Trump administration withdraws 340B mega-guidance: 6 things to know

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/trump-administration-withdraws-340b-mega-guidance-6-things-to-know.html

Image result for 340b

The Trump administration has withdrawn guidance on the 340B Drug Pricing Program that was under review at the end of the Obama administration.

Here are six things to know about the guidance.

1. HHS’ Health Resources and Services Administration released the omnibus guidance on the 340B Drug Pricing Program in August 2015. The 340B Drug Pricing Program allows certain safety-net healthcare organizations to purchase outpatient drugs at discounted prices.

2. The guidance addressed a broad range of topics within the 340B program, including the definition of patient, contract pharmacy compliance requirements, hospital eligibility criteria and eligibility of off-site outpatient locations.

3. On Jan. 30, the White House Office of Management and Budget marked the final guidance document as withdrawn.

4. Although the pharmaceutical drug industry generally supported the guidance, hospitals raised concerns about the proposal. The American Hospital Association previously expressed concern about the guidance, arguing that redefining patient eligibility for the 340B program would have inappropriately narrowed the number of drugs that qualify for 340B pricing.

5. On Wednesday, AHA Executive Vice President Tom Nickels said, “We are pleased that the administration chose not to finalize the Health Resources and Services Administration’s guidance, which, if enacted, would have jeopardized hospitals’ ability to service vulnerable populations, including low-income and uninsured individuals and patients receiving cancer treatments.”

6. For HRSA’s guidance to move forward, it would have to be resubmitted to the Office of Management and Budget.

Consensus builds that GOP will keep value-based focus for healthcare reimbursement

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/insurers-seek-market-stabilization-prior-april-rate-setting-deadline

Health Affairs report suggests new HHS leadership should expand state all-payer models, fine-tune accountable care organizations.

Another report suggest value-based payment models will continue even, if in a different form, under the new administration’s governance of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, according to a Health Affairs report.

“The election of Donald Trump might change the strategy of advancing healthcare reform, but the movement toward value-based care both preceded the Affordable Care Act and has bipartisan support,” the authors said.

If Tom Price is confirmed as secretary and Seema Verma administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator, the agencies will support new value-based payment models said authors David Muhlestein, Natalie Burton and Lia Winfield.

But Price has already voiced his opposition to mandatory models such as bundled payments.

CMS, which has 74 healthcare initiatives and programs in different stages of research, testing, and adoption, recently proposed to make its cardiac care bundle mandatory and said opportunities exist for bundles that consider multiple chronic conditions.

While payment innovation may continue, the agency needs to articulate its overall strategy in four focus areas, the authors said.

The first is the expansion of the population-based model and disease-specific model.

Sepsis Tops Conditions Tracked for Readmission Rates, but Triggers No Penalties

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/quality/sepsis-tops-conditions-tracked-readmission-rates-triggers-no-penalties?spMailingID=10315063&spUserID=MTY3ODg4NTg1MzQ4S0&spJobID=1082253801&spReportId=MTA4MjI1MzgwMQS2#

Sepsis Tops Conditions Tracked for Readmission Rates, but Triggers No Penalties

Sepsis has a higher rate of readmission than heart failure, but the federal government does not penalize hospitals for excessive readmissions due to sepsis.

Medicaid Financing: The Basics

Medicaid Financing: The Basics

Image result for Medicaid Financing: The Basics

Medicaid represents $1 out of every $6 spent on health care in the US and is the major source of financing for states to provide coverage to meet the health and long-term needs of their low-income residents. Medicaid is administered by states within broad federal rules and jointly funded by states and the federal government. President-elect Trump and other GOP proposals have put forth fundamental changes in Medicaid financing. This brief examines the following 3 key Medicaid financing questions:

  • How does Medicaid financing work now? States design their Medicaid programs within broad federal rules; in return, Medicaid provides a guarantee of federal matching payments with no pre-set limit.  There are special match rates for the ACA, administration and other services. Medicaid also provides “disproportionate share hospital” payments to hospitals serving many Medicaid and uninsured patients.
  • How much does Medicaid cost and how are funds spent? Payment to private managed care organizations (MCOs) account for 43% of Medicaid spending. Almost two-thirds of all Medicaid spending is for the elderly and persons with disabilities, who make up just one-quarter of all Medicaid enrollees. Medicaid enrollment and spending increases during recessions. Medicaid growth per enrollee has been lower than private health spending. The ACA has provided a significant amount of federal dollars to states.
  • What is the role of Medicaid in federal and state budgets? Medicaid is the third largest domestic program in the federal budget following Medicare and Social Security. Medicaid is a spending item but also the largest source of federal revenues for state budgets. In responding to two major recessions in the last 15 years, states have adopted an array of policies to control Medicaid spending growth. Research shows that the influx of federal dollars from Medicaid spending has positive effects for state economies.

Medicaid Pocket Primer

http://kff.org/medicaid/fact-sheet/medicaid-pocket-primer/?utm_campaign=KFF-2017-January-Medicaid-State-Fact-Sheets&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=41471819&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_S79w90jSbC_aQNCkHzxPacGPZs7cC1nG5ZS0uvISb4SYLhCIP5ePQipcV2y2vvfgT5bXqOi8B2t5k6zuxzez1QOppJw&_hsmi=41471819

Figure 1: Medicaid’s Role for Selected Populations

WHAT IS MEDICAID?

Medicaid is the nation’s public health insurance program for people with low income. The Medicaid program covers more than 70 million Americans, or 1 in 5, including many with complex and costly needs for care. The vast majority of Medicaid enrollees lack access to other affordable health insurance. Medicaid covers a broad array of health services and limits enrollee out-of-pocket costs. The program is also the principal source of long-term care coverage for Americans. As the nation’s single largest insurer, Medicaid provides significant financing for hospitals, community health centers, physicians, and nursing homes, and jobs in the health care sector. The Medicaid program finances over 16% of all personal health care spending in the U.S.

HOW IS THE MEDICAID PROGRAM STRUCTURED? 

Medicaid is a federal-state program. Subject to federal standards, states design and administer their own Medicaid programs. Beyond the federal requirements, states have extensive flexibility to determine covered populations, covered services, health care delivery models, methods for paying physicians and hospitals, and many other aspects of their Medicaid programs. States can also get Section 1115 waivers to test and implement approaches that diverge from federal Medicaid rules but that the Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) determines advance program objectives. All Americans who meet Medicaid eligibility requirements are guaranteed coverage.

The federal government matches state Medicaid spending on an open-ended basis. The guarantee of federal matching funds increases state resources for coverage of their low-income residents and also permits state Medicaid programs to respond to demographic and economic shifts, changing coverage needs, technological innovations, public health emergencies such as the opioid addiction crisis, and disasters and other events beyond states’ control. Medicaid is a complex program because it has evolved over time to serve diverse populations with a wide range of needs, including many individuals who are very poor and very frail, and because of wide variation across state Medicaid programs. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within HHS is the federal agency responsible for Medicaid. Title XIX of the Social Security Act and a large body of federal regulations govern the program, defining federal Medicaid requirements and state options and authorities.

Medicaid Financing: The Basics

http://kff.org/report-section/medicaid-financing-the-basics-issue-brief/

 Figure 1: Medicaid costs are shared by the states and the federal government.

 

Medicare ACO explosion: CMS boasts 570 participants for 2017

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/healthcare/cms-more-than-570-new-returning-participants-enroll-medicare-acos-for-2017

moneyroll

More than 570 Medicare accountable care organizations will participate this year in Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service models, including the Shared Savings Program, Next Generation ACO Model and The Comprehensive ESRD Care Model, with 131 in a risk-bearing track.

MSSP added 99 new participants and 79 ACOs renewed their commitment to the program, bringing the total number of MSSP ACOs to 480 across all U.S. states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, according to a CMS announcement. Medicare officials have also revealed a new track under MSSP to begin in 2018, the Medicare ACO Track 1+ Model, that offers lower risk to encourage smaller practices and rural hospitals to participate.

After three high-profile members left the Next Generation ACO program last year, many questions emerged about the future of the model. However, the agency said that 28 new participants have joined the Next Generation program for 2017, bringing the total to 45 and more than doubling the number in the program.

Atrius Health is among the new participants in the program for 2017, and in an announcement officials at the Boston-region health system said its previous experience in the Pioneer ACO program have prepared it to take on the higher financial risks associated with the Next Generation model.

“Our experience as a Pioneer ACO has enabled us to build upon our strengths in providing high-quality, coordinated care for our patients across the continuum,” CEO Steven Strongwater, M.D., said in the announcement. “CMS has been an excellent partner in this work, and we look forward to further collaboration and innovation with them in the years to come.”

Joe Damore, vice president for population health, Premier, said the growing number of participants is a “clear signal” that the shift to value-based care will continue.

In an emailed statement, Cliff Gaus, CEO and president of The National Association of ACOs, agreed. “We, along with the ACO community, are feeling confident about the future of the program and we’re looking forwarding to seeing the ACO program grow and stabilize in the coming years,” he said.

Pennsylvania Rural Health Model to use global capitation to pay for inpatient, outpatient care

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/pennsylvania-rural-health-model-use-global-capitation-pay-inpatient-outpatient-care

Building on all-payer models in Maryland and Vermont, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services this week announced a new global capitation model for rural hospitals in Pennsylvania.

Participating critical access hospitals and acute care hospitals will receive all-payer global budgets for a fixed amount of money that is set in advance and funded by all participating insurers, to cover inpatient and outpatient services, CMS said.

In addition, other commercial health plan payers in the state are eligible to participate by paying participating rural hospitals through global budgets.

“Rural hospitals will use this predictable funding to deliberately redesign the care they deliver to improve quality and meet the health needs of their local communities,” CMS said.

CMS is giving Pennsylvania $25 million, which is a portion of the funding, to begin implementing the Pennsylvania Rural Health Model.

The Pennsylvania Department of Health and CMS will jointly administer the model. The state will be responsible for data analytics, quality assurance, and technical assistance.

The model seeks to increase rural Pennsylvanians’ access to care while also reducing the growth of hospital expenditures across payers, including Medicare, to increase the financial viability of the state’s rural hospitals, CMS said.

“The Pennsylvania Rural Health Model presents a historic opportunity for rural hospitals,” said Patrick Conway, MD, CMS principal deputy administrator and chief medical officer. “The model will help rural hospitals remain financially viable and continue to provide essential services to the people in their communities.”

The Pennsylvania Rural Health Model was done in agreement with the state and signed by Governor Tom Wolf and Pennsylvania Secretary of Health Karen Murphy.

Top 10 challenges facing physicians in 2017

http://medicaleconomics.modernmedicine.com/medical-economics/news/top-10-challenges-2017

2016 was a challenging year on many fronts for healthcare providers.

Physicians have just started to digest the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) and its changes to physician reimbursement. A long presidential election finally reached its conclusion, but the consequences of a Republican Congress and President-elect Donald J. Trump for U.S. doctors and patients remain unclear. And running a private practice did not get any easier. Balancing the need to deal with patients who won’t listen or won’t pay while also seeking positive patient satisfaction scores remains a daily struggle for many. 

These were just some of the challenges physician readers told Medical Economics they experienced this year and anticipate continuing for the foreseeable future. 

For the fourth consecutive year, Medical Economics reveals its list of obstacles physicians will face in the coming year and, more importantly, how to overcome them. For this latest presentation, we asked readers to tell us what challenges they face each day and where they needed solutions.

Here are their responses, starting with the biggest challenge of the coming year.