The Unsung Role of the Pharmacist in Patient Health

The Unsung Role of the Pharmacist in Patient Health

Related image

We know many people end up with a risky pileup of prescribed medications. Many efforts have been made, with varied success, to correct this problem. Yet we’ve usually focused on physician behavior, when there’s another powerful lever: pharmacists.

About 30 percent of older adults in the United States and Canada filled a prescription in the last few years for one of many medications that the American Geriatrics Society recommends they avoid. Such drugs can lead to more harm — like cognitive impairment or falls — than good, and often safer options are available.

“Older adults are taking an awful lot of pills these days — 66 percent take five drugs or more per day, and 27 percent take 10 or more per day — so if some of those pills are no longer necessary and may even be causing harm, why not ask if it is time to deprescribe?” said Dr. Cara Tannenbaum, a professor of medicine and pharmacy at the University of Montreal, and director of the Canadian Deprescribing Network.

It’s not easy to get patients off such drugs, though. Physicians often don’t have enough information about what patients are taking, or may lack the time to talk to patients about these medications. They fear that stopping the drugs might cause harm or make patients upset.

To explore the possible role of pharmacists, Dr. Tannenbaum conducted a large randomized controlled trial over four years in community pharmacies in Quebec. The results of the study were recently published in JAMA.

Patients 65 years or older were randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the intervention group, pharmacists gave both patients and their physicians educational materials on the specific drug that might have been inappropriately prescribed. Such brochures could be delivered by mail or in person. The control group got the usual care, with no educational materials.

Drugs that were targets for deprescribing included sedatives, first-generation antihistamines, glyburide (used to treat diabetes), and certain nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, like ibuprofen or naproxen. The main outcome of interest was the ending of a prescription for one of the four medication classes six months later.

Almost 500 patients, average age 75, participated in the trial, and about 90 percent of them completed it. The intervention made a difference. Within six months, 43 percent of the patients in the intervention group had stopped taking one of the selected medicines. The corresponding figure was 12 percent in the control group.

In medicine, we often focus on the traditional doctor/patient interaction. We tend to ignore practitioners who come into contact with patients more than physicians, who in this case could hand over brochures personally. In the study, pharmacists were also paid to send information to the patients’ doctors ($19 Canadian, equivalent to $14 American, per physician outreach).

 

 

 

Healthcare Triage: Money Isn’t the Only Thing That Can Bias Research

Healthcare Triage: Money Isn’t the Only Thing That Can Bias Research

Image result for Healthcare Triage: Money Isn’t the Only Thing That Can Bias Research

Recent news articles have brought renewed attention to financial conflicts of interest in medical science but that should not lead us to ignore other conflicts that may be equally or even more important. Career advancement and reputation are real things that can drive people to make surprising choices in research and publication.

This episode was adapted from a column I wrote for the Upshot. Links to sources can be found there.

 

 

 

 

Gene therapy having big sickle-cell disease results

Image result for These Patients Had Sickle-Cell Disease. Experimental Therapies Might Have Cured Them.

Success against sickle-cell would be “the first genetic cure of a common genetic disease” and could free tens of thousands of Americans from agonizing pain.

Researchers are trying to address sickle-cell disease at the genetic level, and it’s having drastic results so far among the patients participating in clinical trials, the New York Times reports.

  • The experimental gene therapy treatments are still in their early stages, and it could be at least 3 years before one is approved. But a handful of the enrollees no longer show signs of the disease.
  • Currently, the only way to treat those with sickle-cell is through a bone marrow transplant, which is dangerous, expensive and uncommon.

The bottom line: This would be the first genetic cure of a common genetic disease,” Dr. Edward Benz, a professor at Harvard Medical School, told the NYT.

The Personal Toll of Whistle-Blowing

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/02/04/the-personal-toll-of-whistle-blowing?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axiosvitals&stream=top

Why one physician took the risk of becoming an F.B.I. informant to expose alleged Medicare fraud.

 

 

 

 

Amazon now sells hospital rooms

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/supply-chain/amazon-now-sells-hospital-rooms-5-notes.html?origin=rcme&utm_source=rcme

Image result for Amazon now sells hospital rooms

Image result for Amazon now sells hospital rooms

Hospitals, health systems and businesses can now purchase a hospital room on Amazon, CNBC reports.

Five things to know:

1. Amazon already offers a slew of medical supplies, from syringes to bed pans. The e-commerce giant also sells a line of 60 over-the-counter healthcare products.

2. Businesses can now purchase a “smart” hospital room on Amazon from the vendor EIR Healthcare, through a service dubbed MedModular.

3. MedModular is customizable, but all the rooms are equipped with a bathroom and a bed.

4. The rooms cost about $285,000 — or $814 per square foot — and are targeted toward hospitals and other business buyers. EIR Healthcare claims the units are more affordable that traditional construction, CNBC reports.

5. EIR Healthcare CEO Grant Geiger told CNBC that hospital customers have expressed interest in using the units as simulation labs or urgent care facilities.

 

 

ER “facility fees” strike again

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/01/28/688350600/a-fainting-spell-after-a-flu-shot-leads-to-4-692-er-visit?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=newsletter_axiosvitals&stream=top

Image result for excessive emergency room fees

Kaiser Health News and NPR are back with another installment of their “Bill of the Month” series: This time, it’s a guy who fainted after getting a flu shot, was taken to the ER, and ended up with a $4,692 bill.

The biggest culprit, at almost $3,000 of the total bill, was the ER’s “facility fee” — a charge just for walking in the door, not for any particular services.

  • Hospitals code each ER visit on a scale of 1 to 6; a 6 is supposed to be reserved for the most critical care, like a gunshot wound. The higher the number, the higher the facility fee.
  • The patient in this case was coded as a 5. The hospital, run by Atrium Health, said that’s because he received more than 3 tests.

“It’s not a perfect system. Hospitals have an incentive to do a CT exam, and taxi drivers have an incentive to take the long way home,” the David McKenzie, reimbursement director at the American College of Emergency Physicians, told NPR.

Go deeper: Vox did a good rundown of rising facility fees as part of its own series on hospital billing.

 

Reforming Stark/Anti-Kickback Policies

Reforming Stark/Anti-Kickback Policies

Image result for Reforming Stark/Anti-Kickback Policies

An event from the USC-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy

In recent years, the health care system has accelerated experimentation into new payment and delivery models that reward care coordination, integration, and value.  However, observers and market participants have expressed concerns that long-standing anti-fraud rules in Medicare and Medicaid prevent innovation and hold back potentially promising new arrangements.  In 2018, the Trump administration sought stakeholder feedback on how the regulations implementing those laws might be modified to promote value-based, coordinated, integrated care delivery while protecting taxpayers and beneficiaries from fraud.

On January 30, 2019 the USC-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy will host Eric Hargan, the Deputy Secretary of Health and Human Services, for a discussion about this effort. Following his presentation, experts in health care payment and delivery system reform will discuss the issue and the path forward.