Why nurses prefer staffing agencies — beyond the paycheck

Nurses who work for staffing agencies are much more satisfied than their counterparts who serve hospitals, health systems, home healthcare providers and senior living facilities, according to an Oct. 18 report from MIT Sloan Management Review. 

Researchers identified 200 of the largest healthcare employers in the U.S., and calculated how highly nurses rate the organization and senior leadership on Glassdoor from the beginning of COVID-19 through June 2023 (view their ranking here). 

The five highest-ranked employers in the sample were staffing agencies, according to the report — and higher compensation only accounts for part of nurses’ satisfaction. Researchers analyzed the free text on Glassdoor to determine how positively nurses spoke about 200 topics, and found that nurses spoke more highly of staffing agencies on issues other than pay. 

Overall, 75% of nurses’ comments about staffing agencies were positive, compared with 23% of nurses’ comments about health systems. 

Staffing agencies have other healthcare employers beat in problem resolution, the researchers found. Seventy-three percent of nurses said staffing agencies resolved problems efficiently, compared to 31% of nurses employed by hospitals and health systems. The difference was even greater when it came to resolving problems effectively — 55% of nurses say staffing agencies do this, compared to 9% of nurses at hospitals and health systems. 

Nurses also rated staffing agencies more highly on several measures related to honesty, according to the report. Three-quarters of nurses employed by staffing agencies spoke highly of their organizations’ speed in replying to inquiries; less than one-quarter of nurses employed by hospitals and health systems praised their organization on timely replies. Staffing agencies scored 41 percentage points higher on transparency, 36 points higher on trust and 46 points higher on honesty than their hospital and health system counterparts. 

Although nurses employed by staffing agencies also ranked their compensation and work-related stress levels significantly better than nurses employed by hospitals and health systems, the latter took the lead in some metrics. Nurses prefer hospitals and health systems for health and retirement benefits, learning and development opportunities, and connection with colleagues: all “important aspects of organizational life,” according to the report. 

“Healthcare systems can learn from staffing agencies, but they can also leverage their own distinctive advantages to attract and retain nurses,” the report says. “Healthcare systems should invest in their comparative advantages and emphasize them when communicating their value proposition to potential and current employees.”

California warns hospitals of tougher enforcement action for violating nurse staffing ratios

https://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/california-warns-hospitals-tougher-enforcement-action-violating-nurse-staffing-ratios?mkt_tok=NDIwLVlOQS0yOTIAAAGOM3hPgkuufiyi2yh9nvquSoc19gtQkW-i0sinpIHy6fnnJtHwb24wf83LZvu8YdhWRq5YF15CT7BwLlpCsupOGYHL5DrWUd4Px_21QLp7WK8

Hospitals in California are being warned not to violate state law on staffing levels or face fines. New state policy narrows the circumstances under which hospitals can claim “unpredictable circumstances” for violating the mandate.

The California Department of Public Health this week, in a notice to hospitals, warned that noncompliance can result in a $15,000 fine for a first violation and $30,000 for a second. 

The state conducts periodic, unannounced inspections to enforce compliance. 

New policy by Governor Newsom narrows the circumstances under which hospitals will not be penalized for violations due to “unpredictable circumstances,” requiring them to document efforts to maintain safe staffing and that such instances be truly unforeseen. 
 
In an advisory letter to hospitals, the public health department said, “Situations that are not considered unpredictable, unknown or uncontrollable include consistent, ongoing patterns of understaffing. Facilities are expected to maintain required nurse-to-patient ratios at all times, including but not limited to, weekends, holidays, leaves of absences, among others.”  

WHY THIS MATTERS

Minimum staffing ratios have been law in California since nurses and healthcare workers fought to pass AB 394, the nation’s first nurse-patient staffing ratio law in 1999.

In addition, SB 227, which passed in 2019, requires the state to assess administrative fines on hospitals that violate the safe staffing law. Law AB 1422 requires public comment before the public health department grants waivers to the critical care program flexibility requests. 

THE LARGER TREND

Nurse staffing ratios are controversial and California remains the only state to have enacted them.

Earlier this month, the Department of Health and Human Services proposed national minimum staffing standards for nursing homes.

study reportedly commissioned by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said there was “no single staffing level that would guarantee quality care.”

In 2010, the National Institutes of Health conducted a study comparing implications of the California staffing ratios with two other states that did not have the legislation.

The NIH looked at survey data from 22,336 hospital staff nurses in California, Pennsylvania and New Jersey in 2006 and state hospital discharge databases.
California hospital nurses cared for one less patient on average than nurses in the other states and two fewer patients in medical and surgical units, the NIH research said. 

The study found that lower ratios were associated with significantly lower mortality.  When nurses’ workloads were in line with California-mandated ratios in all three states, nurses’ burnout and job dissatisfaction were lower, and nurses reported consistently better quality of care, the NIH said.

Also, the hospital nurse staffing ratios in California were associated with better nurse retention than in the other states.
 
ON THE RECORD

“Patients in California are safer today because nurses and healthcare workers demanded that hospitals be held accountable for violating safe-staffing laws,” said Leo Pérez, RN and president of SEIU 121RN. “The COVID-19 pandemic taught us that our state’s health depends on supporting and listening to those who are on the front lines of patient care – a lesson we should never forget. Today’s action is the result of SEIU’s relentless vigilance. We applaud the step CDPH has taken to enforce laws that keep patients safe.”

The changing face of the nursing workforce

https://mailchi.mp/377fb3b9ea0c/the-weekly-gist-august-4-2023?e=d1e747d2d8

Last week we discussed how hospitals are still struggling to retain talent. This week’s graphic offers one explanation for this trend: 

a significant share of older nurses, who continued to work during the height of the pandemic, have now exited the workforce, and health systems are even more reliant on younger nurses. 

Between 2020 and 2022, the number of nurses ages 65 and older decreased by 200K, resulting in a reduction of that age cohort from 19 percent to 13 percent of the total nursing workforce. While the total number of nurses in the workforce still increased, the younger nurses filling these roles are both earlier in their nursing careers (thus less experienced), and more likely to change jobs. 

Case in point:

From 2019 to 2023, the average tenure of a hospital nurse dropped by 22 percent. The wave of Baby Boomer nurse retirements has also resulted in a 33 percent decrease from 2020 to 2022 in the number of registered nurses who have been licensed for over 40 years. 

Given these shifts, hospitals must adjust their current recruitment, retention, training, and mentorship initiatives to match the needs of younger, early-career nurses.

Hospitals still struggling to retain talent

https://mailchi.mp/c02a553c7cf6/the-weekly-gist-july-28-2023?e=d1e747d2d8

Of all the pandemic’s impacts still felt today, disruptions to the healthcare workforce and rising labor costs may be most impactful to current health system operations.

Over the next three editions of the Weekly Gist, we’ll be exploring the lingering effects of this workforce crisis, with a focus on nurse staffing and recruitment.


In this week’s graphic, we use data from the 2023 NSI National Health Care Retention Report to show how hospital turnover and vacancy rates have changed over the past several years. 

While wage increases helped reduce hospital registered nurse (RN) turnover rates from 27 percent in 2021 to 23 percent in 2022, nurses—along with hospital employees in general—are still changing jobs at higher rates than before the pandemic.

Over half of all hospitals still face nurse vacancy rates above 15 percent, a slight improvement from 2022 but still far more than before the pandemic.

While the worst of nursing turnover appears to have passed, the “rebasing” of wages (for nursing, 27 percent higher compared to 2019) will provide ongoing pressure to strained hospital margins.

California system’s 10.2% operating margin bucks national trend

Mountain View, Calif.-based El Camino Health ended the first quarter with an impressive operating margin of 10.2 percent when many health systems saw their margins hover above zero or fall into the red. The system’s revenue for the quarter totaled $131,290. 

For the nine months ended March 31, the two-hospital system posted an operating gain of $141.4 million on revenue of just over $1 billion. 

However, like most health systems, El Camino’s expenses are substantially higher than the same period last year, increasing 10.6 percent year over year for the nine months ending March 31, 2023, to $881.9 million. 

The system is making a conscious effort to march down labor costs while also placing a significant emphasis on retention. In June, El Camino agreed a deal to increase pay for nurses by 16 percent over three years.

“Like nearly all hospitals, our nursing staff comprises the largest part of our workforce. With the recruitment of a single nurse estimated to be nearly $60,000, our primary strategy to reduce labor costs is to focus on decreasing turnover,” El Camino CEO Dan Woods told Becker’s.

“Our turnover rate for nurses is just about 8 percent while the turnover rate nationally is still running at 22 percent.”

In March, the system also received a credit rating upgrade from Moody’s, which noted the system’s “superlative cash metrics and operating performance.” Fitch Ratings also revised El Camino’s outlook to positive in February, noting that the system has a history of generating double-digit operating EBITDA margins, driven by a solid market position that features strong demographics and a very healthy payer mix.

Hospital CEOs get serious about cutting labor costs

Labor costs have spun out of control in the last few years as inflation set in and hospitals relied on contracted travel nurses to combat nationwide workforce shortages.

The secret to lowering labor costs now, hospital CEOs say, is putting a modern spin on a tried-and-true strategy: retention.

Dan Woods, CEO of El Camino Health in Mountain View, Calif., estimates the cost of recruiting a single nurse as being nearly $60,000, which drove his team’s decision to focus on reducing labor costs by decreasing turnover. The nurse turnover rate is around 22 percent nationally, but El Camino has achieved just 8 percent nurse turnover rate through a variety of retention efforts.

“We continue to chip away at our turnover rate by fostering a positive practice environment for our nurses,” said Mr. Woods. “We achieve this by creating structures and enabling processes so our staff are engaged in assisting with making changes within their practice environments. Also, our staffing and scheduling processes promote efficiency while meeting the needs of our staff, which is essential for retention.”

El Camino does have guardrails to ensure nurses don’t self-schedule overtime or other premium pay. Mr. Woods also mentioned positive labor relations as a retention tool.

“We just completed a new three-year agreement with our nursing union prior to the existing contract expiring and without strikes or the acrimony often associated with labor relations,” he said.

David Callendar, MD, president and CEO of Memorial Hermann Health System in Houston also recently told Becker’s the system is relying less on contract labor and increasing retention through its Well Together employee experience model, which allows employees to personalize programs and benefits to meet their individual needs.

“At Memorial Hermann, we believe that investing in our workforce is the most effective approach to managing labor costs,” said Dr. Callendar. “We accomplish this in three ways: one, creating a workplace where all feel valued and welcomed, and diversity is celebrated; two, investing in employee health and wellness programs; and three, providing professional development and career growth opportunities.”

Rochester (N.Y.) Regional Health is transforming its operating model and workforce strategy to offer more flexibility and build a culture valuing team members for retention.

“We’ve created a new in-house agency to significantly reduce our reliance on third-party contracts and improve staff integration within the health system to foster a more robust culture of collaboration, interdependency, alignment and system-ness,” said Richard Davis, PhD, CEO Of Rochester Regional.

Jeffrey P. Gold, chancellor of the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha, said the academic medical center is focused on reducing the cost per unit of labor and lowering the number of units. The hospital is considering several tactics including additional training and mentorship, evaluating its benefits program and productivity across the organization.

The University of Nebraska Medical Center is also evaluating fixed labor cost departments and roles, and slowing or eliminating full-time employee growth to force innovation, organizational redesign, use of technology and productivity gains with staff retained.

Many hospitals are seeing wages increase within their markets, and increasing pay for existing team members is often less expensive than recruiting and onboarding new ones.

“Obviously, compensation is a key element of staffing, and we are working diligently to ensure that we are competitive within our market,” said R. Kyle Cramer, CEO of Day Kimball Health in Putnam, Conn. “Concurrently, we are evaluating how we staff our clinical areas and the mix of professionals we utilize to create a stronger level of team support and patient engagement. Ultimately we see stabilizing our workforce and reducing turnover through retaining strong members of our clinical and operational team as the key to effectively managing labor costs in this new era.”

Paula Ellis, DNP, interim CEO of F.W. Huston Medical Center in Winchester, Kan., said the critical access hospital has salaries in line with competitors but found benefits lagging. The hospital increased 401K match, provided better health insurance rates, improved tuition assistance and added competitive scholarships to keep employees engaged. The hospital also combined four positions into two.

“Staff were willing and able to take on new duties in exchange for a better schedule,” said Dr. Ellis. “We believe the best method to manage labor costs is to retain staff.”

UPMC adds regional option to in-house travel program

More than a year after launching an in-house travel staffing agency, UPMC is adding a new regional approach to the effort.

Maribeth McLaughlin, MPM, BSN, RN, chief nursing executive for the Pittsburgh-based health system, told Becker’s the approach provides a new option for nurses and surgical technologists who desire to travel. 

Our overall travel program, when you travel for us, you travel across our hospitals in New York, Maryland and Pennsylvania,” she said. “And now we are launching a regional travel strategy where some staff can choose to travel only within certain regions.”

UPMC initially announced in December 2021 that it had created UPMC Travel Staffing, a new in-house travel staffing agency to address a nursing shortage and to attract and retain workers. 

Through the agency, nurses and surgical technologists earn $85 an hour and $63 an hour, respectively, in addition to a $2,880 stipend at the beginning of each six-week assignment.

Ms. McLaughlin said the rate is lower — about $60 an hour — for those who opt for the regional approach.

As of June 1, UPMC has hired more than 700 staff into the in-house travel staffing agency, with 60 percent of those workers being external hires, according to Ms. McLaughlin. And there have been fewer workers leaving UPMC to go to other travel agencies. 

“One of my goals since I’ve taken this role is to really look at building in as many flexible programs as I could for staff,” said Ms. McLaughlin, who has served in her current role since August 2022. “I think as we came out of the pandemic, it’s clear to me that work-life harmony means something different to staff today than it maybe meant when I was a young staff nurse years ago, and that we need to have as much flexibility and as many different programs as we can.”

She said UPMC Travel Staffing has delivered this flexibility and allowed the health system to cancel about 90 contracts with external travel agencies. Additionally, some external travelers have now moved into UPMC’s in-house agency. Ms. McLaughlin expects more to join the in-house agency now that UPMC has launched the regional approach. 

“We’re launching a win-back program where we’re going out and trying to see some of the people who we know we lost and see if they’re interested in coming back closer to home and traveling closer to home,” she explained.

Still, she acknowledged some of the challenges along the way.

Our IT department built us an app to be able to manage all of this because, as you can imagine, we have external travel, internal travelers, core staff and at times it could get a little confusing,” said Ms. McLaughlin. “So we’ve been able to build that to be able to figure out the best ways to assign the staff where the greatest needs are.”

Another challenge she noted is that shifts for workers from external travel agencies are often 12 weeks, while shifts with UPMC Travel Staffing are six weeks. She said this is a purposeful move because those in UPMC Travel Staffing receive benefits and are considered UPMC employees, rather than receiving an hourly rate.

“Overall, it’s been a really successful program for us because it’s allowed us to look at things in a different way,” said Ms. McLaughlin. “It’s a central function. It’s not something we did and farmed out to every hospital to administer themselves. We did it as a system and as a core, which I also think is important.”

Now, she said she’s excited about the new regional approach and the opportunities it presents for recruiting and retention. 

“We’re growing our own students, we’re bringing in all these students, and we’re not saying, ‘You have to just work here.’ We’re saying, ‘You can work for us at UPMC, and here are all the options. You can even be a traveler with us,'” she said.

Why ‘boomerang’ nurses are ditching contract work for hospital staff positions

During the pandemic, many nurses left hospital staff jobs for more lucrative travel jobs. However, many of these nurses are returning to hospitals for full-time positions, especially as travel pay falls and organizations offer new staff benefits, Melanie Evans writes for the Wall Street Journal.

How Allegheny Health Network re-recruits experienced RNs

Hospitals see more nurses return to their positions

During the pandemic, many hospitals struggled with staffing shortages as many nurses left their positions as a result of burnout or for more high-paying travel opportunities. However, many nurses are now returning to staff positions, especially as travel pay declines.

According to  Aya Healthcare CEO Alan Braynin, travel nurse pay is now down 28% compared to a year ago. Hospital openings for travel nurses were also down by 51% at the end of April compared to the same time last year.

At HCA Healthcare, the country’s largest publicly traded hospital chain, nurse hiring increased by 19% in the first three months of the year compared to the average across the last four quarters. In addition, turnover levels have almost declined to pre-pandemic levels, and HCA’s travel nurse costs have dropped by 21% in the first quarter of this year compared to 2022.

According to the organization, many nurses who initially left their hospitals during the pandemic are now coming back. Since 2022, around 20% of the 37,000 nurses hired at HCA hospitals previously worked for the company at some point between 2016 and 2022.

Similarly, Houston Methodist has rehired around 60 nurses who initially left during the pandemic. Roberta Schwartz, the chief innovation officer at the health system’s flagship hospital, said these returning nurses have helped the hospital make more beds available and keep up with an 8% increase in demand.

“The boomerang nurses have returned,” said Gail Vozzella, Houston Methodist’s chief nurse.

How hospitals are attracting boomerang nurses

To attract more nurses to staff positions, hospital officials said they are offering higher pay, as well as several new benefits, such as childcare, less demanding work positions, and more flexible schedules.

For example, Suzane Nguyen, who took a teaching job during the pandemic, rejoined Houston Methodist in June 2022 after she was offered a virtual job. In her new position, she collects patient information by video. “The stress doesn’t compare,” she said.

Similarly, Linda Allen, an ED nurse who left to work for a temporary agency during the pandemic, returned to Sentara Healthcare in 2022 after the hospital system increased its wages and offered new, more flexible schedules.

According to Terrie Edwards, Sentara’s regional VP, the organization has increased its nurse wages by around 21% in the last two years and now offers student debt relief up to $10,000, as well as adoption and infertility benefits.

Overall, these changes have helped Sentara hire around 400 boomerang nurses, which has reduced staff overtime and cut its travel nurse expenses in half.

“They really did step up,” said Allen, who became a full-time employee in September 2022 after initially working temporary 13-week contracts.

Outside of these benefits, some nurses are also just ready for more permanent positions after spending the pandemic working in several different hospitals. “There is something to be said for working in the same place every day, consistently,” said Alexis Brockting, an advanced practice nurse at Mercy Hospital South.

Britain’s National Health Service (NHS) workers stage largest-ever strike

https://mailchi.mp/d62b14db92fb/the-weekly-gist-february-10-2023?e=d1e747d2d8

Monday’s walkout of tens of thousands of nurses and ambulance staff was the largest in the NHS’s 75-year history.

Labor demonstrations have been ongoing across the past few months, as workers demand higher pay and better working conditions amid rampant national inflation and increased workloads.

Specific demands vary by union and nation within the United Kingdom. Welsh nurses called off their strike this week to review a proposal from Wales’ Labour Party-run government, while the Royal College of Nurses, the UK’s largest nursing union, has countered a nominal 5 percent pay increase proposal with demands for a five percent pay raise on top of inflation, which topped 10 percent in Britain in December. 

The Gist: A glance at our neighbors across the pond shows that the US healthcare system is not the only one currently experiencing a labor crisis.

The UK’s nationalized system has also failed to shield its workers from the combined impact of COVID burnout and inflation. But the NHS, as the UK’s largest employer and perennial object of political maneuvering, is more susceptible to organized labor actions. 

In contrast, American healthcare unions, which only covered 17 percent of the country’s nurses in 2021, must negotiate with local employers, whose responses to their demands vary.

While this may enhance the bargaining power of US health system leaders, it also heightens the risk that we will fail to adequately secure our nursing workforce, a key national resource already in short supply, for the longer term. 

Is Magnet status beginning to lose its attraction?

https://mailchi.mp/8f3f698b8612/the-weekly-gist-january-27-2023?e=d1e747d2d8

As hospitals and health system leaders continue to grapple with persistently high nursing vacancy rates and severe staffing challenges, and face growing pressure to cut costs, we’re beginning to hear serious—if paradoxical—consideration being given to sharpening the axe, with an eye on a long-standing sacred cow: “Magnet” status.

For years, leading systems have invested significant time and resources to earn Magnet status, a designation of nursing quality granted by the American Nursing Association through its American Nurses’ Credentialing Center. Applying for—and then renewing—the designation can cost millions of dollars and involve significant process changes and staff time. In return, participants can market themselves as “Magnet hospitals”, presumably garnering additional patient business and giving them a leg up in recruiting high-quality nurses. At a time of severe nursing shortage, you might expect interest in earning or maintaining Magnet status to be spiking.
 
But that’s not what we’re hearing. “It’s just too expensive,” shared one system CEO recently. “We haven’t really seen it move the needle on volume, and our Magnet-designated facilities are just as stretched as the non-Magnet ones, with equally low morale.” Plus, at a time when the ability to pursue flexible staffing models is at a premium, keeping up with Magnet standards is increasingly handcuffing some hospitals looking to evaluate alternative staffing solutions.

“We can achieve all of the benefits of Magnet without having to jump through their hoops on process and data collection,” a system chief nursing officer told us. “We’re working on our own, internally-branded alternative to Magnet—something our own staff comes up with, rather than something artificially imposed from an outside organization.” 

Ironically, this may be another area—like the battle against contract labor—in which systems now find themselves aligned with nursing unions, which have long opposed the Magnet program as just a marketing gimmick. There’s no question that programs like Magnet have helped increase the visibility of nursing as a driver of quality care. But given the current economic environment, it’ll be interesting to see how much hospitals are willing to continue to invest to maintain the designation.