For New Medicaid Patients, The Doctor Is In (Generally). But You May Have To Wait.

http://khn.org/news/for-new-medicaid-patients-the-doctor-is-in-generally-but-you-may-have-to-wait/

Image result for primary care provider shortage

More than 14 million adults have enrolled in Medicaid since the health law passed, and that has caused some hand-wringing over whether there would be enough primary care providers to meet the demand. But a study out this week suggests that the newly insured people are generally able to get timely appointments for primary care.

For the study, which was published online in JAMA Internal Medicine, trained field workers posing as new Medicaid or privately insured patients called physician practices in 10 states and requested a new-patient appointment for either a checkup or newly diagnosed high blood pressure. They recorded whether they were able to get an appointment and how soon it could be scheduled.

The states in the study — Arkansas, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Massachusetts, Montana, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania and Texas — represented a mix of states that expanded Medicaid coverage to adults with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level (about $16,600) and those that haven’t done so. An initial round of fieldworker calls to more than 9,700 practices was made in 2012 and 2013, before most states had expanded Medicaid coverage, followed by a second round of calls to more than 7,300 practices in 2016.

Over the time periods studied, appointment availability improved for Medicaid callers by 5.4 percentage points, while it stayed stable for privately insured callers (though Medicaid callers still had a tougher time getting appointments in general).

But, during the second study period, callers from both groups were less likely to be able to schedule an appointment within a week. The proportion of Medicaid callers who waited a week or less decreased by 6.7 percentage points, to 49.1 percent; the share of those who said they were privately insured who waited a week or less declined by 4.1 percentage points, to 52.7 percent.

“Some of these offices were getting a little more full,” said Daniel Polsky, executive director of the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics at the University of Pennsylvania and the study’s lead author. “One way doctors were making room for more patients was that instead of making an appointment in a week’s time, some were making it in two weeks.”

There are many factors that may have contributed to the ability of primary care providers to absorb more patients, including increased funding for federally qualified health centers and the growth of retail clinics, among others.

The study should ease concerns that the health law will exacerbate the shortage of primary care providers, Polsky said, though there may still be regional challenges accessing care.

“It’s still true that fewer doctors are willing to see Medicaid patients than are willing to see commercial patients,” he said. “But if you have Medicaid, your access to doctors is still good.”

 

Trump Outlines 5 Principles for Healthcare Reform

http://www.healthcaredive.com/news/trump-outlines-5-principles-for-healthcare-reform/437171/

Image result for healthcare reform

 

Five takeaways from the leaked Republican bill to repeal Obamacare

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/5-takeaways-leaked-republican-bill-repeal-obamacare/

Image result for Five takeaways from the leaked Republican bill to repeal Obamacare

A formal draft of the House Republican plan to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act leaked out on Friday.

The final version is likely to be different — how much different, it’s hard to say. The draft obtained by Politico is dated two weeks ago, and rumors have been swirling here that Republicans received an unfavorable analysis from the Congressional Budget Office, the official scorekeepers on the cost and coverage implications of legislation.

But this is nonetheless an important milestone — real legislative text, prepared with an eye toward the complex parliamentary procedures needed to pass ACA repeal with only Republican votes, and presumably with the endorsement of House leadership.

Much attention will be paid to the proposed tax credits offered for people to buy health insurance and the changes to the tax treatment of employer-based insurance. Here are five provisions with big implications for health and medicine.

 

Medicaid’s Role: What’s at Stake Under a Block Grant or Per Capita Cap?

Medicaid’s Role: What’s at Stake Under a Block Grant or Per Capita Cap?

Image result for Medicaid’s Role: What’s at Stake Under a Block Grant or Per Capita Cap?

A new video slideshow from the Kaiser Family Foundation explains how Medicaid works now and what is at stake as policymakers in Washington consider converting program financing to a block grant or per capita cap.

The 3-minute video describes how Medicaid is financed under current law, whom it covers and how spending is distributed across various groups of enrollees, including children, adults, seniors, and people with disabilities. It shows, for instance, that although seniors and people with disabilities comprise about a quarter of Medicaid enrollees, they account for nearly two-thirds of Medicaid spending because they have more complex health needs and therefore higher per person costs.

Proposals to convert Medicaid to a block grant or per capita cap financing could reduce federal Medicaid spending over time and be tied to increased flexibility for states in how they run their Medicaid programs. However, the video slideshow also explains how such proposals may shift costs to states, beneficiaries and providers, as well as limit states’ ability to respond to changes in medical costs and/or demand for Medicaid.

PD Editorial: 20 million reasons to retain and repair Obamacare

http://www.pressdemocrat.com/opinion/6701027-181/pd-editorial-20-million-reasons

For six years, and over the course of five dozen high-profile, low-probability votes, Republicans in Congress vowed to do away with Obamacare.

Republicans denounced the Affordable Care Act as “a crime against democracy” and labeled it “the most dangerous piece of legislation ever passed.” Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn went so far as to warn seniors, “You’re gonna die sooner.”

The election of Donald Trump removed the specter of a presidential veto, yet the Affordable Care Act hasn’t been repealed.

Large and boisterous crowds supporting Obamacare at town hall meetings probably are making some lawmakers nervous about the fallout from killing a program that provides insurance for 20 million Americans. Here’s another possible explanation: Despite its shortcomings, Obamacare has delivered on its basic promise — expanding access to health care by reducing the cost of insurance, especially in states such as California that fully embraced the program.

California has reduced its uninsured rate to a record low of 7.1 percent, according to a report issued this month by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

That’s a decline of 9.9 percentage points since the Affordable Care Act took full effect in 2013.

The CDC figures, based on data for the first three quarters of 2016, also showed a marked improvement on a national scale, with 8.8 percent of Americans lacking health insurance. In 2013, the uninsured rate was 14.4 percent.

Let those be benchmarks.

Trump and congressional Republicans still say they’re going to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. But any plan that results in fewer people having coverage isn’t a replacement. It’s retrenchment. And that isn’t acceptable.

Despite their harsh criticism of Obamacare, Republicans are far from agreeing on any replacement. They have promised to keep the most popular provisions of Obamacare, including protection for people with pre-existing conditions and coverage of dependents up to age 26. There also is GOP support for retaining requirements that insurers cover treatment of mental illness and substance abuse. Targeted for elimination are the financing mechanisms needed for the program to remain viable — individual and employer mandates and subsidies to help low- and middle-income families pay insurance premiums. A proposal to convert Medicaid to a block grant program almost certainly will result in some states raising the threshold for eligibility.

The numbers simply don’t add up.

Hospitals justifiably fear a return to the days of writing off millions of dollars from providing emergency care to uninsured patients, and insurers will have little choice but to drop out of the exchanges — 11 participate in California — if people can wait until they’re sick before buying coverage.

That’s the death spiral Republicans have been predicting since the Affordable Care Act passed in 2010. It could become a self-fulfilling prophesy if insurers conclude that the risk pool that undergirds the insurance market has been, or will soon be, undermined.

No big program is perfect. Republicans have pointed out Obamacare’s shortcomings for years while refusing to work with Democrats on improvements. If it collapses now, some Republicans will point fingers at Obama and claim the program was fatally flawed. But if millions of people who gained access to health insurance suddenly find themselves without coverage once again, many of them are going to blame the people who wrote the cancellation notice.

 

Data Note: Variation in Per Enrollee Medicaid Spending Across States

Data Note: Variation in Per Enrollee Medicaid Spending Across States

Image result for Medicaid Spending

President Trump and other GOP leaders have called for fundamental changes in the structure and financing of Medicaid along with repeal of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The GOP has proposed transitioning Medicaid from its current structure that provides an entitlement to coverage and provides states guaranteed federal matching dollars with no pre-set limit to a block grant or per capita cap. A block grant would limit all federal Medicaid spending and per capita cap could limit federal funding per enrollee. To understand per capita cap proposals, it is helpful to understand variation in per enrollee spending and per enrollee spending growth across states and enrollment groups.  A per capita cap policy could lock in historic variation.  A more detailed analysis of per enrollee spending can be found in this brief. This data note uses interactive maps and tables to show variation in per enrollee spending and spending growth by state and eligibility group.

How Medicaid Helps Your State

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/interactives-and-data/infographics/2017/feb/how-medicaid-helps-your-state

Image result for How Medicaid Helps Your State

As of the November 2016 open enrollment period, Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program have added a total of 16.4 million beneficiaries nationally since the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) coverage expansions went into effect. Moreover, billions of dollars in federal funding for health care have flowed into states.

Both a repeal of the ACA’s Medicaid expansion and alternative approaches to funding, such as block grants, are now under discussion. These changes may result in less federal funds for states to spend on Medicaid, and lead to reduced access to care, reduced payments to health care providers, and job losses.

Click on a state in the map below to view a state Medicaid fact sheet, or browse by state alphabetically below the map.

Repeal & Replace: Missing the Medicare Forest for the Obamacare Trees

http://www.realclearhealth.com/articles/2017/02/24/repeal__replace_missing_the_medicare_forest_for_the_obamacare_trees_110464.html?utm_source=RealClearHealth+Morning+Scan&utm_campaign=bf5d282de4-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_02_24&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b4baf6b587-bf5d282de4-84752421

Image result for Repeal & Replace: Missing the Medicare Forest for the Obamacare Trees

The Trump Administration has promised to deliver to the American people a healthcare plan that is, in President Trump’s own words, “much less expensive and far better” than Obamacare. But While Obamacare is expected to spend over $900 billion from 2018 to 2027, focusing solely on the Obama administration’s signature achievement ignores bigger fiscal challenges; Namely, the Medicare program.

Our insurance program for the elderly and disabled – Medicare – is expected to cost $900 billion in 2024 alone. From 2018 to 2027, this comes to a whopping $8.5 trillion—an order of magnitude larger than the cost of the ACA. Beyond the topline price tag are a number of endangered programs.

Medicare’s hospital insurance trust fund, commonly known as Part A, is expected to run out of money in the next 10 years. This would mean an immediate reduction in benefits when the money runs out—2028, according to the program’s actuaries. Meanwhile, the funds that Medicare uses to pay for physician services (Part B) and prescription drug benefits (Part D) are consistently growing as a share of revenue.

 

GOP governors confront Medicaid divide

GOP governors confront Medicaid divide

GOP governors confront Medicaid divide

Governors are descending on Washington this weekend as Republicans wrestle with the future of ObamaCare’s expansion of Medicaid.

GOP lawmakers say they are looking to governors for advice on what to do about the program, which is one of the toughest issues Republicans face as they look to repeal and replace the healthcare law.

Many of the lawmakers representing states that accepted the Medicaid expansion are looking to keep it. But they are at odds with conservatives and Republicans from states that rejected the expansion; they are pushing full repeal.

It will be hard for any repeal and replace bill to pass Congress unless Republicans can bridge that divide, and they are looking to the governors, who help run Medicaid as a joint federal-state program, for help.

“We’re in extensive discussions with them and we’ll talk with them more when they get here and then move ahead on both Medicaid and the individual market,” Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) told reporters earlier this month, speaking of the governors meeting.

Republican governors are almost evenly divided on the Medicaid issue, with 17 hailing from states that rejected the expansion, and 16 hailing from states that accepted it.

States that took the expansion broadened eligibility for Medicaid — the government healthcare program for the poor and disabled — up to 138 percent of the federal poverty line. About 11 million people have gained coverage because of the Medicaid expansion.

The healthcare plan that House Republicans outlined last week calls for eventually eliminating the extra federal funding for the Medicaid expansion. If states wanted to continue covering the additional people, they would have to spend more of their own money.

Some Republican governors from states that accepted the expansion have been vocal about wanting to protect it — and none more so than Ohio Gov. John Kasich.

Over the weekend Kasich called the House GOP plan “a very, very bad idea, because we cannot turn our back on the most vulnerable.”

Hospitals target nutrition, other social needs to boost health

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/17/hospitals-target-nutrition-other-social-needs-boost-health/98042112/

Physician Joshua Sharfstein, former Maryland Secretary

Tom Shicowich “really, really, really liked Coca-Cola” before he began a new nutrition program targeting his Type 2 diabetes and weight. Being on a “very tight budget,” he couldn’t afford the fruit and vegetables he cut up for a living at his part-time grocery store job. Dinner was often a pizza or fast food meal he picked up on the way home.

Six months after getting free healthy groceries every week through the Geisinger hospital near his rural Pennsylvania home, Shicowich has cut his blood sugar level from nearly 11 to close to a normal level of 7. The 6′ 5″ former high school track team competitor has lost 35 pounds but is still nearly 200 pounds from his target weight of 250 pounds.

The Geisinger Health System is on its way to making its own numbers. On March 1, Geisinger plans to expand its five-patient pilot project to 50 more of its sickest and highest-cost diabetes patients. So far, all of those participating in Geisinger’s Fresh Food Pharmacy have lost weight, lowered their body mass indices, decreased their use of medication, lowered their cholesterol and improved their hemoglobin A1C levels, says Andrea Feinberg, an internal medicine doctor who is “clinical program champion.”

Geisinger is what’s known as an accountable care organization, which makes it fully responsible for the insurance and all health costs for their patients. They employ the doctors and own the hospitals and insurance company. The better-known Kaiser Permanente is another example. That means unlike other hospitals, their profits aren’t based upon patients’ visits and treatments.

“It is no coincidence that the health systems and hospitals that are doing it the best have aligned their incentives more closely to the health of their patients,” says Joshua Sharfstein, a pediatrician who is a former secretary of health for Maryland and top Food and Drug Administration official. “It’s very hard to ask a hospital that’s getting paid for every preventable admission to invest in ways that would eliminate those admissions.”

Read more: