Some seniors surprised to find themselves automatically enrolled in private Medicare plans

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/health/fl-medicare-automatic-plan-conversion-20161005-story.html?utm_campaign=KHN%3A+Daily+Health+Policy+Report&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=35442779&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_a7vlJ7zABlLxwHbCxWCAeLygJKLQ9GDCnB-7cSgUowrQrzVdpaGgIUqCbuF31bQVHJl19l50y7dVbxpffBEBmuOjTpQ&_hsmi=35442779

Image result for automatic enrollment in medicare advantage

Turning 65 soon? Your mailbox probably is stuffed with ads from health care companies eager to sign you up for Medicare coverage.

Be aware, though: buried in there may be a notice that you are about to be automatically enrolled in an HMO-style, private Medicare Advantage plan by your current insurance company. If you never see that letter, or if you ignore it, you could find yourself locked into coverage that doesn’t cover your doctors or costs you more.

Some insurance companies serving South Florida seniors are considering, or have started, a little-known policy called seamless conversion. Insurers granted approval by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services can automatically shift existing members into their Advantage plans when those members become eligible for Medicare.

While CMS requires that beneficiaries be notified in writing at least 60 days in advance, insurers do not need confirmation that the member wants the new coverage before making the switch. Medicare advocates say that blocks seniors from making informed choices.

Seamless conversion was created by Congress almost 20 years ago, as part of the Social Security Act of 1997, but rarely used over the years, said Stacy Sanders, federal policy director for the Medicare Rights Center in New York City. That changed in the 2016 plan year, she said, when CMS sent Medicare Advantage providers letters suggesting conversion was a good option for transitioning low-income seniors and nursing home residents into new state Medicaid managed care programs once their members were eligible for Medicare.

Sanders is concerned that seniors usually will receive seamless conversion notices when they’re most likely to be flooded with Medicare Advantage pitches: during annual open enrollment in October and right before their 65th birthdays.

How Health Care Battles of the Past Shape the Candidates’ Positions Today

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/in-brief/2016/oct/past-as-prologue-presidential-politics-health-policy?omnicid=EALERT1108988&mid=henrykotula@yahoo.com

Despite the singular nature of this year’s presidential campaign, there is plenty of continuity with past elections when it comes to health care, argue David Blumenthal, M.D., and James A. Morone in their New England Journal of Medicine “Perspective.”

In “Past as Prologue—Presidential Politics and Health Policy,” Blumenthal, The Commonwealth Fund’s president, and Morone, director of Brown University’s Taubman Center for American Politics and Policy, discuss the “deep underlying political forces and historical experiences with health care politics and policy” that are reflected in the platforms of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

The authors previously collaborated on the book The Heart of Power: Health and Politics in the Oval Office (University of California Press, 2009).

The two mysteries of Medicare

The two mysteries of Medicare

Image result for The two mysteries of Medicare

A growing proportion of Medicare beneficiaries are opting out of the government-run insurance program. They are instead choosing a private plan alternative, one of the Medicare Advantage plans. The strength of this trend defies predictions from the Congressional Budget Office, and nobody can fully explain it.

Here’s another mystery. Traditional Medicare spending growth has slowed, bucking historical trends and expectations. Though there are theories, we don’t fully know what’s causing that either.

Pinning down explanations for these two mysteries is important. Doing so could help us understand the structure and cost of Medicare in the future.

Biggest healthcare frauds in 2016: Running list

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/slideshow/biggest-healthcare-frauds-2016-running-list?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWVRrMVl6UmtNek5qTURkaSIsInQiOiJ0Q2t5WUwzMm1TMDZaM0NrVU53eWtLWXIrb2tNUDBRZWhpNHRBb3VqWWh0blIzNUR2S1BlSVwveGFCTG9EYStDTFNTWjIrXC9LMmR4YU1DYXU3NVY1QUNoNUxDOW5zWVJVcjdvcFU2TW9vOU04PSJ9

Lazy Image

 

Snapshot of Where Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Stand on Seven Health Care Issues

Snapshot of Where Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Stand on Seven Health Care Issues

Image result for Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump on Health Care Issues

While health care has not been central to the 2016 Presidential campaign, the election’s outcome will be a major determining factor in the country’s future health care policy. A number of issues have garnered media attention, including the future of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), rising prescription drug costs, and the opioid epidemic.

Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have laid out different approaches to addressing these and other health care issues. Central among these is their position on the future of the ACA. Hillary Clinton would maintain the ACA, and many of her policy proposals would build on provisions already in place. Donald Trump, in contrast, would fully repeal the ACA, and although his policy proposals and positions do not offer a full replacement plan, they do reflect an approach based on free market principles.

See where the candidates stand on seven key health policy issues.

Donald Trump’s Health Care Reform Proposals: Anticipated Effects on Insurance Coverage, Out-of-Pocket Costs, and the Federal Deficit

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Publications/Issue-Briefs/2016/Sep/Trump-Presidential-Health-Care-Proposal

Image result for Donald Trump's Health Care Reform Proposals: Anticipated Effects on Insurance Coverage, Out-of-Pocket Costs, and the Federal Deficit

Issue: Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has proposed to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and replace it with a proposal titled “Healthcare Reform to Make America Great Again.” Proposed reforms include allowing individuals to deduct the full amount of premiums for individual health plans from their federal tax returns, providing block grants to finance state Medicaid programs, and allowing insurers to sell insurance across state lines.

Goal: To assess how each of these reforms, when implemented individually, would affect insurance coverage, consumer out-of-pocket spending on health care, and the federal deficit in 2018.

Methods: RAND’s COMPARE microsimulation model.

Key findings and conclusions: The policies would increase the number of uninsured individuals by 16 million to 25 million relative to the ACA. Coverage losses disproportionately affect low-income individuals and those in poor health. Enrollees with individual market insurance would face higher out-of-pocket spending than under current law. Because the proposed reforms do not replace the ACA’s financing mechanisms, they would increase the federal deficit by $0.5 billion to $41 billion.

On Medicare But At Risk: A State-Level Analysis of Beneficiaries Who Are Underinsured or Facing High Total Cost Burdens

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2016/may/on-medicare-but-at-risk

Medicare provides essential health coverage for older and disabled adults, yet it does not limit out-of-pocket costs for covered benefits and excludes dental, hearing, and longer-term care. The resulting out-of-pocket costs can add up to a substantial share of income. Based on U.S. Census surveys, nearly a quarter of Medicare beneficiaries (11.5 million) were underinsured in 2013–14, meaning they spent a high share of their income on health care. Adding premiums to medical care expenses, we find that 16 percent of beneficiaries (8 million) spent 20 percent or more of their income on insurance plus care. At the state level, the proportion of beneficiaries underinsured ranged from 16 percent to 32 percent, while the proportion with a high total cost burden ranged from 11 percent to 26 percent. Low-income beneficiaries were most at risk. The findings underscore the need to assess beneficiary impacts of any proposal to redesign Medicare.

The Opportunities and Challenges of the MSSP ACO Program: A Report From the Field

https://www.aledade.com/new-journal-article-a-report-from-the-field/

table

The trillion dollar shift in healthcare payment “from volume to value” is well underway with both public and private payers and purchasers pushing provider organizations to participate in outcome-based risk contracts, stepping up from pay-for-performance and medical home models to a variety of accountable care and bundled payment programs.

But what are we to take away from the mixed results of these programs — from the lack of savings in the Comprehensive Primary Care demonstration, to the dropouts from the Pioneer program, the recently released underwhelming results from the first year of the Bundled Payment for Care Improvement Initiative, or the 2015 results from the Medicare Shared Savings Program?

One approach would be for partisans for each of these approaches to search for positive nuggets in the results from their preferred program, while heaping scorn on the other “competing” reforms.

Another would be to retreat altogether from the aspirations of achieving better care at lower cost, towards either resignation towards ever-escalating health care costs or more likely to (altogether regretful!) rationing of access to good healthcare for the most vulnerable in our society.

A third path would be to acknowledge that there is no magic bullet for “transforming healthcare” overnight, and that the work of redesigning our delivery systems to meet the expectations of the outcome-based payment models will be slow, hard, and uneven. We would accept that there are likely multiple payment reforms that will need to be implemented alongside each other, targeting different healthcare markets and different participants. (Capitated payments for truly integrated delivery networks. Mandatory bundled payments for proceduralists and hospitals. Accountable care for independent physician networks). And each model will need to be iterated and tweaked and incrementally improved.

That is what I choose to believe.

We are publishing today in the new issue of the American Journal of Managed Care, “A Report From the Field,” the detailed description of what our two ACO “freshman” accomplished in 2015, and openly discussing the challenges we faced, what we are doing differently now, and some policy changes that can put more wind to the backs of those in these trenches.

Here are a few of the key findings:

http://www.ajmc.com/journals/issue/2016/2016-vol22-n9/The-Opportunities-and-Challenges-of-the-MSSP-ACO-Program-A-Report-From-the-Field

Conclusions:

We have learned that, given the right support and incentives, independent primary care practices can embrace population health and practice redesign. These efforts can begin to bear fruit in improved patient access, quality of care, and appropriate utilization in the short term. We strongly believe that the benefits of the program to patients and the taxpayer are not limited to those ACOs that received shared savings distributions. However, lack of recognition of these contributions may stifle continued innovation and physician engagement with alternative payment models. Aledade is committed to navigating these challenges and we are committed to sharing our learning so that more independent physician-led ACOs can succeed in their mission to profitably deliver better care at lower cost. We also hope that policy makers and commercial payers continue to work to remove the unintended policy headwinds ACOs must presently overcome. – See more at: http://www.ajmc.com/journals/issue/2016/2016-vol22-n9/the-opportunities-and-challenges-of-the-mssp-aco-program-a-report-from-the-field/P-5#sthash.3V1BtAtZ.dpuf

 

We’re closer to a publicly funded health care system than you think

http://blog.academyhealth.org/were-closer-to-a-publicly-funded-health-care-system-than-you-think/

Image result for We’re closer to a publicly funded health care system than you think

Every time health care reform comes up for debate, I see people arguing about whether a publicly or privately funded system would be better. The Affordable Care Act, in an attempt to forestall this debate, decided to split the baby, and give half of its newly insured beneficiaries public insurance (Medicaid) and half private insurance (insurance exchanges). But this isn’t really true. Yes, the half of people getting expanded Medicaid are getting public insurance, but the vast majority of people getting private insurance are also getting public funds (subsidies) in order to purchase their private insurance.

In other words, even though we expanded private insurance, we’re doing it with taxpayer dollars. Overall, the reduction in the uninsured was due to mostly public spending, with relatively little private spending overall. This isn’t rare in the US health care system. A recently released policy brief from the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, “Public Funds Account for Over 70 Percent of Health Care Spending in California“, explains this quite well.

If you just look at a simple analysis of Medicaid, Medicaid, and CHIP, you might find that about 45% (or less than half) of total US health care spending is public. But that ignores a ton of health care spending that is also paid for with public funds outside those programs. In an effort to document the different, researchers looked at health care spending in California. They included four major public funding categories:

  1. Payments for public health insurance programs (like Medicare and Medicaid)
  2. Government payments for health insurance coverage for public employees (like me at Indiana University, for instance)
  3. Tax subsidies for employer-sponsored insurance and those purchasing exchange plans who earn less than 400% of the poverty line
  4. County health care expenditures

 

Cost Control Efforts Working ‘So Far’ in MA

http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/quality/cost-control-efforts-working-so-far-ma?spMailingID=9530189&spUserID=MTMyMzQyMDQxMTkyS0&spJobID=1001355843&spReportId=MTAwMTM1NTg0MwS2#

Health policy veteran Stuart Altman, PhD, is hopeful, but not optimistic, about healthcare delivery reforms and thinks hospitals will be forced to bring costs down because patients won't tolerate any more cost shifting.

Health policy veteran Stuart Altman, PhD, is hopeful, but not optimistic, about healthcare delivery reforms and thinks hospitals will be forced to bring costs down because patients won’t tolerate any more cost shifting.

health care expenditures 2013-2015

Each year, we put together a cost trend report that outlines what forces are at play in the state in terms of raising spending and we have hearings every October. We are trying to play an interesting role which is not be regulatory, but really to be in the face of the healthcare system in terms of saying, “Hey  be careful. Don’t go the extra mile on in spending or pricing.”

We want to do it in a way that doesn’t destroy or even hurt the health system.  In any attempt to do that, some of the forces within the health industry scream.

But, for the most part, the hospitals have been supportive of our efforts. If we were to squeeze too hard, they would react more negatively. Everyone is engaged in a very interesting balancing act. We are trying getting the system to work more efficiently… and they are trying to control costs without destroying themselves. So far it’s working.