Gut check: Change is coming, and healthcare executives don’t necessarily think it’s a bad thing

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/gut-check-change-coming-and-healthcare-executives-dont-necessarily-think-its-bad-thing

Self-Discovery

The future of healthcare policy is a bit murky these days. President-elect Donald Trump has pledged to repeal the Affordable Care Act, and the Republican-run U.S. Congress is already fast at work to make that happen.

What’s not known, however, is what will change for the thousands of U.S. healthcare businesses that have not only adapted to the ACA but also made millions in investments in areas such as electronic health records, value-based reimbursement and reporting to align with the policies of the outgoing administration.

Healthcare Finance spoke with several executives at healthcare businesses to get their perspectives on not only the changes they expect but also their thoughts on what the healthcare sector actually needs to do to provide the best care while still safeguarding the health of its business model.

 

Trump’s “executive orders” are a communications strategy.

Trump’s “executive orders” are a communications strategy.

Image result for presidential executive orders

According to Vice-President-elect Pence, “We’re working now on a series of executive orders that will enable that orderly transition to take place even as Congress appropriately debates alternatives to and replacements for ObamaCare.”

This talk about using executive orders to assure an “orderly transition” is a bit confusing. An E.O. has legal force “only if the presidential action is based on power vested in the President by the U.S. Constitution or delegated to the President by Congress.” Authority to implement the ACA, however, is vested in the Secretaries of HHS, Treasury, and Labor—not the President. In the context of the ACA, an executive order won’t be anything more than a document containing a president’s instructions to his subordinates.

That’s why, as Tim Jost details here, President Trump can’t use E.O.s to change the rules that have been adopted to implement the ACA. To do that, agency officials would have to undergo cumbersome rulemaking processes. Guidance documents are easier to withdraw and amend, but an E.O. probably can’t do the job (although strong proponents of the unilateral executive might argue otherwise). Instead, the E.O. would instruct Secretary Price or Secretary Mnuchin to withdraw or amend the guidance that their predecessors adopted.

 

Top managed care trends to watch in 2017

http://managedhealthcareexecutive.modernmedicine.com/managed-healthcare-executive/news/top-managed-care-trends-watch-2017?cfcache=true&ampGUID=A13E56ED-9529-4BD1-98E9-318F5373C18F&rememberme=1&ts=13012017

 

ACA repeal makes hospitals more vulnerable to closure

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/healthcare/hospital-closures-aca-repeal-makes-organizations-more-vulnerable?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTldOaE1tUXlaRFUxTlRrMyIsInQiOiJVUFpNQ0tIKzF1c1pzU0gzbVpuaTNMdE8wbHUxY09LWW1mN1hoaHJ4QnVtVzdOWUExOXNqUXhPZkxTaUUwcFpHWW9ib21QdkRxanU1TzhRMXltUUNZN2dFdVdhSnpJWWpKbTVhMGkzSmlWT3R5UDVhMTJQUXhwSlF3eXNKT1VsRyJ9

hospital hallway

Millions of insured Americans could lose health insurance coverage if Congress and the new White House administration make good on their threat to repeal the Affordable Care Act. But they aren’t the only victims.

Many hospitals could also close as a result of the legislative action and the loss of government funds and increase in uninsured Americans who need care.

And these potential closures only add to the growing problem of vanishing hospital beds, according to a Bloomberg report. Indeed, more hospitals have shifted their focus from inpatient to outpatient care for financial reasons, acquiring or opening stand-alone facilities, physician practices and retail clinics.

“It’s been a very tough environment for hospitals,” Jason McGorman, a Bloomberg Intelligence analyst, said in the piece. “They have to get into other areas and businesses to free up cash and generate better margins than inpatient care, which has become a slow-growth business.

Obamacare architect’s 5 points about health care reform

Obamacare architect’s 5 points about health care reform

Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel,  M.D., Ph.D., former Chief Health Policy advisor to
the Obama Administration; Chair of the Department of Medical Ethics and
Health Policy at the University of Pennsylvania.
Photo credit: Courtesy of The Commonwealth Club

In a wide-ranging conversation Wednesday night at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, Obamacare’s main architect, talked about health care reform and the debate over President-elect Donald Trump’s pledge to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, which has helped insure at least 20 million more  Americans, including five million Californians.

Emanuel is still a strongly advocate of the law, saying it has contributed to keeping U.S. health care costs more under control than at any time in the last 50 years. But like many other health care experts, he acknowledges room for improvement — and hopes it can now be done a bipartisan fashion. Here are five key points he made:

1) If you abolish the mandate that everyone must have health insurance, there are few options to induce people to get covered and create a stable insurance market. You need compulsion, but Americans don’t like compulsion.

2) A possible bipartisan alternative? One possibility is for the government to automatically enroll everyone in a catastrophic coverage plan — and if someone wants more coverage, that person would pay a higher premium.

3) The two biggest mistakes made by the Obama administration and supporters of the Affordable Care Act: flawed communication and rollout. The administration should have relied more on doctors and nurses and less on politicians to explain the reform to the public because the “white coats” are trusted sources of health care information. The botched launch of HealthCare.gov, the website for the federal exchange, didn’t help.

4) The subsidies for Obamacare aren’t high enough to drive down prices for many people.

5) A bipartisan-backed health care law isn’t a dream.  The U.S. almost got nearly universal health care in the early 1970s with a plan proposed by Republican President Richard Nixon and supported by two powerful Democrats: veteran Arkansas Congressman Wilbur Mills, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, and Massachusetts Sen. Ted Kennedy. But scandals led to its derailment after Mills was caught with stripper Fanne Fox — and Nixon was implicated in Watergate. Democrats had hoped to regain traction on the issue after the 1974 mid-term elections, but the proposal lost momentum.

 

What Could President Trump Do Through Executive Order to Dismantle the ACA?

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/blog/2017/jan/what-could-president-trump-do-through-executive-order

Image result for executive orders

The Republican House and Senate have begun the process of repealing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) through the budget reconciliation process. Enacting a budget reconciliation bill is likely to take weeks, however, and at this point it seems likely that such a bill will delay repeal of some of the most important provisions of the ACA for much longer.

In a meeting with Republican lawmakers on January 4, 2017, Vice-President-elect Mike Pence stated that the Trump administration may move much more quickly against the ACA through executive action. He told reporters that the Trump administration would begin on the first day of the administration an orderly transition process to unwind the ACA: “We’re working now on a series of executive orders that will enable that orderly transition to take place even as Congress appropriately debates alternatives to and replacements for Obamacare.”

The President and the executive departments and agencies clearly do have a great deal of power. They can exercise their authority through issuing executive orders, rules, and guidance. The executive branch of government operates programs, decides whether and how to defend or settle litigation, and exercises discretion in enforcing the law. But within our constitutional system the president and executive departments and agencies must comply with the laws and operate according to the processes laid down by law.

What can the executive do to “unwind” a law without congressional action and within the law?

States That Leaned In on the Affordable Care Act Have Much to Lose

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/blog/2017/jan/states-that-leaned-in

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) created health insurance marketplaces to make it easier for consumers to shop for and compare plan options in one place. As of December 24, 2016, over 11.5 million people had signed up for coverage through the marketplaces, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services projects that 13.8 million consumers will have selected a plan for 2017 by the close of this open enrollment period.

However, our new president and Congress are committed to the repeal of the ACA. Repeal could cause as many as 30 million to lose coverage, 9.3 million of whom receive federal premium assistance through the marketplaces. Nearly one-third of these enrollees reside in the 17 states that embraced the chance to set up and manage their own ACA marketplace.1  All but one of these states also expanded their Medicaid program and most incorporated the ACA’s consumer protections into their own state insurance laws, effectively adopting them as their own. These states not only embraced the ACA’s vision of improving access to affordable, quality health coverage, but also took full advantage of the flexibility for states provided under the law to design an insurance market to meet local needs.2

Within days of the ACA’s enactment, legislators, agency staff, and health care stakeholders from these states began working to develop the policy and operational infrastructure needed to build and maintain a sustainable health insurance marketplace. Doing so not only gave these states greater autonomy and flexibility to manage their insurance markets, but also allowed them to tailor public education and outreach efforts to their local population.

 

 

Medicaid’s Future: What Might ACA Repeal Mean?

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2017/jan/medicaids-future-aca-repeal?omnicid=EALERT1152581&mid=henrykotula@yahoo.com

Image result for medicaid

Abstract

Issue: Republicans in Congress are expected to repeal portions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) using a fast-track process known as budget reconciliation.

Goals: This issue brief examines how repeal legislation could affect Medicaid, the nations’s health care safety net, which insured 70 million people in 2016.

Findings and Conclusions:Partial-repeal legislation that passed Congress but was vetoed by President Obama in 2016 offers some insight but new legislation could go further. It could repeal the ACA’s Medicaid eligibility expansions for adults and children but also roll back other provisions, such as simplified enrollment and improvements in long-term services and supports for beneficiaries with disabilities. Additionally, the Trump Administration could expand use of demonstration authority to introduce deeper structural changes into Medicaid, such as eligibility restrictions tied to work, required premium contributions and lock-out for nonpayment, annual enrollment periods, and coverage limits and exclusions. Together, these changes would have far-reaching implications for Medicaid’s continued role as the nation’s safety-net insurer.

Hospital uncompensated care costs fall to lowest level in 26 years: 4 things to know

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/hospital-uncompensated-care-costs-fall-to-lowest-level-in-26-years-4-things-to-know.html

Image result for uncompensated care

From 1990 through 2015, U.S. hospitals’ uncompensated care costs totaled $704.7 billion, according to a recent American Hospital Association report.

To calculate a hospital’s uncompensated care costs, the AHA combined the hospital’s bad debt and financial assistance costs. The uncompensated care figure does not factor in Medicare or Medicaid underpayments or other contractual allowances.

Using that formula, the AHA has calculated national uncompensated care costs from 1990 through 2015.

Here are four things to know about hospital uncompensated care costs, according to the AHA report.

1. In 1990, total uncompensated care costs were $12.1 billion, representing 6 percent of total hospital expenses.

2. Although total uncompensated care costs steadily increased from 1990 to 2000, the costs consistently represented about 6 percent of total expenses. During that period, uncompensated care costs represented the smallest percent of total expenses in 1992 at 5.9 percent and the largest percent in 1999 at 6.2 percent.

3. From 2000 to 2015, national uncompensated care costs fluctuated, reaching a high of $45.9 billion in 2012, which represented 6.1 percent of total expenses.

4. In 2015, total uncompensated care costs were $35.7 billion, representing 4.2 percent of total expenses — the lowest level in 26 years.

The #1 thing you need to know from the 2017 JP Morgan Healthcare Conference: Follow the money

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/hospital-management-administration/the-1-thing-you-need-to-know-from-the-2017-jp-morgan-healthcare-conference-follow-the-money.html

Image result for follow the money

If you want to understand the future of the $3 trillion U.S. healthcare industry, the lesson of the past is to ‘follow the money.’ And no one would argue that the place to do that is the infamous JP Morgan Healthcare Conference taking place this week in San Francisco.

While there are an estimated 4,000 people attending the conference, there’s roughly another 20,000 here for ‘off the grid’ meetings in every nook and cranny you can find. It is a surreal atmosphere in the form of the top executives from more than 450 private and public companies in biotech, pharmaceutical, medical device and technology, as well as healthcare providers, payers, private equity and venture capital firms and investment banks. Simply stated, this is where medicine’s flow happens.

With that said, roughly $1 trillion or one-third of annual U.S. healthcare spend flows through hospitals and healthcare delivery systems. So, if you want to understand what’s happening now and what will happen in the future, a good place to start is in the nonprofit healthcare provider track, where CEOs and CFOs of over 20 of our nation’s largest healthcare delivery systems presented their strategic plans in rapid fire 25-minute presentations.

Together these organizations represent over $100 billion or 10 percent of that $1 trillion spend. Incredible. The average organization presenting had over $6 billion in annual revenue, 15 hospitals, close to 30,000 employees and thousands of physicians on staff. Many of the name brands in healthcare including Downers Grove, Ill.-based Advocate Health Care, Irving, Texas-based CHRISTUS Health, Cleveland Clinic, Detroit-based Henry Ford Health System, Salt Lake City-based Intermountain Healthcare, Indianapolis-based IU Health, Oakland-based Kaiser Permanente, Cincinnati-based Mercy Health, New York-Presbyterian, Chicago-based Northwestern Medicine, Northwell Health in Great Neck, N.Y., and Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health based in West Orange, N.J., presented along with leading children’s hospitals such as Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and innovative physician focused models such as Marshfield Clinic in Wisconsin and Geisinger Health System in Danville, Pa.

This provided an incredibly important snapshot of both the ground level view of what’s happening in the real world today as well as the bets being placed for the future. What follows is a high-level perspective of what was shared by these prominent provider organizations.

So, follow the money…and here’s the Top 10 Trends shaping how that money is flowing: