CBO: Hospitals’ future finances depend on increasing productivity

http://www.healthcaredive.com/news/cbo-hospitals-future-finances-depend-on-increasing-productivity/426036/

  • A new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has recognized that changes in laws and regulations, prompted primarily by the ACA–notablyreduced Medicare payment updates and expanded insurance coverage–can be expected to significantly impact hospitals’ future finances.
  • To help provide a sense of the impacts, the CBO’s working paper predicted hospitals’ profit margins, and the share of hospitals that could lose money in 2025 under several different scenarios.
  • The researchers noted that they provided a wide range of estimates due to “substantial uncertainty” around the predictions and how hospitals will respond to the pressures of the federal healthcare law.

This is how the presidential election is shaping the ongoing drug price debate

This is how the presidential election is shaping the ongoing drug price debate

Change Capsule Pill Filled with Word on Balls

In this year’s presidential campaign, health care has taken a back seat. But one issue appears to be breaking through: the rising cost of prescription drugs.

The blockbuster drugs to treat hepatitis C as well as dramatic price increases on older drugs, most recently the EpiPen allergy treatment, have combined to put the issue back on the front burner.

Democrat Hillary Clinton just issued a lengthy proposal to address what her campaign calls “unjustified price hikes for long-available drugs.” That’s in addition to a broader proposal to address high drug prices the campaign put out last fall.
Republican Donald Trump, meanwhile, has said little about health care since announcing his candidacy in 2015, but he has several times called for a change in law to allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices for the population it serves.

Here are five reasons why this issue is back — and why it is so difficult to solve.

Failure to Improve Is Still Being Used, Wrongly, to Deny Medicare Coverage

For months, physical therapists worked with Mrs. Kirby, a retired civil servant who is now 75, trying to help her regain enough mobility to go home. Then her daughter received an email from one of the therapists saying, “Edwina has reached her highest practical level of independence.”

Translation: Mrs. Kirby wouldn’t receive Medicare coverage for further physical therapy or for the nursing home. If she wanted to stay and continue therapy, she’d have to pay the tab herself.

Medicare beneficiaries often hear such rationales for denying coverage of skilled nursing, home health care or outpatient therapy: They’re not improving. They’ve “reached a plateau.” They’re “stable and chronic,” or have achieved “maximum functional capacity.”

Deanna Kirby wasn’t buying it. “I knew they couldn’t refuse you, even if you’re not improving,” she said.

She’s right. A federal judge last month ordered the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to do a better job of informing health care providers and Medicare adjudicators that the so-called improvement standard was no longer in effect.

 

Marin hospital could be first in state to allow medical marijuana

http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Marin-hospital-could-be-first-in-state-to-allow-9216208.php

Dr. Larry Bedard poses outside of the Marin General Hospital in Greenbrae, California on Wednesday, September 7,  2016. Photo: Gabriella Angotti-Jones, The Chronicle

If Dr. Larry Bedard has his way, Marin General Hospital would become the first acute-care medical center in California to allow patients to openly consume medical marijuana in the hospital.

Patients wouldn’t be allowed to smoke it, since smoking is prohibited. But Bedard, a retired emergency physician at Marin General who now serves on the Marin Healthcare District board, says he knows of no other legally prescribed drug that cannot openly be used by patients in a hospital.

“I know that it happens that it’s being used in the hospital, but it’s ‘don’t ask, don’t tell,’” Bedard said. “It’s kind of wink-and-nod medicine.”

The doctor is taking steps toward bringing it out into the open by introducing a resolution at Tuesday’s board meeting for Marin Healthcare District, which governs Marin General. The resolution, if approved, would direct the hospital’s administrative and medical staff to review and research the clinical and legal implications of using medical marijuana in the hospital and report back to the board.

Bedard initially planned to introduce a resolution to allow patient use in the hospital but stepped back from that last month after the Drug Enforcement Agency declined to remove marijuana from its list of dangerous drugs, keeping it in the same category as such drugs as heroin and LSD.

Brooklyn surgeon in Medicare billing scheme convicted of fraud, faces 40 years in prison

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/brooklyn-surgeon-convicted-medicare-fraud-faces-40-years-article-1.2731355

Dr. Syed Ahmed faces over 40 years in prison.

A Brooklyn surgeon is facing more than 40 years in prison after a federal jury convicted him of a massive Medicare fraud that included claims he’d performed 600 procedures on one person.

Dr. Syed Ahmed was found guilty of all six counts late Thursday night in Brooklyn Federal Court. The jury had deliberated about four hours.

Prosecutors alleged that Ahmed, a specialist in weight loss surgery and wound treatment, billed Medicare for over $7 million in procedures, many of which were not performed on patients, prosecutors alleged.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Patricia Notopoulos told the jury that Ahmed billed Medicare for 5,000 surgeries over a three-year period, including 600 alleged procedures on an elderly woman.

Campaign 2016 Healthcare Election Issues

http://connect.kff.org/poll-health-care-issues-in-the-2016-elections-the-publics-views-on-zika-and-electronic-medical-records?ecid=ACsprvsNwVqzoYoktjeMadLmMP_j5z4aIEIDLtV7mAYMiD8KEFvV0TCbNnPbhhL1Z-Bec8iS2pPQ&utm_campaign=KFF-2016-August-Tracking-Poll&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=33682024&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8xtyy8YqJQ7WAY3Hy2-UCQDhQKjYlvB05qHdtEnzbB4uaWO2JZQtkeD0o1C6GXU8BopN7QM81MUjiM3NFIn_7Xlb8t-A&_hsmi=33682024

Chart_1_-_Poll_Alert.png

Two thirds of voters (66%), including large shares of Democrats, Republicans, and independents, identify access and affordability of health care and the future of Medicare, an issue not being widely discussed on the campaign trail, as top priorities for the presidential candidates to talk about during the campaign. Smaller majorities of voters say the same about Medicaid’s future (54%), prescription drug costs (53%), and the future of the 2010 health care law (52%).

 

Top 3 Most Challenging Stage 3 Meaningful Use Requirements

https://ehrintelligence.com/news/top-3-most-challenging-stage-3-meaningful-use-requirements?elqTrackId=6e6d755711244ce0a92d44b38d2d3bef&elq=3e9b4cb119c74d95b79e6d86ff43216b&elqaid=805&elqat=1&elqCampaignId=705

Stage 3 Meaningful Use requirementsStage 3 Meaningful Use requirements

Stage 3 Meaningful Use isn’t slated to begin until 2018, but a few of its requirements are likely to prove more challenging than others.

Will Medicare Premium Increases Be an Issue in November?

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/06/22/will-medicare-premium-increases-be-an-issue-in-november/

Image result for Will Medicare Premium Increases Be an Issue in November?

Buried in the Medicare trustees report released Wednesday are a few lines that could cause political controversy. “In 2017 there may be a substantial increase in the Part B premium rate for some beneficiaries,” the actuaries write—which means seniors will find out about increases shortly before Election Day.

Higher-than-expected Medicare spending in 2014 and 2015 set the stage for a large premium adjustment in 2016. But, notably, the absence of inflation thanks to the drop in energy prices last year meant that seniors receiving Social Security benefits did not receive an annual cost-of-living adjustment.

The Medicare statute has a “hold harmless” provision that prevents Part B premiums from rising by more than the amount of a Social Security cost-of-living adjustment. For most beneficiaries, the provision meant that in 2016, they received no such adjustment—but also did not pay a higher Part B premium. However, nearly one-third of beneficiaries—new Medicare enrollees, “dual eligibles” enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid (in places where state Medicaid programs pay the Medicare Part B premium), and wealthy seniors subject to Medicare means-testing—do not qualify for the provision.

The New York Times noted last fall that the hold-harmless provision, by protecting most beneficiaries, exposed some to higher increases: “If premiums are frozen for 70 percent of beneficiaries, premiums for the other 30 percent must be raised more to cover the expected increase in overall Medicare costs. In other words … the higher Medicare costs must be spread across a smaller group of people.”

Will House Republican Health Proposal and Trustees’ Report Make Medicare a Factor in Election?

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/06/24/will-house-republican-health-proposal-and-trustees-report-make-medicare-a-factor-in-election/

Image result for Will House Republican Health Proposal and Trustees’ Report Make Medicare a Factor in Election?

So far Medicare has not been one of the major health-care issues in the presidential campaign. Neither Hillary Clinton nor Donald Trump has talked about it much. The former secretary of state has discussed the idea of a Medicare buy-in for the near-elderly, but that’s been mentioned more as a way of strengthening the Affordable Care Act, not reforming Medicare. Meanwhile, Medicare faces serious long-term challenges, including how to finance care for an aging population, ensure its solvency in the future, fill gaps in coverage, and address cost-sharing burdens that can be onerous for its mostly lower- and moderate-income beneficiaries.

Unintended Consequences

http://altarum.org/health-policy-blog/unintended-consequences

Altarum InstituteAltarum Institute

How does it feel knowing the clinical decisions our physicians make affect their pocketbook? MIPS, or the Merit-based Incentive Payment System, is now the law of the land. MIPS attempts to incentivize physicians based on quality measures, use of electronic health records, practice improvement approaches and cost of care. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS), is tasked with working out the details of the program, which aims to take us from a system where physicians are incentivized to “do something” to patients to one in which “quality” is the predominate goal.

Here’s my quandary: As a Geriatrician, I have practiced a lower cost approach to care my whole career. I try to avoid acute hospitalization, medications and procedures in my frail older patients. Why?  Because my experience, as well as a growing body of evidence-based literature, supports this approach. I should be wholeheartedly embracing this new approach to physician incentives. So, why do I feel sick when I think about it?