Asking the Right Questions: Why Healthcare Predictive Analytics Often Don’t Predict Anything Meaningful at All.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/asking-right-questions-why-healthcare-predictive-dont-cousins-phd?trk=v-feed&lipi=urn%3Ali%3Apage%3Ad_flagship3_feed%3BgC0bModjFFl7I4auAFAWBQ%3D%3D

Healthcare organizations collectively waste billions of dollars every year by focusing on the wrong problem to solve. This isn’t unique to healthcare, of course. A recent, must-read article in Harvard Business Review, “Are You Solving the Right Problems” by Thomas Wedell explains how organizations that are good at problem solving often focus on the wrong ones to solve. It’s often human nature.

Healthcare analytics offers a particularly good example. Today, health plans, hospital systems, post-acute care companies and other provider organizations are keenly focused on identifying those patients who are at highest risk of adverse events, such as readmissions and post op complications. They then invest precious resources trying to reduce that risk through home visits, additional pre-op or post-operative care, and so on.

Yet, despite the apparent logic, according to our research, 50% or more of patients identified as high risk cannot be impacted by the interventions provided to reduce that risk.

Yet, despite the apparent logic, according to our research, 50% or more of patients identified as high risk cannot be impacted by the interventions provided to reduce that risk.

On the face of it, this seems like a logical approach to improving care and reducing costs. Yet, despite the apparent logic, according to our research, 50% or more of patients identified as high risk cannot be impacted by the interventions provided to reduce that risk. In some cases, they can’t be impacted at all. Our research is consistent with that conducted by others, including a randomized controlled study of telephone care management and study on nurse-led home-based intervention. In short, a lot of the money spent trying to avoid adverse events is wasted.

https://hbr.org/2017/01/are-you-solving-the-right-problems

 

Sepsis Tops Conditions Tracked for Readmission Rates, but Triggers No Penalties

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/quality/sepsis-tops-conditions-tracked-readmission-rates-triggers-no-penalties?spMailingID=10315063&spUserID=MTY3ODg4NTg1MzQ4S0&spJobID=1082253801&spReportId=MTA4MjI1MzgwMQS2#

Sepsis Tops Conditions Tracked for Readmission Rates, but Triggers No Penalties

Sepsis has a higher rate of readmission than heart failure, but the federal government does not penalize hospitals for excessive readmissions due to sepsis.

Summa CEO Thomas Malone resigns: What happens next at Summa remains unclear

http://www.ohio.com/business/summa-ceo-thomas-malone-resigns-what-happens-next-at-summa-remains-unclear-1.743267

malone27cut_02

Dr. Thomas Malone on Thursday announced his resignation as president and CEO of Summa Health, 21 days after more than 240 physicians signed a no-confidence letter calling for his departure.

Malone, 60, a Northeast Ohio native who began leading the health system two years ago, will continue to serve as CEO for up to 60 days while Summa’s board of directors conducts a search for his successor, the board said.

In a statement released Thursday, Malone said he had detracted from the health system’s mission.

“I care deeply about the future of Summa Health and am incredibly proud of all that we have accomplished together over the past two years,” Malone wrote. “However, as I thought about what would be best for our organization moving forward, it became clear to me that my presence may be a distraction from our goals. And that is unacceptable to me.”

Insight Report: Nursing Shortages Demand ‘Disruptive’ Action

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/nurse-leaders/insight-report-nursing-shortages-demand-disruptive-action?spMailingID=10299296&spUserID=MTY3ODg4NTg1MzQ4S0&spJobID=1082069222&spReportId=MTA4MjA2OTIyMgS2

Image result for nursing shortage

Nurse leaders say the standard recruitment and retention methods of sign-on bonuses, pay increases, and retention incentives won’t be effective in improving the current nursing shortage.

The Promise and Pitfalls of Bundled Payments

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/blog/2016/sep/bundled-payments

he Obama administration recently announced that it plans to expand bundled payment models in the Medicare program. Bundled payments are one of several new payment alternatives in Medicare and Medicaid designed to hold health providers accountable for the cost and quality of care, and thereby encourage and reward better health care value.

All these so-called value-based payment initiatives, which include accountable care organizations (ACOs) and enhancements to older managed care programs under Medicare and Medicaid, are to some degree experimental and their full effects are still uncertain. However, the spread of bundled payments deserves particular scrutiny because of potential unintended consequences.

Why Bundled Payments?

Under bundled payments, a single payment is made for all of the services associated with an episode of care, such as a hip or knee replacement or cardiac surgery. Services might include all inpatient, outpatient, and rehabilitation care associated with the procedure.

“Knee and hip replacements are well-suited to bundles because they often involve comparatively young patients who are physically active (often the source of their joint damage) and want to remain so. But when patients have multiple chronic conditions that interact with each other, it becomes less clear whether the bundle should include the costs of caring for all those problems.”

There are a number of potential advantages to this payment approach. Bundled payments give providers strong incentives to keep their costs down, including by preventing avoidable complications. Bundled payments also can encourage collaboration across diverse providers and institutions, as well as the development and implementation of care pathways that follow evidence-based guidelines. In addition, bundles target the work of specialists, who have been less likely up to now than primary care physicians to participate in value-based payment arrangements.

More conceptually, health care economists are drawn to bundled payments because a bundle of care constitutes a clinically and intuitively meaningful “product” — in this case, the clinical episode. Defining clear products in health care helps create markets in which providers directly compete on quality and price. One barrier to effective health care markets has been that prices, when available, tend to relate to inputs into clinical care — such as pills, bandages, bed days, or X-rays — that are not meaningful to consumers of care and that don’t necessarily predict the total costs of care. For example, a health system that charges a lot for X-rays may still be more efficient because it uses fewer of them or saves money on other inputs. Bundles bring all these inputs together into a single price for a single basket of services.

Healthcare Staffing Outlook: Strong Worker Demand Eyed for 2017

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/hr/healthcare-staffing-outlook-strong-worker-demand-eyed-2017?spMailingID=10269321&spUserID=MTY3ODg4NTg1MzQ4S0&spJobID=1081665555&spReportId=MTA4MTY2NTU1NQS2

Related image

The news is good for job seekers, but ongoing high demand for clinicians and leaders means hiring managers might benefit from thinking creatively about retention strategies.

As Healthcare Changes, So Must its CEOs, CFOs, COOs…

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/leadership/healthcare-changes-so-must-its-ceos-cfos-coos%E2%80%A6?spMailingID=10269321&spUserID=MTY3ODg4NTg1MzQ4S0&spJobID=1081665555&spReportId=MTA4MTY2NTU1NQS2#

To keep up with big changes in how healthcare is administered, financed, and organized, top leaders are finding a need for new talents and organizational structures.