Pennsylvania Rural Health Model to use global capitation to pay for inpatient, outpatient care

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/pennsylvania-rural-health-model-use-global-capitation-pay-inpatient-outpatient-care

Building on all-payer models in Maryland and Vermont, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services this week announced a new global capitation model for rural hospitals in Pennsylvania.

Participating critical access hospitals and acute care hospitals will receive all-payer global budgets for a fixed amount of money that is set in advance and funded by all participating insurers, to cover inpatient and outpatient services, CMS said.

In addition, other commercial health plan payers in the state are eligible to participate by paying participating rural hospitals through global budgets.

“Rural hospitals will use this predictable funding to deliberately redesign the care they deliver to improve quality and meet the health needs of their local communities,” CMS said.

CMS is giving Pennsylvania $25 million, which is a portion of the funding, to begin implementing the Pennsylvania Rural Health Model.

The Pennsylvania Department of Health and CMS will jointly administer the model. The state will be responsible for data analytics, quality assurance, and technical assistance.

The model seeks to increase rural Pennsylvanians’ access to care while also reducing the growth of hospital expenditures across payers, including Medicare, to increase the financial viability of the state’s rural hospitals, CMS said.

“The Pennsylvania Rural Health Model presents a historic opportunity for rural hospitals,” said Patrick Conway, MD, CMS principal deputy administrator and chief medical officer. “The model will help rural hospitals remain financially viable and continue to provide essential services to the people in their communities.”

The Pennsylvania Rural Health Model was done in agreement with the state and signed by Governor Tom Wolf and Pennsylvania Secretary of Health Karen Murphy.

Gut check: Change is coming, and healthcare executives don’t necessarily think it’s a bad thing

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/gut-check-change-coming-and-healthcare-executives-dont-necessarily-think-its-bad-thing

Self-Discovery

The future of healthcare policy is a bit murky these days. President-elect Donald Trump has pledged to repeal the Affordable Care Act, and the Republican-run U.S. Congress is already fast at work to make that happen.

What’s not known, however, is what will change for the thousands of U.S. healthcare businesses that have not only adapted to the ACA but also made millions in investments in areas such as electronic health records, value-based reimbursement and reporting to align with the policies of the outgoing administration.

Healthcare Finance spoke with several executives at healthcare businesses to get their perspectives on not only the changes they expect but also their thoughts on what the healthcare sector actually needs to do to provide the best care while still safeguarding the health of its business model.

 

Mayo summit: Healthcare payment reform requires commitment to change

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/healthcare/summit-panel-payment-reform-requires-sustained-commitment-to-change?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTmpaall6QmtNV0k0WkRRNCIsInQiOiIrZkVQTkVnTk1kdTlIWU9ZSmluUDhHTXI0bmY1V2VWN1NtZE9uRVlOZjRzWUM4eTZ4bFJmRmd6U3BBMks5bDl5cmVpdjRITCs5RlNoa1ZJQktQXC94TE9NWkpwbFV4dlVWaGwzMlpUOHZPTkJzSTVkamdjOHFEREIrcEpqVEU0T2kifQ%3D%3D

money

Healthcare payment reforms won’t be effective unless hospitals and health systems adopt a “policy of continuous improvement” to ensure that they meet patient needs across the spectrum of care

So said a panel of experts convened by the Mayo Clinic and Arizona State University Alliance for Healthcare.

The panel attended last week’s Health Care Payment Reform Summit, and met with the press on Saturday to discuss their findings. The biggest takeaway: There must be a sustained culture change in order for payment reforms to take hold.

“Healthcare historically has been a status quo model—improve to a certain point and stay there,” George Halvorson, chair and CEO of the Institute for Intergroup Understanding, told reporters. “The model of the future needs to be better.”

Halvorson said that the industry as a whole must embrace data and computer systems that can make care better and track where improvements are most needed. This extends to payment reform, he said, as a model needs to be established that encourages innovation and consistent improvement.

One particular area of focus is to look at ways to reduce costs and improve care for the most complex patients. Elliott S. Fisher, M.D, director of The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, said that the top 5% of the sickest patients incur the most costs and use the most healthcare resources. These patients often have needs outside of the hospital’s control that can contribute to their situations, like homelessness or food insecurity, he said.

The panelists agreed that an effective solution is for providers to better identify patients with complex conditions and unmet socioeconomic needs. Therefore, Fisher said, it’s important that adequate data is gathered for providers to improve care for patients with complex conditions.

Trump’s “executive orders” are a communications strategy.

Trump’s “executive orders” are a communications strategy.

Image result for presidential executive orders

According to Vice-President-elect Pence, “We’re working now on a series of executive orders that will enable that orderly transition to take place even as Congress appropriately debates alternatives to and replacements for ObamaCare.”

This talk about using executive orders to assure an “orderly transition” is a bit confusing. An E.O. has legal force “only if the presidential action is based on power vested in the President by the U.S. Constitution or delegated to the President by Congress.” Authority to implement the ACA, however, is vested in the Secretaries of HHS, Treasury, and Labor—not the President. In the context of the ACA, an executive order won’t be anything more than a document containing a president’s instructions to his subordinates.

That’s why, as Tim Jost details here, President Trump can’t use E.O.s to change the rules that have been adopted to implement the ACA. To do that, agency officials would have to undergo cumbersome rulemaking processes. Guidance documents are easier to withdraw and amend, but an E.O. probably can’t do the job (although strong proponents of the unilateral executive might argue otherwise). Instead, the E.O. would instruct Secretary Price or Secretary Mnuchin to withdraw or amend the guidance that their predecessors adopted.

 

Healthcare Triage: Donald Trump and Healthcare Cost Sharing

Healthcare Triage: Donald Trump and Healthcare Cost Sharing

Image result for Healthcare Triage: Donald Trump and Healthcare Cost Sharing

One of the few things that both Donald trump and Hilary Clinton seemed to agree on is that high out-of-pocket spending, specifically as it relates to the Affordable Care Act, is a problem. One of Clinton’s most popular health care proposals during her campaign was to reduce out of pocket spending to more “manageable” levels for many Americans. President-elect Trump sought to fix this problem by repealing the ACA and replacing it with something better.

Reducing out-of-pocket spending, however, will require some tradeoffs. No easy solution exists, but there are examples out there worthy of consideration. That’s the topic of this week’s Healthcare Triage.

Healthcare Triage News: Medicaid for Children Leads to Better Outcomes Later in Life

Healthcare Triage News: Medicaid for Children Leads to Better Outcomes Later in Life

Image result for Healthcare Triage News: Medicaid for Children Leads to Better Outcomes Later in LifeImage result for Healthcare Triage News: Medicaid for Children Leads to Better Outcomes Later in LifeImage result for Healthcare Triage News: Medicaid for Children Leads to Better Outcomes Later in Life

The recent election has caused many to question whether significant changes are about to happen to Medicaid. Repeal of the Affordable Care Act would, of course, lead to the elimination of the Medicaid expansion, which could result in significant numbers of adults losing their coverage overnight.

But even without repeal, many Republican replacement proposals also result in significant changes to Medicaid, whether it be through funding, eligibility, or benefits. So, again, let’s talk about what Medicaid does, and whether it’s long term benefits are worth it. This is Healthcare Triage News.

Top managed care trends to watch in 2017

http://managedhealthcareexecutive.modernmedicine.com/managed-healthcare-executive/news/top-managed-care-trends-watch-2017?cfcache=true&ampGUID=A13E56ED-9529-4BD1-98E9-318F5373C18F&rememberme=1&ts=13012017

 

How doctors can overcome payment obstacles in 2017

http://medicaleconomics.modernmedicine.com/medical-economics/news/how-doctors-can-overcome-payment-obstacles-2017?utm_source=TrendMD&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Medical_Economics_TrendMD_0

 

ACA repeal makes hospitals more vulnerable to closure

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/healthcare/hospital-closures-aca-repeal-makes-organizations-more-vulnerable?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTldOaE1tUXlaRFUxTlRrMyIsInQiOiJVUFpNQ0tIKzF1c1pzU0gzbVpuaTNMdE8wbHUxY09LWW1mN1hoaHJ4QnVtVzdOWUExOXNqUXhPZkxTaUUwcFpHWW9ib21QdkRxanU1TzhRMXltUUNZN2dFdVdhSnpJWWpKbTVhMGkzSmlWT3R5UDVhMTJQUXhwSlF3eXNKT1VsRyJ9

hospital hallway

Millions of insured Americans could lose health insurance coverage if Congress and the new White House administration make good on their threat to repeal the Affordable Care Act. But they aren’t the only victims.

Many hospitals could also close as a result of the legislative action and the loss of government funds and increase in uninsured Americans who need care.

And these potential closures only add to the growing problem of vanishing hospital beds, according to a Bloomberg report. Indeed, more hospitals have shifted their focus from inpatient to outpatient care for financial reasons, acquiring or opening stand-alone facilities, physician practices and retail clinics.

“It’s been a very tough environment for hospitals,” Jason McGorman, a Bloomberg Intelligence analyst, said in the piece. “They have to get into other areas and businesses to free up cash and generate better margins than inpatient care, which has become a slow-growth business.

Who pays for war on Planned Parenthood?

http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/editorials/article124977729.html?utm_campaign=CHL%3A+Daily+Edition&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=40612592&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9LselH-wiu-loS_ePlL-q1z4YWLvVwoqV-OpQTh47u3NfJb5vHpDsS_ASUb-Rf_gelQDO3_8OTQCcoHHVaptBrra60kw&_hsmi=40612592

Planned Parenthood supporters in Los Angeles rally in 2015 for women’s access to reproductive health care on National Pink Out Day. Republicans in Congress this week announced plans to strip the group of federal funding.

The 15-month, $1.6 million congressional “investigation” into Planned Parenthood is finally over, with the chilling announcement that Republicans in charge plan now to eviscerate the nonprofit most associated with reproductive rights.

Tennessee’s Rep. Marsha Blackburn and the fellow Republicans on her “Select Panel on Infant Lives” – launched last year in the wake of the bogus “fetal parts” video smear led by California anti-abortion activist David Daleiden – issued their “recommendations” on Wednesday, with no Democratic input and zero proof of wrongdoing. Baseless as the proposals were, House Speaker Paul Ryan swiftly announced that at least one – senselessly stripping Planned Parenthood of hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funds – will be among the first orders of business.

Blackburn also called for bans on abortion at 20 weeks and federal funding for research using fetal tissue. Never mind that the former is unconstitutional and the latter saves lives.

This crusade against Planned Parenthood in particular – and reproductive rights in general – is misogynistic, archaic and counterproductive. Good people can disagree on the morality of abortion, but women have had the right to choose for more than 40 years and polls show the vast majority of Americans want to keep it that way.

In the name of placating evangelicals in their base and attacking one of Democrats’ favored organizations, congressional Republicans have singled out a health care provider that annually serves 2.5 million sometimes desperate humans. About nine in 10 Planned Parenthood clients come for services that have nothing to do with pregnancy termination. Eight in 10 are on Medicaid; many of the rest have no insurance.