Why an “Empty Desire” for Big Data is Inhibiting Value-Based Care

http://healthitanalytics.com/news/why-an-empty-desire-for-big-data-is-inhibiting-value-based-care?elqTrackId=7e1ea6a5e2184a469cc018b890eccc22&elq=03ec8f5a4aad45249c8fc7202a9a18d4&elqaid=2412&elqat=1&elqCampaignId=2218

Value-based care and big data in healthcare

For the most part, the healthcare industry has embraced the idea that access to big data is a critical part of doing business in the modern care environment.  But there’s a major difference between having big data and leveraging it effectively for cutting costs and improving quality.

The chasm is growing between organizations that simply have access to data and those who know how to use it well, argues Shahid Shah, Entrepreneur-in-Residence at the AHIP Innovation Lab, and the resulting imbalance of information is making it difficult for payers and providers to truly make the leap into value-based care.

If provider organizations and their payer partners wish to bridge those gaps and prepare for a financial environment that prioritizes better outcomes, they will need to completely overhaul their approach to developing quality metrics, designing their health IT environments, and quantifying their data-driven relationships.

The process must start with taking a closer look at what payers really want or need when they talk about sharing information.

“Payers have an empty desire for data,” Shah told HealthITAnalytics.com at the HL7 FHIR Value-Based Care Summit in Chicago.

“It’s empty because it’s not in contracts yet. They haven’t reached the level of sophistication where they can accept data from providers and do something meaningful with it. If providers actually started giving them data, they wouldn’t know what to do with it, because they don’t have the systems in place.”

While there are still some technical challenges that make data aggregation and analytics a problematic proposition, the bigger issues are cultural, organizational, and legal.

“The infrastructure isn’t the main obstacle,” explained Shah, who is also Co-Founder and CEO of Netspective Communications.  “Developers will always try to solve whatever problems you throw at them, even if it takes a while.  There is nothing that a developer won’t eventually be able to do.”

“Data blocking and the inability to share data really happen because we haven’t created the demand ecosystem for interoperability. The fundamental flaw of our so-called desire for interoperability is that we haven’t reduced it to a transaction that can be measured and monitored in legal terms.”

The current generation of value-based care contracts simply don’t contain the necessary language to establish clear parameters for effective data sharing, he stated.

“They just don’t deal with data,” he said.  “There aren’t clauses that say things like, ‘I want you to send me this amount of data on this number of your patients over this period of time using this particular standard so that I can calculate these ten measures using such-and-such as the denominator, et cetera.’”

“Instead, payers ask for raw data so that they can compute the measures on their own, but that can lead to conflicts with providers and confusion over payments.  We need a better way to share data – and better data to share – if we’re going to make value-based care work.”

The Devil is in the Culture: It is all about Will!

http://www.mobihealthnews.com/content/value-based-care-patient-engagement-local-attention-and-digital-technology-are-fixes

Image result for cartoon the devil in the culture

As lawmakers on Capitol Hill wrangle over the fate of the Affordable Care Act and its would-be replacement, the American Health Care Act, the National Academy of Medicine said its four main priorities for fixing the country’s healthcare industry include continuing the shift from fee-for-service to value based payment models; empowering people to be fully engaged in their healthcare decisions; tapping communities for local health solutions; and implementing integrated services and seamless digital interfaces.

Writing a blog for the Journal of the American Medical AssociationDonald M. Berwick, MD, acknowledged that these solutions don’t exactly reinvent the wheel.

“The strength of the Vital Directions report is not in its innovativeness; it contains no surprises,” said Berwick. “This report offers a template for change broad and inclusive enough for it to be a charter for coherent and effective system redesign.”

The first step in that redesign, the shift from volume to value, is already underway, and the academy contends that its continuation is vital in terms of reducing waste and improving value.

Berwick agreed that this shift is needed, but wrote that fee-for-service behaviors “and top line-driven revenue growth strategies continue to dominate healthcare economies, and recent political pushback has been strong against expanding effective bundled payment models and value-based pharmaceutical purchasing.”

The report also cites evidence that underinvestment in social services relative to healthcare services may be contributing to the country’s poor health performance. To reduce inequality and increase cost savings, the report recommends integrating clinical care services and non-medical services, such as housing, food, transportation and income assistance.

That solution leads into another of the report’s action plans, activating communities. A person’s health is very much a product of the available social supports within their community, their physical environment and their behavior. The U.S. continues to invest far less in community-based social services, which the report said is vital to combating health threats such as chronic disease and substance abuse. The report recommends investing in local leadership and infrastructure capacity for public health initiatives, and calls for collaboration from leaders in different sectors, such as business, education, housing and transportation. For this approach to be successful, close coordination is needed between medical and social services.

When it comes to empowering and engaging people, the report claims that patients are often insufficiently involved in their own care decisions, sometimes resulting in care that doesn’t take their specific life situations into account. Health regimens and treatments should work within that context, and policymakers should focus on increasing the amount of information that’s available, the authors wrote. Telehealth was identified as an important component of that, as it helps patients in underserved or remote areas and essentially gives them greater ownership of their health information.

Revamping digital interfaces, the fourth action plan, is particularly vital, the authors said, because the extent to which systems can share and make use of data remains severely limited. That causes breaks in care continuity, which not only predisposes the patient to harm but increases stress for the clinician. Creating principals for end-to-end interoperability, strengthening the overall data infrastructure, building public trust around privacy and security, and smoothing over inconsistent state and local policies on data use and sharing are possible solutions.

Berwick wrote that if the country adopted these policy frameworks, healthcare quality and costs would likely improve dramatically within a decade.

“The devil is not in the details here,” wrote Berwick. “Everything the authors recommend can, in principle, be done with remarkably few cycles of trial and learning. The devil is in the culture. It is all about will.”

“Leaders must recruit the courage to make the case and put their own political and organizational futures on the line,” wrote Berwick.

 

Fee-for-Value: Is Your Revenue Cycle Ready?

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/finance/fee-value-your-revenue-cycle-ready?spMailingID=10565023&spUserID=MTY3ODg4NTg1MzQ4S0&spJobID=1120501013&spReportId=MTEyMDUwMTAxMwS2

Image result for fee for value revenue cycle

Healthcare organizations are adopting innovative practices as they prepare for a new future.

 

Vermont Tests The Waters On GOP Health Care Overhaul

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/health-plans/vermont-tests-waters-gop-health-care-overhaul?spMailingID=10548476&spUserID=MTY3ODg4NTg1MzQ4S0&spJobID=1120254532&spReportId=MTEyMDI1NDUzMgS2#

Image result for overhaul

A statewide experiment aims to test new payment systems, prevent unnecessary treatments, and constrain overall growth in the cost.

Tiny — and very blue — Vermont could be at the leading edge of the health reforms envisioned by the Trump administration and a Republican Congress.

The Green Mountain State, population around 626,000, got a broad waiver last October from the federal government to redesign how its health care is delivered and paid for. The statewide experiment aims to test new payment systems, prevent unnecessary treatments, constrain overall growth in the cost of services and drugs, and address public health problems such as opioid abuse.

The six-year initiative — an outgrowth of a failed attempt by Vermont a few years ago to adopt a single-payer plan for all residents — could eventually encompass almost all of its 16 hospitals, 1,933 doctors and 70 percent of its population, including workers insured through their jobs and people covered under Medicare and Medicaid.

The Obama administration approved the experiment, but it fits the Republican mold for one way the Affordable Care Act could be replaced or significantly modified. The Trump administration and lawmakers in Congress have signaled that they want to allow states more flexibility to test ways to do what Vermont is doing — possibly even in the short-term before Republicans come to an agreement about the future of the ACA.

Aetna, UnitedHealth show increasing appetite for value-based care contracts

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/wisconsin-hospitals-slash-readmission-rates-penalties-through-partnerships-hospital-association

Aetna has long held a goal to reach 75 to 80 percent of its medical spend in value-based relationships by 2020.

The biggest health insurers are moving quickly towards to value-based care arrangements, their recent earnings reports show.

While Aetna has long-held a goal to reach 75 to 80 percent of its medical spend in value-based relationships by 2020, Aetna’s medical spend is now 45 percent tied to value, CEO Mark Bertolini said during last week’s fourth quarter earnings call.

“One way we measure our success is by how well we are able to keep our members out of the hospital and in their homes and communities,” Bertolini said. “For example, in 2016, we reduced total acute admissions by approximately 4 percent, and we deployed predictive modeling to target members at the greatest risk of readmission.”

Aetna has achieved a 27 percent reduction in readmission rates using multidisciplinary care teams that engage facilities to develop effective discharge plans, he said.

Value-based payment: Why practices need to get on board now

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/healthcare/practices-smart-to-get-board-now-value-based-payment

For an industry traditionally scrutinized for low executive pay, one has to wonder what our executives are actually making.

The smartest move physician practices can make right now is to move ahead with value-based payment arrangements, experts say.

The transition from fee-for-service to value-based care is inevitable and practices that embrace new payment methods will be ahead of the curve, according to Physicians Practice. If doctors are still unsure, here are a few of the reasons it makes sense for practices to move ahead with value-based care:

You’ll be better prepared for MACRA. The new payment systems implemented under the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) are here to stay, and getting in on a payer’s value-based system will get you ahead on changes you need to make, such as tracking quality patient data, says Mott Blair, M.D., a family physician, whose practice has added a health coach and can identify high-risk patients and be pro-active to keep them healthy.

You won’t get left out in the cold. As local hospitals start setting up a system of providers, you want to be included in order to get referrals, particularly for specialty practices, Elizabeth Woodcock, president of the consulting firm Woodcock and Associates, told the publication.

You’ll get paid for more patient care. Under fee-for-service arrangements, practices don’t get reimbursed for some of the time they spend on patient care, such as returning patient calls or following up on missed appointments. With a value-based arrangement, you will be rewarded for these activities that lead to better patient care.

While there’s lots of questions about the future of healthcare, experts say the push to value-based care will likely continue under President Donald Trump’s administration. Dozens of leading healthcare organizations have called on Trump to continue the federal government’s push to value-based, patient-centered payment models that reward providers for improved quality and cost-effective care.

Can ACOs survive a repeal and replacement of the Affordable Care Act?

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/healthcare/future-acos-can-they-survive-a-repeal-and-replace-aca?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal&mrkid=959610&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWkRjeU1tTTFPVEUyTjJaaCIsInQiOiJBNGU4aWlDQkpcL3l6eURqQUMyR2w3aVFtNStxVzBraUpQcTVOamQ4SVNEVUNDeXFQQ1RDWG5qdmptMjI4VWpiVTdHUDltN0ZTMG5ObWlHOWl0cXRmVEpjQ0h2bFU1NXJKM2YzaHBrcnc2VlVJVkoyTHJrQjBndGI5b3BGWmdJV1oifQ%3D%3D

Doctor patient

Just as the fate of the Affordable Care Act is up in the air, so is the future of accountable care organizations, which were established under the healthcare reform law to improve care and reduce costs.

But one leading health policy expert predicted that even if Republican lawmakers come up with a plan to repeal and replace the healthcare reform law, ACOs will survive. They will just need to adapt to the new regulatory landscape.

“ACOs are here to stay,” wrote Paul Keckley, Ph.D., managing editor of The Keckley Report, in a post for Hospitals & Health Networks. “How they fit into a medical group or health system’s contracting and population health strategies will change as regulations like MACRA kick in and as employers, insurers, Medicare and Medicaid assess their value.”

More than 850 ACOs currently provide care to more than 28 million patients across the country. This year 570 ACOs will participate in Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services models, including the Shared Savings Program  (MSSP), Next Generation ACO Model and The Comprehensive ESRD Care Model.

Two recent studies showed evidence that ACOs do lead to quality improvements and cost reductions, but those benefits grow over time. The problem is that Tom Price, the new head of the Department of Health & Human Services, doesn’t support some value-based care initiatives, such as Medicare’s mandatory bundled payment initiatives for hip and knee replacements.

But Keckley predicted physician-led ACOs that follow practices to standardize care and incentives for clinicians linked to cost savings will survive. However, in order to survive the organizations must focus on primary care driven care coordination, he said. “From these primary care centric models, virtual ACOs that incorporate rural health and teleconnectivity, and clinical models that include social determinants of health in assessing risks and care coordination tactics will evolve,” he wrote.

He also predicted that CMS will change quality measures and simplify reporting requirements under MSSP ACOs. And if Congress does move to Medicaid block grants, he expects Medicaid ACOs will be a growth opportunity.

IBM Watson Health debuts cloud solutions for value-based care

http://www.healthcaredive.com/news/ibm-watson-health-debuts-cloud-solutions-for-value-based-care/436527/

Dive Brief:

  • IBM Watson Health unveiled a new series of value-based cloud solutions aimed at helping providers, health plans and employers better manage their healthcare costs and quality.
  • The solutions — debuted at HIMSS17 in Orlando, FL—will integrate patient-level data from electronic health records and other sources to enhance understanding of different patient populations, risk factors and red flags at the individual, group and population level.
  • Watson Health also announced an agreement with Atrius Health to develop a cloud-based service to improve the doctor-patient experience.

Dive Insight:

The shift to value-based care and reimbursement models is forcing hospitals, payers and employers to rethink the way they manage risk in patient populations and come up with new approaches to improve quality while reducing costs. However, CMS’ new Quality Payment Program lacks needed IT infrastructure for collecting the data allowed by MACRA, which implemented the program, a recent HHS report concluded. But IBM is not the only company hoping to provide helpful solutions for value-based care. Earlier this month, Epic said it will incorporate care management content into its electronic health records (EHRs) and Health Catalyst deployed a new software tool that can be used to identify and align quality measure selection.

The value-based solutions set combines capabilities of Watson Care Manager, Truven Health Analytics, Phytel and Explorys. Initial applications, to be rolled out later this year, will focus on provider performance, patient engagement, bundled payments forecasting and management and custom analytics. Under the agreement with Atrius Health, Watson Cognitive Insights will combined the various influences on an individual’s health, including behavioral determinants, to improve primary care physicians’ effectiveness and efficiency and the quality and safety of ambulatory care. Among other things, the IBM solution could summarize key cognitive insights about a patient’s health status, assemble a de-identified cohort of similar patients and predict how those people might respond to various treatment options, according to the company.

During her keynote address at HIMSS17, IBM CEO Ginni Rometty talked of a new “golden age” in healthcare, thanks to cognitive computing, digitalhealth reports. Yet the industry must work to ease concerns about transparency, privacy of personal health information and artificial intelligence replacing highly skilled healthcare workers, she said. Rometty urged companies to invest in scalable — rather than piecemeal — solutions and to support an open platform, noting that will allow users to combine data being generated with their own insights.

Hospitals target nutrition, other social needs to boost health

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/17/hospitals-target-nutrition-other-social-needs-boost-health/98042112/

Physician Joshua Sharfstein, former Maryland Secretary

Tom Shicowich “really, really, really liked Coca-Cola” before he began a new nutrition program targeting his Type 2 diabetes and weight. Being on a “very tight budget,” he couldn’t afford the fruit and vegetables he cut up for a living at his part-time grocery store job. Dinner was often a pizza or fast food meal he picked up on the way home.

Six months after getting free healthy groceries every week through the Geisinger hospital near his rural Pennsylvania home, Shicowich has cut his blood sugar level from nearly 11 to close to a normal level of 7. The 6′ 5″ former high school track team competitor has lost 35 pounds but is still nearly 200 pounds from his target weight of 250 pounds.

The Geisinger Health System is on its way to making its own numbers. On March 1, Geisinger plans to expand its five-patient pilot project to 50 more of its sickest and highest-cost diabetes patients. So far, all of those participating in Geisinger’s Fresh Food Pharmacy have lost weight, lowered their body mass indices, decreased their use of medication, lowered their cholesterol and improved their hemoglobin A1C levels, says Andrea Feinberg, an internal medicine doctor who is “clinical program champion.”

Geisinger is what’s known as an accountable care organization, which makes it fully responsible for the insurance and all health costs for their patients. They employ the doctors and own the hospitals and insurance company. The better-known Kaiser Permanente is another example. That means unlike other hospitals, their profits aren’t based upon patients’ visits and treatments.

“It is no coincidence that the health systems and hospitals that are doing it the best have aligned their incentives more closely to the health of their patients,” says Joshua Sharfstein, a pediatrician who is a former secretary of health for Maryland and top Food and Drug Administration official. “It’s very hard to ask a hospital that’s getting paid for every preventable admission to invest in ways that would eliminate those admissions.”

Read more:

Top 2017 challenges healthcare executives face

http://managedhealthcareexecutive.modernmedicine.com/managed-healthcare-executive/news/top-2017-challenges-healthcare-executives-face?cfcache=true&ampGUID=A13E56ED-9529-4BD1-98E9-318F5373C18F&rememberme=1&ts=15022017

Working as a managed care executive in today’s healthcare environment is a demanding role. According to Managed Healthcare Executive’s 2016 State of the Industry Survey, challenges abound. Government requirements and mandates, such as implementing value-based reimbursement, are difficult to meet. Meanwhile, employing new technologies, such as electronic health records and data analytics, is no easy task. Pharmaceutical costs continue to rise dramatically, burdening the entire system.

The survey findings, based on 160 responses, show the biggest challenges that executives at health systems, health plans, pharmacy benefit organizations, and more anticipate next year. Here’s a closer look at the survey results, and what industry experts say organizations can do to overcome them.