Why A Single-Payer Healthcare System Is Inevitable

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/why-a-single-payer-healthcare-system-is-inevitable_us_57bb38d0e4b0b51733a4e665?&utm_campaign=KHN%3A+Daily+Health+Policy+Report&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=33278487&_hsenc=p2ANqtz–pFhM1yVmgKE5kBJSkJqgzGm6EX86cVbU_jxP8glbnNrQH2CY9ktk8qbzIisOdLEgV0JX5fgsxqoDwrFym5ZxmTnCJOw&_hsmi=33278487

The best argument for a single-payer health plan is the recent decision by giant health insurer Aetna to bail out next year from 11 of the 15 states where it sells Obamacare plans.Aetna’s decision follows similar moves by UnitedHealth Group, the nation’s largest health insurer, and by Humana, another one of the giants.

All claim they’re not making enough money because too many people with serious health problems are using the Obamacare exchanges, and not enough healthy people are signing up.

The problem isn’t Obamacare per se. It lies in the structure of private markets for health insurance – which creates powerful incentives to avoid sick people and attract healthy ones. Obamacare is just making this structural problem more obvious.

In a nutshell, the more sick people and the fewer healthy people a private for-profit insurer attracts, the less competitive that insurer becomes relative to other insurers that don’t attract as high a percentage of the sick but a higher percentage of the healthy.

Eventually, insurers that take in too many sick and too few healthy people are driven out of business.

If insurers had no idea who’d be sick and who’d be healthy when they sign up for insurance (and keep them insured at the same price even after they become sick), this wouldn’t be a problem. But they do know – and they’re developing more and more sophisticated ways of finding out.

NY attorney general settles with insurer to provide coverage

http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2016/08/22/ny-attorney-general-settles-with-insurer-to-provide-coverage.html

New York’s attorney general has reached a settlement requiring a Buffalo-based insurer to pay thousands of improperly denied claims for outpatient psychotherapy and about 125 claims for nutritional counseling for eating disorders. Investigators found more than $1.6 million in wrongful insurance denials by HealthNow New York Inc., which covers more than 573,000 New Yorkers, according to the attorney general’s office. The investigation followed consumer complaints last year.

Aetna CEO’s $131 Million Parachute Biggest Among Health Targets

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-06-17/aetna-ceo-s-131-million-parachute-biggest-among-health-targets

 

Aetna Inc. CEO Mark Bertolini has the most to gain among top executives at the three U.S. health insurers seen as targets in a potential wave of industry consolidation. Bertolini could receive $131.3 million should he lose his job in a takeover, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Cigna Corp. Chief Executive Officer David Cordani would get $58.7 million, while Humana Inc. CEO Bruce Broussard’s so-called golden parachute is valued at $26.1 million.

The five biggest publicly traded insurers are all eyeing potential combinations after a two-year lull in big managed-care deals. Anthem Inc. has explored a takeover of Cigna and Humana, and Aetna and Cigna have considered buying Humana, Bloomberg has reported. The Wall Street Journal has said UnitedHealth Group Inc. might be interested in Aetna or Cigna.

We “expect this merger frenzy will culminate in a ‘Big Three’ that is a more efficient industry landscape,” Ana Gupte, an analyst at Leerink Partners, said Tuesday. Humana is likely to be acquired by Aetna or Anthem for $200 to $225 a share, she wrote.

The change-in-control payouts are meant to keep investor interests in mind.

“These protections provide a certain level of comfort for executives to put aside their personal issues and think, ‘What’s in the best interest of shareholders?’” said Yonat Assayag, a partner at ClearBridge Compensation Group, an executive pay consulting firm. “The amounts may seem large, but the cost compared to the value that’s created for shareholders is usually a very small percentage.”

Fitch: Health insurer credit metrics hit hard in first half of 2016

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/payer-issues/fitch-health-insurer-credit-metrics-hit-hard-in-first-half-of-2016.html

Debt Buying FirmsDebt Buying Firms

Higher leverage ratios from acquisition-related debt combined with declining revenue growth and declining interest coverage ratios contributed to deteriorating credit metrics for publicly traded health insurers in the first half of 2016, according to a Fitch Ratings report.

The weakened credit picture has led Fitch to take several negative rating actions. The rating agency downgraded Louisville, Ky.-based Humana’s senior notes, revised Minnetonka, Minn.-based UnitedHealth Group’s rating outlook to negative and placed ratings of Hartford, Conn.-based Aetna, Indianapolis-based Anthem and St. Louis-based Centene on negative watch.

Appeals court reopens whistleblower’s case against Medicare Advantage orgs

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payer/appeals-court-reopens-whistleblower-s-case-against-medicare-advantage-orgs?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal&mrkid=959610&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTTJNNE9ESmpNR1psWmpWaSIsInQiOiJXOXlcL0xySWFOazE4RUJ3cUNVaWtoMnZ3WVZDMUdQUGlLUmNaemNHZklCMEhJQW1xS01MNE1pRGNXUlpURXBUVGtDOE5nQWxqUmRMZ3BOSGZwT1pDajV4dHRma0hQZ1F4amlFNnBEZGhqdW89In0%3D

In a newly issued opinion, a federal appeals court gives a whistleblower another chance to make his case that major health insurers inflated Medicare Advantage risk scores to collect greater government payments.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services pays Medicare Advantage organizations based on a risk score calculated by measuring a beneficiary’s overall health, with higher payments for sicker patients.

But whistleblower James Swoben claims that UnitedHealth, Aetna, WellPoint, Health Net and physician group HealthCare Partners gamed the system by conducting biased retrospective reviews of medical records already submitted to CMS. Such reviews would violate the False Claims Act.

Healthcare Hypocrite of the Week: Aetna’s Mark Bertolini

http://medcitynews.com/2016/08/hypocrite-aetna-mark-bertolini/?utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=33097793&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8tHuz1OyW0jad1rYHbmCrWm51PA21pdsKB9af25xlqpvHnWr2o1T0b7LutMzmXzy521UtBFmUcZw75t8pNJcQYSG5Uvw&_hsmi=33097793

Mark Bertolini

Mark Bertolini, CEO of Aetna

It’s only Thursday, but it’s probably safe to announce that the winner of Healthcare Hypocrite of the Week is Aetna Chairman and CEO Mark Bertolini. And it’s not because Elizabeth Holmes and Martin Shkreli have managed to stay out of the news for a while.

Despite calling the Affordable Care Act business a “good investment” as recently as April, Bertolini has decided to pull Aetna out of most of the public health insurance exchanges. Initially, he cited the ACA risk pools as being unsustainable — in other words, too many old people with chronic illnesses and not enough young and spry customers to mitigate the risk. But as it turns out his actions may have been prompted by a desire to get even when the insurer didn’t get its way on a business deal.

On Monday, Aetna announced that it was pulling out of public individual insurance exchanges in all but four states. For the 2017 plan year, the Hartford, Connecticut-based insurer will only participate in the exchanges in 252 counties in Delaware, Iowa, Nebraska and Virginia. The reason? The company said it lost $200 million on individual plans in the second quarter and $430 million since the Obamacare insurance mandate took effect in 2014.

One-third of states have little to no competition on the Obamacare exchange markets

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/one-third-states-have-little-no-competition-obamacare-exchange-markets

Alaska, Alabama, Kansas, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Wyoming, will have only one carrier per region.

As major insurers UnitedHealth, Humana and Aetna — along with smaller insurers like the Scott & White Health Plan in Texas — plan to leave theObamacare insurance markets, the exodus will leave some states without much competition on the exchanges.

A new study by Avalere predicts one-third of the country will have no exchange plan competition in 2017. Seven states: Alaska, Alabama, Kansas, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Wyoming, will have only one carrier per rating region in every region in the state, the Avalere study said.

States divide up their exchange market region into rating areas. Consumers may only purchase plans offered within the rating region in which they reside.

Nearly 55 percent of exchange market rating regions have two or fewer carriers, the Avalere study said.

Letter shows Aetna warned DOJ it would exit Obamacare markets if merger challenged

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/letter-shows-aetna-warned-doj-it-would-exit-obamacare-markets-if-merger-challenged?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTW1Jek1EWm1PRFpqWldZeCIsInQiOiJNUE5TM3FXaktDWTF6WFlreiszSFpHRjZBeENcL3ZCS1REN01UQzVvVG9pdGNsSmZnK1BwTlJNWHhzZGdGRzdTckRoS2VqT05tMGVXZTdDWjN5SmVxbW1sR09qRDNnaTBNbEpXY3M5cjZaaUE9In0%3D

Aetna CEO Mark Bertolini (file photo)

Aetna CEO Mark Bertolini

Aetna warned the Department of Justice in a July 5 letter that it would leave the public exchange market if the agency went forward and blocked its merger with Humana.

“Our analysis to date makes clear that if the deal were challenged and/or blocked we would need to take immediate actions to mitigate public exchange and ACA small group losses,” Aetna CEO Mark Bertolini said in the letter. “Specifically, if the DOJ sues to enjoin the transaction, we will immediately take action to reduce our 2017 exchange footprint.”

The letter to Ryan M. Kantor, assistant chief for litigation in the Antitrust Division, was sent days before the DOJ’s injunction blocking Aetna’s $37 billion merger with Humana, and also Anthem’s planned $54 billion deal with Cigna.

This week, Aetna announced it was exiting the Obamacare-created exchange market in all but four states in 2017, a reduction of its current participation in 15 states.

However, Aetna left the exchange markets after seeing deteriorating numbers in its second quarter results, the insurer said in a request for comment today.

“That deterioration, and not the DOJ challenge to our Humana transaction, is ultimately what drove us to announce the narrowing of our public exchange presence for the 2017 plan year,” Aetna said.

Aetna’s withdrawal from Obamacare exchanges isn’t the start of a death spiral

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-aetna-obamacare-20160817-snap-story.html?utm_campaign=CHL%3A+Daily+Edition&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=33162087&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8NvJGaCD6NRfk633U9oruy0gAARfnzhUmgR73MXbgH6Kn-xnwzqWVetaFD6yxn73Itj2RU7GT3GpmmZQmhcpzETdNU6Q&_hsmi=33162087

Aetna, Inc. headquarters

Giant insurer Aetna announced this week that it was withdrawing from the Obamacare exchanges in 11 of the 15 states it had been doing business, becoming the third major insurance company to scale back its offerings dramatically in the face of heavy losses. The news led to a chorus of “I told you so’s” from critics of the 2010 healthcare law, who have long predicted that it would collapse under its own weight. But they are confusing the growing pains of a new market with the death rattle of a failing one.

It’s important to bear in mind what Obamacare, formally known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, set out to do. Over the long term, it sought to improve the quality of healthcare and rein in costs — an ambitious effort that may not yield significant results for years, if ever. In the short term, its goal was to extend insurance coverage to millions of uninsured Americans. To do so, it barred insurers from denying coverage or charging higher rates to those with preexisting conditions, required all adults to obtain coverage and offered subsidies to help poorer households pay their insurance premiums.

These changes reinvented the market for individual policies, which serves those not covered by large employer plans or government-run health programs. No longer could insurers minimize their risk by denying coverage to or gouging those with preexisting conditions. The new subsidies also attracted many previously uninsured people who had no track record to guide insurers on their needs and costs.

The result was a hotly competitive market with winners and, yes, losers. The insurance companies that have done well include those with experience serving low-income communities, as well as those in states such as California that have worked hard to bring young and healthy customers into the market. But Aetna and UnitedHealth, which announced in April that it would withdraw from almost all the Obamacare exchanges it had entered, had previously focused on serving large employers, a much less risky and volatile market.