Bundled payments: What healthcare leaders need to know

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/healthcare/keckley-what-healthcare-leaders-must-know-bundled-payments

Will Prop. 61 drive prescription drug prices up or down?

http://www.dailynews.com/government-and-politics/20161005/will-prop-61-drive-prescription-drug-prices-up-or-down?utm_campaign=CHL%3A+Daily+Edition&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=35447723&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8r0lyRKasPpqKN2Ob-IW2R5dtL5-fj09MZC4sHcXXAkV1MmzdsSBOlLfwrCOLR3r1Ti_fKGeL2HyW1R1-Or2IjZHhUtA&_hsmi=35447723

Image result for prop 61

Some seniors surprised to find themselves automatically enrolled in private Medicare plans

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/health/fl-medicare-automatic-plan-conversion-20161005-story.html?utm_campaign=KHN%3A+Daily+Health+Policy+Report&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=35442779&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_a7vlJ7zABlLxwHbCxWCAeLygJKLQ9GDCnB-7cSgUowrQrzVdpaGgIUqCbuF31bQVHJl19l50y7dVbxpffBEBmuOjTpQ&_hsmi=35442779

Image result for automatic enrollment in medicare advantage

Turning 65 soon? Your mailbox probably is stuffed with ads from health care companies eager to sign you up for Medicare coverage.

Be aware, though: buried in there may be a notice that you are about to be automatically enrolled in an HMO-style, private Medicare Advantage plan by your current insurance company. If you never see that letter, or if you ignore it, you could find yourself locked into coverage that doesn’t cover your doctors or costs you more.

Some insurance companies serving South Florida seniors are considering, or have started, a little-known policy called seamless conversion. Insurers granted approval by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services can automatically shift existing members into their Advantage plans when those members become eligible for Medicare.

While CMS requires that beneficiaries be notified in writing at least 60 days in advance, insurers do not need confirmation that the member wants the new coverage before making the switch. Medicare advocates say that blocks seniors from making informed choices.

Seamless conversion was created by Congress almost 20 years ago, as part of the Social Security Act of 1997, but rarely used over the years, said Stacy Sanders, federal policy director for the Medicare Rights Center in New York City. That changed in the 2016 plan year, she said, when CMS sent Medicare Advantage providers letters suggesting conversion was a good option for transitioning low-income seniors and nursing home residents into new state Medicaid managed care programs once their members were eligible for Medicare.

Sanders is concerned that seniors usually will receive seamless conversion notices when they’re most likely to be flooded with Medicare Advantage pitches: during annual open enrollment in October and right before their 65th birthdays.

How Health Care Battles of the Past Shape the Candidates’ Positions Today

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/in-brief/2016/oct/past-as-prologue-presidential-politics-health-policy?omnicid=EALERT1108988&mid=henrykotula@yahoo.com

Despite the singular nature of this year’s presidential campaign, there is plenty of continuity with past elections when it comes to health care, argue David Blumenthal, M.D., and James A. Morone in their New England Journal of Medicine “Perspective.”

In “Past as Prologue—Presidential Politics and Health Policy,” Blumenthal, The Commonwealth Fund’s president, and Morone, director of Brown University’s Taubman Center for American Politics and Policy, discuss the “deep underlying political forces and historical experiences with health care politics and policy” that are reflected in the platforms of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

The authors previously collaborated on the book The Heart of Power: Health and Politics in the Oval Office (University of California Press, 2009).

A Quiet Revolution in Health Care in a Digital Era

http://altarum.org/health-policy-blog/a-quiet-revolution-in-health-care-in-a-digital-era

WirelessWireless

The whole American political spectrum shares two goals: lower health care spending and better health care delivery. Unfortunately, most political groupings believe success will emerge from a top-down reconfiguration of insurance. Almost certainly, though, better, cheaper care will come not from a relentless focus on insurance, but from fragmentary, bottom-up innovation already underway.

The Left seeks nationalization and centralization — a single-payer system where a wise federal government funds and allocates care. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) approximates this ideal by subsidizing and enlarging the pre-existing menagerie of public, private, individual and group plans. The Right’s hope is federalism and privatization — shifting power from Washington to states and private entities. Each vision has dozens of variations.

While Americans squabble over insurance, a digital revolution quietly disrupts fundamental notions of health care itself. Imagine a world where schoolchildren produce low-cost prosthetic hands; heart patients use smartphones to perform electrocardiograms on themselves; patients shop the globe for surgical hospitals; cloud computing helps patients manage mental health issues; individual doctors manage thousands of prescriptions a day; and streaming video liberates doctors from computers.

This world already exists, barely perceived by the political community — or the medical community. The key to nurturing it is to remove the obstacles that lie in its path.

Understanding the Value of Medicaid

View at Medium.com

Today, Medicaid provides coverage to nearly 73 million people — kids, low-income working adults, seniors, and people with disabilities — making it the nation’s largest insurer.

The two mysteries of Medicare

The two mysteries of Medicare

Image result for The two mysteries of Medicare

A growing proportion of Medicare beneficiaries are opting out of the government-run insurance program. They are instead choosing a private plan alternative, one of the Medicare Advantage plans. The strength of this trend defies predictions from the Congressional Budget Office, and nobody can fully explain it.

Here’s another mystery. Traditional Medicare spending growth has slowed, bucking historical trends and expectations. Though there are theories, we don’t fully know what’s causing that either.

Pinning down explanations for these two mysteries is important. Doing so could help us understand the structure and cost of Medicare in the future.

Election 2016 FAQ: Proposition 52, Private Hospital Fees For Medi-Cal

http://www.capradio.org/articles/2016/10/03/election-2016-faq-proposition-52,-private-hospital-fees-for-medi-cal/?utm_campaign=CHL%3A+Daily+Edition&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=35302967&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8_y7tr7hjKlocU1Bf0RP6qo8AOsaLKyNwYTxsS4ZJy4709jXXIbWZfW2Fcz8YjL39HJrT6rBSjniGZ4BrgqygFdZHHFA&_hsmi=35302967

Image result for Election 2016 FAQ: Proposition 52, Private Hospital Fees For Medi-Cal

The Basics

In California, private hospitals pay an annual fee to the state that in turn helps bring in additional federal funds for Medi-Cal, the state’s health care program for low-income Californians. One in three Californians get their health care through Medi-Cal. The funds generated by the fee cover hospital services for Medi-Cal patients and health care for low-income children.

Hospitals originally approached the Legislature to create the “Hospital Quality Assurance Fee,” which state lawmakers enacted in 2009. This law is slated to expire in 2018. Proposition 52 would make the fee permanent and would make it tougher for the Legislature to use the money for other purposes.

The federal government matches state spending on health care for the poor, so the more California puts up for Medi-Cal, the more federal dollars it receives. The hospital fee boosts the state’s fund for Medi-Cal and thus attracts more federal money. Those dollars are then paid back to the hospitals to reimburse them for caring for their Medi-Cal patients.

What you’re voting on

Hospitals say the fee system is crucial to California’s medical safety net. They say they spend more to treat Medi-Cal patients than government reimbursement covers. The supplemental federal money hospitals get helps shrink their deficits. The estimated net benefit to hospitals in 2015-2016 was $3.5 billion.

Hospitals also contribute around $1 billion annually for children’s health care. This extra money acts like a handling fee that hospitals pay the state so the Legislature partners with them on Medi-Cal matching funds. Hospitals want to cement this law rather than have it re-upped every few years to avoid uncertainty and to make sure the amount of the extra fee for children’s health care doesn’t continue to increase, as it has in years past.

Proposition 52 requires a two-thirds vote in the state Legislature to end the program or to divert money from the hospital fee away from Medi-Cal. That’s something that lawmakers did in 2011, when they used approximately half a billion dollars for other purposes.

A Bygone Era: When Bipartisanship Led To Health Care Transformation

http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/10/02/495775518/a-bygone-era-when-bipartisanship-led-to-health-care-transformation?utm_campaign=KHN%3A+First+Edition&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=35220326&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_Y4ev2QTsrH6TWQlVimlZP-SvZi73CIdcG5_Qc0FFbgg3uhW_LaYUI4SJlbWsfEbgZ1DvEpMbHHzNXkdzYm9iAtzxUOA&_hsmi=35220326

Image result for hill burton act

People might be forgiven for thinking that the Affordable Care Act is the federal government’s boldest intrusion into the private business of health care.

But few know about a 70-year-old law that is responsible for the construction of much of our health system’s infrastructure. The law’s latest anniversary came and went without much notice in August.

The Hill-Burton Act was signed into law by President Harry S. Truman on August 13, 1946 — and its effect on health care in the U.S. was nothing short of monumental. Perhaps more importantly, it stands as an example, warts and all, of how a bipartisan Congress can forge compromises to bolster American infrastructure and boost the well-being of our people.

Known formally as the Hospital Survey and Construction Act, Hill-Burton started as a Truman initiative. In November 1945, only two months after the official end of World War II, he gave a speech to Congress outlining five goals to improve the nation’s health. The first and least controversial of these called for constructing hospitals and clinics to serve a growing and rapidly demilitarizing population.

Hill-Burton provided construction grants and loans to communities that could demonstrate viability — based on their population and per capita income — in the building of health care facilities. The idea was to build hospitals where they were needed and where they would be sustainable once their doors were open.

Over the subsequent decades, new facilities sprang up all around the country, including many in the 40 percent of U.S. counties that lacked hospitals in 1945.

By 1975, Hill-Burton had been responsible for construction of nearly one-third of U.S. hospitals. That year Hill-Burton was rolled into bigger legislation known as the Public Health Service Act. By the turn of the century, about 6,800 facilities in 4,000 communities had in some part been financed by the law. These included not only hospitals and clinics, but also rehabilitation centers and long-term care facilities.

In 1997, this type of direct, community-based federal health care construction financing came to an end. However, numerous Hill-Burton clinics and hospitals still exist around the country, specifically financed by a part of law to provide care to those unable to afford it.

A month after enactment of the law, Truman, a Democrat, appointed Republican Sen. Burton to the Supreme Court in a bipartisan gesture that doesn’t seem imaginable in today’s polarized political landscape. And consider this: Burton was unanimously approved by the entire Senate the same day he was appointed. With no committee hearings! He joined the court the very next day.

“Hill-Burton speaks to an earlier time in our history when the American people and those who represented them had confidence that government could do good things,” Markel said. “And that makes it all the more phenomenal to me.”

No one knows how many patients are dying from superbug infections in California hospitals

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-torrance-memorial-infections-20161002-snap-story.html?utm_campaign=KHN%3A+First+Edition&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=35220326&_hsenc=p2ANqtz–q48_nyJSgCl8xVrBEwT6GLi1L5uwbL-wFLD1CzsDaqKwJvA7Gvbnan0dOU4uApCaA6Nc4bjRnR-iXNQlJtbH0Z6T0mA&_hsmi=35220326

Sharley McMullen's death certificate says she died from respiratory failure and septic shock caused by her ulcer.

We, the community of physicians, had been watching these patients die and trundling them off to the morgue for years.— Dr. Barry Farr, former president, Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America