3 Disruptive Solutions For U.S. Healthcare: CareMore, Forward, Health City

https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertpearl/2017/11/14/disruptive-solutions-healthcare/#31b4ef452364

Image result for healthcity

American healthcare needs a hero. Among other wealthy countries, it ranks dead last in clinical outcomes yet costs more than $3 trillion a year. By comparison, Europe spends $1.8 trillion annually on healthcare for a population nearly twice the size.

This three-part series, which previously explored the limited impact of primary care innovators and the struggles of U.S. hospitals, now concludes with the search for a hero – a disruptive cure for what ails the U.S. healthcare system.

Highlighted here are three possible directions the industry could turn and three trailblazing companies hoping to guide the way.

CareMore: In The Direction Of High-Touch Patient Care

Today’s healthcare is extremely people dependent. From receptionists, billing clerks and housekeepers to nurses, technicians and physicians, people account for more than 40% of all healthcare expenditures.

Therefore, one might assume lowering the cost of medical care means slashing headcount. Not at CareMore. The company spends twice as much on staffing as the typical healthcare organization – part of an approach that has proven remarkably successful.

Founded in 1993 as a medical group, CareMore was acquired by Anthem in 2011 and rapidly expanded its services across eight states. The company’s president and CEO Sachin H. Jain believes the best way to lower healthcare spending is to invest in the health of patients.

To do that, Jain hires large numbers of nurse practitioners, social workers, physician assistants and pharmacists. Located in care centers, these multidisciplinary teams help seal the cracks of America’s fragmented care delivery system.

In a recent Forbes editorial, Jain explained his hire-more philosophy: “Given the false choice between ensuring that I have the right processes and technology in place or the right people … I would choose the latter every day of the week.”

Indeed, people are central to CareMore’s strategy. But to understand why the company may prove disruptive, let’s dive deeper into its model, one that prioritizes disease management, limited specialty referral and reduced hospitalization:

  1. CareMore focuses on caring for the relatively sick, particularly low-income seniors enrolled in Medicare Advantage. This government-run program differs from traditional Medicare in that doctors receive a lump-sum prepayment for the expected cost of care, rather than receiving “fee-for-service” payments for each visit, test or procedure. Further, Medicare Advantage offers financial incentives to providers that keep patients healthier and avoid expensive hospital care. This is how CareMore is able to invest in a larger staff.
  2. The company invites the community doctors with whom it contracts to refer patients to CareMore care centers at no added expense. This controlled care-management process is a win-win for overburdened primary care physicians and for CareMore, whose nurse practitioners get to direct specialty referrals within their narrow network of providers.
  3. Today, 20% of elderly patients consume 80% of Medicare resources. That’s why CareMore hires “extensivists” to oversee complex patient cases both inside the hospital and on an outpatient basis. And because extensivists are trusted by their patients, they’re able to manage specialty referral, hospitalization and admissions to skilled nursing facilities in the most efficient ways.
  4. CareMore’s multi-disciplinary teams offer individualized programs for patients living with complex (and expensive) medical problems such as chronic lung disease, diabetes, heart failure and kidney dysfunction. And because chronic diseases are often associated with high levels of stress and depression, CareMore provides extensive mental and behavioral health services.
  5. The distinct power of CareMore derives from its synergistic approach, an end-to-end care model that not only maximizes quality outcomes and avoids complications from chronic disease, but also effectively controls specialty referrals and inpatient utilization.

This last point may be the most important. In some ways, CareMore’s model resembles other cutting-edge primary care programs that serve patients with chronic illnesses. But by using nurse practitioners and extensivists to personally manage referrals within CareMore’s cost-effective specialty network, the company goes a step beyond.

As a result, CareMore achieves 20% fewer hospital admissions, 23% fewer hospital days per patient and a 4% shorter inpatient stay compared to traditional Medicare beneficiaries.

The biggest question for CareMore is whether it will hit a ceiling. Its people-dependent approach could prove too difficult to replicate on a nationwide scale. As it tries to expand to new markets, CareMore may also encounter resistance from patients and the broader medical community given the narrowness of its specialty network.

Forward: In The Direction Of High-Tech Patient Care   

Adrian Aoun, who created Forward in 2016, takes a decidedly different approach to solving healthcare’s biggest problems. With a background in artificial intelligence (AI), Aoun previously created Sidewalk Labs, an urban innovation project for Google and, before that, a news-aggregation startup that Google purchased for more than $30 million.

So, rather than hiring more people, Aoun uses sophisticated technology to reduce healthcare’s massive headcount and costs. He thinks computerized systems can diagnose and treat humans more accurately and affordably. And because human employees are more expensive and less-reliable than computers, you won’t find many of them performing traditional office roles at Forward’s San Francisco location, nor at the one set to open in Los Angeles. Instead, here’s what you will see:

  1. An iPad, not a receptionist, checks you in. From there, you step up to a sophisticated, space-aged body scanner and place your left hand inside the reader. In less than a minute, the machine records your pulse, oxygenation, height, weight and body temperature. The data is immediately input into your medical record and compared to past measurements.
  2. Inside the exam room, a technician uses “near infrared” technology to draw your blood before running tests at Forward’s fully automated in-house laboratory system. Your blood count, chemistries and genetic analyses for key markers are made available in less than half an hour and graphed against prior results.
  3. When a physician enters the room, there’s no large computer to sit behind and, therefore, no barrier between you, the doctor and the problem at hand. Your medical information appears on a large wall monitor that’s powered by a combination of AI and predictive analytics, with easy-to-follow graphics and voice-recognition commands. And since Forward’s members pay a $149 monthly fee with no copays or deductibles, data entry is designed to support care delivery, not billing and coding.
  4. Then there’s the AI system itself. Unlike commonly used algorithmic care that requires manual revisions, Forward’s technology learns as it goes. By analyzing a multitude of patient problems and treatments, the system ascertains which solutions are most effective. And with patients staying connected through a variety of wearable devices and computer applications, nurse practitioners and physicians know when a patient is likely to have trouble, even when that person is sitting at home.
  5. Finally, every health measurement taken at Forward is uploaded to the patient’s smart phone, making it easy for individuals to obtain data on their laboratory and clinical results.

As a primary care model, Forward’s approach is interesting but unlikely to disrupt the $3 trillion healthcare industry. The company’s uniqueness is in its technology, which is designed to scale up. Through high-tech devices and AI programming, Forward’s model could expand into high-end specialties. Already, the company is introducing automated eye refraction and digitally enabled melanoma screening at little or no extra cost.

Ask most doctors, and they’ll tell you Forward is not the future of medicine. Then again, technology aversion is the very thing that undid industry titans like Kodak, Borders and Yellow Cab.

Ultimately, Forward’s disruptive ability depends on how far and how quickly the company can broaden its scope beyond primary care. For example, will Aoun seek to hire a select group of specialists to consult with patients via video? Imagine the benefit of having top cardiologists and oncologists checking in on that giant wall monitor or via a patient’s smartphone. More importantly, can Forward convince insurance companies to carve out dollars from premiums to pay for the patient care delivered and for the hospital or specialty care avoided? If not, Forward’s going rate of $149 per month may restrict its footprint to the nation’s most affluent areas.

Health City: In The Direction Of Off-Shore Patient Care

Take a one-hour plane ride from Miami to the Grand Cayman Islands and feast your eyes on the palm-tree-lined entryway of healthcare’s third potential disruption. Health City is a sophisticated, modern hospital, offering affordable cardiology, pediatric, orthopedic and oncology services with clinical results that rival the best in the United States. Adjacent to the hospital, you’ll see the future site of a five-star hotel. Dr. Devi Shetty hopes to fill it with hundreds of Americans each night, thus making his healthcare tourism plans a reality.

Shetty, an India-born and American-trained surgeon, sees the future of healthcare differently than the leaders of CareMore and Forward. He believes 50% of the costs swallowed up by traditional care providers can be eliminated through discipline and operational excellence.

Shetty’s approach, like the other two, is complex. It includes:

  1. Highly efficient operating rooms. Health City completes more than twice as many surgeries per day as the average U.S. hospital. And rather than using the ORs five days a week, they’re scheduled for six. Instead of an eight-hour block, they run for 12. To accomplish this, Health City matches supply to demand to an exacting degree, quite unlike American facilities with their inadequate volume, inconsistent staffing and wasted capacity.
  2. Hyper-specialization. Higher patient volume per physician drives higher clinical quality at lower costs. That is, the more surgeons focus on a limited number of procedures, the better their performance and results. And by limiting number of procedures per physician, the more likely Health City is to achieve operational efficiency and innovate surgical techniques.
  3. Technology. IT needs to support clinicians, not vice-versa. At Health City, nurses and physicians carry their mobile devices everywhere, entering data on touch-screen interfaces to improve patient care, not to keep track of billing codes. The system is locally designed to analyze and provide immediate hospital data. As a result, physicians and administrators can see reports today on how to improve patient care tomorrow.
  4. Little to no delays. Walk into the administrative area of Health City and the first thing you’ll notice is a large computer screen reporting how long it takes physicians to respond to an elevation in a patient’s heart rate or higher than usual post-operative bleeding. In U.S. hospitals, delays in addressing patient problems often run an hour or longer on nights and weekends. Inside Health City, the average delay is eight minutes, with an aim of reducing it to six.
  5. A powerful mission. Health City is committed to “delivering world-class healthcare that is accessible and affordable for all.” It’s a core value built into the hospital’s culture, believed by all and evident in its outcomes.

Health City’s biggest challenge is getting patients to travel to the Cayman Islands for care. The objective data affirms the hospital’s clinical excellence and lower costs, but Americans distrust the medical care provided in other parts of the world. With most of its patient population hailing from the Caribbean and South America, Health City’s best hope is to contract with large, self-funded U.S. companies that want to cut their medical costs in half, particularly those organizations willing to offer employees incentives to combine their medical care with a tropical island vacation.

Will Healthcare Disruption Happen? How?

American healthcare is inefficient, ineffective and expensive. In other words, it’s ripe for disruption, which could happen a number of ways. It may be through highly personal care that effectively manages utilization and helps sick patients get healthier. Perhaps high-tech systems will replace expensive humans and create far better outcomes for patients. Or maybe an operationally efficient, off-shore solution will disrupt America’s bloated delivery system, just as it did the manufacturing and IT sectors.

CareMore, Forward and Health City represent three possible approaches to healthcare disruption, but it’s far too early to declare a hero among them. Combined, these companies care for a fraction of 1% of American patients. Should that number grow, it will likely come at the expense of the doctors and hospitals who benefit from today’s broken system. Unless healthcare providers in the U.S. are willing to embrace new solutions and care delivery models soon, they risk being disrupted. The cautionary lesson taught by other industries is that once disruption begins, it’s already too late for the old model to save itself.

 

How One U.S. Clinic Disrupted Primary Care, Made Patients Healthier And Still Failed

https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertpearl/2017/10/24/primary-care/#49ba8eee2c0f

Turntable Health launched in Las Vegas in 2013 and looked to turn the traditional primary care model on its head.

Zubin Damania has a face for television, a mind for medicine and the sort of fearless personality required to be one of the internet’s most famous MDs.

Damania’s celebrity began in earnest not long after someone posted a clip from his 1999 UCSF Medical School commencement address. In his opening, Damania jokes that he’s on a “time delay,” given his reputation as a “loose cannon.” The rest of the clip, which has been viewed over 130,000 times on YouTube, takes you briefly inside the mind of a versatile entertainer and healthcare visionary.

From UCSF, Damania completed his internal medicine residency at Stanford University. He spent the next 10 years as a practicing hospitalist by day and a healthcare satirist by night – writing, performing and filming musical parodies about the frustrations of being a doctor. He’s best known today by his online persona, ZDoggMD, and for his nightly Facebook show, covering the latest medical news with his trademark wit.

The rise and fall of Turntable Health

In 2013, Zappos.com CEO Tony Hsieh asked Damania to launch a next-generation medical clinic in Las Vegas as part of a $350 million downtown revitalization project. Founded as a primary care practice, Turntable Health looked to turn healthcare delivery on its head.

Inside a waiting room that resembled a sleek Silicon Valley startup, Turntable members passed the time by spinning records, playing Xbox and practicing yoga. As part of their membership, patients had access to an entire “wellness ecosystem,” complete with same-day visits, 24/7 doctor access (by email, phone or video), along with a dedicated health coach. Doctors at the clinic spent 45 minutes or more with their patients, quite unlike the 13 to 16-minute visits that have become standard in U.S. doctors’ offices.

Damania credits the vision for his clinic to a partnership he forged with Rushika Fernandopulle, CEO of another innovative primary-care organization called Iora Health. With Fernandopulle’s guidance, Damania focused on population health and disease prevention to improve patient wellness and, over time, lower costs. And rather than charging for each visit, test or procedure, Turntable patients who were not covered by traditional insurance paid a flat fee of $80 a month.

Unlike any other primary care clinic in Las Vegas, Turntable Health was a success, medically. By emphasizing prevention and doctor-patient relationships, Damania’s practice achieved superior quality outcomes, while providing rapid access to care and high patient satisfaction. But from an economic perspective, the clinic was a bust. Insurers shied away from member fees, insisting on more traditional reimbursements, which directly contradicted Damania’s long-term health strategy. Turntable Health was forced to close its doors in January 2017, just three years after opening.

In a public statement, Damania explained: “We flatly refused to compromise when pressured by payers to offer fee-for-service options, or to begin charging a co-pay. We firmly believe that healthcare is a relationship, not a transaction.”

Unfortunately for Damania, most health insurers are too impatient. Investing in primary care and chronic-disease management is proven to reduce and even avoid medical problems. But it can take five to 10 years for the improvements in the health of patients to offset the added upfront costs of providing the necessary care. Health plans worry patients will switch insurers before they can recoup such a long-term investment.

Primary care doctors can and do play a critical role in preventing disease, spurring lifestyle changes and warding off complications from chronic illness, when they have the time to do so. Today’s fee-for-service payment system doesn’t adequately reward these efforts.

Today’s insurers are systematically reducing primary care reimbursements, forcing doctors to see 20 to 30 patients a day while spending the bulk of their time in front of a computer, entering patient data for billing purposes. This backward approach to care delivery is wreaking havoc on the nation’s health and economy. As the incidence of chronic disease grows, the cost of American healthcare continues to rise more rapidly than the nation’s ability to pay.

The closure of Turntable Health was a major loss for Las Vegas, where residents joke that the best place to go for healthcare is the airport. Compared to people with access to integrated and coordinated medical care programs, Las Vegans are less likely to be insured, get the recommended cancer screenings and receive other necessary preventive care interventions.

Pushing primary care: Iora Health and One Medical

Damania’s partner in primary care, Iora Health, is experiencing relative success nationally, with 30+ clinics in 11 metropolitan areas. Using the same model of patient engagement and prevention that Turntable adopted, Iora has shown 35% to 40% drops in hospitalizations compared to their community peers, with 12% to 15% lower total healthcare costs. They’ve also established contracts with insurance companies who are willing to invest in primary care, thus solving one of ZDogg’s biggest challenges.

And they’re not alone. One of Iora’s leading competitors, One Medical, operates out of San Francisco under the leadership of Dr. Tom Lee. Labeled by some as a “concierge” medical practice, the company’s network includes 250+ doctors in 40 cities coast to coast. One Medical offers patients the ability to schedule same-day appointments, access their health records online, and fill prescriptions using the One Medical app – all for a relatively affordable yearly fee of about $149. With a promise that “your care is our highest priority,” the company makes the primary care experience more convenient and user friendly, a mission that’s been paying off since 2007. One Medical’s subscriber base continues to grow by tens of thousands of patients each year, particularly within the tech industry.

Although these extremely well-run primary care systems have improved outpatient quality and patient satisfaction, their impact on overall healthcare costs remains minimal. If Americans want to make healthcare affordable again, the scope and pace of change will need to accelerate at every point of care. This will require innovative approaches that rein in the rapidly escalating costs of specialty and hospital care, where most added national healthcare expenditures (NHE) exist.

 

 

Here’s What’s Really Driving Healthcare Costs

https://www.medpagetoday.com/publichealthpolicy/healthpolicy/69102?pop=0&ba=1&xid=fb-md-pcp

Image result for Here's What's Really Driving Healthcare Costs

 

The market economy fails when applied to healthcare.

That healthcare expenditures in the US are high and rising rapidly is nothing new, but this study appearing in the Journal of the American Medical Association identifies the exact components of healthcare that are driving those soaring costs. As F. Perry Wilson, MD points out in this 150 Second Analysis, the data suggest traditional economic forces break down in the US healthcare market.

Transcript:

It’s no secret that healthcare costs in the United States are exceedingly high, and rising.

The US spends the most of any country in the world on healthcare in terms of percent of GDP, sitting around 18% as of the most recent data.

But to address the issue, we need to understand what is driving this increase, and a new study appearing in the Journal of the American Medical Association does the best job yet in decomposing the factors behind the rising costs.

The researchers used data from the US Disease Expenditure Project, which utilizes 183 data sources and 2.9 billion patient records to quantify where each healthcare dollar is being spent in this country.

Here’s the top level overview. After accounting for inflation, healthcare expenditures increased by $933.5 billion between 1996 and 2013. To put that into perspective, that’s enough money to create 9 additional interstate highway systems. We could fully fund 3 NASAs every year.

Or we could provide 400 malaria nets to every man, woman, and child in Africa. We could even do something crazy like pay down the debt.

But to save money in the future, we have to know why we keep spending more. Here’s the breakdown.

Some of the increase in spending comes from the aging of the US population and population growth. Not much we can do about that. But 50% of the increase was simply due to higher prices.

This is distinct from healthcare utilization. In fact, healthcare utilization was decreased a bit over this time period. This is shown most dramatically in the data for inpatient care. Take a look at this bar chart.

Use of inpatient care (that’s service utilization – in purple) went down substantially from 1996 – 2013 as we moved to more outpatient treatment. But this may have been a Faustian bargain. The price of the inpatient care that remained went up much more – increasing overall inpatient spending by around 250 billion dollars.

Let’s take a moment to realize how weird this is, economically. Demand for healthcare decreased over time. Prices increased. That is not an efficient market.

Different chronic diseases had different patterns of price increases. The biggest increase was seen in diabetes care, as you can see here, driven largely by rising costs of pharmaceuticals.

Regardless of the disease, though, it is clear that it is the price of what we’re buying – whether a drug, an ED visit, or a hospital stay – not the amount of what we’re buying that is the major driver of cost increases. Efforts to reduce the consumption of healthcare, therefore, may not bend the cost curve as much as efforts to reduce its price. That’s just my 2 cents.

Professor Speaks episode, “ACA Individual Mandate”

https://zc1.campaign-view.com/ua/viewinbrowser?od=11287eca81286e&rd=13f3dcd2f1327e7b&sd=13f3dcd2f1324a7b&n=11699e4c13d805f&mrd=13f3dcd2f1324a6d&m=1

http://www.propharmaconsultants.com/speak.html

Professor Speaks

The November 15th, 2017 Professor Speaks episode, “ACA Individual Mandate”, is now available on YouTube and the Pro Pharma Website.

This episode addresses questions like:

  • What is the Individual Mandate?
  • Why do some want to repeal it?
  • What would be the effect of repealing it?

We’re on the brink of a health care M&A binge

Related image

CVS Health is extremely close to cementing its $66 billion takeover of Aetna, the Wall Street Journal reported yesterday. It’d be the biggest deal of the year, and Axios’ Bob Herman notes that more health care deals could also be in the offing:

  • Humana recently altered its executive compensation and severance policies in case the health insurer is bought out or merges with another company. Wall Street views Humana as a ripe acquisition target for Cigna because of Humana’s huge Medicare business.
  • Express Scripts is about to lose its large, lucrative pharmacy benefits contract with Anthem. Express Scripts’ CEO said at a Forbes health care conference yesterday he “would be open” to striking a merger deal with a health insurer or partnering with Amazon.
  • Catholic Health Initiatives and Dignity Health, two large hospital systems, likely will provide more details into their merger discussions when they chat with bondholders next week.

Get smart: Health care mergers and acquisitions have been in vogue for years, and big deals would be almost certain to happen if Congress also passes its tax cut bill — which would give companies more money to play with through vastly lower corporate tax rates.

Image result for axios

GOP may have no choice but to try health care again after taxes

https://www.axios.com/gop-may-have-no-choice-but-to-try-health-care-again-after-taxes-2513940879.html

Image result for market instability and uncertainty

 

Republicans have been asking themselves what they’ll turn to next, after their tax overhaul wraps up. If they repeal the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate, there’s a good chance the answer will be health care — whether they like it or not.

What they’re saying: President Trump has said several times that he wants to take another crack at repeal-and-replace after the tax bill. GOP leaders in the House and Senate have not echoed that plan. But if Republicans do end up repealing the individual mandate, Insurance markets will begin to feel the effects quickly, leading to almost immediate nationwide upheaval that will be impossible to ignore — especially in an election year.

  • This year saw a lot of chaos — insurers pulling out of markets, coming back in, changing their premiums at the last minute — due in large part to changes that would pale in comparison to something on the scale of repealing the individual mandate.
  • “I think next year will be even crazier” if the coverage requirement goes away, the Kaiser Family Foundation’s Larry Levitt says.

The timing: The disruption caused by repealing the individual mandate would start early next year and intensify again just before next year’s midterm elections.

  • The Senate’s tax bill would eliminate the ACA’s penalty for being uninsured, starting on Jan. 1, 2019. That might seem like a long way away, but it’s not.
  • Insurers will start deciding this coming spring whether they want to participate in the exchanges in 2019 — and if so, where. Without the mandate, insurers would likely begin to pull back from state marketplaces early next year, likely leaving many parts of the country with no insurance plans to choose from.
  • Insurers will then have to finalize their 2019 premiums next fall. Those rates would likely be substantially higher (10% higher, on average, according to the Congressional Budget Office) without the mandate in place — and that news would hit just before next year’s midterms.

The bottom line: All this fallout would be impossible to ignore, putting more pressure on Congress to return to health policy whether it wants to or not — and reopening all the same internal divisions that have stymied every other health care bill.

Flashback: “You can make an argument that Obamacare is falling of its own weight — until we repeal the individual mandate,” Sen. Lindsey Graham said two weeks ago. “Then there is absolutely no excuse for us not to replace Obamacare because we changed a fundamental principle of Obamacare. So I hope every Republican knows that when you pass repeal of the individual mandate, it’s no longer their problem, it becomes your problem.”