The benefits of bankruptcy? How one hospital found redemption in Chapter 11

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/benefits-bankruptcy-how-one-hospital-found-redemption-chapter-11?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWkRObE1XWmhNemt3TjJFNCIsInQiOiJuWXNFaDk2M2RINGpwRlZ6ck1oekJyVkg0clVSUjlQek9TUExrdVVYUlNubjAzU2pkS0FtNndPODc0dVpBaTkvUEFKd05aK01mMXp6dDc5NzVTNDVQZmVZWmFXTjFCd08xMnRKWGljZzNGTEFPSHFIY21UT1Y2TnYwTk5QWWVGUCJ9

Image result for hospital bankruptcies

Filing for bankruptcy might make hospital finance executives cringe with desperation, if not failure, but strategically pursuing Chapter 11 can actually lay the foundation for a brighter future.

In fact, Morehead Memorial Hospital in Eden, North Carolina, actually owes its future to its leader’s decision to file for Chapter 11. Like so many rural hospitals, whose ranks are shrinking fast, Morehead faced common problems including flat or declining populations, migration of patients who find work in other communities and get care there, as well as the prevalence of Medicare and Medicaid in payer mixes that cause financial losses and vulnerabilities.

The albatross: Old debt

Morehead CEO Dana Weston’s original inclination was to look for a buyer, but after a year of searching a realization sunk in: the large amount of debt attached to the hospital was a liability akin to a brick wall between Morehead and a path forward.

Weston said they got consistent feedback that organizations felt it wasn’t in their current strategy to acquire a struggling rural hospital, since many systems already have more than one such facility under their umbrella. Most of the debt was at least a decade old, and addressing it was really the only way to make themselves attractive to potential buyers.

So Weston and the executive team did something that sounded more like an end than a beginning: Morehead filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on July 10.

Navigating Chapter 11, especially for a struggling rural hospital with limited resources and personnel must be done properly for the strategy to succeed.

And Morehead had some unique complexities, according to Ron Winters, managing director of hospital and healthcare services management firm Healthcare Management Partners. Winters has followed Morehead’s case and pointed out that the hospital is near a state border so they deal with different insurers from other states and are within 90 minutes of several larger competing hospitals, which didn’t help. Even worse, the size and scope of the their complex debt picture, including a $34 million U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development loan that offered limited flexibility on repayment, really limited their options, Winters said.

“You couldn’t just go to HUD and say let’s make a deal,” Winters explained. “You needed the bankruptcy code to make a transaction happen.”

That’s because when a hospital enters bankruptcy, Winters said it is effectively drawing a line in the sand on the very day it files. Chapter 11 code dictates that any obligation incurred after the petition date is superior to anything owed prior to the petition date. So new debt legally takes priority over old in terms of what will be covered by proceeds from a transaction. Moreover, bankruptcy rules state that any buyer that acquires an entity that went through chapter 11 proceedings is assured no creditor can come after them for the acquired hospital’s debt. They only pay what they agreed to for the transaction, providing security and alleviating risk.

Eliminating the risk of old debt is the precise upside Morehead leveraged to make itself attractive to a prospective buyer.

Common misperceptions

The phrase Chapter 11, and this is true in any industry, hits an organization’s reputation pretty hard.

The legalese is hard to translate to employees and the community, and Weston said the sale of assets, which is how their bankruptcy transaction is referred to, caused quite a stir because it sounded like a liquidation.

“People had this picture in their mind of an auction where the furniture, equipment, everything was just gonna be sold off to the highest bidder,” Weston said. “That’s not the case at all.”

She insisted that the board’s decision to file for Chapter 11 was the right one because it removed one of the major barriers to interest in buying Morehead by addressing the debt through bankruptcy and shedding that liability.

Without a partner, Morehead simply had no future.

Avoiding bankruptcy’s downside

Winters warned that there is a risk to bankruptcy and two main drawbacks are costs and the consequences of not being prepared with a plan. First, a debtor must hire a bankruptcy lawyer and other experts such as a patient care ombudsman to monitor the care provided to patients and look after patient rights. If a hospital doesn’t have available assets to pay for those things, that’s a problem.

“It’s ideal to have some unpledged assets to use as liquidity for the proceedings or have a buyer lined up the very first day,” Winters said.

Having a buyer lined up on the first day would seem an ideal scenario, and is called a stalking horse purchaser. Bankruptcy code provides that a debtor must create protections so that the stalking horse can’t be easily outbid or outbid at all. A winning bidder that beats the stalking horse must do so by a minimum amount, for instance, and reimburse them for costs related to establishing stalking horse status.

Without a buyer ready to go or other financing plans laid out, creditors get worried, Winters said. “With financing, your creditors should be satisfied that all obligations following the bankruptcy petition will be satisfied.”

Hospitals would do well to start thinking about options like seeking a partner or bankruptcy while they still have some amount of liquidity and unpledged assets. “When you have none left you’re not going to be able to drive an attractive transaction and you run the greatest risk of collapsing,” Winters said.

The new future

Weston’s plan worked and Morehead’s survival is now all but assured.

On Nov. 13, a federal bankruptcy judge chose UNC Health Care as the winning bidder for Morehead, setting a course for emergence from Chapter 11 for early 2018.

The closing is expected to take 60 days, and Morehead will operate as usual during the transition. UNC personnel will be visiting Morehead in the coming weeks to start building relationships with hospital staff and the community.

Collapsing was never an option, according to Weston. The first-time CEO said there was far too much at stake. She said what keeps her up at night are the employees at Morehead and the community it serves. The hospital is vitally important to its hometown and to Rockingham County. It’s the biggest employer in Eden and the 4th or 5th largest in the county.

“The most valuable thing for me in this role is for the 700 who work here to trust that I am in this with them,” Weston said. “This community is my family.”

CapEx vs. OpEx

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/why-operations-finance-leaders-should-be-spearheading-healthcare-migrations-cloud?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWkRObE1XWmhNemt3TjJFNCIsInQiOiJuWXNFaDk2M2RINGpwRlZ6ck1oekJyVkg0clVSUjlQek9TUExrdVVYUlNubjAzU2pkS0FtNndPODc0dVpBaTkvUEFKd05aK01mMXp6dDc5NzVTNDVQZmVZWmFXTjFCd08xMnRKWGljZzNGTEFPSHFIY21UT1Y2TnYwTk5QWWVGUCJ9

Quick strategy question: If you could start from scratch and implement Microsoft Outlook by cutting a fat check to acquire the software and hardware to run it on-site, and then foot the bill to maintain both, would you really sign-off on that rather than simply subscribing to a cloud-based email service and letting someone else take care of the maintenance and upgrades?

That answer is a resounding ‘unlikely.’

Black Book, in fact, found that 92 percent of hospital C-suite executives believe that cloud shifts the IT cost burden from capital expenditure to operational expenditure with positive results. Doug Brown, Black Book Managing Partner, pulled that from research the firm conducted for its upcoming 2018 Health IT Trends report.

“Moving software purchases to a cloud model and the resulting flexibility in how a healthcare organization can account for these tools as an OpEx versus a CapEx is one of the many advantages that the cloud has brought to organizations,” Brown said.

Cloud: Here today and to stay

Cloud computing is not the next big thing, it’s already here and at this point moving to the cloud model is largely being driven by end users and tech shops. And that is creating something of a mess. Symantec researchers found that at the end of 2016, enterprises in various industries had 926 cloud apps in use, up from 841 the year before, but top executives estimated that number to be between 30 and 40 apps.

“The ultimate decision often comes down to the CIO,” said IDC Health Insights Research Director Mutaz Shegewi.

That poses its own set of problems, notably that some CIOs want to keep their data on-premise for fear of losing hold over it or are concerned about the larger value IT provides as a department when pieces of its role can be outsourced to the cloud, Shegewi said.

“Increasingly and with time, I have seen resistive CIOs give in and even advocate for the switch once they understand the value and benefits that could be brought about by the cloud, especially around security and vulnerability,” Shegewi said.

Therein lies the opportunity for forward-thinking finance executives to help lead their IT counterparts toward the cloud and its OpEx cost advantages. Who better to spearhead that migration?

Former hospital CFO Kim Lee, who is now COO at Faith Community Hospital in Wichita Falls, Texas, ranked the cloud model’s positive points as lower upfront costs and shorter implementation time as well as upgrades managed for customers, and less of a support burden on the IT team. She added to that list with easier remote access and connecting to apps, as well as improved security management.

Lee said that Faith Community Hospital as an organization, in fact, recommends certain cloud-based apps to its user base.

“We find cloud apps are less likely to experience security issues compared to utilizing a third-party vendor who may have to go through an interface process to talk to the software,” Kim said. “It takes out the middleman approach and the mobility support is provided by your software vendor.”

And with Black Book predicting that 57 percent of hospitals with 200 or more beds will pair back, if not freeze altogether, CapEx investments in IT during 2018 and the same goes for 85 percent of hospitals with fewer than 200 beds, now is the time for finance teams to get more involved in cloud decisions by working closely with the CIO and other technology leaders.

That’s not to suggest everything should be moved into the cloud strictly for the sake of OpEx, of course.

CapEx vs. OpEx considerations

Northwell Health CFO Michele Cusack works with the IT department to help make choices about what to put in the cloud and what should really stay on-site.

Cusack said it’s important to evaluate which systems can better fuel the overall mission on-premise or do so in the cloud. Certain applications, like email, commodity and productivity apps, are a good OpEx fit.

Software that houses sensitive patient data, on the other hand, requires more careful consideration before transitioning that out to the cloud, if at all.

Northwell is now in amidst a shift to the cloud for its human capital management system, for instance, and it subscribes to other key applications running in private clouds.

“We look at the overall savings by comparing the monthly fees to the upfront capital costs, the potential reduction or elimination of certain on premise IT infrastructure, the cost benefit of seamless future upgrades to systems, and the cost benefit of being able to scale resources quickly in response to demand,” Cusack explained.

Lee added to that list of aspects to account for when tapping into the cloud for apps or bigger software services.

“A few of the top considerations when choosing a cloud-based software is reviewing your contract to ensure there are procedures in place for internet downtimes, procedures for access to facility records long-term, certification of compliance with HIPAA, Security Risk Assessments and PHI, processes in place to accommodate your back up requirements and adequate planning prior to implementation and timely notification for new software releases,” Lee said.

CFO as the new cloud champions

Cusack and Lee are not the only CFOs reaping the cloud’s OpEx advantages.

Seventy-two percent of the finance chiefs Black Book polled reported that IT spend as a percentage of operating expenses in their organizations increased at least 50 percent since 2015’s study.

“In current economic times with most organizations in the pursuit of maintaining a lean balance sheet to preserve cash flow, the cloud migration decision is appropriately led by the Chief Financial Officer,” said Doug Brown, managing partner of research firm Black Book. “It shouldn’t be a CIO’s job to determine CapEx or OpEx or the benefits of accounting for technology investments as an operational expense versus a capital expense.”

 

What we learned from Azar’s first hearing

https://www.axios.com/hhs-nominee-drug-prices-are-too-high-2513516063.html

Alex Azar is in line to be the next HHS secretary. Photo: Carolyn Kaster / AP

The biggest cloud hanging over Alex Azar during his Senate confirmation hearing Wednesday was his pharmaceutical industry background. Republicans praised the experience as an advantage to tackle high drug costs, while Democrats said it raises conflicts of interest and encourages a revolving door mentality.

Azar’s response: He will not “implement pharma’s policy agenda. I don’t know what their list of agenda items is.”

Between the lines: Private industry experience doesn’t preclude someone from a public job. But, as my colleague Bob Herman notes, many of Azar’s responses matched up with the pharmaceutical lobby’s playbook:

  • discussing the holes in health insurance plans and high deductibles
  • targeting pharmacy benefit managers and others in the “entire channel”
  • focusing on lowering what people pay at the pharmacy counter instead of systemic issues like the rising list prices that drugmakers set

Yes, but: Azar did mention wanting to reform the drug patent system, which the drug industry almost certainly would oppose.

 

 

​Mandate repeal gets more complicated

Related image

Senate Republicans are still moving ahead with their tax overhaul, but the bill’s health care components —namely, repealing the individual mandate — got thornier yesterday.

On the Senate side: GOP leaders told Sen. Susan Collins they would agree to pass two health care measures to offset the damage from repealing the mandate: the ACA stabilization bill from Sens. Lamar Alexander and Patty Murray, and Collins’ proposal to establish a new reinsurance program with about $5 billion in federal money.

  • Alexander-Murray would not have much effect at all, the Congressional Budget Office said yesterday. CBO still expects repealing the mandate to produce about 13 million newly uninsured Americans and premium hikes of about 10%, on average.
  • As it did in its initial score of the Alexander-Murray legislation, CBO assumed the ACA’s cost-sharing payments were still being made, even though they are not. This is weird, and it does produce more conservative estimates of the bill’s impacts. But it’s not new, and GOP leaders on the Senate Budget Committee have some input into CBO’s assumptions on this front.
  • As for reinsurance, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has told Collins he’s on board.

The other side: The House is not on board. Rep. Mark Meadows, the influential chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, said yesterday that he opposes new reinsurance funding, according to The Hill. It’s not entirely clear whether Alexander-Murray could pass the House outside of a larger package, either.

Don’t forget about entitlements. Sen. Bob Corker’s colleagues are not wild about his idea for a “trigger” that would automatically raise taxes if these tax cuts don’t end up paying for themselves. Some are talking instead about a “trigger” that would cut spending — including spending on Medicare and Medicaid.

  • A similar trigger already exists: As it stands, the tax bill would already prompt some $25 billion in Medicare cuts, thanks to existing rules that call for automatic spending cuts to counteract new laws that add to the deficit — which the tax bill would. An ACA payment program for insurers would also be cut substantially under those automatic reductions.
  • The New York Times has a good visualization of these automatic spending cuts.

Image result for axios vitals

Healthcare Triage News: Lots of Children Are About to Lose Their Health Coverage

Healthcare Triage News: Lots of Children Are About to Lose Their Health Coverage

Image result for Health Triage: Lots of Children Are About to Lose Their Health Coverage

Budget authorization for the Children’s Health Insurance Program in the US ran out a couple of months ago, and there’s no reauthorization in sight. A LOT of kids are insured through this program.