CBO: Republican healthcare bill would cover millions fewer than ACA but reduce federal deficit

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/aca/cbo-republican-healthcare-bill-would-cover-millions-fewer-than-aca-but-reduce-federal-deficit?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTW1OaFl6TXlZVFF6WldKayIsInQiOiI3eHNMN1ZraGpJWHJ0eUFFRmdzaDRjVFVsOXBpV0VKVzdtWlU1UmxTbVZWRkpnMDhEN0Rrb3cyZlwvM0NmZnFJMXZTOG1KYXlLRHc0YWNUQzA3MmhpOVNQRFN4WmNsNUZVQmNQTGdPWE5UNUczUGppRUFGZ2dwelltaldGXC9IM3pWIn0%3D&mrkid=959610&utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal

capitol

The Congressional Budget Office on Monday released its highly anticipated score of House Republicans’ healthcare bill, finding that it would increase the number of uninsured individuals by millions, but also lower individual market premiums in the long run and decrease the federal deficit.

Congress uses the CBO’s cost estimates to evaluate the effects of any major legislation, and policymakers were particularly eager to get its estimate for the American Health Care Act given the high political stakes associated with the bill.

Here’s a brief rundown of the CBO’s estimates (PDF):

  • In 2018, 14 million more people would be uninsured under the GOP bill than under the Affordable Care Act—mostly due to the repeal of the individual mandate penalties. By 2026, that number would swell to 24 million because of changes to subsidies in the individual market and in the Medicaid program.
  • Relative to projections for the ACA, the Republicans’ bill would lead to higher average premiums in the individual market before 2020—15% in 2018 and 20% in 2019—and lower average premiums after that. The CBO notes, though, that premium changes under the new proposal would differ “significantly” for people of different ages, given the bill’s provision that allows insurers to charge older customers up to five times more for coverage.
  • Enacting the legislation would reduce federal deficits by $337 billion from 2017 to 2026, with the largest savings coming from reductions in Medicaid spending and eliminating the ACA’s subsidies for individual market customers. The largest costs, on the other hand, would come from the bill’s elimination of many of the ACA’s taxes and its creation of a new tax credit for health insurance.
  • The CBO estimates that the individual market would probably be stable in most areas under either the ACA or the AHCA. While tax credits under the newly proposed bill would be less generous than the ACA’s subsidies, other changes such as grants to states from the Patient and State Stability Fund would lower average premiums enough “to attract a sufficient number of relatively healthy people to stabilize the market,” the agency said.

Before the score emerged, the Trump administration had already cast doubt on the merits of the CBO’s projections. White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer pointed out during a press briefing Monday that the agency had originally projected 24 million people would be enrolled through the Affordable Care Act exchanges as of 2016, but the number ended up being only about 10.4 million.

“The CBO was off by more than half last time,” he said.

Later, he acknowledged that some senators are likely to look at the CBO’s score when evaluating the American Health Care Act, and it’s important to remind them of the agency’s past track record.

Previously, The Commonwealth Fund issued an analysis that sought to dispel such criticism of the agency’s estimates about the ACA. It concluded that while the CBO overestimated marketplace enrollment and costs and underestimated Medicaid enrollment, overall its projections were “reasonably accurate,” and closer to realized experience than the estimates of many other prominent forecasters.

 

CBO report predicts 24 million would lose coverage by 2026 under American Health Care Act

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/cbo-report-predicts-24-million-would-lose-coverage-2026-under-american-health-care-act

Image result for CBO report predicts 24 million would lose coverage by 2026 under American Health Care Act

An estimated 14 million people would lose coverage under the American Health Care Act, a number that would rise to 24 million by 2026, according to a Congressional Budget Officer report released Monday afternoon.

Most of the initial loss would be due to repeal of the federal mandate for individuals to buy coverage, due to lack of a financial penalty and higher premiums.

Uninsured numbers would rise due to the bill’s repeal of Medicaid expansion. Some states would discontinue the expansion. Also per beneficiary spending caps would affect coverage, the CBO said.

Due to a lack of subsidies for insurance purchased in the nongroup market and to the Medicaid program, the increase in the number of uninsured people relative would rise to 21 million in 2020 and then to 24 million in 2026, the CBO said.

“In 2026, an estimated 52 million people would be uninsured, compared with 28 million who would lack insurance that year under current law,” the CBO said.

Premiums are expected to rise 15 to 20 percent in 2018 and 2019.

Older Americans would pay five times the amount on their premiums as compared to younger enrollees.

 

CBO ignites firestorm with ObamaCare repeal score

http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/323652-cbo-millions-would-lose-coverage-under-gop-healthcare-plan

Image result for congressional budget office

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) on Monday projected that the number of people without health insurance would grow by 14 million in 2018 under the Republican ­ObamaCare replacement bill, with that number rising to 24 million in a decade.

The bombshell estimate was larger than even many analysts had predicted, stirring fresh doubts about whether the legislation can pass ahead of a possible vote in the House next week.

Democrats highlighted President Trump’s campaign promises to provide “insurance for everybody,” saying the bill falls woefully short.

“The CBO’s estimate makes clear that TrumpCare will cause serious harm to millions of American families,” Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer (N.Y.) said in a statement.

“Tens of millions will lose their coverage, and millions more, particularly seniors, will have to pay more for health care. The CBO score shows just how empty the president’s promises, that everyone will be covered and costs will go down, have been.”

The CBO estimated that 24 million people would become uninsured by 2026 under the bill, largely due to the proposed changes to Medicaid. Seven million fewer people would be insured through their employers over that same time frame because some people would choose not to get coverage and some employers would decline to offer it.

The CBO calculated that premiums would decrease an average of 10 percent by 2026 after an initial increase of 15 percent to 20 percent due to the repeal of ­ObamaCare’s requirement that everyone buy coverage. Costs would rise for older people but fall for younger people, it said.

Out-of-pocket costs, including deductibles, “would tend to be higher” under the GOP plan than under ­ObamaCare because of looser requirements on insurers. High deductibles have been one of the GOP’s main lines of attack against ­ObamaCare.

 

If the AHCA can’t pass, what does @SpeakerRyan do next?

If the AHCA can’t pass, what does @SpeakerRyan do next?

Image result for healthcare

The House Republicans released the American Health Care Act (AHCA) on Monday. Aaron summarizes it here. Critics of the bill include all liberals, many conservatives, the major medical societies, and many health industry groups.

It will be challenging to pass the bill. On the one hand, Democrats will oppose it because it reduces taxes on people with high incomes while cutting Medicaid and health insurance subsidies. On the other hand, the conservative wing of the House Republicans may not support it because they view it as “Obamacare-lite“.

Nevertheless, the AHCA could pass Congress. Will House conservatives really vote against a bill that largely repeals the ACA? The House leadership is moving the AHCA forward as fast as possible, hoping they can pass it before opposition groups can mobilize. Senator McConnell can eliminate the filibuster rule so that the AHCA can be passed on a majority vote. He might then be able to hold his coalition together to get that majority.

But suppose conservatives refuse to support the AHCA and it is defeated in the House. What happens next?

Speaker Ryan will revise the bill to meet the conservatives’ demands and unite the Republican caucus. He’ll then pass the revised bill in the House. Here’s why.

First, although Ryan could conceivably pass a more liberal ACA replacement with Democratic votes, he won’t. Ryan believes what the conservatives believe. The current AHCA is his attempt to win just enough moderate Republican Senate votes to get the bill passed. The current AHCA was his move to the left, and he won’t make another one if it fails. Second, although Ryan’s in trouble if he can’t pass something, he’s finished as Speaker if he compromises with the Democrats on ACA repeal.

Ryan’s problem if he moves right is that a more conservative AHCA would probably lose moderate Senate Republican votes and be defeated in the Senate. However, that defeat would not cost Ryan his job and his credibility with the Republican base, and with them his prospects for enacting his legislative program. Moreover, the 2018 election has many Democratic seats at risk. If the Republicans take those seats and expand their Senate majority, the chances for a hard-right ACA repeal and replace bill get much better.

If I’m correct, the Democrats might think they are winning based on the critical reception of the AHCA, but they are actually in peril. They have to defeat the AHCA now and then win seats in 2018. The way to defeat the AHCA is to sustain and build the opposition to ACA repeal shown during the Congressional ‘town hall’ demonstrations this winter. They have to convince Republicans representing Blue districts and states that they are at risk if they vote for the AHCA.

 

Federalism and the End of American Healthcare Act

http://www.yalelawjournal.org/forum/federalism-and-the-end-of-obamacare

Federalism and the American Health Care Act

Image result for federalism and the american healthcare act

Republicans may talk the talk of devolving health care policy to the states, but that’s not what the American Health Care Act does. Instead, it starves health reform of the funding upon which it depends.

Most significantly, Republicans intend to phase out the Medicaid expansion and to impose a hard cap on federal contributions. If a recession forces a state to exceed its cap in a given year, any overruns will come out of its Medicaid payments the following year. With that kind of shortfall, the states will have to make savage Medicaid cuts to make ends meet.

Republicans also want to slash the subsidies that make insurance affordable in the private market. Under the ACA, no one making less than four times the poverty level has to devote more than 10 percent of her income toward private coverage; most pay much less. The American Health Care Act would erase that affordability guarantee and, instead, extend age-based subsidies that would be much too meager for most people to afford coverage.

If federal money is withdrawn, states will be stuck. Because of the countercyclical trap and ERISA, they won’t be able to enact and sustain coverage expansions on their own. The end result will not be the diversity that federalism celebrates. It will be a uniformly crappy system that leaves millions of the sick and poor without coverage.

It doesn’t have to be this way. A group of Republican senators led by Bill Cassidy (R-LA) and Susan Collins (R-ME) has floated an alternative, the Patient Freedom Act of 2017, that retains the ACA’s funding streams while giving the states more room to choose how to use that money. That’s a model that deserves serious attention from both Republicans and Democrats. It might enable partisans on both sides move past the rancorous debate over the ACA.

For now, however, the Republicans seem intent on dismantling coverage gains across the entire United States. Their proposals trade on the rhetoric of states’ rights, but they would have the perverse effect of inhibiting state power. That’s bad for federalism — and bad for the country.

 

Healthcare Triage – The American Health Care Act: A Republican Response to The Affordable Care Act

Healthcare Triage – The American Health Care Act: A Republican Response to The Affordable Care Act

Image result for Healthcare Triage – The American Health Care Act: A Republican Response to The Affordable Care Act

After so many, many years, it’s finally here. The Republican bill for repeal and replace. Kudos to Mark and Stan for getting this up so fast.

Welcome to a very special episode of Healthcare Triage.

The AHCA’s mandate replacement doesn’t make sense to me

The AHCA’s mandate replacement doesn’t make sense to me

Image result for carrot with no stick

I’m having a really hard time with this. I’m going to try and walk through my dilemma in the hope that someone will be able to make me understand.

The Republicans hate the individual mandate. I get that. I don’t necessarily understand their rationale, but I accept it. They also, however, understand the need for some sort of carrot/stick to get healthy people to buy insurance so that we don’t get adverse selection and see the private insurance market enter a death spiral. So they need to replace it.

We have discussed this before. There are many ways to solve this adverse selection problem without a mandate. Open enrollment periods, penalties for not signing up, loss of protections, inducements for keeping coverage, etc. We have written about this again and again and again and again and again and again. So I’m not saying that you can’t replace the individual mandate.

Many wonks believe that too few healthy people are joining the exchanges. This is leaving the risk pool too expensive and leading to higher premiums. To fix that, we could increase the size of the mandate penalty (stick), increase the size of the subsidies to make insurance cheaper (carrot), or both (carrot and stick).

The AHCA plan, though, goes at this sideways. It eliminates the stick. It reduces the carrot. And it then puts in a new plan – the 30% insurance markup if people lose continuous coverage.

In theory, making people pay a lot more if they don’t buy insurance as soon as they need to will make healthy people join the market. If they know it will cost a lot more if they wait until they are sick, or if they know it will mean they won’t have community ratings if they don’t purchase plans early, they should buy in – reducing adverse selection.

But this plan doesn’t really do that. It’s a one-time, one year, 30% markup on insurance. That’s a tiny, tiny penalty in the scheme of things.

 

The American Health Care Act: 10 things to know

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/hospital-management-administration/gop-health-bill-is-out-10-things-to-know-this-morning.html

Image result for american healthcare act

After years of lobbying to repeal and replace the ACA, House Republicans put forth The American Health Care Act on Monday. Here are 10 things to know about the legislation.

1. The AHCA would eliminate the ACA’s individual mandate, or requirement for American adults to enroll in health insurance. Further, the legislation eliminates the tax penalty adults faced if they were not covered. However, the concept of penalties still remains in some form: To encourage people to buy coverage, the AHCA lets insurers charge a 30 percent penalty for those who let their health plans lapse and try to buy a new policy, according to NPR.

2. The AHCA calls for Medicaid expansion to remain in effect through Jan. 1, 2020. This is different from earlier drafts of legislation, which called for an immediate reversal of Medicaid expansion. Thirty-one states, plus Washington, D.C., have opted to expand Medicaid under the ACA. By 2020, the government will “freeze” the expanded programs and restrict funding only to people who were in the program as of then — no added enrollees from that date on. States would keep getting that amount of federal aid for each Medicaid enrollee as long as the enrollee doesn’t lose eligibility for more than a month. There is also a provision in the AHCA that calls for grants of extra Medicaid provider reimbursement funds to go toward states that didn’t expand Medicaid.

3. The AHCA restructures Medicaid’s federal funding to a per-capita cap opposed to the current open-ended federal entitlement, reports Politico. States would receive capped payments based on how many people are enrolled in Medicaid. The plan also calls for more frequent eligibility testing of Medicaid enrollees.

4. The AHCA restructures Americans’ tax credits to buy health insurance. It replaces income-based subsidies under the ACA with refundable, age-based and income-capped tax credits, according to Politico. These credits increase with age, from as low as $2,000 for those under 30 or as high as $4,000 for those over 60. There would be a limit as far as credits for a single household — $14,000 — and subsidies would be eliminated over time for individuals with annual income of $75,000 and for families with annual income of $150,000, according to the report.

5. A few ACA staples roll over in the AHCA. The ACA provision related to pre-existing conditions would remain intact, meaning insurers would not be able to deny coverage or increase prices for people with such conditions, reports Reuters. Also, the AHCA retains provisions allowing adults up to age 26 to maintain coverage through their parents’ health plans, according to the report.

6. The AHCA eliminates the cap on the tax exemption for employer-sponsored insurance. Although earlier drafts of legislation capped the exemption at 90 percent of current premiums, the final version eliminated the proposal, according to Politico. The bill also gets rid of the penalty for businesses that do not offer employees health coverage.

7. The AHCA delays the effective date for the ACA’s Cadillac Tax on costly health plans from 2020 to 2025, according to The Hill. GOP lawmakers are delaying but keeping the tax to make certain their replacement plan will not increase the national deficit after a decade.

8. The AHCA bars federal Medicaid funds or federal family planning grants for Planned Parenthood clinics, according to the report. (Separate from the AHCA, the White House earlier this week extended terms for a compromise to Planned Parenthood by proposing maintained federal funding if the group agrees to discontinue providing abortions, according to ABC News.)

9. The cost of the AHCA is not yet known. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has not yet scored the legislation, which means there is neither a cost estimate for the plan or how many Americans would gain or lose insurance under it.

10. What’s next? The House Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce committees are expected to review the AHCA legislation Wednesday. If the committees approve the measure, the full House could potentially act on it before April 7, according to The New York Times. The measure would then be taken up by the Senate.

Fitch: Changes to Medicaid in ACA repeal bill pose risks for hospitals

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/fitch-changes-to-medicaid-in-aca-repeal-bill-pose-risks-for-hospitals.html

Image result for hospital credit ratings

House Republicans’ proposed ACA repeal and replacement plan, known as the American Health Care Act, calls for changes to Medicaid that expose states and hospitals to new fiscal risks, according to a Fitch Ratings report.

The AHCA would eliminate Medicaid’s entitlement structure and restructure the program’s federal funding to a per-capita cap system on Jan. 1, 2020. This change is intended to slow Medicaid spending growth. The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured estimates switching to a per-capita cap system would reduce federal spending on Medicaid by $1 trillion (or 26 percent) over 10 years. This reduction would require states to make significant budgetary changes and could result in reduced reimbursement for hospitals, according to the report.

The AHCA calls for the government to freeze expanded Medicaid programs on Jan. 1, 2020, and restrict funding only to people who were enrolled in the expanded programs as of Dec. 31, 2019. Under the ACHA, states that expanded Medicaid “will be faced with a unique policy predicament of denying Medicaid access to individuals who would otherwise qualify beginning in 2020, or taking on significant costs they had anticipated would be bored largely by the federal government,” according to Fitch.

Moody’s: GOP’s American Health Care Act is credit negative for nonprofit hospitals

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/moody-s-gop-s-american-health-care-act-is-credit-negative-for-nonprofit-hospitals.html

OR Efficiencies

If House Republicans’ proposed ACA repeal and replacement plan, known as the American Health Care Act, were to become law in its current form it would be credit negative for nonprofit hospitals, according to Moody’s Investors Service.

The components of the AHCA most likely to negatively affect hospitals are transitioning federal Medicaid payments to a per-capita payment to the states, the Medicaid expansion freeze in 2020 and how subsidies are calculated for individuals who purchase insurance on the exchanges, according to Moody’s.

Under the legislation, the uninsured rate would rise, which would cause hospitals’ bad debt and uncompensated care costs to increase, according to Moody’s.

The AHCA’s retention of Medicaid expansion and elimination of scheduled disproportionate share cuts for states that did not expand Medicaid would have a positive impact on nonprofit hospitals, according to Moody’s. However, the rating agency said the positive effects are not enough to compensate for the credit negative components of the AHCA.