Partners HealthCare’s annual operating income soars 489%

Related image

Boston-based Partners HealthCare saw its operating income rise in fiscal year 2018 despite a decline in revenues, according to financial documents released Dec. 7.

Partners saw operating revenues dip 0.5 percent year over year to $13.31 billion in fiscal year 2018, which ended Sept. 30. The health system’s significant growth in provider revenues was partially offset by a decline in insurance revenue. Partners said the decrease in insurance revenue was attributable to the transition of members from Medicaid managed care programs into the new MassHealth ACO program in March.

After accounting for a 2.4 percent decrease in expenses, Partners ended fiscal 2018 with operating income of $309.9 million. That’s up 489 percent from a year earlier, when the health system posted operating income of $52.57 million.

Partners reported a 2.3 percent operating margin for fiscal 2018, up from a 0.4 percent operating margin in the year prior.

“While a 2-3 percent margin is slim compared to our peers across the nation, it enables us to reinvest in patient care and provide for the future capital needs of our hospitals and facilities,” said Peter K. Markell, treasurer and CFO of Partners.

After factoring in nonoperating income, Partners ended fiscal 2018 with net income of $826.6 million, up from $659.1 million in fiscal 2017.



Allina’s operating income sinks 45% in Q2

Image result for allina health

Allina Health’s revenues increased in the second quarter of 2018, but the Minneapolis-based system’s operating income plummeted due to growth in expenses.

Allina reported revenues of $1.07 billion in the second quarter of this year, up from $1.01 billion in the same period of 2017, according to recently released bondholder documents. The boost was attributable to higher net patient service revenue, which climbed 6.4 percent year over year.

The system’s operating expenses totaled $1.06 billion in the second quarter of 2018, up from $990.4 million in the same period a year earlier.

Allina ended the second quarter of this year with operating income of $13.1 million. That’s down 45 percent from the first quarter of 2017, when the system reported operating income of $23.9 million.

Allina reported an investment return of $33.8 million in the second quarter of 2017, but that number dropped to $6.3 million in the second quarter of this year.

After factoring in the drop in investment income, Allina’s net income tumbled 56 percent year over year to $19.1 million in the second quarter of 2018.



CapEx vs. OpEx

Quick strategy question: If you could start from scratch and implement Microsoft Outlook by cutting a fat check to acquire the software and hardware to run it on-site, and then foot the bill to maintain both, would you really sign-off on that rather than simply subscribing to a cloud-based email service and letting someone else take care of the maintenance and upgrades?

That answer is a resounding ‘unlikely.’

Black Book, in fact, found that 92 percent of hospital C-suite executives believe that cloud shifts the IT cost burden from capital expenditure to operational expenditure with positive results. Doug Brown, Black Book Managing Partner, pulled that from research the firm conducted for its upcoming 2018 Health IT Trends report.

“Moving software purchases to a cloud model and the resulting flexibility in how a healthcare organization can account for these tools as an OpEx versus a CapEx is one of the many advantages that the cloud has brought to organizations,” Brown said.

Cloud: Here today and to stay

Cloud computing is not the next big thing, it’s already here and at this point moving to the cloud model is largely being driven by end users and tech shops. And that is creating something of a mess. Symantec researchers found that at the end of 2016, enterprises in various industries had 926 cloud apps in use, up from 841 the year before, but top executives estimated that number to be between 30 and 40 apps.

“The ultimate decision often comes down to the CIO,” said IDC Health Insights Research Director Mutaz Shegewi.

That poses its own set of problems, notably that some CIOs want to keep their data on-premise for fear of losing hold over it or are concerned about the larger value IT provides as a department when pieces of its role can be outsourced to the cloud, Shegewi said.

“Increasingly and with time, I have seen resistive CIOs give in and even advocate for the switch once they understand the value and benefits that could be brought about by the cloud, especially around security and vulnerability,” Shegewi said.

Therein lies the opportunity for forward-thinking finance executives to help lead their IT counterparts toward the cloud and its OpEx cost advantages. Who better to spearhead that migration?

Former hospital CFO Kim Lee, who is now COO at Faith Community Hospital in Wichita Falls, Texas, ranked the cloud model’s positive points as lower upfront costs and shorter implementation time as well as upgrades managed for customers, and less of a support burden on the IT team. She added to that list with easier remote access and connecting to apps, as well as improved security management.

Lee said that Faith Community Hospital as an organization, in fact, recommends certain cloud-based apps to its user base.

“We find cloud apps are less likely to experience security issues compared to utilizing a third-party vendor who may have to go through an interface process to talk to the software,” Kim said. “It takes out the middleman approach and the mobility support is provided by your software vendor.”

And with Black Book predicting that 57 percent of hospitals with 200 or more beds will pair back, if not freeze altogether, CapEx investments in IT during 2018 and the same goes for 85 percent of hospitals with fewer than 200 beds, now is the time for finance teams to get more involved in cloud decisions by working closely with the CIO and other technology leaders.

That’s not to suggest everything should be moved into the cloud strictly for the sake of OpEx, of course.

CapEx vs. OpEx considerations

Northwell Health CFO Michele Cusack works with the IT department to help make choices about what to put in the cloud and what should really stay on-site.

Cusack said it’s important to evaluate which systems can better fuel the overall mission on-premise or do so in the cloud. Certain applications, like email, commodity and productivity apps, are a good OpEx fit.

Software that houses sensitive patient data, on the other hand, requires more careful consideration before transitioning that out to the cloud, if at all.

Northwell is now in amidst a shift to the cloud for its human capital management system, for instance, and it subscribes to other key applications running in private clouds.

“We look at the overall savings by comparing the monthly fees to the upfront capital costs, the potential reduction or elimination of certain on premise IT infrastructure, the cost benefit of seamless future upgrades to systems, and the cost benefit of being able to scale resources quickly in response to demand,” Cusack explained.

Lee added to that list of aspects to account for when tapping into the cloud for apps or bigger software services.

“A few of the top considerations when choosing a cloud-based software is reviewing your contract to ensure there are procedures in place for internet downtimes, procedures for access to facility records long-term, certification of compliance with HIPAA, Security Risk Assessments and PHI, processes in place to accommodate your back up requirements and adequate planning prior to implementation and timely notification for new software releases,” Lee said.

CFO as the new cloud champions

Cusack and Lee are not the only CFOs reaping the cloud’s OpEx advantages.

Seventy-two percent of the finance chiefs Black Book polled reported that IT spend as a percentage of operating expenses in their organizations increased at least 50 percent since 2015’s study.

“In current economic times with most organizations in the pursuit of maintaining a lean balance sheet to preserve cash flow, the cloud migration decision is appropriately led by the Chief Financial Officer,” said Doug Brown, managing partner of research firm Black Book. “It shouldn’t be a CIO’s job to determine CapEx or OpEx or the benefits of accounting for technology investments as an operational expense versus a capital expense.”


Top 10 healthcare trends for 2017

Image result for Top 10 healthcare trends for 2017

2017 will be a transition year shaped by changes proposed by President-elect Donald Trump and a Republican Congress. Chief healthcare concerns include legislative proposals to “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act (ACA), along with the continued movement to implement alternative payment models (APMs) as called for in the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA). We will address the potential changes ahead when it comes to shifting health benefits, provider supply, new care models, transparency, and the continued growth of consumerism. 2017 will be a dynamic year as we pivot and move in a new political direction.