U.S. Uninsured Rate at New Low of 10.9% in Third Quarter

http://www.gallup.com/poll/196193/uninsured-rate-new-low-third-quarter.aspx

Uninsured by Quarter Q3 2016

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • Uninsured rate reaches nine-year low
  • Rate down 6.2 points since individual mandate took effect
  • Uninsured rate has dropped most among low-income households, Hispanics

In the third quarter of 2016, 10.9% of U.S. adults were without health insurance, representing a new low in Gallup’s and Healthways’ nearly nine years of trending the rate of uninsured. This is down from 11.9% in the fourth quarter of 2015, before the 2016 open enrollment period that allowed U.S. adults to obtain insurance through the government health insurance exchanges.

The uninsured rate has declined 6.2 percentage points from 17.1% in the fourth quarter of 2013, right before the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that Americans carry health insurance took effect in early 2014.

Results for the third quarter are based on approximately 44,000 interviews with U.S. adults aged 18 and older from July 1- Sept. 30, 2016, conducted as part of the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index. Gallup asks 500 U.S. adults each day whether they have health insurance, which, on an aggregated basis, allows for precise and ongoing measurement of the percentage of Americans with and without health insurance.

 

How Not to Hire the Wrong People

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/hr/how-not-hire-wrong-people?spMailingID=9652923&spUserID=MTMyMzQyMDQxMTkyS0&spJobID=1020558128&spReportId=MTAyMDU1ODEyOAS2

Image result for How Not to Hire the Wrong People

There’s been a lot of fanfare lately about the use of data to predict “flight risk” with employees. But one could argue that this type of approach, while seemingly proactive on the surface, actually treats the symptoms and not the actual illness itself. The illness? Hiring the wrong people to begin with.

The reason we consistently make bad hiring decisions is actually quite simple: We rarely have the information we need to make an informed decision. We get a candidate’s resume, and then we ask a few behavioral interview questions, like: “Tell me about a time when you had to …” Then we ask ourselves an interesting question. How do I feel about this candidate?

Frequently the answer to this question depends on how much the individual reminds us of ourselves. Subjectively deciding to hire a “Mini Me” is common, according to Business Insider, which found that “…when we don’t have a rigorous, replicable set of criteria from which to evaluate a potential hire’s merit, we fall back on our most immediate instrument: ourselves.” The result is a lack of diversity that can negatively impact outcomes, including financial returns. On the other hand, a 2015 McKinsey report found that companies in the top quartile for racial and ethnic diversity are 35% more likely to have financial returns above their respective national industry medians.

5 Things to Know About Drug Diversion

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/nurse-leaders/5-things-know-about-drug-diversion?spMailingID=9652923&spUserID=MTMyMzQyMDQxMTkyS0&spJobID=1020558128&spReportId=MTAyMDU1ODEyOAS2#

Image result for 5 Things to Know About Drug Diversion

Drug diversion and addiction among nurses is not uncommon, but it is often misunderstood. An expert shares insights to improve understanding.

Have you ever worked with a colleague who diverted drugs to feed an addiction?

Chances are you have, though you may not have known it, since drug diversion and addiction are often very secretive issues. Most estimates put nurses’ drug and alcohol misuse at around 6% to 10%, or about one in 10 nurses.

This makes it highly likely that at some point in your career you’ll encounter a colleague or staff member who is, or will, divert and misuse drugs.

Yet, diversion and addiction are still misunderstood, says Laura Wright, PhD, CRNA, associate professor in the Department of Acute, Chronic, and Continuing Care at The University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Nursing.

 

“Addiction is a disease, it’s not a moral defect,” she says. “But, when I talk about addiction, I still get people asking me, ‘Why would they ever do that? That’s an awful thing. How could they do that to their children?'”

Here are five things Wright, who is a member of the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists Peer Assistance Advisors Committee, (AANA) wants nurses to know about drug diversion and addiction.

Transgender man’s suit is latest clash over hospital chain’s Catholic ethics

http://www.scpr.org/news/2016/10/07/65331/transgender-man-s-suit-is-latest-clash-over-cathol/

Image result for ethical and religious directives for catholic health care services

Josef Robinson was born a woman; he started the process of becoming a man about two and a half years ago. He began hormone therapy and planned to undergo a bilateral mastectomy as well.

But Robinson, a registered nurse at a Dignity Health facility in Arizona, got some surprising news: His San Francisco-based employer, which describes itself as being “rooted in the Catholic tradition,” refused to cover any of his transition-related care under its employee health insurance plan. His policy excludes all coverage related to sex transformation surgery.

That “was totally shocking to me,” said Robinson. “I never would have thought in a million years that that would happen.”

Robinson sued Dignity, alleging that its refusal to cover transition-related care qualifies as sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Affordable Care Act.

Title VII forbids discrimination on the basis of sex. The Affordable Care Act prohibits discrimination based on sex in health insurance and health care. Section 1557 of the law, which the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services finalized in May, says categorical exclusions related to gender transitions are discriminatory.

“I work for a hospital who treats all kinds of people – doesn’t matter race, religion, whatever – yet they have an insurance policy that has an exclusion for transgender individuals,” Robinson said. “It just doesn’t add up for me.”

Everything You Wanted To Know About Your Health Plan (But Were Afraid To Ask)

Everything You Wanted To Know About Your Health Plan (But Were Afraid To Ask)

EL SEGUNDO,  CA - OCTOBER 14, 2014:  Pro Proposition 45 supporters delivered a wheelbarrow full of steer manure to the Blue Shield office on Sepulveda in El Segundo to protest ads against the proposition on OCTOBER 14, 2014.  (Photo by Bob Chamberlin/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

It can be well worth the effort to go up against your health plan if it denies you treatment you think you need.

That’s just one of the many lessons consumers can glean by using a new online tool unveiled today by the Department of Managed Health Care.

It shows that last year, nearly two-thirds of Anthem Blue Cross enrollees who filed an appeal with the department to challenge a denial of-care ended up getting the medical services they requested. The same was true in well over half of the appeals filed by people with Blue Shield of California coverage and 45 percent of cases involving members of Kaiser Permanente, the state’s largest insurer. In some of those cases, the insurer itself decided to reverse its decision.

The department’s “health plan dashboard,” which can be found on its website, contains information pertaining only to the plans it regulates. But those plans cover 25 million Californians — nearly three-quarters of the state’s insured population.

There are many other sources consumers can use to educate themselves about insurance plans, but the Department of Managed Health Care has a wealth of data that probably exceeds any other organization’s, said Betsy Imholz, director of special projects at Consumers Union, an advocacy group.

Imholz noted that many consumers are unaware of all the information available, and it is often difficult to understand. Reporting on quality and other aspects of health care is still in a developmental stage, she said. “But our hope is that data will become better and more accessible. “This [dashboard] is a good step.”

Wide variation in Medicare payments to treat post-surgical complications

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/finance/wide-variation-medicare-payments-to-treat-post-surgical-complications?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal&mrkid=959610&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWVRNelpHVmtNR1JrTmpjeiIsInQiOiIyNGJBRGJMS1pRVkRSNnFvOEhmQ2dlKzRUcmVxeWJScjVKdmpSeWVDclY3bEhRRXpobHp5Z3JvSE9ydnkycDgrNU14Y2NFeGFwRzNVWTdzRGZTRE1DUzhmZEpvZElCaVFGTVJNcnFEV0VXOD0ifQ%3D%3D

surgery

Post-operative complications are always costly. But depending on the hospital, they can cost much more than anticipated.

That’s the conclusion of researchers at the University of Michigan School of Medicine and Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. The research team examined more than 576,000 Medicare patients who suffered post-surgical complications for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, oncology-related colectomies, pulmonary resection and total hip replacements. Complication rates ranged from 4.9 percent for the hip replacements to 25.1 percent for the colectomies.

Prior research has suggested that higher-volume facilities tend to have better outcomes and associated lower costs.

The cost of delivering care for the post-surgery complications was anywhere from two to three times higher at more expensive hospitals than at lower-cost facilities, with quality of care often suffering in comparison, according to their study, which was published in JAMA Surgery.

Bundled payments: What healthcare leaders need to know

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/healthcare/keckley-what-healthcare-leaders-must-know-bundled-payments