Brooklyn surgeon in Medicare billing scheme convicted of fraud, faces 40 years in prison

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/brooklyn-surgeon-convicted-medicare-fraud-faces-40-years-article-1.2731355

Dr. Syed Ahmed faces over 40 years in prison.

A Brooklyn surgeon is facing more than 40 years in prison after a federal jury convicted him of a massive Medicare fraud that included claims he’d performed 600 procedures on one person.

Dr. Syed Ahmed was found guilty of all six counts late Thursday night in Brooklyn Federal Court. The jury had deliberated about four hours.

Prosecutors alleged that Ahmed, a specialist in weight loss surgery and wound treatment, billed Medicare for over $7 million in procedures, many of which were not performed on patients, prosecutors alleged.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Patricia Notopoulos told the jury that Ahmed billed Medicare for 5,000 surgeries over a three-year period, including 600 alleged procedures on an elderly woman.

Campaign 2016 Healthcare Election Issues

http://connect.kff.org/poll-health-care-issues-in-the-2016-elections-the-publics-views-on-zika-and-electronic-medical-records?ecid=ACsprvsNwVqzoYoktjeMadLmMP_j5z4aIEIDLtV7mAYMiD8KEFvV0TCbNnPbhhL1Z-Bec8iS2pPQ&utm_campaign=KFF-2016-August-Tracking-Poll&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=33682024&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8xtyy8YqJQ7WAY3Hy2-UCQDhQKjYlvB05qHdtEnzbB4uaWO2JZQtkeD0o1C6GXU8BopN7QM81MUjiM3NFIn_7Xlb8t-A&_hsmi=33682024

Chart_1_-_Poll_Alert.png

Two thirds of voters (66%), including large shares of Democrats, Republicans, and independents, identify access and affordability of health care and the future of Medicare, an issue not being widely discussed on the campaign trail, as top priorities for the presidential candidates to talk about during the campaign. Smaller majorities of voters say the same about Medicaid’s future (54%), prescription drug costs (53%), and the future of the 2010 health care law (52%).

 

Top 3 Most Challenging Stage 3 Meaningful Use Requirements

https://ehrintelligence.com/news/top-3-most-challenging-stage-3-meaningful-use-requirements?elqTrackId=6e6d755711244ce0a92d44b38d2d3bef&elq=3e9b4cb119c74d95b79e6d86ff43216b&elqaid=805&elqat=1&elqCampaignId=705

Stage 3 Meaningful Use requirementsStage 3 Meaningful Use requirements

Stage 3 Meaningful Use isn’t slated to begin until 2018, but a few of its requirements are likely to prove more challenging than others.

Will Medicare Premium Increases Be an Issue in November?

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/06/22/will-medicare-premium-increases-be-an-issue-in-november/

Image result for Will Medicare Premium Increases Be an Issue in November?

Buried in the Medicare trustees report released Wednesday are a few lines that could cause political controversy. “In 2017 there may be a substantial increase in the Part B premium rate for some beneficiaries,” the actuaries write—which means seniors will find out about increases shortly before Election Day.

Higher-than-expected Medicare spending in 2014 and 2015 set the stage for a large premium adjustment in 2016. But, notably, the absence of inflation thanks to the drop in energy prices last year meant that seniors receiving Social Security benefits did not receive an annual cost-of-living adjustment.

The Medicare statute has a “hold harmless” provision that prevents Part B premiums from rising by more than the amount of a Social Security cost-of-living adjustment. For most beneficiaries, the provision meant that in 2016, they received no such adjustment—but also did not pay a higher Part B premium. However, nearly one-third of beneficiaries—new Medicare enrollees, “dual eligibles” enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid (in places where state Medicaid programs pay the Medicare Part B premium), and wealthy seniors subject to Medicare means-testing—do not qualify for the provision.

The New York Times noted last fall that the hold-harmless provision, by protecting most beneficiaries, exposed some to higher increases: “If premiums are frozen for 70 percent of beneficiaries, premiums for the other 30 percent must be raised more to cover the expected increase in overall Medicare costs. In other words … the higher Medicare costs must be spread across a smaller group of people.”

Will House Republican Health Proposal and Trustees’ Report Make Medicare a Factor in Election?

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/06/24/will-house-republican-health-proposal-and-trustees-report-make-medicare-a-factor-in-election/

Image result for Will House Republican Health Proposal and Trustees’ Report Make Medicare a Factor in Election?

So far Medicare has not been one of the major health-care issues in the presidential campaign. Neither Hillary Clinton nor Donald Trump has talked about it much. The former secretary of state has discussed the idea of a Medicare buy-in for the near-elderly, but that’s been mentioned more as a way of strengthening the Affordable Care Act, not reforming Medicare. Meanwhile, Medicare faces serious long-term challenges, including how to finance care for an aging population, ensure its solvency in the future, fill gaps in coverage, and address cost-sharing burdens that can be onerous for its mostly lower- and moderate-income beneficiaries.

Unintended Consequences

http://altarum.org/health-policy-blog/unintended-consequences

Altarum InstituteAltarum Institute

How does it feel knowing the clinical decisions our physicians make affect their pocketbook? MIPS, or the Merit-based Incentive Payment System, is now the law of the land. MIPS attempts to incentivize physicians based on quality measures, use of electronic health records, practice improvement approaches and cost of care. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS), is tasked with working out the details of the program, which aims to take us from a system where physicians are incentivized to “do something” to patients to one in which “quality” is the predominate goal.

Here’s my quandary: As a Geriatrician, I have practiced a lower cost approach to care my whole career. I try to avoid acute hospitalization, medications and procedures in my frail older patients. Why?  Because my experience, as well as a growing body of evidence-based literature, supports this approach. I should be wholeheartedly embracing this new approach to physician incentives. So, why do I feel sick when I think about it?

Hospital Observation Care Can Be Costly For Medicare Patients

http://khn.org/news/observation-care-faq/

Image result for hospital observation careImage result for hospital observation care

http://khn.org/news/hospital-surprise-medicares-observation-care/

Some seniors think Medicare made a mistake.  Others are stunned when they find out that being in a hospital even for a couple of days doesn’t always mean they were actually admitted.

Instead, they received observation care, considered by Medicare to be an outpatient service. The observation designation means they can have higher out-of-pocket expenses and fewer Medicare benefits. Yet, a government investigation found that observation patients often have the same health problems as those who are admitted.

Medicare officials are working to finalize a notice that will inform patients that they are receiving observation care. That is required under a federal law that went into effect in August, and hospitals will likely begin using the notices in January. Some states already require that patients be told about their status.

More Medicare beneficiaries are entering hospitals as observation patients every year. The number doubled since 2006 to nearly 1.9 million in 2014, according to figures from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. At the same time, enrollment in traditional Medicare grew by 5 percent.

Here are some common questions and answers about observation care and the coverage gap that can result. (Seniors enrolled in Medicare Advantage should ask their plans about their observation care rules since they can vary.)

There’s a simple fix for Obamacare’s current woes: the public option

http://www.vox.com/2016/8/18/12520820/public-option-health-care-obamacare

THE REALITY IS THAT COMPETITION AMONG PRIVATE INSURERS HAS NEVER LIVED UP TO THE RHETORIC PUT FORTH BY THE INDUSTRY OR FREE MARKET FUNDAMENTALISTS

This week, Aetna announced it would stop selling insurance plans in all but four Obamacare exchanges, the state-run markets set up under the 2010 Affordable Care Act. Aetna, which now covers more than 800,000 people in 15 exchanges, said it had been hemorrhaging money on the plans. (A fight with the government over an acquisition of the insurance company Humana may have played a role, too.)

Aetna’s exit, following similar departures by UnitedHealth and Humana, means that a growing number of US counties — 20 to 25 percent, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation — now have only a single private insurer offering coverage on the exchanges, a development that essentially eliminates consumer choice. One county in Arizona now has no insurers. Even before Aetna’s decision, more than half of state exchanges had four or fewer insurers, with DC, Vermont, Connecticut, and Rhode Island having only two.

It’s enough to make a frazzled health care consumer in one of those feeble markets wish there were another option — perhaps even (dare one say it?) a public option. Does the phrase ring a bell? That’s the health care policy that some policymakers pushed to include in the 2010 law.

CBO: Aging population, drugs driving federal healthcare spending

http://www.healthcaredive.com/news/cbo-aging-population-drugs-driving-federal-healthcare-spending/425062/

The country’s aging population, which is using more Social Security and requiring more Medicare coverage, is driving most of the spending increases, according to the report. Compared to 50 years ago, the number of people who are 65 years old and older has more than doubled, CBO found. As a result, Medicare outlays will remain at about 3% of GDP until 2018 but then increase on an annual basis through 2026.

“Over the next decade, as members of the baby-boom generation age and as life expectancy continues to increase, that number is expected to rise by more than one-third, boosting the number of beneficiaries of those programs,” the report states, adding, “As a result, projected spending for people age 65 or older in three large programs — Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid — increases from roughly one-third of all federal noninterest spending in 2016 to about 40% in 2026.”

Fewer than one-third of ACOs qualify for Medicare bonuses

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payer/cms-acos-generated-466m-savings-2015?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTXpNd1lqZGlNR0U1WkRJeCIsInQiOiJLOWhzWGhXZ2FrUHdBMEg5d1VNTnppNTR6TEh5XC9tQjI1bDgxcVlUUWNcL1wvSWt0SkRUck9vYm90K1VuSlZJUGFpQ3RubDhPdjFFTWZFUEF1S3RDTUlpZ0VQbmtJRmYyOVg5ZHk0T3RiUUZYRT0ifQ%3D%3D&mrkid=959610&utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal

CMSCMS

Fewer than one-third of Accountable Care Organizations qualified for bonuses from Medicare in 2015.

And just 31 percent of ACOs generated savings of $466 million, according to a CMS announcement released Thursday.

CMS and Congress must “take swift and decisive action to solidify the foundation of the Medicare ACO program,” Clif Gaus, CEO of the National Association of ACOs, said in a response (.pdf) to the findings.

The savings were accumulated from 392 Medicare Shared Savings Program participants and 12 Pioneer ACO participants, according to CMS. Total savings grew 13 percent from 2014, when ACOs recognized $411 million in total savings.

The National Association of ACOS “was disappointed not to find stronger financial results that reflect the extensive financial and personal contributions invested by ACOs,” Clif Gaus told FierceHealthcare via email, adding, “the ACO program has strong, bipartisan support and is considered a model for the transition from fee-for-service to value-based payment.”