Balancing the Books: How Affordable Is Health Insurance Through Covered California When Local Cost of Living Is Taken Into Account?

Click to access PDF%20BalancingAffordableCoveredCa.pdf

http://www.chcf.org/publications/2016/06/balancing-affordable-covered-ca?_cldee=aGVucnlrb3R1bGFAeWFob28uY29t

Subsidies offered through the health insurance marketplaces established under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) have reduced the cost of health insurance for millions of Californians. Subsidy amounts, however, are set nationally and do not take into account the local cost of living, which varies dramatically across the state.

Even with the help of subsidies, many Californians struggle to afford coverage through Covered California, the state’s health insurance marketplace, especially those living in areas where a high cost of living already strains household budgets.

In this analysis, researchers identified an affordability threshold — the minimum amount a typical household would need to earn to have sufficient funds to cover their basic needs and Covered California premiums and out-of-pocket costs after federal subsidies.

The affordability threshold varied widely by county, mostly due to the local cost of living, but in every county it fell above the maximum income to qualify for Medi-Cal as an adult (138% of the federal poverty level or $33,543 for a family of four or $16,395 for one person). This suggests that in every California county, there are families and individuals — specifically those earning above 138% of FPL and below the local affordability threshold — who are falling into an affordability gap. They earn too much for Medi-Cal but not enough to afford health insurance through Covered California, even with subsidies.

 

13 recent healthcare industry lawsuits, settlements

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/legal-regulatory-issues/13-recent-healthcare-industry-lawsuits-settlements-july8.html

Money and Scale

Medicaid plans can now pay mental health institutions. Most won’t until 2017

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20160705/NEWS/160639991

A policy that lifts a 50-year ban on Medicaid pay for mental health institutions kicked in Tuesday, but it may be months before many enrollees can take advantage of the new coverage

Since the creation of Medicaid in 1965, the program has excluded payment for institutions of mental disease (IMDs) for beneficiaries 21 and over. Most residential treatment facilities for mental health and substance-use disorders with more than 16 beds did not qualify for Medicaid reimbursement.

Medicaid Expansion: Driving Innovation In Behavioral Health Integration

http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2016/07/05/medicaid-expansion-driving-innovation-in-behavioral-health-integration/

Blog_DoctorPatientConvo

Safety-net providers in states that have accepted the federal funding available for Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) are experiencing a positive ripple effect, where increased insurance coverage rates among patients and thus greater financial security for safety-net institutions are translating into better care. We found that safety-net providers in states that expand Medicaid are delivering more services and better-coordinated care than what is available in states rejecting the expansion.

Of particular interest is the effect of Medicaid expansion on attempts to integrate behavioral health services with primary health care — long a thorny issue for safety-net providers. Research has shown that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has increased access to behavioral health services. We present case studies from two provider systems that illustrate some of the innovative approaches that are improving the quality of behavioral health care at safety-net institutions.

The Fundamentally Different Goals of the Affordable Care Act and Republican ‘Replacement’ Plans

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/06/07/the-fundamentally-different-goals-of-the-affordable-care-act-and-republican-replacement-plans/?utm_campaign=KFF-2016-June-Drew-ACA-GOP-alternatives&utm_medium=email&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9Uqf60gdSQ_FC57uSLNkYvFicHfqEALEVvadSgR8xY01bL5QFOrYsCgcl6KB_N5PVHy5G8fwynf8MEywb7m1kUxPljFQ&_hsmi=30331935&utm_content=30331935&utm_source=hs_email&hsCtaTracking=7825060e-e865-4738-ba5a-68a31a8904b6%7C192993c0-5763-4c2a-b289-c32fd7a5274a

Rep. Pete Sessions and Sen. Bill Cassidy introduced legislation last month calling for replacing elements of the Affordable Care Act. A House task force established by SpeakerPaul Ryan is expected to follow with more health-care proposals. These Republican health plans are generally referred to as “replacements” for the ACA–in the spirit of “repeal and replace”–as though they would accomplish the same objectives in ways that conservatives prefer. But the proposals are better understood as alternatives with very different goals, trade-offs, and consequences. Whether they are “better” or “worse” depends on your perspective.

To boil down to the most basic differences: The central focus of the Affordable Care Act is expanding coverage and strengthening consumer protections in the health insurance marketplace through government regulation. By contrast, the primary objective of Republican plans is to try to reduce health-care spending by giving people incentives to purchase less costly insurance with more “skin in the game,” with the expectation that they will become more prudent consumers of health services. They also aim to reduce federal spending on Medicare and Medicaid and the federal government’s role in both programs. Elements of the ACA were designed to reduce costs, such as the law’s Medicare payment reforms, and elements of Republican plans such as tax credits aim to expand access to insurance, but the primary aims of the ACA and the Republican plans differ.

Advance Planning For Your End-Of-Life Care

Advance Planning For Your End-Of-Life Care

end-of-life-home-770

Starting in October, Medi-Cal — the state’s version of the federal Medicaid program for low-income residents — began covering advance care planning discussions between doctors (or other qualified providers) and patients (or a family member), said Tony Cava, spokesman for the state Department of Health Care Services, which administers Medi-Cal.

Any Medi-Cal recipient can use the coverage regardless of age, he said. Doctors can bill for the conversation twice a year per patient — plus an additional 30 minutes for one of the conversations — before they have to seek authorization for more coverage.

Medicare, the federal health insurance program for people 65 and older, and for people younger than 65 who have certain disabilities, started covering the discussions on Jan. 1.Medicare does not limit the number of discussions per patient each year.

CDC reveals Americans are going to the ED more than you think

http://www.healthcaredive.com/news/cdc-reveals-americans-are-going-to-the-ed-more-than-you-think/421560/

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db252.htm

Health care spending: some room for optimism

http://blog.academyhealth.org/health-care-spending-some-room-for-optimism/

This chart, produced by the Bipartisan Policy Center based on CBO data from 2011, shows the projected spending on health care, social security, discretionary, and mandatory by the federal government, as a percentage of GDP. As you can see, for all our hyperventilation about social security, it’s relatively stable once we get about 20 years out. Discretionary and other mandatory spending are similarly flat over time. But healthcare… that’s what’s going to get us.

 

Republicans unveil long-sought ACA replacement

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payer/republicans-unveil-long-sought-aca-replacement?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal&mrkid=959610&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTVROaVlUYzFOV1psTnpJNSIsInQiOiI4MDNhTTZwVEtacWtLV0k2NjZTaDBSc24zYndQNGh2aUE0cUNqRnhISGV0eEdVaUErbjl1K05rSksyOFhKYUljWHBPVDM0Zm9lM1JjOUJNdWdVU3dtZEJrUXNmNXZMM1AxU0w0WnhZMms0cz0ifQ%3D%3D

Paul Ryan holding up "A Better Way" document

Click to access ABetterWay-HealthCare-PolicyPaper.pdf

http://khn.org/news/house-republicans-unveil-long-awaited-plan-to-replace-health-law/