New 11-Country Health Care Survey: U.S. Adults Skip Care Due To Costs, Struggle Financially, And Have The Worst Health

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/press-releases/2016/nov/international-survey-release

A new 11-country survey from The Commonwealth Fund finds that adults in the United States are far more likely than those in 10 other high-income nations to go without needed health care because of costs and to struggle to afford basic necessities such as housing and healthy food. The survey findings, published today as a Health Affairs Web First article, also indicate that Americans are sicker than people in other countries and experience high levels of emotional distress.

Despite a significant decline from 2013, about one-third (33%) of U.S. adults went without recommended care, did not see a doctor when sick, or failed to fill prescriptions because of cost. By comparison, as few as 7 percent in the U.K. and Germany and 8 percent in the Netherlands and Sweden experienced these cost problems. The U.S. also stands out for its exceptionally high rate of material hardship. Fifteen percent of U.S. adults reported worrying about having enough money for nutritious food and 16 percent reported struggling to afford their rent or mortgage.

Adults in the U.S. were also the most likely to be in poor health. More than a quarter (28%) of U.S. respondents reported having multiple chronic illnesses—by far the highest rate of any country surveyed—and a similar proportion (26%) said they experienced emotional distress in the past year that was difficult to cope with on their own. Respondents in Canada (27%) and Sweden (24%) reported similar levels of emotional distress.

The Commonwealth Fund’s 2016 international survey interviewed 26,863 adults from Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Questions focused on people’s experiences with their country’s health care system—comparing their assessments of health care access, quality, and affordability—as well as on self-reported health and well-being. The study’s authors note that by examining the variation in performance of national health systems, the U.S. can gain useful insights as it implements new reforms and seeks to meet the needs of vulnerable patients.

“Previous surveys have shown that, especially compared to other industrialized nations, the U.S. has far too many people who can’t afford the care they need, even when they have health insurance,” said Robin Osborn, Vice President and Director of The Commonwealth Fund’s International Program in Health Policy and Practice Innovations and the study’s lead author. “This survey underscores that we can do better for our sickest and poorest patients, and that should be a high priority in efforts to improve our current system.”

AMA Says New Health Policy Must Maintain Coverage for All Currently Covered

https://morningconsult.com/2016/11/15/ama-says-new-health-policy-must-maintain-coverage-for-all-currently-covered/?utm_source=RealClearHealth+Morning+Scan&utm_campaign=5952aea6b6-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2016_11_16&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b4baf6b587-5952aea6b6-84752421

Image result for american medical association

The American Medical Association’s House of Delegates vowed Tuesday to work with the incoming Trump administration and Congress on health care reform, but said any new reforms shouldn’t result in people losing coverage.

“A core principle is that any new reform proposal should not cause individuals currently covered to become uninsured,” the group said in a statement. “We will also advance recommendations to support the delivery of high quality patient care. Policymakers have a notable opportunity to also reduce excessive regulatory burdens that diminish physicians’ time devoted to patient care and increase costs.”

The group added that it was committed to improving health insurance so patients can access high quality and affordable care. The group released a policy framework, noting they would advocate for expanding insurance coverage and choice.

Additionally, the group says it will also advocate to make sure policies offered through insurance exchanges, Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care offer wide provider networks. They’re also focused on encouraging prescription drug price and cost transparency.

“The new AMA policy acknowledges the carte blanche approach to drug pricing needs to change to align with the health system’s drive for high-quality care based on value,” AMA President Andrew Gurman said in a separate statement. “This transformation should support drug prices based on overall benefit to patients compared to alternatives for treating the same condition. We need to have the full picture to assess a drug’s true value to patients and the health care system.”

 

 

 

The 1 thing about healthcare that needs to change: 4 executives weigh in

http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/hospital-management-administration/the-1-thing-about-healthcare-that-needs-to-change-4-executives-weigh-in.html

Self-Discovery

From the shift to value-based care to increased price transparency, the healthcare industry is in the midst of significant changes that are aimed at efficiently improving care. However, for that goal to be achieved, problems in the industry such as disparity in access to care and confusing billing systems still need to be addressed, according to healthcare executives.

In a panel discussion on Nov. 9 at the Becker’s 5th Annual CEO + CFO Roundtable in Chicago moderated by Rhoda Weiss, PhD, nationally recognized consultant, speaker, and author, four great minds in healthcare discussed the changes they would like to see in the industry, what gives them pride in their organizations and the issues that keep them awake at night.

Hillary Clinton’s healthcare proposals a mixed bag for nonprofits, Trump plan lacks detail, Fitch says

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/hillary-clintons-healthcare-proposals-mixed-bag-nonprofits-trump-plan-lacks-detail-fitch-says

Clinton’s plan to expand Medicaid in the 19 states that declined to do so would benefit nonprofit hospitals in those states, Fitch says.

As Insurers Cut Brokers’ Commissions, Consumers May Have One Less Tool For Enrollment

http://khn.org/news/as-insurers-cut-brokers-commissions-consumers-may-have-one-less-tool-for-enrollment/

Alina Nurieva, right, sits with Gabriela Cisneros, an insurance agent from Sunshine Life and Health Advisors, as she picks an insurance plan on healthcare.gov in Miami in 2015. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

With open enrollment set to begin today, some health insurance brokers are already fielding questions about coverage and whether existing plans will still be available next year. For an increasing number of brokers, there’s also another question: Will they get paid?

Some insurers — including Cigna and Aetna — will not pay licensed agents and brokers a commission for helping people enroll in individual health insurance coverage for 2017 in many states, while others have reduced their commissions. They join United Healthcare, which dropped commissions on new business this year in many states.

That is already prompting some brokers to step back from the exchanges when open enrollment begins this week, which could be a hurdle for consumers who normally would seek help from brokers in navigating the complexities of insurance coverage. (Government-supported navigators are still available.)

In Nevada, where the largest carrier in the state has cut commissions for new business and another has dropped payments to $10 a month per customer, broker Vickie Mayville is weighing her options.

“It sometimes takes four hours to ensure clients have the right plan,” said Mayville, who runs her own agency in Las Vegas. “I will help my clients and anyone referred to me, but I’m not actively seeking out new clients.”

Uninsured In Coal Country: Desperate Americans Still Turn To Volunteer Clinics

http://khn.org/news/uninsured-in-coal-country-desperate-americans-still-turn-to-volunteer-clinics/

Image result for Uninsured In Coal Country: Desperate Americans Still Turn To Volunteer Clinics

Six years after the passage of the Affordable Care Act, and despite 20 million more Americans gaining health insurance, considerable gaps in health care remain.

The decision by states like Virginia not to expand Medicaid and the lack of dental and vision coverage even for those with insurance have meant that the demand for RAM’s free mobile clinics has stayed strong.

Clinton vs. Trump: 5 critical election issues

http://managedhealthcareexecutive.modernmedicine.com/managed-healthcare-executive/news/hillary-vs-trump-5-critical-election-issues?cfcache=true&ampGUID=A13E56ED-9529-4BD1-98E9-318F5373C18F&rememberme=1&ts=25102016

While Hillary Clinton vows to forge ahead with Obamacare if she is elected president, Donald Trump would scrap it altogether. The end results would be two very different forms of healthcare, and industry leaders have much to consider.

Brill“Many different factors are weighing on managed care executives such as the costs of pharmaceuticals, diagnostics and devices; the impact of consolidation amongst hospitals, physicians, health plans; and the losses in the exchange marketplace,” says Managed Healthcare Executive editorial advisor Joel V. Brill, MD, chief medical officer, Predictive Health, LLC, which partners with stakeholders to improve coverage of value-driven care. “With each of these factors, plans can, at least at a high level, make some educated guesses about the relative risk of each factor and impact to the bottom line.”

The election results, however, are much less certain, which from a risk perspective, weighs heavily on the minds of healthcare executives, Brill says. “How can you plan for business knowing that whatever you are doing currently could be upended in the beginning of November?”

To help provide some clarity, Managed Healthcare Executive identified five of the top industry issues, reviewed the candidates’ platforms for each, and asked industry experts to weigh in.

Value-Based Drug Pricing: Watch Out for Side Effects

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/blog/2016/jul/value-based-drug-pricing

What would penicillin cost under value-based pricing, a system in which drug makers set prices based on the benefits of their products to consumers and the larger society, rather than drugs’ costs of production? Penicillin has saved millions of lives since its first use in 1942, and it still works for many patients despite growing bacterial resistance to the drug. (Fortunately, many fewer patients get infections with pneumococcus now because we have a good vaccine for it.) Surely, under value-based pricing, penicillin would sell for thousands or tens of thousands of dollars a dose.

Medicine depends on many cheap generic drugs like penicillin to treat conditions as diverse as acne, gout, hypertension, heart disease, and cancer. Pricing these drugs according to their value would make them unaffordable to uninsured and underinsured patients and dramatically increase the aggregate costs of pharmaceuticals.

There is a compelling superficial logic to value-based pricing. Why shouldn’t manufacturers charge the full value of the products they produce? Why shouldn’t consumers have to pay it? That logic begins to fray, however, when you think about how other markets work in our capitalist system.

Aiming Higher: Results from a Scorecard on State Health System Performance, 2015 Edition

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2015/dec/aiming-higher-2015

The fourth Commonwealth Fund Scorecard on State Health System Performance tells a story that is both familiar and new. Echoing the past three State Scorecards, the 2015 edition finds extensive variation among states in people’s ability to access care when they need it, the quality of care they receive, and their likelihood of living a long and healthy life. However, this Scorecard—the first to measure the effects of the Affordable Care Act’s 2014 coverage expansions—also finds broad-based improvements. On most of the 42 indicators, more states improved than worsened.

“On most of the 42 indicators, more states improved than worsened.”

By tracking performance measures across states, this Scorecard can help policymakers, health system leaders, and the public identify opportunities and set goals for improvement. The 50 states and the District of Columbia are measured and ranked on 42 indicators grouped into five domains: access and affordability, prevention and treatment, avoidable hospital use and cost, healthy lives, and equity. Individual indicators measure things like rates of children or adults who are uninsured, hospital patients who get information about how to handle their recovery at home, hospital admissions for children with asthma, and breast and colorectal cancer deaths, among many others.

The top-ranked states are Minnesota, Vermont, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island. These states were also leaders in the 2014 Scorecard.

Healthcare, holding politicians accountable among top concerns for US Hispanics

http://www.dailynews.com/social-affairs/20160816/healthcare-holding-politicians-accountable-among-top-concerns-for-us-hispanics?utm_campaign=CHL%3A+Daily+Edition&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=33045560&_hsenc=p2ANqtz–sDlffUnvzl4kd2HbOJpvdFMdiYOIiKusnuv4i_Q7cZizQGgs7326JwDMZ_6RNsry6HDY1Ndf5Ieypa7IROhZPMbEqAg&_hsmi=33045560

One of several panel discussions at the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society second annual “America’s Future: Reimagining Opportunity in a Changing Nation” summit at the California Endowment on Tuesday, Aug. 16, 2016 in Los Angeles.

Quality affordable healthcare and holding elected officials accountable for their decisions are among the highest priorities for Hispanics in the U.S., according to a new Harris Poll survey.

Seventy-seven percent of Hispanics surveyed rated quality affordable healthcare as “absolutely essential/extremely important” to improving opportunity in their community while 76 percent rated holding elected officials accountable as “absolutely essential/extremely important,” said Abigail Golden-Vazquez, executive director of The Aspen Institute’s Latinos and Society Program, at the institute’s second annual America’s Future Summit on Tuesday at the California Endowment in downtown Los Angeles.