High-Need, High-Cost Patients: Who Are They and How Do They Use Health Care?

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2016/aug/high-need-high-cost-patients-meps1

A Population-Based Comparison of Demographics, Health Care Use, and Expenditures

Abstract

Issue: Finding ways to improve outcomes and reduce spending for patients with complex and costly care needs requires an understanding of their unique needs and characteristics.

Goal: Examine demographics and health care spending and use of services among adults with high needs, defined as people who have three or more chronic diseases and a functional limitation in their ability to care for themselves or perform routine daily tasks.

Methods:Analysis of data from the 2009–2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

Key findings: High-need adults differed notably from adults with multiple chronic diseases but no functional limitations. They had annual health care expenditures that were nearly three times higher—and which were more likely to remain high over two years of observation—and out-of-pocket expenses that were more than a third higher, despite their lower incomes. On average, rates of hospital use for high-need adults were more than twice those for adults with multiple chronic conditions only; high-need adults also visited the doctor more frequently and used more home health care.

Conclusion: Wide variation in costs and use of services within the high-need group suggests that interventions should be targeted and tailored to those individuals most likely to benefit.

JAMA Forum: Why Are Private Health Insurers Losing Money on Obamacare?

https://newsatjama.jama.com/2016/08/25/jama-forum-why-are-private-health-insurers-losing-money-on-obamacare/

Uwe Reinhardt, PhD (Image: Jon Roemer/Princeton University)

Uwe E. Reinhardt, PhD, is the James Madison professor of political economy and of economics at Princeton University, where he teaches health economics, comparative health systems, general microeconomics, and financial management. Dr Reinhardt is also the codirector of the Griswold Center for Economic Policy Studies at Princeton University. The bulk of his research has been focused on health economics and policy, both in the United States and abroad. He is a member of the Health and Medicine Division of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) and served on its Governing Council in the 1980s. He is past president of AcademyHealth, the Foundation for Health Services Research, and the International Health Economics Association. He is also a member of JAMA‘s editorial board.

Health spending is highly concentrated among the highest spenders.

The contributions individuals make out of their paychecks toward employer-sponsored health insurance are community rated, which means that they are the same for all employees of the firm, regardless of their health status and even age. So healthy employees are forced to subsidize less healthy colleagues through the premiums they pay. With the ACA, the Obama administration sought to provide the same deal for US individuals purchasing health insurance in the individual market.

For health insurers, however, this approach can be called an unnatural act, because it forces them knowingly to issue policies to very ill people at premiums evidently far below these individuals’ likely claims on the insurer’s overall risk pool. Actuaries and health policy analysts understand that this approach can work only if all individuals, healthy and ill, are mandated to purchase coverage for a defined, basic package of benefits, at the community-rated premium—thereby forcing young and healthy individuals to subsidize with their premiums the health care of individuals with medical conditions in the insurer’s risk pool.

However, for purely political reasons, the ACA mandate for all person in the United States to be insured was rather weak, leading many younger or healthier individuals simply to forgo purchasing health insurance and paying the relatively low fines for doing so. Over time, this practice naturally will drive up the community-rated premiums, inducing even greater numbers of young and healthy individuals to forgo insurance coverage, leaving private insurers with ever-more expensive risk pools.

The result of this adverse risk selection (the scenario in which sicker-than-average people purchase insurance while young and healthy people do not) has been that some private health insurers underpriced their policies on the ACA exchanges, perhaps to gain market share early on or because they simply did not anticipate quite the adverse risk selection that occurred.

VIDEO: Healthcare Economist & Futurist Dr. Bill McGivney

http://healthcareexecutivesnetwork.org/mcgivney/

Healthcare Executives Network

 

Elderly Hospital Patients Arrive Sick, Often Leave Disabled

Elderly Hospital Patients Arrive Sick, Often Leave Disabled

Ron Schwarz, 79, was hospitalized after falling in the shower. Schwarz is a patient in a special ward at the San Francisco General Hospital known as the Acute Care for the Elderly unit, or ACE. (Heidi de Marco/KHN)

Not A Priority

Hospitals can be hazardous places for elderly patients, who are at increased risk of falling, drug-induced injury and confusion.

But as the nation’s senior population grows, many facilities are ill-equipped to address their unique needs.

Kaiser Health News visited hospitals around the country, reviewed data and interviewed dozens of patients, family members and health providers to document the extent of the problem and highlight possible solutions.

How hospitals handle the old — and very old — is a pressing problem. Elderly patients are a growing clientele for hospitals, a trend that will only accelerate as baby boomers age. Patients over 65 already make up more than one-third of all discharges, according to the federal government, and nearly 13 million seniors are hospitalized each year. And they stay longer than younger patients.

Many seniors are already suspended precariously between independent living and reliance on others. They are weakened by multiple chronic diseases and medications.

Caring for High-Need, High-Cost Patients—An Urgent Priority

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/in-brief/2016/jul/caring-high-need-high-cost-patients-urgent-priority?omnicid=EALERT1072635&mid=henrykotula@yahoo.com

Meaningful improvement in the health system will require improvement in care for those patients using it the most: people with multiple chronic conditions. Within this clinically diverse group are patients who remain stable for years with appropriate treatment, others who live with extreme functional limitations, and still others with persistent behavioral health challenges or related social needs, like housing or food, that exacerbate their conditions. Care for these high-need, high-cost patients is expensive: despite comprising just 5 percent of the U.S. population, they account for 50 percent of the nation’s annual health care spending.

Association Between Medicare Accountable Care Organization Implementation and Spending Among Clinically Vulnerable Beneficiaries

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/in-the-literature/2016/june/association-between-medicare-accountable-care-organization?omnicid=CFC1066901&mid=henrykotula@yahoo.com

“Medicare ACO programs are associated with modest savings on average across all beneficiaries, with savings concentrated in clinically vulnerable beneficiaries and use of institutional settings.”

Where’s the value in accountable care?

Where’s the value in accountable care?

From left: Stephanie Baum of MedCity News, Christina Miles of Aon Hewitt, David Van Houtte of Aetna, Dr. Katherine Schneider of Delaware Valley ACO and Dr. Greg Carroll of GOHealth Urgent Care

Accountable care is supposed to be about paying for value. But six years after passage of the Affordable Care Act heralded the shift away from fee-for-service, Dr. Greg Carroll, corporate clinical leader of GOHealth Urgent Care, has an important question: “Where’s the value?”

Physician group: High cost-sharing undermines insurance protections

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payer/physician-group-high-cost-sharing-undermines-insurance-protections?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTXpVMk1HRm1NRE5pWW1JMSIsInQiOiIrM3BwTVBRRXorTzl3NjQxOWNPOUh1UUxUT0ZcL2xNTGdleWQzKzRFRzIwZzhHYTg2T0c3TWlZV1BjUEsxd0JBRmNJaGk0WU9NMTRvWmFyZndPVit2SzZmUDFxM1dWSm1OV2l4Rnd1YlBMWTQ9In0%3D&mrkid=959610&utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal

closeup of a person holding a credit card

Increased cost-sharing, particularly high deductibles, lead patients to neglect necessary healthcare, according to a position paper from the American College of Physicians (ACP).

“The effects are particularly pronounced among those with low incomes and the very sick,” said Nitin S. Damle, M.D., president of the ACP in an announcement that accompanied the paper.

By exposing individuals to the full cost of certain expenses, cost-sharing undermines the primary function of insurance, says the ACP, noting that underinsurance may be a more challenging problem than lack of insurance.

More than 40 percent of marketplace plan enrollees and more than 20 percent of those insured through employers who report being in fair or poor health or having a chronic condition express confidence that they can afford necessary care, the paper says. But those with high-deductible plans have less confidence in their ability to afford a serious illness than those with low-deductible plans.

The ACP notes that rising premiums have led many employers to shift costs to employees in the form of higher average deductibles, which more than doubled between 2005 and 2015, even as wages remained largely flat.

Survey reveals 3 value-based payment trends to watch

http://managedhealthcareexecutive.modernmedicine.com/managed-healthcare-executive/news/survey-reveals-3-value-based-payment-trends-watch?cfcache=true

Population Health2

 

4 forces that will influence medical cost trends in 2017

http://www.healthcaredive.com/news/4-forces-that-will-influence-medical-cost-trends-in-2017/421162/

Binoculars

The healthcare industry is in a transformational period. The rising use of retail clinics, MACRA, population health efforts and the Medicare Part B demonstration are but a few examples of disruptive conversations being had in board rooms. Yet, all of these discussions are underscored by the one topic underlying most business conversations: the almighty dollar.

There’s a push and pull between healthcare services utilization and narrow networks focusing on value that could shift the medical cost growth rate in future years. “When medical growth outpaces general inflation, a flat trend is not good enough,” the report states.

“As a result, 2017 will be a tough balancing act for the health industry,” the report states, adding, “Healthcare organizations must simultaneously increase access to consumer friendly services while decreasing unit cost. Employers, worried that this current trend is at an inflection point that could turn back up, will demand more value from the health industry.”