. You’re developing quality programs and safety programs. You’re trying to get the surgeons on board. You’re never seeing a patient; that’s a different set of skills.

You don’t need to be clinical, you need to be a manager and a leader. It could be an MBA, it could be a master’s in health. But you need more than clinical training.

So what hospitals do [by recruiting for a certain skillset] is totally reactive as opposed to being proactive and developing people.

HR Dive: Do you see a shift in terms of the skills that physicians and other professionals are being taught in school?

Haylon: You’re being taught technical skills, clinical skills, whatever your specialty is. You go to medical school, do your residency, maybe followed by a fellowship, and it’s all technical skills. Physicians [are also] getting way more specialized than they used to be.

Typically the people who have jobs [in healthcare leadership] have gone and gotten additional training and education on their own.

Physicians and nurses are not trained in school to run big organizations. Plus, they’re doing research, and they’ve got to handle anybody that comes into the OR and the ER. It’s hard enough to get training for it, and it’s beyond belief if you don’t have training.

HR Dive: What else should hospital systems be mindful of when looking for leadership in the medical workforce?

Haylon: When you look at survey data from across the hospital industry, you see that people are staying in positions for incredibly short periods of time. Forty percent of people right now in key positions in hospitals have been in their position two years or less. Another 40% expect to leave in the next two years. What happens is that hospitals have a hole, and they need better leaders, so they poach from somebody else.

So the director of a surgical department will be a manager at a small hospital, then become a manager at a bigger hospital, then a manager at a bigger hospital, then a director at a small hospital, then a director at a bigger hospital, and finally a director at a bigger hospital. They just keep poaching from each other.

The problem is it’s the same people who are circling through. The people you’re hiring never had the time to put in place good, quality programs, [including] safety programs and productivity programs, because they’re not there long enough. They can’t make it stick in just two years; these are very complicated things.

And so that’s the result of what you’re talking about. The lack of training and development shows itself in this poaching and job hopping in the hospital world. It is like no industry you have ever seen before.

In other industries, an enormous amount of resources are put into training, so people stay in those industries and move up. You take up greater responsibilities, but they invest a lot in you as a developing person. The hospitals invest almost nothing. It’s up to the individual to go and figure it out on your own. Get your MBA, take this class, get a certification from the hospital association. But you’re not developing your own people.

Other organizations develop their own people because they want to be the best at what they do — they want to differentiate themselves. The only way they can do that is to develop their own people. Because hospitals don’t do that, there really is no differentiation, and hence, they struggle.

So this lack of training and the lack of development ends up creating an industry where everybody knows they’re going to jump all the time. You’ve got hospitals that have hired their sixth CEO in seven years. So the question is: If you’re a patient and you have knowledge of this, would you want to go to that hospital?

If you have that sort of instability at the top spot, then it’s going to trickle all the way down. Healthcare is complicated; it takes a while to figure out orders in place that are going to work. If they have quality problems, or safety problems, you can’t fix them that quickly. You’ve got to have someone who understands the lay of the land and can make a difference.

Why One California County Went Surgery Shopping

http://khn.org/news/why-one-california-county-went-surgery-shopping/

Retiree Leslie Robinson-Stone and her husband enjoyed a weeklong, all-expenses-paid trip to a luxury resort — all thanks to the county she worked for.

The couple also received more than a thousand dollars in spending money and a personal concierge, who attended to their every need. For Santa Barbara County, it was money well spent: Sending Robinson-Stone 250 miles away for knee replacement surgery near San Diego saved the government $30,000.

“The only difference between our two hospitals is one is expensive and the other is exorbitant,” said Andreas Pyper, assistant director of human resources for Santa Barbara County, referring to the local options.

Frustration with sky-high hospital bills and a lack of local competition is common to many employers and consumers across the country after years of industry consolidation. Fed up with wildly different price tags for routine operations, some private employers are steering patients they insure to top-performing providers who offer bargain prices. Santa Barbara County, with about 4,000 employees, is among a handful of public entities to join them.

The county has saved nearly 50 percent on four surgery cases since starting its out-of-town program last year, officials said. The program is voluntary for covered employees.

At a Scripps Health hospital in the San Diego area, the county paid $61,600 for a spinal fusion surgery that would have cost more than twice as much locally. It avoided two other operations altogether after patients went outside the area for second opinions.

Typically, employers are seeking deals through “bundled payments” — in which one fixed price covers tests, physician fees and hospital charges. And if complications arise, providers are on the hook financially. Medicare began experimenting with this method during the Obama administration.

Santa Barbara County is among about 400 employers on the West Coast working with Carrum Health, a South San Francisco start-up that negotiates bundled prices and chooses surgeons based on data on complications and readmissions.

“Not all surgeons are equal. We don’t want to give Scripps a blank check. That defeats the whole purpose,” said Sachin Jain, Carrum’s chief executive.

Santa Barbara officials try to persuade workers and their family members to participate in its program by waiving copays and deductibles. The county pays about $2,700 in travel costs and still comes out way ahead.

“If that doesn’t speak to the inefficiencies in our health care system, I don’t know what does,” Pyper said. “It’s almost like buying a Toyota Corolla for $50,000 and then going to San Diego to buy the same Corolla for $16,000. How long would the more expensive Toyota dealership last?”

Even as more employers and insurers embrace bundled payments, the Trump administration is applying the brakes. In August, Medicare officials proposed cancelingmandatory bundled payments for certain surgeries and scaling back the program for knee and hip replacements. Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price, when he was still a member of Congress, accused Medicare of overstepping federal authority and interfering in the doctor-patient relationship. Hospital trade groups have voiced similar objections.

That leaves some health-policy experts dismayed.

“These bundled payments put pressure on medical providers … and the savings are astonishing,” said Bob Kocher, a former health official in the Obama administration and now a partner in the venture capital firm Venrock.

Santa Barbara County officials said they had no choice after seeing their medical costs soar by 15 percent in each of the past two years. Like many local governments, it has an older workforce prone to chronic illness, blocked arteries and bum knees.

But health costs run higher than the state average in this scenic coastal county of about 450,000 people, according to data from Oakland-based Integrated Healthcare Association. By one measure, the average health insurance premium in the individual market runs $660 a month in Santa Barbara, 27 percent higher than in Los Angeles.

Still, Maya Barraza, the county’s manager for employee benefits and rewards, knew the program would be a hard sell to workers. “You don’t want to be away from your family and what’s familiar,” she said.

Cottage Health, the county’s largest health system, says it wants to keep patients in town for treatment and follow-up care.

Established in 1891, it’s grown from a single hospital to more than 500 beds across three hospitals, and annual revenue hit $746 million last year.

Valet attendants greet visitors at two entrances outside the group’s white, Spanish-style hospital in the city of Santa Barbara. In the main lobby, the names of wealthy donors are splashed across one wall, including billionaire investor and Donald Trump confidant Thomas Barrack.

“We are continually looking at reducing costs and improving quality,” said Cottage Health spokeswoman Maria Zate. “Cottage Health has some of the top surgeons in California.”

Sixty miles north in Santa Maria, the state’s largest hospital chain, Dignity Health, offers another option: Marian Regional Medical Center.

Both Cottage and Dignity hospitals in Santa Barbara County have quality scores of fair to excellent for joint replacements, spinal procedures and coronary bypass surgeries, according to three years of Medicare data analyzed by research firm Mpirica Health.

Dignity Health didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Carrum tries to help employers like Santa Barbara County find more affordable options. It has struck bundled price deals for various procedures with Scripps hospitals in the San Diego area, Stanford Health Care in the Bay Area and Swedish Medical Center in Seattle, part of the Providence Health chain.

Several other companies, such as Health Design Plus, are also assisting employers, insurers and patients with the logistics of surgery shopping. Boeing and other large employers are the most aggressive at pursuing bundled pricing and sending workers across the country for care.

Since 2014, more than 2,000 joint replacement and spinal surgeries have been performed for fixed prices through the Pacific Business Group on Health’s “centers of excellence” program, which includes employers such as JetBlue and Lowe’s. It added gastric bypass and other bariatric surgeries last year, and the employer group is working on bundled prices for cancer treatment.

Some companies have gone so far as to send patients overseas for cheaper care, but most employers favor a more regional approach, experts say. Workers still rely on local physicians for follow-up care.

Municipalities, school districts and other public employers have been slower to adopt some of these strategies, perhaps to avoid the political risk of antagonizing local providers, some researchers suggest.

For some hospitals, there are advantages in offering deep discounts: They get patients they otherwise would never see and are paid in full right after the patient is discharged, avoiding the onerous billing and collections process.

They also have the financial capacity to offer such sharply reduced prices.

Michael Bark, assistant vice president of payer relations at Scripps Health, said most hospitals significantly mark up their commercial rates for orthopedic procedures and cardiac surgeries to compensate for lower government reimbursements.

Robinson-Stone, a Santa Barbara County retiree, sits on her front step at her home in Lompoc, Calif. Her former employer sent her 250 miles away for knee replacement surgery at a hospital near San Diego and saved $30,000. (Heidi de Marco/California Healthline)

“There are immense profit margins built into those cases,” Bark said.

Robinson-Stone, a former county sheriff’s deputy and a computer support specialist, was initially wary of traveling for her surgery. But the 62-year-old Lompoc resident had ongoing pain that kept her from biking, walking her dogs and tending to her fruit trees. Medication and cortisone shots didn’t work, and she had no ties to local surgeons. So she signed up online and was given a choice of six orthopedic surgeons at Scripps Green Hospital in La Jolla.

In June 2016, she and her husband, Frank Stone, checked in at the Estancia La Jolla Hotel and Spa.

Robinson-Stone met the surgeon on a Wednesday, had the operation the next day and returned to her hotel room by Saturday. She continued physical therapy at the hotel and returned to the hospital a few days later to have the staples removed.

She was back on her bike within two months and eventually lost about 20 pounds.

“I just celebrated one year from surgery,” she said, “and I’m a happy camper.”

Storm Harvey could financially hurt already strained Houston hospitals

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-storm-harvey-healthcare/storm-harvey-could-financially-hurt-already-strained-houston-hospitals-idUSKCN1B92T2

Image result for houston hospitals under water

 

Structural improvements over the last decade to Houston hospitals have helped them so far to avoid devastation like Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans in 2005, but the pounding it is receiving from Tropical Storm Harvey is expected to financially hobble many already strained Texas medical centers.

The storm has forced hospitals to cancel surgeries, evacuate patients and contend with food and supply shortages. Even bigger challenges are expected in coming months when people who have lost homes and jobs avoid medical treatment or seek charitable care.

“A lot of hospitals already were burdened by uncompensated care…they were already struggling, and this will make things much harder,” said Vivian Ho, a healthcare economist at Rice University.

Rice has been temporarily closed because of the slow-moving storm that has killed at least 11 people since Friday and paralyzed Houston, the fourth most-populous city in the United States with a U.S.-census estimated 2.3 million.

Houston’s healthcare industry includes some of the most prestigious institutions in the country and has grown to accommodate a rising population in recent years.

But uncertainty about changes to U.S. health insurance policy, the region’s shrinking energy sector and Texas’ high percentage of uninsured have forced several Houston hospitals to cut thousands of jobs this year and post millions of dollars in losses, even before the storm.

Investment bank Jefferies warned in an Aug. 28 note that Harvey could have a significant impact on Texas healthcare providers, especially HCA Healthcare Inc, which has “11 percent of its beds in the areas impacted by severe weather.”

Texas Hospital Association spokesman Lance Lunsford said medical centers made significant improvements after buildings were damaged by Tropical Storm Allison in 2001.

Harvey broke rainfall records for the continental United States, with one site south of Houston recording 49.2 inches (1.25 meters) of precipitation.

Flooding prompted MD Anderson on Monday to cancel appointments and surgeries until Wednesday at the earliest, St. Luke’s Hospital closed one of its branches, and flooding at Ben Taub Hospital shut its food service.

MD Anderson on Monday told employees not part of its storm “ride out” team to stay home.

Roads around the cancer center’s main hospital were impassible, and a doctor posted photos of flooding that reached into the hospital lobby.

MD Anderson’s economic impact to the area is about $35 billion, according to its web site. Its 21 hospitals and affiliated institutions employ more than 106,000 people.

An Untapped Opportunity For Health Care Progress: Redesigning Care For High-Need Patients

http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2017/08/28/an-untapped-opportunity-for-health-care-progress-redesigning-care-for-high-need-patients/

A doctor works with a patient

While uncertainty and debate about health care reform remains, there is near-universal agreement on the need to improve care delivery and health outcomes and decrease the rate at which spending continues to grow. An underrecognized but crucial component to achieving these goals is redesigning care for “high-need patients”—in other words, the small cohort of patients with complex needs who represent the greatest usage of the health care system.

Currently, 1 percent of patients account for more than 20 percent of health care expenditures, and 5 percent account for nearly half of the nation’s spending on health care, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Driving these costs for high-need patients are the functional limitations that impact patients’ daily living and ability to cope with health challenges, leading to their use of health care and social services that are often too late and poorly matched to their needs.

A 2014 survey conducted by the Commonwealth Fund found that high-need patients are highly susceptible to lack of coordination within the health care system and are more likely to experience cost-related barriers to accessing care, compared to other older adults. A 2016 Commonwealth Fund survey found that nearly two-thirds of high-need patients reported hardships with housing, meals, or utilities and that this population was also more likely to report feeling socially isolated, compared with the general adult population. Providing quality care for these high-need patients is a sizable challenge—yet it’s also an area where strategic attention and investment could yield significant payoffs for patients and the entire health system.

Indeed, a number of health systems have designed successful models that leverage an understanding of the unique characteristics of high-need patients to deliver quality care at sustainable costs.

Although there is no one-size-fits-all solution, a new publication from the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) says successful models generally share a number of common features across four dimensions:

    • Focus of service setting. Successful models tailor their care settings for either a targeted age group with various combinations of illnesses or individuals who use a significant amount of care. Examples of care settings include enhanced primary care, transitional care, integrated care, home-based care, and others.
    • Care and condition attributes. Successful models include practices such as targeting patients most likely to benefit from an intervention, coordinating care and communication among patients and providers, promoting patient and family engagement in self-care, and facilitating transitions from the hospital and referrals to community resources.
    • Delivery features. Successful models often feature the use of care managers alongside primary care providers to identify and work with high-risk patients. In addition, they often put high-risk patients under the care of specific physicians who treat a limited number of patients to enhance communication and adherence.
    • Organizational culture. For care models to be successful, organizations must emphasize leadership at all levels; be capable of adapting based on the size of the program and local circumstances; offer specialized, customizable training for team members; and effectively use data access, sources, and application.

Denver Health: A Real-World Example

In 2012, Denver Health—an integrated system that includes an acute care hospital, all of Denver’s federally qualified health centers, a public health department, an emergency 9-1-1 call center, a health maintenance organization, and several school-based health centers—set out to create a new care model and transform its primary care delivery system by providing individualized care that would more effectively meet medical, behavioral, and social needs for its largely low-income population. In designing its 21st Century Care model, which included modifications to better serve its high-need patients, Denver Health’s goals were to improve the experience of care, improve the health of populations, and reduce per capita costs of health care. Early in its implementation, a fourth goal also emerged: improving provider engagement and creating healthier and happier patients.

With support from a Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation award, Denver Health was able to redesign its health teams and invest in health information technology to enable population segmentation and categorization of patients by clinical risk groups. Funds were also spent on rapid evaluation efforts to refine the care model’s design.

The new model matched care delivery to four risk tiers. Healthy individuals were assigned to tier one and interacted with staff using Denver Health’s eTouch text messaging platform. Individuals in tier two received additional chronic disease management, such as lay patient navigators, nurse care coordination and home visits, and environmental scans for children with asthma. For patients in tiers three and four, integrated behavioral health assessments and care were standard, as was the inclusion of nurse care coordinators, clinical pharmacists, and clinical social workers as part of the care team. For patients in tier four, Denver Health relied on specialized intensive outpatient clinics to serve as adult patients’ medical homes or multidisciplinary special needs clinics for high-risk pediatric patients. Targeted toward individuals who had experienced multiple potentially avoidable inpatient admissions within one year, care teams in these clinics included a dedicated social worker and navigator, and teams were responsible for a limited number of patients. This clinic also worked closely with the Mental Health Center of Denver.

Denver Health’s systems modification paid off, particularly for high-need patients. These innovations not only improved patient outcomes and patient and provider satisfaction, but also resulted in reductions in expected spending. Over a one-year period, the system saw an approximately 2 percent reduction in expected spending. Most of the savings were driven by a decrease in hospitalizations among patients in tier four. Denver Health’s success demonstrates the real potential of strategic models to improve care for these patients while curbing health care spending.

The Opportunity

Health systems can play an essential role in improving care for our nation’s high-need patients. That’s why we, as members of an initiative under the NAM Leadership Consortium for a Value and Science-Driven Health System, are spreading the word about the characteristics of high-need patients, the challenges they face, and the features of successful care models for this population. This initiative was conducted in partnership with the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, the Bipartisan Policy Center, the Commonwealth Fund, and publication sponsor, the Peterson Center on Healthcare.

To promote improvements to the care of high-need patients, health systems should work with payers, providers, and other health systems to better identify and target high-need patients, test new practices and tools, and develop interactive electronic health records that can include functional and behavioral status and social needs. They should use established metrics and quality improvement approaches to continuously assess and improve care models and partner with community organizations, patients, caregivers, and social and behavioral health service providers outside the health care system to create patient-centered care plans. Health systems can also assess their current culture and promote changes needed to build new and successful care models, blending medical, social, and behavioral approaches.

Of course, health systems can’t do this alone. At the federal level, policy makers should improve coordination among the Medicare and Medicaid programs to increase access to needed services and reduce the burden on patients and caregivers, and should continue payment policy reforms that align initiatives to incentivize pay-for-performance instead of fee-for-service models. Policy makers should also explore the expansion of programs that could mitigate the financial strain of caregiving, such as Medicaid’s Cash and Counseling—a national program in which the government gave people cash allowances to pay for the services and goods they felt would best meet their personal care needs and counseling about managing their services—and incentivize the adoption and use of interoperable electronic health records that include functional, behavioral health, and social factors.

Payers can develop financing models to provide social and behavioral health services that will both improve care and lower the total cost of care for high-need patients, recognizing that even cost-neutral programs are worth supporting if the outcome is positive for patients. Providers can learn to work collaboratively in teams and engage with patients, care partners, and their caregivers in the design and delivery of care.

Return on investment for most models of care for high-need patients will take time. But one of the most expensive and challenging populations for the current health care system will remain underserved and continue to drive health care spending until there is a unified effort to improve their care. We know there are models that work. Now, action is critical, and while health care reform remains on center stage in the national policy agenda, the time is right. By taking the lead in the bold changes needed for this transformation, health systems can play a pivotal role alongside all stakeholders in reducing costs and improving the health of some of the nation’s most vulnerable patients.

Harvey pounded the nation’s chemical epicenter. What’s in the foul-smelling floodwater left behind?

http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-houston-chemical-plant-20170831-story.html

Image result for Harvey pounded the nation's chemical epicenter. What's in the foul-smelling floodwater left behind?

The pounding rains of Hurricane Harvey washed over the conduits, cooling towers, ethylene crackers and other esoteric equipment of the nation’s largest complex of chemical plants and petroleum refineries, leaving behind small lakes of brown, foul-smelling water whose contents are a mystery.

Broken tanks, factory fires and ruptured pipes are thought to have released a cocktail of toxic chemicals into the waters. Explosions that released thick black smoke were reported at the Arkema Inc. chemical plant, where floods knocked out the electricity, leaving the facility outside Houston without refrigeration needed to protect volatile chemicals.

Meanwhile, emissions into the air have soared as the petrochemical industry shut down and then started up chemical operations, a cycle that causes an uptick in releases.

The potential health problems were magnified by overflowing sewers, inoperative treatment plants and the residues of animal waste, including carcasses.

Nobody is sure how much long-term health impact, if any, will result from the tidal wave of toxins and bacteria that swept through the nation’s fourth largest city.

Exhaustive investigations by the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Academy of Engineering after Hurricane Katrina, in which floodwaters languished in New Orleans for about six weeks, showed that toxic concentrations and the resulting exposures were too low to cause significant long-term health problems.

That festering flood caused a stench for weeks that left soldiers gagging for air as they flew helicopters 2,000 feet over the city. The Army Corps of Engineers had to pump the water out of New Orleans, much of which lies below sea level.

A report by the National Academy of Engineering in March 2006 said the floodwaters contained elevated levels of contaminants. The inorganic compounds were below drinking-water standards, while arsenic levels, attributed in part to lawn fertilizer, were above those standards.

The EPA took 1,800 samples of residue and soil from across the New Orleans area after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and found that generally “the sediments left behind by the flooding from the hurricanes are not expected to cause adverse health impacts to individuals returning to New Orleans.”

The situation is far different in Houston, where the floodwaters are receding much faster.

But because Houston is far more industrialized, Harvey could have a much larger potential for leaving a toxic trail.

Without question, air emissions rose significantly during and after the storm, said Elena Craft, a toxicologist and senior scientist at the Texas branch of the Environmental Defense Fund.

The industry shutdown and startup cycle released 2 million pounds of pollutants, equal to 40% of all the emissions from 2016, Craft said, based on reports the industry made to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.

“In a few days, we have had months of exposure,” Craft said.

Marathon Oil, for example, reported to the state that heavy rain had pounded the roof of a storage tank so hard that it tilted, exposing gasoline to the air.

The emissions reports also included such carcinogens and suspected carcinogens as benzene and butadiene.

Craft said that sewage treatment plants in Beaumont went off line. A pipe carrying anhydrous hydrogen chloride was compromised in La Porte. Harris County’s 26 federal Superfund toxic waste sites may have been affected, including one that contains dioxins from a former paper mill along the San Jacinto River.

The fire at the Arkema chemical plant in Crosby released organic hydrogen peroxide, which officials said is an irritant but not toxic.

Tommy Newsom, who lives about 7 miles from the plant, said he felt fine but wondered what other chemicals might be involved. “Who knows how much of what they’re telling us is true?” he said.

“I think the wind’s in my favor,” said Newsom, a 60-year-old port worker, pointing to Texas state and U.S. flags at the entrance to his housing development.

Jennifer Sass, a senior scientist with the Natural Resources Defense Council’s health program, said the situation in Houston is a perfect breeding ground for hepatitis and tetanus.

“The flood is so large and slow-moving and the area is packed with dirty industries that are poorly regulated. Because the oil and gas industries down here are not as safe, we are concerned those toxins and chemicals are leaking,” she said.

Texas regulators urged caution. “Floodwaters may contain many hazards, including infectious organisms, intestinal bacteria, and other disease agents,” the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality said in a statement. “Precautions should be taken by anyone involved in cleanup activities or any others who may be exposed to floodwaters.”

The American Chemistry Council said its members are in constant communication with state and federal regulators about the status of their operations.

“Hurricane Harvey has presented extreme and unique challenges for the city of Houston and the surrounding areas in southeast Texas and Louisiana, warranting an unprecedented response effort, including that by local industry,” the trade group said in a statement.

Podcast: ‘What The Health?’ Hurricane Harvey And Health Costs

Podcast: ‘What The Health?’ Hurricane Harvey And Health Costs

Image result for hurricane relief

Hurricane Harvey and its torrential aftermath disrupted everything on the Texas and Louisiana coasts — including health care. Patients can expect months of chaos, as their providers scramble just to get back to work and sort out medical records. In addition, the storm may end up killing, injuring and sickening many more people, as toxins such as mold and chemical explosions take their toll.

Even so, Harvey could have been worse, says a panel of experienced health care journalists on the latest Kaiser Health News “What the Health?” podcast. That’s because the medical infrastructure, unlike in many previous national disasters, held up relatively well. Hospitals planned for flooding, to the point that underground tunnels connecting one to another could be sealed off with “submarine doors” to keep the water from invading every facility.

Julie Rovner of Kaiser Health News, Joanne Kenen of Politico and Margot Sanger-Katz of The New York Times also discuss what impact the relief effort in Washington could have on an already jampacked September agenda. The pressing need for money to rebuild in Texas and Louisiana could complicate and delay other important congressional decisions, including deliberations on stabilizing or changing the Affordable Care Act.

Also this week: an interview with KHN Editor-in-Chief Elisabeth Rosenthal, author of “An American Sickness,” about why medical care costs so much.