Trump’s budget forces states into ‘difficult decisions’ about spending for hospitals serving indigent patients

http://www.journalnow.com/business/business_news/local/trump-s-budget-forces-states-into-difficult-decisions-about-spending/article_15f1eee9-b4aa-5c6b-8132-3d93739682c5.html

hospital bed

A prominent rating agency, Moody’s Investors Service, said Thursday the proposed Trump administration budget could form an even darker financial cloud over the nation’s not-for-profit health-care systems and state legislatures.

Moody’s said the White House budget, if approved in its current form by Congress, would represent a “credit negative” for both groups.

The White House budget calls for $610 billion in Medicaid cuts over 10 years as well as eliminating $250 billion dedicated to state Medicaid expansion programs.

A projected $834 billion in lower Medicaid spending over 10 years was scored by the Congressional Budget Office if the American Health Care Act (AHCA) is enacted. The bill also would lead to 23 million Americans losing their health insurance by 2026, the office projected.

Moody’s wrote that the White House budget, if enacted, “would pressure state governments to take various actions to balance their budgets, including adjusting Medicaid eligibility rules, increasing their own funding of Medicaid, or cutting payments to hospitals and other providers,” Moody’s said.

“Although the budget would give states limited new flexibility to adjust their Medicaid programs, the measure overall reflects a significant cost shift away from federal funding to states,” Moody’s said. “It would force states to make difficult decisions about safety-net spending for hospitals that serve large numbers of indigent patients.”

The warning comes 10 weeks after Moody’s and S&P Global Ratings cautioned that the proposed AHCA could put increased pressure on health-care systems’ operating revenue and bottom lines.

The ratings groups expressed concern that the ACHA would change funding for Medicaid from an open-ended entitlement to a system based on payments that will be made to the states based on a capped per-capita amount.

The bill passed the U.S. House, but is likely to face significant changes in the U.S. Senate.

Another factor Moody’s cited in the credit negative rating is a White House budget proposal “that forces” states to share the costs of the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as food stamps.

The federal government covers all benefit costs of the program, while states pay to administer it. The White House budget proposes to shift 25 percent of the benefit costs to states, totaling $190 billion by fiscal 2027.

“We expect action to vary among states, with some taking more action to limit the loss of insurance coverage or benefit changes,” Moody’s said.

“Material reductions of insurance coverage would be credit negative for not-for-profit hospitals because they would increase their bad debt and uncompensated care costs.”

In the most recent quarterly reports for the Triad’s three main health-care systems, each reported an increase in bad debt.

According to the American Hospital Association, bad debt is defined as services for which hospitals anticipate, but do not receive, payment from patients who have the financial means to pay.

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center reported that through the first three quarters of fiscal 2016-17, it had $166.1 million in bad debt, compared with $38.2 million the year before.

65 financial benchmarks for hospital executives

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/65-financial-benchmarks-for-hospital-executives-022117.html

Image result for financial benchmarks

Hospitals leaders across the nation use benchmarking as a way to determine the areas of their business that need improvement. The continuous process of benchmarking allows hospital executives to see how their organizations stack up against local and regional competitors as well as national leaders.

Here are 65 benchmarks related to one of the most important day-to-day areas hospital executives oversee — finance.

Key ratios
Source: Moody’s Investors Service, “U.S. Not-for-Profit Hospital 2015 Medians” report, September 2016.

The medians are based on an analysis of audited 2015 financial statements for 340 freestanding hospitals, single-state health systems and multi-state health systems, representing 81 percent of all Moody’s-rated healthcare entities. Children’s hospitals, hospitals for which five years of data are not available and certain specialty hospitals were not eligible for inclusion in the medians.

 

8 hospitals with strong finances

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/8-hospitals-with-strong-finances-051817.html

Here are eight hospitals and health systems with strong operational metrics and solid financial positions according to recent reports from Fitch Ratings, Moody’s Investors Service and S&P Global Ratings.

1. Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago has an “AA-” rating and stable outlook with S&P. The credit rating agency believes the hospital will maintain its business position, improved balance sheet and solid cash flow margins.

2. Coral Gables-based Baptist Health South Florida has an “AA-” rating and stable outlook with S&P. The system maintained key balance sheet metrics and generated better-than-projected financial results in fiscal year 2016, according to S&P.

3. Dallas-based Baylor Scott & White Health has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The health system has strong cash flow margins and a favorable business position as the largest nonprofit health system in Texas, according to Moody’s.

4. Christiana Care Health Services has an “Aa2” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The Wilmington, Del.-based system has solid liquidity and a history of above average financial performance, according to Moody’s.

5. Kaiser Permanente has an “AA-” rating and stable outlook with S&P. The Oakland, Calif.-based system has a strong enterprise profile with a favorable integrated business model, according to S&P.

6. Albuquerque, N.M.-based Presbyterian Health Services has an “AA” rating and stable outlook with S&P. The system has a solid financial profile and a modest debt load, according to S&P.

7. Madison-based University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The system has strong balance sheet resources and established clinical and academic market positions, according to Moody’s.

8. WellSpan Health has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The York, Pa.-based system has a strong and broadening market position and a track record of healthy financial performance, according to Moody’s.

Moody’s: US nonprofit hospitals see decrease in median operating margin

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/moody-s-us-nonprofit-hospitals-see-decline-in-median-operating-margin.html

OR Efficiencies

U.S. nonprofit hospitals’ median operating margin fell in fiscal year 2016 as expenses grew, according to preliminary financial data compiled by Moody’s Investors Service.

The data is from the agency’s annual report, “Not-for-profit Healthcare and Public Hospitals — US: Preliminary 2016 Medians Skew Lower As Revenue and Expense Pressures Hinder Profitability.” For the report, Moody’s examined audited fiscal year 2016 financial statements for 150 hospitals and health systems.

Here are seven things to know from the analysis.

 

Kaiser hits $1 billion operating gain in Q1

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20170515/NEWS/170519892?utm_campaign=CHL:%20Daily%20Edition&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=51986490&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-839Ex2h99Z8rm5tf8l2lPojAGaBIqcTZ4WSv6wsJY2cbOYWcNtHo6UgIzmQJnqy-2QzLnCsclP8jXne8igI2EeUoSRaA&_hsmi=51986490

Image result for kaiser permanente thrive

Kaiser Permanente Monday posted a record $1 billion operating gain in its first quarter, just days after holding its largest-ever bond offering.

The Oakland, Calif.-based health plan and hospital giant eclipsed the $1 billion barrier on revenue of $18.1 billion. That compared with an operating gain of $701 million on revenue of $16.3 billion in the year-earlier quarter.

The 5.5% operating margin in the first quarter beat the strong 4.3% operating margin from the year-earlier period.

Not-for-profit Kaiser is the nation’s largest integrated health system with 11.7 million health plan members and 39 hospitals.

Its record first quarter was disclosed in a financial filing Monday.

Efforts to reach Kaiser for a comment late Monday were unsuccessful.

Kaiser’s performance was only nominally aided by contributions from its $1.8 billion acquisition of Seattle-based Group Health Cooperative on Feb. 1.

Group Health contributed $18 million of operating income on revenue of $709 million over the last two months of the quarter, the financial filing shows.

Kaiser earlier this month raised a record $4.4 billion through a series of three bond offerings to build out access points in its current markets and look for growth opportunities in communities neighboring its facilities. Those include hundreds of physician offices and outpatient centers across the country.

Kaiser reported operating income of $1.9 billion on revenue of $64.6 billion in full-year 2016 compared with operating income of $1.8 billion on revenue of $60.7 billion in the prior year.

In the first quarter of 2017, Kaiser also posted an investment gain of $582 million compared with an investment loss of $157 million in the year-ago period.

The operating gain coupled with the investment gain and other non-operating income pushed Kaiser to a net gain in the quarter of $1.56 billion.

Kaiser only books actual investment gains, not paper or unrealized gains in its investment portfolio.

11 health systems with strong finances

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/11-health-systems-with-strong-finances-041117.html

Here are 11 health systems with strong operational metrics and solid financial positions according to recent reports from Fitch Ratings, Moody’s Investors Service and S&P Global Ratings.

Note: This is not an exhaustive list. Health system names were compiled from recent credit rating reports and are listed in alphabetical order.

1. Allina Health has an “AA-” rating and stable outlook with Fitch and S&P and an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The Minneapolis-based system has a leading market position in a competitive service area and favorable balance sheet metrics, according to Moody’s.

2. Coral Gables-based Baptist Health South Florida has an “AA-” rating and stable outlook with S&P. The system maintained key balance sheet metrics and generated better-than-projected financial results in fiscal year 2016, according to S&P.

3. Christiana Care Health Services has an “Aa2” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The Wilmington, Del.-based system has solid liquidity and a history of above average financial performance, according to Moody’s.

4. Froedtert Health has an “AA-” rating and positive outlook with S&P. The system has healthy financial metrics, and its market share in a competitive service area is improving, according to S&P. The debt rating agency expects Froedtert’s financial profile to remain consistent over the next one to two years.

5. St. Joseph, Mich.-based Lakeland Hospitals has an “AA-” rating and stable outlook with Fitch. The health system has a strong financial profile and leading market position, according to Fitch.

6. Mercy Health has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The St. Louis-based system’s balance sheet measures and financial performance have improved in the last three years, according to Moody’s. The debt rating agency expects Mercy Health’s operating margins to continue to improve.

7. Dallas-based Methodist Health has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The system has a low debt burden and strong balance sheet measures, according to Moody’s.

8. Seattle Children’s Healthcare System has an “Aa2” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The system has strong balance sheet measures and operating performance, according to Moody’s. The debt rating agency expects Seattle Children’s Healthcare System’s overall profitability to remain strong and its debt coverage measures to improve.

9. Madison-based University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The system has strong balance sheet resources and established clinical and academic market positions, according to Moody’s.

10. Richmond-based Virginia Commonwealth University Health System has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The health system has solid operating performance and a strong credit profile, according to Moody’s. The debt rating agency expects the health system to sustain cash flow margins at close to current levels and maintain its liquidity.

11. WellSpan Health has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The York, Pa.-based system has a strong and broadening market position and a track record of healthy financial performance, according to Moody’s

 

Political uncertainty doesn’t change long-term outlook for healthcare, Fitch says

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/political-uncertainty-doesn-t-change-long-term-outlook-for-healthcare-fitch-says.html

Image result for long term healthcare industry outlook

Fitch Ratings said it maintains a stable outlook and sector rating for healthcare, even as the current political climate generates uncertainty.

The agency initially published its 2017 outlook for the industry last December, shortly after the 2016 presidential election. Since then, the agency said rating actions on healthcare companies have primarily been affirmations, and it believes the medium- to long-term fundamental outlook for healthcare is intact. Fitch analysts added the drivers of healthcare trends have not significantly changed.

“As the industry struggles to meet the cost burden of increasing healthcare demand, the long-term solution will require finding a balance between an individual’s access to healthcare and its affordability,” Megan Neuburger, managing director of U.S. Corporates at Fitch, said in a news release. “Without any concrete solutions currently on the table, near-term uncertainty may force providers to rethink aspects of their business, but this is unlikely to overhaul the industry’s broader dynamics.”

Fitch cites a number of issues it believes are current risks to healthcare, including repeal and replacement of the ACA, drug pricing, the shift from fee-for-service to value-based care and healthcare consumerism.

The GOP’s ACA replacement plan was pulled from the House floor last month. However, Fitch said HHS could still potentially cut funding for federal cost-sharing subsidies that help individuals purchase insurance coverage.

Additionally, Fitch said federal lawmakers have introduced legislation with the goal of lowering drug prices. “Policy objectives are aimed at addressing both drug manufacturers taking advantage of supply dislocations to increase prices on established products and hefty price tags for new, truly innovative therapies,” the agency said.

As far as the shift to value-based care, the agency believes “both political parties are philosophically aligned on the benefits of alternative payment models like the Medicare Comprehensive Joint Replacement bundle, so they are likely to continue in some form, although the role government will explicitly play is still up for debate.” And regarding healthcare consumerism, Fitch noted patients’ desire for price transparency will continue as they take on more financial responsibility for their care.

5 health systems with strong finances

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/5-health-systems-with-strong-finances-011117.html

Market Power

Here are five hospitals and health systems with strong operational metrics and solid financial positions according to recent reports from Moody’s Investors Service, Fitch Ratings and S&P Global Ratings.

Note: This is not an exhaustive list. Hospital and health system names were compiled from recent credit rating reports and are listed in alphabetical order.

1. Minneapolis-based Allina Health has an “AA-” rating and stable outlook with Fitch and an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The health system has stable operating cash flow and favorable balance sheet metrics, according to Moody’s.

2. Coral Gables-based Baptist Health South Florida has an “AA-” rating and stable outlook with S&P. The system has maintained key balance sheet metrics and generated better-than-projected financial results in fiscal year 2016, according to S&P.

3. Christiana Care Health Services has an “Aa2” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The Newark, Del.-based system has solid liquidity and a history of above average financial performance, according to Moody’s.

4. Springfield, Ill.-based Hospital Sisters Health System has an “AA-” rating and stable outlook with S&P. The system successfully implemented a strategic plan, which helped it maintain a strong balance sheet while improving operations, according to S&P.

5. Madison-based University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics has an “Aa3” rating and stable outlook with Moody’s. The system has strong balance sheet resources and established clinical and academic market positions, according to Moody’s

Moody’s changes Geisinger Health System’s outlook to negative

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/moody-s-changes-geisinger-health-system-s-outlook-to-negative.html

Image result for geisinger health system

Moody’s Investors Service revised Danville, Pa.-based Geisinger Health System’s outlook to negative from stable.

The outlook revision is based on a number of financial and strategic challenges, including an operating loss related to Geisinger’s health plan’s exchange product.

Moody’s Investors Service also affirmed the “Aa2” and “Aa2/VMIG 1” ratings on Geisinger’s outstanding bonds. The rating affirmations are based on Geisinger’s large size, leading market position and exceptional clinical reputation.

California Braces For Medi-Cal’s Future Under Trump And The GOP

California Braces For Medi-Cal’s Future Under Trump And The GOP

Dollar CutDollar Cut

California grabbed the first opportunity to expand Medicaid and ran with it, helping cut the number of uninsured people in half in a few short years.

Thanks in part to billions of dollars in federal funding, a third of California’s residents — including half its children — are insured by Medi-Cal, the state’s version of Medicaid.

Now, with the election of Donald Trump and a Republican-controlled Congress, the state that bet so heavily on the Medicaid expansion is bracing to see how much of its work will be undone. While no one knows yet exactly what will happen, many policymakers and advocates fear the federal government will end or severely limit funding for the expansion.

“There are no easy cuts in Medi-Cal,” said Stan Rosenstein, a former Medi-Cal administrator. Reduced federal funding “could have a major impact on the uninsurance rate, on the viability of our hospitals, and it could have a very negative impact on the economy.”

Medi-Cal cuts could restrict who is eligible for coverage, slash health care benefits, limit access to doctors and reduce payment rates to medical providers — already among the lowest in the nation, health policy experts and advocates said. Medi-Cal covers a host of services for low-income residents, including maternity care, prescription drugs, long-term care services, mental health treatment and hospital stays.

Laurel Lucia, a health care program manager at the University of California, Berkeley Labor Center, said a well-funded Medicaid program benefits everyone, not just those currently on the program.

“A lot of people are just a layoff away from needing Medicaid,” she said. “The Republican plans for Medicaid threaten to undermine that safety net.”