Kaiser Health News report questions safety of ASCs: 5 things to know

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/quality/kaiser-health-news-report-questions-safety-of-ascs-5-things-to-know.html

Image result for ambulatory surgery center

Ambulatory surgery centers are often considered low-cost alternatives to expensive in-hospital care, but a new report from Kaiser Health News and USA Today raises questions about the safety of ASCs and the regulations that govern their practices.

Here are five things to know about the report.

1. The report claims the proliferation of increasingly complex surgeries at ASCs has shone a light on facilities’ poor preparation for emergency scenarios. ASCs are required to have patient transfer agreements to local hospitals in the event of an emergency, complying with state and federal regulations. The report cited examples of patients who were transferred from ASCs in rural areas where hospitals were up to 30 miles away and were unable to access the emergency care needed.

2. ASCs are a surgical site option for elective procedures for patients who are good candidates for the outpatient setting, typically otherwise healthy patients without comorbidities. Not every patient is a good candidate for outpatient surgery; those with pre-existing conditions are better suited for the hospital.

Preexisting conditions can complicate even the most routine surgeries, and the report claims over 260 patients have died since 2013 after procedures at ASCs. Though federal regulations require ASCs keep resuscitation equipment on hand in case of emergencies, a number of the patient deaths detailed in the article took place in facilities that skirted these regulations. However, the Ambulatory Surgery Center Association issued a statement March 2 in response to the article, reporting more than 200 million successful procedures have been performed in ASCs across the country over the same five year period.

3. The report cites examples of patients who felt hurried out of ASCs and dying on the way home.

“The stories these reporters tell are indeed tragic and will no doubt be deeply concerning to readers. Unfortunately, the article fails to provide a comparison to other sites of care and make clear that medical errors occur across all sites of care, including hospitals, and typically at much higher rates than in ASCs,” said Rebecca Craig, RN, MBA, the CEO of Fort Collins, Colo.-based Harmony Surgery Center and Peak Surgical Management.

4. In the third quarter of 2017, the most recent data available, the rate of all cause emergency department visits within one day of ASC discharge was 0.69 percent, according to statistics from ASC Quality.

5. Physicians are allowed to have ownership in ASCs, collecting a percentage of the facility fee for each case. The article’s authors suggest this ownership may influence their decision to direct cases to the center , but the laws governing ASC referrals vary by state, with some states barring surgeon referrals to any ASC in which they or a family member maintain a financial interest.

Prescription for secrecy

https://projects.jsonline.com/news/2018/2/28/is-your-doctor-banned-from-practicing-in-other-states.html

Image result for state medical board secrecy

 

Is your doctor banned from practicing in other states? State licensing system keeps patients in the dark.

Like traveling medicine hucksters of old, doctors who run into trouble today can hopscotch from state to state, staying ahead of regulators.

Instead of snake oil, some peddle opioids. Others have sex with patients, bungle surgeries, misdiagnose conditions or are implicated in patient deaths.

Even after being caught in one state, they can practice free and clear in another; many hold a fistful of medical licenses.

Stories about individual doctors avoiding discipline in a second state have been reported before. An investigation by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel and MedPage Today shows how widespread the problem is: At least 500 physicians who have been publicly disciplined, chastised or barred from practicing by one state medical board have been allowed to practice elsewhere with a clean license.

And their patients are kept in the dark — even as more become victims — thanks to an antiquated system shrouded in secrecy.

In Colorado, Gary Weiss’ care of a multiple sclerosis patient prompted four doctors to complain to the state medical board when the patient died in 2011. The board and Weiss agreed that he was “permanently inactivating” his license in 2014, meaning he could never get it back.

But in Florida, where Weiss has a long-standing practice, officials applied no restrictions despite malpractice lawsuits from seven other patients in two states, all accusing him of misdiagnosing them with multiple sclerosis.

Plastic surgeon John Siebert had sex with a patient in New York, got his license suspended for three years and was permanently ordered to have a chaperone in the room with any female patients. But he operates free of medical board restrictions in Wisconsin. In fact, he was appointed to an endowed chair at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, funded in part by billionaire Diane Hendricks, a patient and a major political contributor to Gov. Scott Walker.

Look up Jay Riseman on the website of the Division of Professional Registration in Missouri, where he practices as a hospice doctor: It lists no disciplinary history, no red flags.

But in Illinois, where a medical board official once called him an “imminent danger to the public,” the families of three patients who died remain haunted by what he did. Riseman continues to practice, despite having prescribed massive amounts of pre-surgery laxatives to infants and failing to act in the case of an older woman with a blood infection.

Among the more than 500 doctors identified by the Journal Sentinel and MedPage Today, the single biggest reason for board action was medical errors or oversights. One fifth of the cases were a result of putting patients in harm’s way.

All have slipped through a system that makes it difficult for patients, employers and even regulators in other states to find out about their troubling pasts.

 

 

Medical errors officially the third leading cause of death in U.S., study finds

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/story/medical-errors-officially-third-leading-cause-death-us-study-finds/2016-05-03?page=full

Preventing_medical_errors

Researchers estimate more than 250K deaths a year caused by medical mistakes.

Hospital Software Often Doesn’t Flag Unsafe Drug Prescriptions, Report Finds

http://khn.org/news/hospital-software-often-doesnt-flag-unsafe-drug-prescriptions-report-finds/?utm_campaign=KHN%3A+Daily+Health+Policy+Report&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=28168114&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_7ezvW9MklgSHG5WGHzgFqgLDOC79aYh9tkSTRgEnT6Ls_cgQGI0OIQ78V1wbsNxRfyBkwQ4FdZviYTnldUVu8CwZ45w&_hsmi=28168114

shefali_leapfrog

Deadly and hidden mistakes: Hospital error reports often elude the public

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/hospital-694394-reports-public.html

Details of conditions inside Mission Hospital of Mission Viejo – which temporarily closed its 14 operating rooms last fall because of a small outbreak of infections associated with orthopedic surgeries – were hidden by the federal government for six months.