TeamHealth to pay $60 million to settle ‘upcoding’ claims as acquisition by Blackstone wraps up

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/teamhealth-pay-60-million-settle-upcoding-claims-acquisition-blackstone-wraps?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWmpKaE5ETXhZVGc0TkdJNSIsInQiOiJjWXBGUGRYOWwySVVDRnRsdjhpOTJEK09yNSt1dzcyN1d0TmNucCtzN1A4cWlVcGl2NmM3M1wvR0lYQjRUa3ZQdzd2b2g4ZnFQWFRlYVhBMFwvY3I2VFlJaEVkdXhlODhNSGk4VUpVempaVUloZVBmRjRtekZXQ1ZGYVdjNFRJdkZRIn0%3D

DOJ alleged that subsidiary IPC pressured physicians to bill for higher levels of service than what was provided.

TeamHealth Holdings, nationwide hospital staffing provider and owner of group practice IPC Healthcare, has agreed to pay $60 million plus interest to settle allegations that IPC engaged in a prolonged scheme of billing Medicare, Medicaid, the Defense Health Agency and the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program for more expensive medical services that were actually provided, the Department of Justice announced.

TeamHealth is comprised of more than 20,000 affiliated physicians and advanced practice clinicians, and offers outsourced emergency medicine, hospital medicine, critical care, anesthesiology, orthopedic hospitalist, acute care surgery, obstetrics and gynecology hospitalist, and other services to approximately 3,300 acute and post-acute facilities and physician groups across the country.

According to the DOJ, the government alleged that IPC put corporate pressure on physicians to “upcode” claims to maximize billing, especially pressuring physicians with lower billing levels.

TeamHealth also agreed to increase accountability and transparency in order to avoid any future fraud, according to the settlement.

The allegations stem from a whistleblower lawsuit filed in a Chicago federal court by Bijan Oughatiyan, a physician formerly employed by IPC as a hospitalist. Under the False Claims Act, the government was allowed to intervene and take over the suit, as it did in this case. Oughatiyan will receive about $11.4 million, which is his share of the recovery as allowed under the False Claims Act.

The acquisition of TeamHealth by funds affiliated with global asset manager Blackstone and certain other investors, wrapped up Monday, making TeamHealth a privately held company.

DOJ charges ex-Tenet Healthcare exec with role in $400M fraud scheme

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/healthcare/doj-charges-ex-tenet-healthcare-exec-role-400m-fraud-scheme

DOJ

Six months after Tenet Healthcare reached an agreement to pay $514 million in penalties for an alleged kickback scheme, one of its former executives has been indicted for his part in the plan to pay bribes for patient referrals.

The Department of Justice announced Wednesday that it has indicted John Holland, 60, of Dallas in his role in a $400 million scheme to defraud the government, Georgia and South Carolina Medicaid Programs, and prospective patients of Tenet hospitals.

Holland, the former senior vice president of operations for Tenet Healthcare Corporation’s Southern States Region and the former chief executive officer of North Fulton Medical Center Inc. in Roswell, Georgia, was charged with mail fraud, healthcare fraud and major fraud against the United States.

The indictment alleges Holland was involved in a scheme to pay bribes for patient referrals. which helped Tenet bill the Georgia and South Carolina Medicaid Programs more than $400 million and obtain more than $149 million in Medicaid and Medicare payments based on those patient referrals.

The scheme began in 2000, according to the indictment,  when Holland circumvented internal accounting controls and falsified Tenet’s books, records and reports to conceal payments of bribes and kickbacks in return for the referral of patients to North Fulton Medical Center Inc. and other Tenet hospitals, including Atlanta Medical Center Inc., Spalding Regional Medical Center Inc. and Hilton Head Hospital.

Holland pled not guilty to the charges during a court hearing, Reuters reported. His lawyer, Richard Deane, said Tenet’s agreement in August to settle criminal charges and civil claims, should have resolved this issue.

“Mr. Holland is not guilty and we now look forward to presenting this case to a jury,” Deane said in a statement to Reuters.

But Acting Assistant Attorney General Blanco said in a statement from the DOJ that “these charges underscore our continued commitment to holding both individuals and corporations accountable for their fraudulent conduct.“We will follow the evidence where it takes us, including to the corporate executive ranks.”

2016 Health Care Year in Review

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/blog/2016/dec/2016-health-care-year-in-review

Image result for 2016 Health Care Year in Review

This was a tumultuous year in health care and elsewhere. Wherever we looked, the improbable and unbelievable became true and believable: from Brexit to a President-elect Trump to alleged foreign sabotage of our political institutions. Historians will dissect the remnants of these events for decades. For us, for now, let’s focus on health care, which is plenty.

U.S. judge finds that Aetna deceived the public about its reasons for quitting Obamacare

http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-aetna-obamacare-20170123-story.html

Mergers in the healthcare sector: why you'll pay more

Aetna claimed this summer that it was pulling out of all but four of the 15 states where it was providing Obamacare individual insurance because of a business decision — it was simply losing too much money on the Obamacare exchanges.

Now a federal judge has ruled that that was a rank falsehood. In fact, says Judge John D. Bates, Aetna made its decision at least partially in response to a federal antitrust lawsuit blocking its proposed $37-billion merger with Humana. Aetna threatened federal officials with the pullout before the lawsuit was filed, and followed through on its threat once it was filed. Bates made the observations in the course of a ruling he issued Monday blocking the merger.

Aetna executives had moved heaven and earth to conceal their decision-making process from the court, in part by discussing the matter on the phone rather than in emails, and by shielding what did get put in writing with the cloak of attorney-client privilege, a practice Bates found came close to “malfeasance.”

The judge’s conclusions about Aetna’s real reasons for pulling out of Obamacare — as opposed to the rationalization the company made in public — are crucial for the debate over the fate of the Affordable Care Act. That’s because the company’s withdrawal has been exploited by Republicans to justify repealing the act. Just last week, House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) cited Aetna’s action on the “Charlie Rose” show, saying that it proved how shaky the exchanges were.
Bates found that this rationalization was largely untrue. In fact, he noted, Aetna pulled out of some states and counties that were actually profitable to make a point in its lawsuit defense — and then misled the public about its motivations. Bates’ analysis relies in part on a “smoking gun” letter to the Justice Department in which Chief Executive Mark Bertolini explicitly ties Aetna’s participation in Obamacare to the DOJ’s actions on the merger, which we reported in August. But it goes much further.

Antitrust trial over $37B Aetna-Humana merger nearing an end

http://www.healthcaredive.com/news/antitrust-trial-over-37b-aetna-humana-merger-nearing-an-end/433206/

A decision on the $37 billion merger between Aetna and Humana will be made soon. The payers and the federal government have been an engaged in a legal standoff since the U.S. Department of Justice and several states filed an antitrust lawsuit in July 2016 to block the merger, citing reduced competition, hindered innovation, and increased prices to consumers. The federal government also alleges the deal would give Aetna too much of a stake in the Medicare Advantage market.

Representatives for both Aetna and the federal government have been exchanging barbs for the past several months. The government accused Aetna of scaling back its participation in ACA marketplaces as a result of the lawsuit. Aetna claimed that these accusations were unfounded and said the deal would be a pro-competitive move that would benefit millions.

Health insurance giant Anthem has also proposed a $54 billion merger with Cigna. If both mergers occur, it would combine four of the five largest insurers in the country.

There is no timeline set for a decision in the case. Yet Judge Bates said he would issue his decision in a “timely manner,” according to Bloomberg.

Metro Phoenix doctor indicted in $100 million Tricare fraud case

http://www.azcentral.com/story/money/business/health/2017/01/01/metro-phoenix-doctor-indicted-in-100-million-tricare-fraud/95969880/?utm_source=RealClearHealth+Morning+Scan&utm_campaign=be01ccd91c-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_01_03&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b4baf6b587-be01ccd91c-84752421

Health care fraud indictment

A Valley physician is among a dozen doctors, pharmacy owners and marketing pros accused of a kickback scheme that prosecutors allege involved a sham medical study used to bilk up to $102 million from the publicly-funded federal health program for military family members.

Walter Neil Simmons, 47, of Gilbert, an emergency medicine doctor who has worked at two metro Phoenix hospital chains, was indicted in October in U.S. District Court in Dallas on one count of conspiracy to commit health-care fraud. The federal charge carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in federal prison and a $250,000 fine.

Feds Allege Mass Forest Park Medical Center Kickback Scheme; 21 Indicted

http://healthcare.dmagazine.com/2016/12/01/doj-indicts-21-alleges-forest-park-officials-paid-40-million-in-kickbacks-for-patient-referrals/?utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=38578013&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9nq-_xFj_5ZsB5A4GXxtR4dmyVTHWn9cNkB_MTg2hapXhZT97fHccuUvHO0Xt0TZ00pj_4tk5lsYhA5hKfDHAVK1sDrw&_hsmi=38578013

(Credit: Justin Clemons)

A federal grand jury has returned indictments on 21 individuals allegedly involved in a massive kickback scheme through the defunct Forest Park Medical Center chain of luxury hospitals, which resulted in “well over half a billion dollars” in billed claims due to illegal bribes.

The 44-page indictment, unsealed Thursday, describes a vast, four-year conspiracy, fueled by $40 million in kickbacks funneled through a number of shell companies—consulting firms, commercial real estate firms, business services organizations—into the pockets of high-powered surgeons, some of whom have their faces on billboards throughout Dallas-Fort Worth.

The 21 suspects include two of the four physician founders of the hospital chain, including Dr. Richard Toussaint, the anesthesiologist who is awaiting sentencing on a separate fraud conviction; and Wade Barker, the bariatric surgeon who helped develop the idea for Forest Park. Other early adopters indicted in the scheme include Wilton ‘Mac’ Burt, a consultant who helped run the chain’s affiliated management company until he and his colleague, Alan Beauchamp, were bought out in 2015. Beauchamp was also indicted.

But the bribery scheme sailed far outside the doors of Forest Park’s grey and blue flagship at the corner of U.S. 75 and Interstate 635. Also indicted were prominent bariatric surgeons Drs. David Kim and William Nicholson as well as the minimally invasive spine surgeons Drs. Michael Rimlawi, Douglas Won, and Shawn Henry. Won, the DOJ alleges, was paid $7 million for his referrals. Rimlawi is accused of accepting $3.8 million. The feds argue that Kim and Nicholson, both of whom were investors in Forest Park, were paid $4.595 million and $3.8 million respectively. Reads the indictment: “The surgeons spent the vast majority of the bribe payments marketing their personal medical practices—which benefitted them financially—or on personal expenses such as cars, diamonds, and payments to family members.”

In all, the feds say Forest Park collected “in excess of two hundred million dollars in tainted and unlawful claims.” None of those named in the indictment have returned requests for comment. Sheryl Zapata, the chief development officer for the Texas Back Institute where Nicholson currently practices, said “TBI is not a part of this and we will not be commenting.”

“Medical providers who enrich themselves through bribes and kickbacks are not only perverting our critical health care system, but they are committing a serious crime,” read a statement from U.S. Attorney John Parker. “Massive, multi-faceted schemes such as this one, built on illegal financial relationships, drive up the cost of healthcare for everyone and must be stopped.”

Forest Park Medical Center was a chain of luxury hospitals that sprouted in Dallas, Fort Worth, Southlake, Frisco, and San Antonio. One in Austin was built but never opened, kneecapped due to nearly two dozen construction liens.

The model collapsed in on itself due to its reliance on high out-of-network charges that it would bill to insurance companies. The payers eventually balked, and the patient volumes dried up. The hospitals died one by one, each eventually entering bankruptcy and sold off to a health system. Because they were physician owned, they were barred by the Affordable Care Act from billing any public health insurance plan, such as Medicare, for fear of conflicts of interest regarding referrals. And despite this, it twice had to settle claims with the DOJ for paying kickbacks for Tricare patients and Department of Labor employees. The indictment alleges that this is exactly what happened: Beauchamp, Barker, and Kim, among others, “also attempted to refer patients with lower-reimbursing insurance coverage, namely Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries, to other facilities in exchange for cash.”

Nixed Hershey-PinnacleHealth marriage could send them into arms of someone else

http://www.pennlive.com/news/2016/11/nixed_hershey-pinnaclehealth_m.html

PinnacleHealth System and Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center said a marriage made sense for many reasons.

Not the least of which was to gain size and strength needed to fend off megasystems from outside their traditional service area. Those systems, they said, are positioning to siphon away patients needing the most advanced care, thereby eroding revenues needed to support those services in Harrisburg-area counties.

But the Federal Trade Commission opposed the merger on the grounds it would create a local hospital monopoly, and Hershey and Pinnacle subsequently called off their engagement.

 Still, experts say the forces that pulled the one-time rivals together are real and won’t go away. Those forces have triggered a wave of health system consolidation all over the country. In the Harrisburg region, they have prompted players such as Geisinger Health System, WellSpan Health and the newly-merged Lancaster General Health-University of Pennsylvania Health System to eye the territory traditionally served by Pinnacle and Hershey.

Those systems now surround Pinnacle and Hershey. At the same time, health care has entered an era where health systems are forever trying to attract more patients. That often requires expanding their footprint.

“It’s going to be hard for them to maintain what they’re doing as stand-alones,” said David Sarcone, an associate professor of business management and health studies at Dickinson College.

Stephen Foreman, an associate professor of health care administration at Robert Morris University in Pittsburgh said, “I can’t say I think their positions are all that great right now.”

 

The Future of Health Care Mergers Under Trump

Though there has been a flurry of merger and acquisition activity in recent years, industry experts are unsure whether the merger momentum will continue under President-elect Donald Trump’s administration, according to The New York Times.

Here are five things to know about how M&A activity in the healthcare industry may be affected under the Trump administration.

1. President-elect Trump nominated Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) to replace Attorney General Loretta Lynch. While it is unclear how the department will handle antitrust cases under Sen. Sessions, the impact from the change in leadership will not be felt immediately. The outcomes of the two major antitrust cases in the insurance market, the Anthem-Cigna and Aetna-Humana mergers, are expected to be decided before Mr. Trump takes office in January. However, the new administration might still have an impact on the mergers, particularly if either the companies or the government decide to appeal the decision, according to the article.

2. According to the article, there is little expectation the Department of Justice under President-elect Trump would drop the cases if the insurers lost and appealed. However, any agreed upon settlement deal may be less onerous to the insurers involved.

3. There is a chance the federal government’s approach to healthcare mergers may not change, according to the article. “There is a history of bipartisan support for antitrust enforcement in healthcare,” said Leslie Overton, a partner at Alston & Bird and a former DOJ official. “I don’t think we should expect a wholesale shift, based on the change from Democratic to Republican.”

4. The Federal Trade Commission’s position on M&A activity may change even less, according to industry experts interviewed by The New York Times. The independent agency is less subject to the political preferences of the president and of Congress.

5. Industry experts also suggest the possible repeal of the ACA will not impede the increasing M&A activity of the past few years. According to the article, hospitals may feel more pressure to join together if the ACA is repealed due to reduced Medicare and Medicaid payments and increased volumes of uninsured patients.

Healthcare mergers and acquisitions in 2016: Running list

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/slideshow/healthcare-mergers-and-acquisitions-2016-running-list?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWlRkaE16VTBPRGhrTmpWbSIsInQiOiIxRk44S3JKdEd3Mzl5czNscEJZNjI1N210RWE0b0RxNWd3RHhoZUg2TXJCM3U2QnZJWm1VcFhMS2daQ1pmRzEyTG5DU2E0cWFCdGtWQlJKS0N0NE51Y2FubWdZbWptcTRhVHRZaTZJNDM1VT0ifQ%3D%3D

Lazy Image